1
|
Yang J, Xie X, Li J, Li Y, Li B, Wang C, Jiang P. Which strategy is better for lung transplantation: Cardiopulmonary bypass or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Perfusion 2024:2676591241242018. [PMID: 38557237 DOI: 10.1177/02676591241242018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Background: In lung transplantation surgery, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is essential for safety. Various support methods, including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump techniques, are used, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) gaining prominence. However, consensus on the best support strategy is lacking.Purpose: This article reviews risks, benefits, and outcomes of different support strategies in lung transplantation. By consolidating knowledge, it aims to clarify selecting the most appropriate ECLS modality.Research Design: A comprehensive literature review examined CPB, off-pump techniques, and ECMO outcomes in lung transplantation, including surgical results and complications.Study Sample: Studies, including clinical trials and observational research, focused on ECLS in lung transplantation, both retrospective and prospective, providing a broad evidence base.Data Collection and/or Analysis: Selected studies were analyzed for surgical outcomes, complications, and survival rates associated with CPB, off-pump techniques, and ECMO to assess safety and effectiveness.Results: Off-pump techniques are preferred, with ECMO increasingly vital as a bridge to transplant, overshadowing CPB. However, ECMO entails hidden risks and higher costs. While safer than CPB, optimizing ECMO postoperative use and monitoring is crucial for success.Conclusions: Off-pump techniques are standard, but ECMO's role is expanding. Despite advantages, careful ECMO management is crucial due to hidden risks and costs. Future research should focus on refining ECMO use and monitoring to improve outcomes, emphasizing individualized approaches for LT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianbao Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xinling Xie
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Jian Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Yongnan Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Bin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Cheng Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Peng Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng E, Jiang SM, Servito T, Payne D, El-Diasty M. Lung transplantation and concomitant cardiac surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2022; 37:3342-3352. [PMID: 35811496 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for end-stage lung diseases. In some cases, these patients may also have underlying cardiac disease which may require surgical intervention before or during transplantation. Concomitant cardiac surgery may often be preferred, as reduced lung function precludes these patients from pre-transplant surgery. Our meta-analysis sought to examine the impact of lung transplantation paired with concomitant cardiac surgery on long-term mortality. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Our primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in hospital and serious postoperative complication rates. We used a meta-analytic model to determine the differences in the above outcomes between patients who underwent lung transplantation with or without concomitant cardiac surgery. RESULTS Out of the 1876 articles screened, 7 met our pre-determined inclusion criteria. Lung transplantation with concomitant cardiac surgery was not associated with increased mortality compared to lung transplantation alone (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-1.31; I2 = 0%; p = .99). LOS in hospital was not significantly different between groups (standardized mean difference = 0.32; 95% CI = -0.91 to 1.55). Postoperative complication rates were also reported but not analyzed due to missing data. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in mortality rates in patients undergoing lung transplantation with or without concomitant cardiac surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years. However, postoperative complication rates were higher in the concomitant group. The decision to perform concomitant procedures should be tailored to each patient's clinical condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Meng
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Jiang
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Therese Servito
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darrin Payne
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohammad El-Diasty
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reck Dos Santos P, D'Cunha J. Intraoperative support during lung transplantation. J Thorac Dis 2022; 13:6576-6586. [PMID: 34992836 PMCID: PMC8662508 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The role of intraoperative mechanical support during lung transplantation (LTx) is essential to provide a safe hemodynamic and ventilatory status during critical intraoperative events. This hemodynamic and ventilatory stability is vital to minimize the odds of suboptimal outcomes, especially considering that, due to the scarcity of donors and the fact that more and more patients with significant comorbidities are being considered for this therapy, a more aggressive approach is often needed by the transplant centers. Hence, the attenuation of any potential injury that can happen during this complex event is paramount. While a thorough assessment of the donor and optimization of postoperative care is pursued, certainly protective intraoperative management would also contribute to better outcomes. Understanding each patient’s underlying anatomy and cardiopulmonary physiology, associated with awareness of critical events during a complicated procedure like LTx, is essential for a precise indication and safe use of support. