Successful preemptive cidofovir treatment for CMV antigenemia after dose-reduced conditioning and allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation

Cidofovir, a choice for salvage treatment of CMV infection in patients with haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cidofovir (CDV) is a nucleotide analogue with broad antiviral activities. It remains unclear about the CDV administration for anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatment in patients with haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, 31 out of 101 haplo-HSCT recipients suffered CMV infection in the CT group (conventional treatment) were enrolled into the CDV-ST group (CDV-second-line treatment). These patients were treated with CDV as they failed conventional treatment or they were unavailable to the preemptive antiviral therapy. Nine patients with CMV infection were enrolled into the CDV-FT group (CDV-frontline treatment) and received CDV preemptive therapy.

RESULTS

In the CDV-ST group, 23/28(82.1%) patients were observed treatment response with a median time of 9 (2-23) days, and 20 (71.8%) among these patients obtained complete response (CR). In the CDV-FT group, 6/8 (75.0%) patients acquired CR with a median of 6 (4-25) days. The treatment response in CDV-treated groups was comparable with those in CT groups. Besides, there was no statistical difference in CMV-related mortality between the three groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up period (Median follow-up:10 (1-28) months), a total of 8/22 (36.4%) patients experienced CMV reactivation in the CDV-ST group, versus 23/62 (37.1%) in CT group (P>0.05). CDV-related toxicities occurred in 13/40 (32.5%) patients, including 6 (15%) reversible nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that CDV is potentially an option for the salvage treatment of CMV infection in the haplo-HSCT patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cytomegalovirus management after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A mini-review

Because of the high incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity in the population, CMV infection is a common and severe complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in Taiwan. Here we propose a CMV management strategy for patients undergoing allo-HSCT from the Taiwanese perspective, which focuses on the epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring, prophylaxis, and treatment of CMV infection after allo-HSCT. In terms of CMV monitoring, weekly CMV monitoring with the COBAS® AmpliPrep system is the standard approach because the pp65 CMV antigenemia assay has a lower sensitivity than CMV monitoring with the COBAS® AmpliPrep system. However, pp65 CMV antigenemia assay has a better correlation with clinical symptoms in immunocompromised patients. A 14-week prophylactic course of letermovir is recommended for allo-HSCT recipients in Taiwan, especially for recipients of hematopoietic stem cells from mismatched unrelated and haploidentical donors. Preemptive ganciclovir therapy should be initiated when the CMV viral load exceeds 1000 copies/mL, and should not be discontinued until CMV DNA is no longer detected in the blood. For allo-HSCT recipients who have CMV-related diseases, ganciclovir with or without CMV-specific intravenous immunoglobulin is the standard of care. The limited availability of foscarnet, an alternative for patients who are not responsive to or cannot tolerate ganciclovir, is a crucial issue in Taiwan. For pediatric allo-HSCT recipients, more data are needed to propose a CMV management recommendation.

Guidelines for the management of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with haematological malignancies and after stem cell transplantation from the 2017 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL 7)

Cytomegalovirus is one of the most important infections to occur after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and an increasing number of reports indicate that cytomegalovirus is also a potentially important pathogen in patients treated with recently introduced drugs for hematological malignancies. Expert recommendations have been produced by the 2017 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL 7) after a review of the literature on the diagnosis and management of cytomegalovirus in patients after HSCT and in patients receiving other types of therapy for haematological malignancies. These recommendations cover diagnosis, preventive strategies such as prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy, and management of cytomegalovirus disease. Antiviral drugs including maribavir and letermovir are in development and prospective clinical trials have recently been completed. However, management of patients with resistant or refractory cytomegalovirus infection or cytomegalovirus disease is a challenge. In this Review we summarise the reviewed literature and the recommendations of the ECIL 7 for management of cytomegalovirus in patients with haematological malignancies.

