Brain death does not affect hepatic allograft function and survival after orthotopic transplantation in a canine model

Current research on organ donor management

A shortage of organs is available for transplantation, with 116,000 patients on the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing wait list. Because the demand for organs outweighs the supply, considerable care must be taken to maximize the number of organs transplanted per donor and optimize the quality of recovered organs. Studies designed to determine optimal donor management therapies are limited, and this research has many challenges. Although evidenced-based guidelines for managing potential organ donors do not exist, research in this area is increasing. This article reviews the existing literature and highlights recent trials that can guide management.

Energy status of pig donor organs after ischemia is independent of donor type

BACKGROUND

Literature is controversial whether organs from living donors have a better graft function than brain dead (BD) and non-heart-beating donor organs. Success of transplantation has been correlated with high-energy phosphate (HEP) contents of the graft.

METHODS

HEP contents in heart, liver, kidney, and pancreas from living, BD, and donation after cardiac death in a pig model (n=6 per donor type) were evaluated systematically. BD was induced under general anesthesia by inflating a balloon in the epidural space. Ten hours after confirmation, organs were retrieved. Cardiac arrest was induced by 9V direct current. After 10min of ventricular fibrillation without cardiac output, mechanical and medical reanimation was performed for 30min before organ retrieval. In living donors, organs were explanted immediately. Freeze-clamped biopsies were taken before perfusion with Celsior solution (heart) or University of Wisconsin solution (abdominal organs) in BD and living donors or with Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutaric solution (all organs) in non-heart-beating donors, after perfusion, and after cold ischemia (4h for heart, 6h for liver and pancreas, and 12h for kidney). HEPs (adenosine triphosphate, adenosine diphosphate, adenosine monophosphate, and phosphocreatine), xanthine, and hypoxanthine were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Energy charge and adenosine triphosphate-to-adenosine diphosphate ratio were calculated.

RESULTS

After ischemia, organs from different donor types showed no difference in energy status. In all organs, a decrease of HEP and an increase in hypoxanthine contents were observed during perfusion and ischemia, irrespective of the donor type.

CONCLUSION

Organs from BD or non-heart-beating donors do not differ from living donor organs in their energy status after average tolerable ischemia.

Early activation of the inflammatory response in the liver of brain-dead non-human primates

BACKGROUND

Donor brain death (BD) triggers a systemic inflammatory response that reduces organ quality and increases immunogenicity of the graft. We characterized the early innate immune response induced by BD in the liver and peripheral blood of hemodinamically stable non-human primates (NHP).

METHODS

Rhesus macaques were assigned to either brain death or control group. BD was induced by inflation of a subdurally placed catheter and confirmed clinically and by cerebral angiography. Animals were monitored for 6 h after BD and managed to maintain hemodynamic stability.

RESULTS

Cortisol, epinephrine, nor-epinephrine, and IL-6 levels were elevated immediately after BD induction. Neutrophils and monocytes significantly increased in circulation following BD induction, while dendritic cells were decreased at 6 h post-induction. Flow cytometry revealed increased expression of chemokine receptors CxCR1, CxCR2, CCR2, and CCR5 in peripheral blood leukocytes from NHP subjected to BD. Microarray analysis demonstrated a significant up-regulation of genes related to innate inflammatory responses, toll-like receptor signaling, stress pathways, and apoptosis/cell death in BD subjects. Conversely, pathways related to glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism were down-regulated. In addition, increased expression of SOCS3, S100A8/A9, ICAM-1, MHC class II, neutrophil accumulation, and oxidative stress markers (carboxy-methyl-lysine and hydroxynonenal) were detected by immunoblot and immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of the innate immune response after BD in association with a down-regulation of genes associated with cell metabolism pathways in the liver. These findings may provide a potential explanation for the reduced post-transplant function of organs from brain dead donors. In addition, this work suggests potential novel targets to improve donor management strategies.

The influence of brain death on donor liver and the potential mechanisms of protective intervention

Brain-dead donors have become one of the main sources of organs for transplantation in Western countries. The quality of donor organs is closely related to the outcome of the transplantation. Experimental studies have confirmed the inferior graft survival of livers from brain-dead donors compared with those from living donors. Studies conducted in the past 10 years have shown that brain death is associated with effects on the decreased donor organ quality. However, whether the decrease in the viability of donor organs is caused by brain death or by the events before and after brain death remains uncertain. The purpose of this review is to introduce the advances and controversies regarding the influence of brain death on the viability of donor livers and to summarize the mechanisms of the different protective interventions for donor livers.

