Donor and recipient pretransplant conditioning with nonlethal radiation and antilymphocyte serum improves the graft survival in a rat small bowel transplant model

Intestinal transplantation: Significance of immune responses

Intestinal allografts, with many resident immune cells and as a destination for circulating lymphocytes of the recipient, appear to be the most challenging solid organ transplants. The high incidence of acute rejection and frequent reports of fatal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after intestinal transplantation call for more research to describe the molecular mechanisms involved in the immunopathogenesis of post-transplant complications to define new therapeutic targets. In addition, according to the rapid development of immunosuppressive agents, it is time to consider novel therapeutic approaches in managing treatment-refractory patients with rejection or severe GvHD. Herein, the main immunological challenges before and after intestinal transplant including, brain-dead donor inflammation, acute rejection, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejections, as well as GvHD have been described. Besides, the new immune-based therapies used in experimental and clinical settings to improve tolerance toward intestinal allograft, and cases of operational tolerance have been reviewed.

Update on immunosuppressive strategies in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The intestine is the most immunologically complex solid organ allograft with the greatest risk of both rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). High levels of immunosuppression are required, further increasing morbidity. Due to low volume of transplants and few centers with experience, there is paucity of evidence-based, standardized, and effective therapeutic regimens. We herein review the most recent data about immunosuppression, focusing on novel and emerging therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data are moving the field toward increasing use of basilixumab and consideration of alemtuzumab for induction and inclusion of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and antimetabolites for maintenance. For rejection, we highlight novel roles for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibition, α4β7 integrin inhibition, microbiome modulation, desensitization protocols, and tolerance induction strategies. We also highlight emerging novel therapies for GVHD, especially the promising role of Janus kinase inhibition.

SUMMARY

New insights into immune pathways associated with rejection and GVHD in intestinal allografts have led to an evolution of therapies from broad-based immunosuppression to more targeted strategies that hold promise for reducing morbidity from infection, rejection, and GVHD. These should be the focus of further study to facilitate their widespread use.

Immunomodulatory effects of pre-irradiated extremity allograft in the rodent model

Allogeneic human hand transplantation requires combination immunotherapy to maintain viability. Immunosuppression will be lifelong, with doses as high or higher than those required for solid organ allotransplantation. The risks associated with lifelong immunosuppression are unacceptable, particularly for younger transplant patients. It therefore becomes imperative to explore ways to reduce or eliminate the requirement for immunosuppression. Reconstructive surgery should consider, to a large extent, graft pre-treatment as a strategy for the transplantation of vascularised limb tissue allografts with reduced requirement for immunosuppression. In the clinical setting of composite tissue allograft (CTA), the graft is always procured from a cadaveric donor. Therefore, only a short time is available between harvesting the graft from the donor and transplanting into the recipient. This period provides the only opportunity to manipulate the CTA. Quite a few studies, however, have so far investigated donor pre-treatment and pre-transplant modification of the extremity allograft. Work from our group and others has demonstrated that removal of allogeneic bone marrow in the limb graft by irradiation and its rapid reconstitution with recipient marrow cells can significantly prolong the survival of limb allografts in the absence of immunosuppression. In the current work, we review these studies and discuss the immunomodulatory effects on the extremity allograft.

Chimerism and bone marrow based therapies in transplantation

Composite tissue allotransplantation holds a great potential for providing increased knowledge of anatomy and microsurgical experience for life-enhancing reconstructions. Many transplant cases around the world have made this a clinical reality at the present time. Composite tissue allotransplants contain multiple tissue types, including bone, muscle, vessels, nerves, skin, and immune cells and bear a huge antigenic load. Although immunosuppressive drugs are applied successfully to prevent allograft rejection, their side effects pose a barrier to worldwide use. Bone marrow therapy in many tolerance induction protocols, therefore, provides a guide to reaching the target of permanent immunotolerance. Multiple studies suggest that bone marrow is immunomodulatory and may facilitate allograft acceptance. In this review, bone marrow based therapy protocols of clinical and experimental models are presented in two major categories: solid organ and composite tissue transplantation.