New Developments in the Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection After Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be one of the most important pathogens that universally affect solid organ and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Lack of effective CMV-specific immunity is the common factor that predisposes to the risk of CMV reactivation and clinical disease after transplantation. Antiviral drugs are the cornerstone for prevention and treatment of CMV infection and disease. Over the years, the CMV DNA polymerase inhibitor, ganciclovir (and valganciclovir), have served as the backbone for management, while foscarnet and cidofovir are reserved for the management of CMV infection that is refractory or resistant to ganciclovir treatment. In this review, we highlight the role of the newly approved drug, letermovir, a viral terminase inhibitor, for CMV prevention after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Advances in immunologic monitoring may allow for an individualized approach to management of CMV after transplantation. Specifically, the potential role of CMV-specific T-cell measurements in guiding the need for the treatment of asymptomatic CMV infection and the duration of treatment of CMV disease is discussed. The role of adoptive immunotherapy, using ex vivo-generated CMV-specific T cells, is highlighted. This article provides a review of novel drugs, tests, and strategies in optimizing our current approaches to prevention and treatment of CMV in transplant recipients.

Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in adult cancer patients: 2017 updated evidence-based guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

Cancer patients frequently suffer from gastrointestinal complications. In this manuscript, we update our 2013 guideline on the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in adult cancer patients by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). An expert group was put together by the AGIHO to update the existing guideline. For each sub-topic, a literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, and strengths of recommendation and the quality of the published evidence for major therapeutic strategies were categorized using the 2015 European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) criteria. Final recommendations were approved by the AGIHO plenary conference. Recommendations were made with respect to non-infectious and infectious gastrointestinal complications. Strengths of recommendation and levels of evidence are presented. A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in cancer patients is mandatory. Evidence-based recommendations are provided in this updated guideline.

Cytomegalovirus retinitis in a patient with secondary acute lymphosarcoma leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: A rare case report: a care-compliant article

RATIONALE

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is a common opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients, which may lead to blindness. CMV retinitis is not an uncommon infectious disease in patients with immune regulatory abnormalities, for example, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients. However, CMV retinitis in a patient with acute lymphosarcoma leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) phase is very rare.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A case of CMV retinitis in a patient receiving immunosuppressive therapy as a part of ALL allogeneic HSCT is described including the pathogenesis, clinical signs, and therapy.

DIAGNOSES

CMV retinitis.

INTERVENTIONS

Ganciclovir intravitreal injection at weekly intervals for 4 weeks.

OUTCOMES

Patient's vision had improved and the load of CMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in the aqueous humor declined. The CMV retinitis and perivascular of retina infiltration regressed.

LESSONS

We propose that the concentration of CMV DNA load in the aqueous humor could be useful in making the diagnosis and in selecting the optimal treatment in this kind of CMV retinitis.

A systematic review of oral herpetic viral infections in cancer patients: commonly used outcome measures and interventions

PURPOSE

To review the literature for outcome measures for oral viral infections in cancer patients. A secondary aim was to update the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) clinical practice guidelines for the management of oral viral infections in cancer patients.

METHODS

Databases were searched for articles published in the English language, 1981-2013. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were reviewed systematically. The data about the outcome measures were classified according to the aim of the study: prevention, treatment, or non-interventional. The results of interventional studies were compared to the 2010 MASCC/ISOO publication.

RESULTS

Multiple clinical and laboratory tests were used to measure oral viral infections, with great variability between studies. Most of the studies were about Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV). The outcome measure that was most commonly used was the presence of HSV infection diagnosed based on a combination of suggestive clinical presentation with a positive laboratory result. HSV culture was the most commonly reported laboratory outcome measure. Acyclovir and valacyclovir were consistently reported to be efficacious in the management of oral herpetic infections. No new data on the quality of life and economic aspects was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the variability in outcome measures reported to assess oral herpetic infections the researcher should select carefully the appropriate measures based on the objective of the study. Acyclovir and valacyclovir are effective in the management of oral herpetic infections in patients receiving treatment for cancer. Studies on newer anti-viral drugs may be useful to address the issue of anti-viral resistance.