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) have been the most common approaches used, with the latter gaining popularity more recently and we have used VA ECMO exclusively for the last decade. New technologies certainly contributed to more liberal use of VA ECMO intraoperatively, enabling a protecting and physiologic environment for the newly implanted grafts. In this setting, potential prophylactic use for lung protection during a critical period is also considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan D'Cunha
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weingarten N, Schraufnagel D, Plitt G, Zaki A, Ayyat KS, Elgharably H. Comparison of mechanical cardiopulmonary support strategies during lung transplantation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020; 17:1075-1093. [PMID: 33090042 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1841630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung transplantation outcomes are influenced by the intraoperative mechanical cardiopulmonary support strategy used. This surgery was historically done either on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or off pump. Recently, there has been increased interest in intraoperative support with veno-arterial (VA) or veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, there is a lack of consensus on the relative risks, benefits and indications for each intraoperative support strategy. AREAS COVERED This review includes information from cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series that compare morbidity and/or mortality of two or more intraoperative cardiopulmonary support strategies during lung transplantation. EXPERT OPINION The optimal strategy for intraoperative cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation remains an area of debate. Current data suggest that off pump is associated with better outcomes and could be considered whenever feasible. ECMO is generally associated with preferable outcomes to CPB, but the data supporting this association is not robust. Interestingly, whether CPB is unplanned or prolonged might influence outcomes more than the use of CPB itself. These observations can help guide surgical teams in their approach for intraoperative mechanical support strategy during lung transplantation and should serve as the basis for further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Weingarten
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation , Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dean Schraufnagel
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation , Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gilman Plitt
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation , Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anthony Zaki
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation , Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kamal S Ayyat
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation , Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Haytham Elgharably
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation , Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taka H, Miyoshi K, Kurosaki T, Douguchi T, Itoh H, Sugimoto S, Yamane M, Kobayashi M, Kasahara S, Oto T. Lung transplantation via cardiopulmonary bypass: excellent survival outcomes from extended criteria donors. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67:624-632. [PMID: 30659507 DOI: 10.1007/s11748-019-01067-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The role of intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in lung transplant (LTx) surgery is controversial. CPB enables slow pulmonary reperfusion and initial ventilation with low oxygen concentrations, both theoretically protective of transplanted lungs. In this study, we explored clinical outcomes following extended criteria donor LTx surgery implementing a thoroughly protective allograft reperfusion strategy using CPB. METHODS Thirty-nine consecutive adult patients who underwent bilateral LTx with elective CPB and protective allograft reperfusion were reviewed. Bilaterally implanted lungs were reperfused simultaneously, via slow CPB flow reduction and initial ventilation with 21% oxygen and nitric oxide, followed by a brief modified ultrafiltration. During weaning from CPB, mean pulmonary arterial pressure was strictly maintained at 10-15 mmHg by controlling CPB and pulmonary flow. The clinical outcomes in 23 patients who received lungs from extended criteria donors (ECD group) were elucidated and compared to 16 patients undergoing LTx from standard criteria donors (SCD group). RESULTS No life-threatening deterioration was observed to graft functionality during the first 72 h after LTx in the ECD group; however, only one patient required post-transplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In three of 23 ECD LTx patients (12%), surgical revision for bleeding was required. Survival outcomes for the ECD group were favorable, with 100% survival at 6-months, 87.0% at 1-year, and 80.7% at 5-years. Outcomes in the ECD group were comparable to those in the SCD group. CONCLUSIONS Despite a certain extent of risk associated with full-dose heparinization, use of CPB does not undermine survival outcomes after ECD LTx surgery if protective allograft reperfusion is securely performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirosh Taka