The influence of brain death on donor liver and the potential mechanisms of protective intervention

Brain-dead donors have become one of the main sources of organs for transplantation in Western countries. The quality of donor organs is closely related to the outcome of the transplantation. Experimental studies have confirmed the inferior graft survival of livers from brain-dead donors compared with those from living donors. Studies conducted in the past 10 years have shown that brain death is associated with effects on the decreased donor organ quality. However, whether the decrease in the viability of donor organs is caused by brain death or by the events before and after brain death remains uncertain. The purpose of this review is to introduce the advances and controversies regarding the influence of brain death on the viability of donor livers and to summarize the mechanisms of the different protective interventions for donor livers.

Complement-dependent inflammation and injury in a murine model of brain dead donor hearts

RATIONALE

Donor brain death (BD) is an unavoidable occurrence in heart transplantation and results in profound physiological derangements that render the heart more susceptible to ischemia/reperfusion injury in the recipient and likely has negative long-term consequences to allograft survival.

OBJECTIVE

We developed a novel mouse model of BD and investigated the role of complement in BD-induced myocardial inflammation and injury.

METHODS AND RESULTS

BD was induced by inflation of a balloon catheter in the cranial cavity. BD in wild-type mice resulted in a significant increase in serum concentrations of the complement activation product complement component (C)3a, and immunohistochemical analysis of heart sections demonstrated C3 deposition on the vascular endothelium and surrounding myocytes. Following induction of BD in complement (C3)-deficient mice, cardiac troponin levels, and histological evidence of injury were significantly reduced compared to wild-type mice. C3 deficiency was also associated with reduced myocardial leukocyte infiltration and reduced or absent expression of P-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-1beta.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate an important role for complement in BD-induced inflammation and injury and suggest that a complement inhibitory strategy applied to the donor (in addition to the recipient) may provide graft protection.

Systemic inflammation in the brain-dead organ donor

Brain death itself impairs organ function in the potential donor, thereby limiting the number of suitable organs for transplantation. In addition, graft survival of kidneys obtained from brain-dead (BD) donors is inferior to that of kidneys obtained from living donors. Experimental studies confirm an inferior graft survival for the heart, liver and lungs from BD compared with living donors. The mechanism underlying the deteriorating effect of brain death on the organs has not yet been fully established. We know that brain death triggers massive circulatory, hormonal and metabolic changes. Moreover, the past 10 years have produced evidence that brain death is associated with a systemic inflammatory response. However, it remains uncertain whether the inflammation is induced by brain death itself or by events before and after becoming BD. The purpose of this study is to discuss the risk factors associated with brain death in general and the inflammatory response in the organs in particular. Special attention will be paid to the heart, lung, liver and kidney and evidence will be presented from clinical and experimental studies.

Donor dopamine treatment in brain dead rats is associated with an improvement in renal function early after transplantation and a reduction in renal inflammation

Brain death (BD) is associated with tissue inflammation. As dopamine treatment of BD donor rats reduces renal monocyte infiltration, we tested if this treatment affects renal function and inflammation in recipients. BD was induced in F344 rats and was maintained for 6 h in all experiments. Dopamine was given for 6 (DA6) or 3 h (DA3) from the onset of BD. Ventilated non-BD (NBD) and BD animals served as controls. Kidneys were transplanted into bilaterally nephrectomized Lewis recipients. Serum creatinine (s-crea) was measured and leukocyte infiltration was assessed 10 days after transplantation. One day after transplantation, s-crea was significantly reduced in recipients who received a renal allograft from dopamine treated BD or from NBD rats compared to BD vehicle (P < 0.05). Ten days after transplantation, the number of infiltrating monocytes was significantly lower in grafts obtained from dopamine treated and from NBD rats (P < 0.05). A reduced infiltration in these grafts was confirmed by Banff 97 classification. Cytokine-induced neutrophil-chemoattractant 1 and interleukin (IL)-6 mRNA expression were reduced in DA rats compared to BD controls. No difference for macrophage chemoattractant protein 1 and IL-10 were found. These findings may explain the salutary effect of donor dopamine treatment in renal transplantation.

Interstitial Lactic Acidosis in the Graft During Organ Harvest, Cold Storage, and Reperfusion of Human Liver Allografts Predicts Subsequent Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

BACKGROUND

The impact of the process of liver transplantation on glucose metabolism in the graft was studied using microdialysis.

METHODS

Microdialysis catheters were inserted into 15 human livers to monitor metabolic changes that took place during organ harvest, the process of backtable preparation of the graft, and following implantation in the recipient where it remained in situ for 48 hours. The cannula was perfused with isotonic solution and hourly samples of perfusate were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Six livers showed serum biochemical evidence of ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury with 24 hours aspartate transaminase (AST) levels >2000 IU/L (Group A) whereas the remaining patients showed little evidence of IR injury (Group B). In Group A, lactate levels in the donor microdialysate rose to >6 mM (P < 0.05), were significantly higher during backtable preparation of the liver (>15 mM; P < 0.03), and took longer to normalize in the recipient following implantation (18 vs. 8 hours, P < 0.03) than lactate levels of the livers of patients in Group B who did not develop ischemia reperfusion injury. No significant differences were observed in glucose, pyruvate, or glycerol concentrations between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial lactic acidosis in the donor allograft is associated with significant reperfusion injury on implantation.