Progress in Treatment of Viral Infections in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

In children, the most commonly encountered type of leukemia is acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). An important source of morbidity and mortality in ALL are viral infections. Even though allogeneic transplantations, which are often applied also in ALL, carry a recognized risk for viral infections, there are multiple factors that make ALL patients susceptible to viral infections. The presence of those factors has an influence in the type and severity of infections. Currently available treatment options do not guarantee a positive outcome for every case of viral infection in ALL, without significant side effects. Side effects can have very serious consequences for the ALL patients, which include nephrotoxicity. For this reason a number of strategies for personalized intervention have been already clinically tested, and experimental approaches are being developed. Adoptive immunotherapy, which entails administration of ex vivo grown immune cells to a patient, is a promising approach in general, and for transplant recipients in particular. The ex vivo grown cells are aimed to strengthen the immune response to the virus that has been identified in the patients' blood and tissue samples. Even though many patients with weakened immune system can benefit from progress in novel approaches, a viral infection still poses a very significant risk for many patients. Therefore, preventive measures and supportive care are very important for ALL patients.

Therapeutic strategies for cytomegalovirus in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Advances in surveillance of cytomegalovirus reactivation using sensitive techniques and a preemptive strategy to treat virus reactivation has reduced incidence of cytomegalovirus end organ disease. However, severe immunosuppression associated with extensive T-cell depletion resulting from graft-versus-host disease prevention for cases of mismatched or others such as haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and graft-versus-host disease therapy itself create clinical challenges in managing cytomegalovirus infection. Novel anticytomegalovirus therapies including newer pharmacologic interventions, vaccines, and adoptive cellular therapies to restore anticytomegalovirus immunity appear promising and are expected to continue to shape our treatment armamentarium. Eradication of CMV disease altogether, rather than simply suppressing viremia, should be the ultimate desirable goal.

Potential of acyclic nucleoside phosphonates in the treatment of DNA virus and retrovirus infections

The acyclic nucleoside phosphonates [HPMPC: cidofovir, Vistide; PMEA: adefovir dipivoxil, Hepsera; and PMPA: tenofovir, Viread] have proven to be effective in vitro (cell culture systems) and in vivo (animal models and clinical studies) against a wide variety of DNA virus and retrovirus infections, for example, cidofovir against herpesvirus [herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus type 6, 7 and 8), polyoma-, papilloma-, adeno- and poxvirus (variola virus, cowpox virus, vaccinia virus, molluscum contagiosum virus and orf) infections; adefovir against herpesvirus, hepadnavirus [human hepatitis B virus] and retrovirus [HIV type-1 and 2, simian immunodeficiency virus and feline immunodeficiency virus] infections; and tenofovir against both hepadna- and retrovirus infections. Cidofovir has been officially approved for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in AIDS patients, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Viread) for the treatment of HIV infections (i.e., AIDS) and adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

Adenovirus pneumonia presenting with nodular shadows on chest X-ray in two unrelated allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients

Adenoviruses are increasingly recognized as important pathogens following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We herein report two cases of disseminated adenovirus infection that presented with nodular shadows on chest X-ray after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors. Both patients died of respiratory failure. Autopsies revealed adenovirus infection of multiple organs. Adenovirus infection should be suspected when nodular lung lesions of unknown origin appear in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.

Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in adult cancer patients: evidence-based guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients frequently suffer from gastrointestinal complications. However, a comprehensive, practical and evidence-based guideline on this issue is not yet available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An expert group was put together by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO) to develop a guideline on gastrointestinal complications in cancer patients. For each subtopic, a literature search was carried out in PubMed, Medline and Cochrane databases and the strength of recommendation and the quality of the published evidence for major therapeutic strategies were categorized using a modification of the 'Infectious Diseases Society of America' criteria. Consensus discussions were held on each of the topics.

RESULTS

Recommendations were made with respect to non-infectious and infectious gastrointestinal complications. For all recommendations, the strength of the recommendation and the level of evidence are presented.

CONCLUSION

This guideline is an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in cancer patients.