- Department of Clinical Engineering, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kentaroh Miyoshi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Okayama Medical Center/Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Kurosaki
- Department of Thoracic Surgery/Organ Transplant Center, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuma Douguchi
- Department of Clinical Engineering, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hideshi Itoh
- Department of Medical Engineering, Faculty of Health Sciences, Junshin Gakuen University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Sugimoto
- Department of Thoracic Surgery/Organ Transplant Center, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masaomi Yamane
- Department of Thoracic Surgery/Organ Transplant Center, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Motomu Kobayashi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shingo Kasahara
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Oto
- Department of Thoracic Surgery/Organ Transplant Center, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Lung transplantation is the only therapeutic option for more than 3,000 individuals in the United States with end-stage lung disease. Innovations in anesthetic and surgical techniques have expanded the indications for lung transplantation. Presently, the major limiting factor in the number of lung transplantations that are performed is the availability of suitable donor organs. Lung transplantation includes a number of surgical procedures, including single-lung, double-lung, bilateral-sequential-single-lung, heart-lung, and lobar transplantation. Patients undergoing lung transplantation present a variety of challenges to the anesthesia team. Critical periods include induction of anesthesia, initiation of positive pressure ventilation, establishment and maintenance of one-lung ventilation, pulmonary artery clamping, pulmonary artery unclamping, and reperfusion of the transplanted lung. Pharmacologic advances have been an important factor in the continued development and success of lung transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive agents have improved the prevention and management of post-transplant rejection. Selective pulmonary vasodilators that are administered via inhalation affect the anesthetic management during the surgical procedure. Technologic advances in monitoring have also been valuable in lung transplantation. Transesophageal echocardiography is commonly used to evaluate intraoperative ventricular function. Continuous cardiac output, mixed venous oxygen saturation, continuous arterial blood gas monitoring, and the bispectral index have also been used to monitor the patient during lung transplantation. Anesthetic management of lung transplantation requires a thorough understanding of end-stage lung disease and pharmacologic and technical considerations that may not be applicable in any other part of anesthetic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen Miranda
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cerón Navarro J, de Aguiar Quevedo K, Jordá Aragón C, Peñalver Cuesta JC, Mancheño Franch N, Vera Sempere F, Padilla Alarcón J. Mortalidad perioperatoria del trasplante pulmonar en la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica. Med Clin (Barc) 2016; 146:519-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Revised: 03/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
8
|
Marczin N, Popov AF, Zych B, Romano R, Kiss R, Sabashnikov A, Soresi S, De Robertis F, Bahrami T, Amrani M, Weymann A, McDermott G, Krueger H, Carby M, Dalal P, Simon AR. Outcomes of minimally invasive lung transplantation in a single centre: the routine approach for the future or do we still need clamshell incision? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22:537-45. [PMID: 26869662 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivw004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive lung transplantation (MILT) via bilateral anterior thoracotomies has emerged as a novel surgical strategy with potential patient benefits when compared with transverse thoracosternotomy (clamshell incision, CS). The aim of this study is to compare MILT with CS by focusing on operative characteristics, postoperative organ function and support and mid-term clinical outcomes at Harefield Hospital. METHODS It was a retrospective observational study evaluating all bilateral sequential lung transplants between April 2010 and November 2013. RESULTS CS was performed in 124 patients and MILT in 70 patients. Skin-to-skin surgical time was less in the MILT group [285 (265, 339) min] compared with CS [380 (306, 565) min] and MILT-cardiopulmonary bypass [426 (360, 478) min]. Ischaemic time was significantly longer (502 ± 116 vs 395 ± 145 min) in the MILT group compared with CS (P < 0.01). Early postoperative physiological variables were similar between groups. Patients in the MILT group required less blood [2 (0, 4) vs 3 (1, 5) units, P = 0.16] and platelet transfusion [0 (0, 1) vs 1 (0, 2) units, P < 0.01]. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter (26 vs 44 h, P < 0.01) and intensive therapy unit stay was 2 days shorter (5 vs 7) in the MILT group. While overall survival was similar, fraction of expired volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were consistently higher in the MILT group compared with CS during mid-term follow-up after transplantation. Specifically, FEV1 and FVC were, respectively, 86 ± 21 and 88 ± 18% predicted in the MILT group compared with 74 ± 21 and 74 ± 19% predicted in the CS group (P < 0.01) at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS MILT was successfully introduced at our centre as a novel operative strategy. Despite longer ischaemic times and a more complex operation and management, MILT appears to offer early postoperative and mid-term clinical benefits compared with our traditional approach of clamshell operations. These observations warrant larger definite studies to further evaluate the impact of MILT on physiological, clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandor Marczin