Abrogation of the Alloreactive Responses of Cadaveric Donor Intestinal Lymphocytes by Intraoperative Campath-1H Exposure

A number of recent reports in clinical and experimental intestinal transplantation have suggested that the donor lymphocytes present in and around the gastrointestinal system are potent mediators of graft-versus-host (GvH) reactivity and that GvH responses may contribute to posttransplant morbidity. Therefore, we have tested the proliferative and cytotoxic capabilities of gut-associated lymphocytes from cadaveric donors obtained prerevascularization (pre-r) and about 6 hours postrevascularization (post-r) in recipients pretreated with Campath-1H antibody (alemtuzumab). Mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) were performed with lymphoid cells isolated from intestinal epithelial mucosa, lamina propria, and lymph nodes. The pre-r lymphocytes responded strongly to both the recipient and third-party alloantigenic stimulating cells. However, similar preparations from the post-r samples responded in MLR at significantly lower levels (P < .01). This post-r decrease in responsiveness was not observed in similar lymphocyte samples obtained from donors of recipients not treated with Campath-1H. Both the pre-r and post-r samples had similar flow cytometric profiles, suggesting that there was no receptor loss in these lymphoid tissues by the short-term 6-hour exposure to Campath-1H given to the recipient. Conversely, in preliminary experiments where the donor were treated with Campath-1H, it was observed that very few lymphocytes could be obtained from intestinal tissues (n = 3). These results suggested that Campath-1H treatment of the recipient could bring about a drastic reduction in an otherwise strong GvH reactivity by the donor intestinal immune cells.

Intestinal transplantation: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As outcomes with intestinal transplantation continue to improve, its role in the management of intestinal failure patients becomes clearer. Some intestinal failure patients do well with long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN), while others develop life-threatening complications and need to be evaluated for intestinal transplants (ITs). The purpose of this review is to update the current status of intestinal transplantation and its role in the management of intestinal failure patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current outcomes indicate that intestinal transplants should be considered earlier in intestinal failure patients that develop liver injury, to prevent irreversible liver disease that would mandate a simultaneous liver transplant. Due to the small bowel (SB) graft's unique immunobiologic features, it is especially challenging to transplant successfully. Although new immunosuppressive strategies have been developed that appear to improve short-term results, their impact on long-term outcomes has yet to be shown. A better understanding of the interactions that occur between the SB's inherent immune system and its luminal flora may be required to devise strategies that will significantly curtail the SB graft's immunogenicity.

SUMMARY

Intestinal transplantation remains a significant challenge. Ongoing efforts to better define the parameters that best predict total parenteral nutrition failure and the unique mechanisms that influence small bowel allograft outcomes are necessary before a broader application of small bowel transplantation can be indicated.

[Apoptosis participation in the acute rejection of intestinal transplantation in rats]

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transplantation is a possible treatment for patients with short bowel syndrome, aiming the reintroduction of oral diet. However, the major obstacle in this procedure is the strong rejection. Delay in rejection diagnosis may be irreversible and lethal.

AIM

To define method for early diagnosis of rejection based on the apoptosis from intestinal allograft.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Isogenic rats Brown-Norway (BN) and Lewis (LEW) were submitted to intestinal heterotopic allotransplantation and divided in two groups: LEW donor to LEW recipient isograft group C and BN donor to LEW recipient allograft group (Tx). According to the day of sacrifice, Tx group were subdivided in three subgroups with eight animals each as follow: Tx3-- sacrificed at third postoperative day (POD), Tx5 -- sacrificed at fifth POD and Tx7 -- sacrificed at seventh POD. Eight animals from control group were subdivided in three moments according to the time of biopsy from the graft as follow: C3 -- biopsy at third POD; C5 -- biopsy at fifth POD and C7 -- biopsy at seventh POD. All animals from control group were sacrificed at seventh POD. Rejection parameters were compared between the control groups (C3 vs C5, C3 vs C7 and C5 vs C7, and allograft group (Tx3 vs Tx5, Tx3 vs Tx7 and Tx5 vs Tx7). The same parameters were analyzed between the control group and allograft groups ( C3 vs Tx3, C5 vs Tx5 and C7 vs Tx7). In C group no statistical significant difference regarding the expression of the apoptotic cells were detected, while in Tx group, the presence of apoptotic cells were remarkable since the third postoperative day.