Management of CMV, HHV-6, HHV-7 and Kaposi-sarcoma herpesvirus (HHV-8) infections in patients with hematological malignancies and after SCT

These recommendations were prepared by the European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia following a predefined methodology. Literature searches were made to identify studies pertinent to management of CMV, HHV-6, -7 and -8 infections. For CMV, 76 studies were reviewed: 72 published and 4 presented as abstracts. Twenty-nine of these studies were prospective randomized trials. For the other herpesviruses, HHV-6, -7 and -8, no randomized controlled trial has been performed, although data from some studies with other primary endpoints have been used to assess the management of HHV-6 infection. Works presented only as abstracts were used to a very limited extent. The quality of evidence and level of recommendation were graded according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria.

Detection of β-herpesviruses in allogenic stem cell recipients by quantitative real-time PCR

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of reactivation of human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6) and HHV-7 infections in stem cell transplantation recipients, and to examine a possible increase in virulence of the two roseoloviruses when a reactivation of CMV (HHV-5) simultaneously occurs. For this purpose, quantitative real-time PCR systems were developed to assess the viral load of CMV, HHV-6, or HHV-7 in the plasma of haematopoetic stem cell recipients. One hundred and ninety-eight plasma samples from 37 patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation were tested for CMV, HHV-6, and HHV-7 by a 5'-exonuclease (TaqMan) quantitative real-time PCR. The CMV load obtained by the real-time PCR assay was compared retrospectively with results generated previously with a commercially available test (COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test, Roche). The results suggest that CMV and HHV-6 may be associated with post-transplantation end-organ disease, while HHV-7 reactivation had no impact on the patients included in this study. No evidence for a potential interaction of the roseoloviruses and CMV infections was found.

Cidofovir for cytomegalovirus reactivation in pediatric patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cidofovir (CDV) is a nucleotide analogue with broad antiviral activity. This drug has a very favorable pharmacokinetic profile that enables intermittent dosing, but the potential for nephrotoxicity has hitherto restricted its use in stem cell transplant recipients. Data on pediatric patients are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To report the efficacy and toxicity of CDV in a group of pediatric patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of CDV used pre-emptively for CMV reactivation in 10 out of 30 children who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from January 2000 to December 2001. In all the patients but one, CDV was used as second-line therapy (after foscarnet or ganciclovir) of CMV reactivation.

RESULTS

Overall, 12 courses of CDV were administered with a median 5 doses per course, range 1-6 (two patients were treated twice). Considering the first CDV treatment episode, 8 out of 10 patients had positive CMV antigenemia assay when they started CDV. Five of eight antigenemic patients responded completely while three were switched to foscarnet or ganciclovir, respectively, due to increasing (one) or persistent CMV antigenemia (two). Overall, the therapy with CDV was well tolerated, but it was withdrawn in one patient due to a two-fold increase in the baseline creatinine level. This patient concurrently had a high tacrolimus blood level.

CONCLUSION

Safety is the major concern regarding the use of CDV but the adoption of probenicid, intravenous hydration and anti-emetic therapy improved its tolerability profile. Our data suggest that CDV has an acceptable toxicity and would deserve further controlled studies in the setting of pre-emptive therapy for CMV.

Clinical potential of the acyclic nucleoside phosphonates cidofovir, adefovir, and tenofovir in treatment of DNA virus and retrovirus infections

The acyclic nucleoside phosphonates HPMPC (cidofovir), PMEA (adefovir), and PMPA (tenofovir) have proved to be effective in vitro (cell culture systems) and in vivo (animal models and clinical studies) against a wide variety of DNA virus and retrovirus infections: cidofovir against herpesvirus (herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus [CMV], Epstein-Barr virus, and human herpesviruses 6, 7, and 8), polyomavirus, papillomavirus, adenovirus, and poxvirus (variola virus, cowpox virus, vaccinia virus, molluscum contagiosum virus, and orf virus) infections; adefovir against herpesvirus, hepadnavirus (human hepatitis B virus), and retrovirus (human immunodeficiency virus types 1 [HIV-1] and 2 [HIV-2], simian immunodeficiency virus, and feline immunodeficiency virus) infections; and tenofovir against both hepadnavirus and retrovirus infections. Cidofovir (Vistide) has been officially approved for the treatment of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Viread) has been approved for the treatment of HIV infections (i.e., AIDS), and adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera) has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Nephrotoxicity is the dose-limiting side effect for cidofovir (Vistide) when used intravenously (5 mg/kg); no toxic side effects have been described for adefovir dipivoxil and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, at the approved doses (Hepsera at 10 mg orally daily and Viread at 300 mg orally daily).

Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants

The main risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT) are recipient CMV seropositivity and acute graft-versus-host disease. Currently, two antiviral strategies, prophylactic or preemptive antiviral treatment, are used for prevention of CMV disease. Preemptive treatment is most favorable when short-term (14-day) treatment is applied. Several methods are available for monitoring of CMV reactivation. PCR-based CMV DNA detection assays are the most sensitive methods; however, the clinical benefit of this high sensitivity is unclear. Even more, there is lack of clarity whether PCR tests can better be performed with plasma, whole blood, or peripheral blood leukocyte samples. Recovery of a CMV-specific CD8(+) cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) response is necessary for preventing CMV reactivation and disease. Reconstitution of absolute CMV-specific CTL counts to values above 10 x 10(6) to 20 x 10(6) CTLs/liter is associated with protection from CMV disease. In the near future, preemptive therapy might be withheld in patients with CMV reactivation who are shown to have adequate CMV-specific cytotoxic T-cell levels. Antiviral therapy with (val)acyclovir has been studied only as prophylactic treatment for prevention of CMV infection. High-dose oral valacyclovir is more effective than acyclovir when used in addition to preemptive treatment of CMV reactivation with ganciclovir or foscarnet. Three antiviral drugs have been tested for preemptive therapy of CMV reactivation and/or treatment of CMV disease. Although intravenous ganciclovir is considered the drug of choice, foscarnet has similar efficacy and less toxicity, especially hematologic toxicity. Cidofovir has not been tested extensively, but so far the results are disappointing. Oral valganciclovir for preemptive treatment of SCT recipients is currently being studied. In addition to antiviral therapy, adoptive immunotherapy with CMV-specific cytotoxic T cells as prophylactic or preemptive therapy is a very elegant strategy; however, generation of these cells is expensive and time-consuming, and therefore the therapy is not available at every transplantation center. Magnetic selection of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells from peripheral blood by using HLA class I-peptide tetramers may be very promising, making this strategy more accessible.

Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: current status, known challenges, and future strategies

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significant progress has been made in the prevention of CMV disease over the past decade, but prevention of late CMV disease continues to be a challenge in selected high-risk populations. The pretransplantation CMV serostatus of the donor and/or recipient remains an important risk factor for posttransplantation outcome despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy; CMV-seropositive recipients of T cell-depleted grafts in particular continue to have a survival disadvantage compared with seronegative recipients with seronegative donors. The risk of developing antiviral drug resistance remains low in most patients; however, in a setting of intense immunosuppression (eg, after transplantation from a haploidentical donor), the incidence may be as high as 8%. Primary CMV infection via blood transfusion can be reduced by the provision of seronegative or leukocyte-depleted blood products; however, a small risk of 1% to 2% of CMV disease remains. Surveillance and preemptive therapy are effective in preventing the sequelae of transfusion-related CMV infection. Indirect immunomodulatory effects of CMV are increasingly recognized in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Strategies currently being investigated include long-term suppression of CMV with valganciclovir for the prevention of late CMV infection and disease, adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T cells, and donor and recipient vaccination strategies.

Evidence for a graft-versus-tumor effect in refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

A 31-year-old woman suffered a 4th relapse of epithelial ovarian cancer refractory to several cytotoxic drugs including platinum, paclitaxel, and topotecan.

METHODS

Sequential high-dose chemotherapy with autografting (three courses) led to a minor response of short duration. In order to induce a graft-versus-tumor effect, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from an HLA-identical sibling donor, after dose-reduced conditioning, was performed in January 2001.

RESULTS

On day +51 the patient developed acute grade II graft-versus-host disease of the skin and gastrointestinal tract, which was successfully treated by prednisolone. Six months after allogeneic HSCT a complete disappearance of the tumor could be seen. Unfortunately, 14 months later a 5th relapse was diagnosed.