- Department of Anaesthetics, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK Department of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Aron-Frederik Popov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Bartlomiej Zych
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Rosalba Romano
- Department of Anaesthetics, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK Department of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rudolf Kiss
- Department of Anaesthetics, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK Department of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Anton Sabashnikov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Simona Soresi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Fabio De Robertis
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Toufan Bahrami
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Mohamed Amrani
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Alexander Weymann
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Grainne McDermott
- Department of Anaesthetics, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK Department of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Heike Krueger
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Martin Carby
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Paras Dalal
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - André Ruediger Simon
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bennett SC, Beal EW, Dumond CA, Preston T, Ralston J, Pope-Harman A, Black S, Hayes Jr D, Whitson BA. Mechanical circulatory support in lung transplantation: Cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal life support, and ex-vivo lung perfusion. World J Respirol 2015; 5:78-92. [DOI: 10.5320/wjr.v5.i2.78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2014] [Revised: 03/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung transplant is the standard of care for patients with end-stage lung disease refractory to medical management. There is currently a critical organ shortage for lung transplantation with only 17% of offered organs being transplanted. Of those patients receiving a lung transplant, up to 25% will develop primary graft dysfunction, which is associated with an 8-fold increase in 30-d mortality. There are numerous mechanical lung assistance modalities that may be employed to help combat these challenges. We will discuss the use of mechanical lung assistance during lung transplantation, as a bridge to transplant, as a treatment for primary graft dysfunction, and finally as a means to remodel and evaluate organs deemed unsuitable for transplant, thus increasing the donor pool, improving survival to transplant, and improving overall patient survival.
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Lung transplantation on cardiopulmonary support: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outperformed cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144:1510-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2012] [Revised: 04/28/2012] [Accepted: 07/31/2012] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
12
|
Abstract
Lung transplantation is a surgical option for patients who fail optimization of medical treatment for the severe symptoms that result from COPD. This review will discuss patient selection, transplant listing, and the surgical technique for transplantation in COPD. Furthermore, it will describe transplant outcomes and its effects on recipient survival, pulmonary function, exercise capacity, respiratory muscle function, and quality of life. The respective roles of transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery as therapies for advanced disease will be outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namrata Patel
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dramatic Improvement in Survival After Lung Transplantation Over Time: A Single Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2009; 41:687-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
14
|
Carter YM, Gelman AE, Kreisel D. Pathogenesis, management, and consequences of primary graft dysfunction. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 20:165-72. [PMID: 18707651 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2008] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Primary graft dysfunction continues to be a major contributing factor to morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. This condition is presumed to be the result of ischemia-reperfusion injury, which is associated with the release of endogenous substances that can activate the innate immune system. Primary graft dysfunction has been shown to be an independent risk factor for the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome indicating that it can shape alloimmune responses. In this review, we focus on the classification, pathogenesis, possible prevention strategies, management and consequences of primary graft dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette M Carter