Intestinal graft versus native liver cytokine expression in a rat model of intestinal transplantation with and without donor-specific cell augmentation

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulatory strategies such as donor-specific bone marrow or blood transfusions have been used to promote engraftment after intestinal transplants. We previously showed that delivery of donor antigen via the portal vein can effectively reduce the rate of intestinal graft rejection. The purpose of our current study was to investigate the impact of donor-specific cell augmentation (blood versus bone marrow) via the portal vein on cytokine expression in intestinal grafts versus native livers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed heterotopic small intestinal transplants between male Brown-Norway (donor) and female Lewis (recipient) rats. We studied 10 groups according to the type of donor-specific cell augmentation and the use and dose of immunosuppressive therapy. For cell augmentation, donor-specific blood or bone marrow was transfused via the donor portal vein immediately before graft implantation. For immunosuppression, tacrolimus was used post-transplant at a high or low dose. Control rats received neither immunosuppression nor cell augmentation. Tissue samples for histological assessment were obtained at designated time points. RNA was extracted from intestinal graft and native liver biopsies for cytokine measurements (IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and TNF-beta). Chimerism levels were determined using Q-PCR analysis.

RESULTS

Without concurrent immunosuppression, neither portal donor-specific blood nor bone marrow transfusion reduced the rate of rejection. With immunosuppression, outcome was significantly better after portal donor-specific blood (versus bone marrow) transfusion. Irrespective of the type of donor-specific cell augmentation, severe rejection caused strong cytokine expression in the grafts of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha; in the native livers, mainly of TNF-alpha (with IFN-gamma showing hardly any increase). In general, rejection caused stronger cytokine expression in the grafts than in the native livers. Mild rejection correlated well with strong intragraft expression of IL-6, TNF-alpha, and TNF-beta (early rejection markers); severe rejection with IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha (late rejection markers). In addition to cell augmentation per se, the type of cell augmentation also had an impact on cytokine expression in both grafts and native livers. Cell-augmented (versus tacrolimus-treated) rats showed hardly any differences in intragraft cytokine expression, but the expression of almost all cytokines was significantly stronger in the native livers. With immunosuppression, bone marrow infusion increased intragraft cytokine expression of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF alpha, as well as liver cytokine expression of IL-1 beta, compared to blood transfusion. This finding reflected the more advanced rejection stages in the bone marrow infused group; different types of donor-specific cell augmentation had similar effects on liver cytokine expression. In the absence of myoablative therapy, chimerism levels were low, in both cell-augmented and non-cell-augmented groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Rejection and donor-specific cell augmentation independently causes differences in intragraft versus native liver cytokine expression after intestinal transplants. Portal donor-specific blood transfusion, as compared with donor-specific bone marrow infusion, lowered the incidence of rejection and diminished intragraft cytokine up-regulation.

Transplante de intestino delgado

RACIONAL: Avanços da biotecnologia e o desenvolvimento de novas drogas imunossupressoras melhoraram os resultados do transplante de intestino delgado. Esse transplante é atualmente indicado para casos especiais da falência intestinal. OBJETIVO: A presente revisão realça os recentes desenvolvimentos na área do transplante de intestino delgado. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Mais de 600 publicações de transplante de intestino delgado foram revisadas. O desenvolvimento da pesquisa, novas estratégias de imunossupressão, monitorização do enxerto e do receptor, e avanços na técnica cirúrgica são discutidos. RESULTADOS: Realizaram-se cerca de 700 transplante de intestino delgado em 55 centros: 44% intestino-fígado, 41% enxerto intestinal isolado e 15% transplante multivisceral. Rejeição e infecção são as principais limitações desse transplante. Sobrevida de 5 anos na experiência internacional é de 46% para o transplante de intestino isolado, 43% para o intestino-fígado e de cerca de 30% para o transplante multivisceral. Sobrevidas prolongadas são mais freqüentes nos centros com maior experiência. Em série de 165 transplantes intestinais na Universidade de Pittsburgh, PA, EUA, foi relatada sobrevida do paciente maior do que 75% no primeiro ano, 54% em 5 anos e 42% em 10 anos. Mais de 90% desses pacientes assumem dieta oral irrestrita. CONCLUSÃO: O transplante de intestino delgado evoluiu de estratégia experimental para uma alternativa viável no tratamento da falência intestinal permanente. Promover o refinamento da terapia imunossupressora, do manejo e prevenção de infecções, da técnica cirúrgica e da indicação e seleção adequada dos pacientes é crucial para melhorar a sobrevida desse transplante.