What can be learned from brain-death models?

Brain death of the donor is an important risk factor influencing graft outcome. In addition to its nonspecific effects, it potentiates graft immunogenicity and increases host alloresponsiveness. Thus brain death in addition to other unspecific injuries such as organ procurement, preservation and consequences of ischemia/reperfusion injury, contributes towards the change of an inert organ to an immunological altered graft. Prior to engraftment, brain death initiates a cascade of molecular and cellular events including the release of proinflammatory mediators leading to cellular infiltrates. Those events may affect the incidence of both acute and chronic changes, developing and contributing to reduced graft survival. Consequently, strategies to reduce the immunogenicity or the pro-inflammatory status of the graft are becoming more attractive and might even help to improve organ quality and graft function.

Ischemic preconditioning and liver tolerance to warm or cold ischemia: experimental studies in large animals

BACKGROUND

In the rodent, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been shown to improve the tolerance of the liver to ischemia-reperfusion under normothermic or hypothermic conditions. The aim of the present study was to test this hypothesis in a dog model, which may be more relevant to the human.

METHODS

Beagle dogs were used in two distinct animal models of hepatic warm ischemia and orthotopic liver transplantation (hypothermic ischemia). IPC consisted of 10 minutes of ischemia followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion. In the first model, livers were exposed to 55 minutes prolonged warm ischemia and reperfused for 3 days (n = 6). In the second model, livers were retrieved and preserved for 48 hours at 4 degrees C in University of Wisconsin solution, transplanted, and reperfused without immunosuppression for 7 days (n = 5). In each model, nonpreconditioned animals served as controls (n = 5 in each group). Also, isolated dog hepatocytes were subjected to warm and cold storage ischemia-reperfusion to model the animal transplant studies using IPC.

RESULTS

In the first model (warm ischemia), IPC significantly decreased serum aminotransferase activity at 6 and 24 hours post-reperfusion. After 1 hour of reperfusion, preconditioned livers contained more adenosine triphosphate and produced more bile and less myeloperoxidase activity (neutrophils) relative to controls. In the second model (hypothermic preservation), IPC was not protective. Finally, IPC significantly attenuated hepatocyte cell death after cold storage and warm reperfusion in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

IPC is effective in large animals for protecting the liver against warm ischemia-reperfusion injury but not injury associated with cold ischemia and reperfusion (preservation injury). However, the IPC effect observed in isolated hepatocytes suggests that preconditioning for preservation is theoretically possible.

Liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors: current status and future prospects

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for many patients with acute and chronic liver failure, but its application is limited by a shortage of donor organs. Donor organ shortage is the principal cause of increasing waiting lists, and a number of patients die while awaiting transplantation. Non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) livers are a potential means of expanding the donor pool. This is not a new concept. Prior to the recognition of brainstem death, organs were retrieved from deceased donors only after cardiac arrest. Given the preservation techniques available at that time, this restricted the use of extrarenal organs for transplantation. In conclusion, after establishment of brain death criteria, deceased donor organs were almost exclusively from heart-beating donors (HBDs). To increase organ availability, there is now a resurgence of interest in NHBD liver transplantation. This review explores the basis for this and considers some of the published results.

The effects of donor brain death on renal function and arachidonic acid metabolism in a large animal model of hypothermic preservation injury

BACKGROUND

Donor brain death (BD) has been implicated as a risk factor for the poor performance of kidneys after transplantation in small but not large animal models. This study determined the effects of donor BD on renal function and lipid mediator metabolism in a large animal model of renal hypothermic preservation injury.

METHODS

Adult beagle donors were subjected to explosive BD for 16 hr. After BD, the kidneys were removed, cold stored for 24 hr in cold University of Wisconsin solution, and allotransplanted into recipient dogs for either 4 hr (group 1) or 7 days (group 2). Controls for both groups consisted of kidneys obtained from living donors. Renal allograft function and tissue arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism were determined after reperfusion.

RESULTS

Short-term renal function after transplantation was generally unaffected by BD. Renal blood flow decreased after reperfusion but was not altered during the 16-hr BD period. Neutrophil infiltration significantly increased in kidneys from brain-dead donors before storage and after 4 hr of reperfusion. Renal cortex and medulla AA metabolism were not significantly affected by BD after short-term reperfusion except when thiol-ether leukotrienes (LTC(4)/D(4)/E(4)) were increased with BD. Serum creatinine was elevated during 7 days, but, surprisingly, BD significantly attenuated this injury.

CONCLUSION

BD in large mammals does not significantly affect renal allograft function or AA metabolism after transplantation. The role of BD in human renal preservation injury and inflammation should be reevaluated.