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1013, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Factors Related to Postoperative Mortality in Lung Transplantation for Emphysema. Transplant Proc 2007; 39:3317-22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2007] [Accepted: 09/11/2007] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
16
|
Pilcher DV, Snell GI, Scheinkestel CD, Bailey MJ, Williams TJ. High Donor Age, Low Donor Oxygenation, and High Recipient Inotrope Requirements Predict Early Graft Dysfunction in Lung Transplant Recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005; 24:1814-20. [PMID: 16297787 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2004] [Revised: 03/20/2005] [Accepted: 04/04/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early dysfunction in lung transplants is characterized by poor oxygenation, which may then lead to prolonged mechanical ventilation. This may be due to a combination of donor, recipient, and management factors. Our aim was to determine the incidence and severity of hypoxia and graft dysfunction and which factors were directly associated with poor oxygenation within the first 24 hours after lung transplantation. METHODS A retrospective study of all 128 lung transplants between 1999 and 2002 was undertaken. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine which donor, recipient, operative, and intensive care unit (ICU) parameters were associated with the worst recorded arterial blood gas partial pressure of oxygen (PAO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) ratio in the initial 24 hours after operation. RESULTS Eighty-three percent of the patients (104 of 128) had a PAO2/FIO2 ratio below 300 within the first 24 hours post-transplantation, and 60% (77 of 128) had a PAO2/FIO2 ratio below 200. A high donor age (p = 0.004), low donor PAO2 (p = 0.007), and high post-operative inotrope requirements (p = 0.02) were correlated with a low PAO2/FIO2 ratio. Recipient diagnosis, ischemic time, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, fluid balance in the ICU, and cardiac index were not related. There was no difference in the long-term outcomes of patients with high or low PAO2/FIO2 ratios. CONCLUSIONS A low PAO2/FIO2 ratio is a common finding in the first 24 hours after lung transplantation. Donor factors such as age and PAO2, and the need for increasing inotrope requirements in ICU predict early graft dysfunction and hypoxia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David V Pilcher
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barr ML, Kawut SM, Whelan TP, Girgis R, Böttcher H, Sonett J, Vigneswaran W, Follette DM, Corris PA. Report of the ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction Part IV: Recipient-Related Risk Factors and Markers. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005; 24:1468-82. [PMID: 16210118 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2004] [Revised: 02/07/2005] [Accepted: 02/17/2005] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark L Barr
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Parekh K, Meyers BF, Patterson GA, Guthrie TJ, Trulock EP, Damiano RJ, Moazami N. Outcome of lung transplantation for patients requiring concomitant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130:859-63. [PMID: 16153940 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2004] [Revised: 05/02/2005] [Accepted: 05/09/2005] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical results of lung transplantation and concomitant cardiac surgery are unclear. The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on the pulmonary allograft is controversial, and the effect of cardiac arrest and cardiac surgery in this setting is unknown. Our aim was to review the operative results and long-term survival in this group of patients. METHODS A retrospective review of all lung transplantations between 1988 and 2003 was performed. Patients who had concomitant cardiac surgery during lung transplantation were compared with those who underwent lung transplantation alone. The variables analyzed included allograft ischemic times, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, early graft dysfunction, postoperative morbidity, survival, length of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and overall hospital stay. RESULTS During this period, 35 of 700 lung transplant recipients (15 single and 20 bilateral transplantations) underwent concomitant cardiac surgery. The cardiac procedures were for patent foramen ovale (n = 18), atrial septal defect (n = 9), ventricular septal defect (n = 2), coronary bypass (n = 4), and "other" (n = 2). Allograft ischemic time, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, length of hospital stay, operative mortality, and survival were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Ventilator time and intensive care unit stay were longer in the cardiac surgery group. CONCLUSIONS Cardiac surgery at the time of lung transplantation can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. The immediate and long-term survival in these patients is similar to that of other lung transplant recipients. Lung transplantation should continue to be offered to patients with normal ventricular function who require concomitant limited cardiac surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalpaj Parekh
- University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Resident Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Parekh K, Meyers BF. Primary lung allograft dysfunction: a clinical and experimental review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2004.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|