CONCLUSIONS

This case demonstrates, on the one hand, that allogeneic HSCT is able to induce complete remissions (CR) in chemoresistant ovarian cancer. On the other hand, despite achievement of CR after allografting, the chance of cure remains limited for these patients.

Beta-herpesvirus challenges in the transplant recipient

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has major consequences after allogeneic stem cell and solid organ transplantation. CMV may cause significant morbidity and mortality, and monitoring to detect reactivation to reduce disease or management of end organ disease is associated with increased resource utilization. Two other members of the beta-herpesvirus family, human herpesvirus (HHV) type 6 and HHV-7, are increasingly recognized as important pathogens in transplant recipients, either by direct infection (e.g., encephalitis, hepatitis, or pneumonitis) or via interaction with CMV. In addition to direct effects of CMV infection, such indirect effects as an increased risk for bacterial and fungal infections or impaired graft acceptance and function are important research topics. Diagnosis and treatment of CMV infection is currently more advanced than for HHV-6 and HHV-7.

Sequence changes in the human adenovirus type 5 DNA polymerase associated with resistance to the broad spectrum antiviral cidofovir

Although there is currently no FDA approved antiviral treatment for adenovirus (Ad) infections, the broad spectrum antiviral cidofovir (CDV) has demonstrated potent inhibitory activity against many Ad serotypes in vitro and in an in vivo ocular replication model. The clinical potential of CDV prompted the assessment for the emergence of CDV resistance in Ad5. Serial passage of Ad5 in increasing concentrations of CDV resulted in derivation of four different Ad5 variants with increased resistance to CDV. CDV resistance was demonstrated by ability to replicate viral DNA in infected cells at CDV concentrations that inhibit the parental virus, by ability to form plaques in CDV concentrations of >20 microg/ml and by increased progeny release following infection and growth in media containing CDV. Using marker rescue, the loci for CDV resistance in variant R1 was shown to be mediated by one residue change L741S, one of two mutations within the R1 encoded DNA polymerase. The CDV-resistant variants R4, R5 and R6 also contained mutations in their respective DNA polymerase sequences, but these were different from R1; variant R4 contained two changes (F740I and V180I), whereas both R5 and R6 variants contained the non-conserved mutation A359E. R6 contained additional alterations L554F and V817L. The location of the R1 change is close to a region of the DNA polymerase which is conserved with other polymerases that is predicted to involve nucleotide binding.

Prophylaxis of herpesvirus infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised older patients

In older patients, prophylaxis of herpesvirus infections mainly involves preventing the recurrence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and complications of herpes zoster in immunocompetent patients, while in immunocompromised patients it is more concerned with the prevention of opportunistic virus reactivation. HSV ocular infection is the most frequent cause of corneal blindness in the US. The effectiveness of aciclovir 400mg twice daily in preventing the recurrence of HSV eye disease in immunocompetent patients has been well demonstrated. The issue of treatment duration for patients with highly recurrent ocular herpes remains unresolved. Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most common neuralgic illnesses worldwide. Some progress in prevention of PHN has been made with a combination of antiviral therapy (famciclovir or valaciclovir), started within 72 hours of onset of the rash, and analgesic treatment. However, the best prevention of PHN is the prevention of herpes zoster disease, and the varicella vaccine is an option which over the next few years will be tested in clinical trials. For immunocompromised patients of any age, restoring immunity prevents herpesvirus disease, as demonstrated for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in AIDS patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Specific antiviral therapy during the initial period after transplantation could prevent reactivation of HSV or CMV in seropositive recipients. Whether pre-emptive therapy or prophylaxis with ganciclovir is the optimal approach against CMV remains controversial, and the relative merits and limitations of each approach may guide the choice. In stem cell transplantation, pre-emptive therapy with foscarnet avoids the neutropenia and related complications associated with ganciclovir. In renal transplant recipients, universal prophylaxis of CMV infection with valaciclovir has the same efficacy as ganciclovir. Although it is relatively toxic, cidofovir should be further evaluated because of its in vitro activity against most DNA viruses.