Determinants of protracted cytomegalovirus infection in solid-organ transplant patients

Update in Viral Infections in the Intensive Care Unit

The advent of highly sensitive molecular diagnostic techniques has improved our ability to detect viral pathogens leading to severe and often fatal infections that require admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Viral infections in the ICU have pleomorphic clinical presentations including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory failure, central or peripheral nervous system manifestations, and viral-induced shock. Besides de novo infections, certain viruses fall into latency and can be reactivated in both immunosuppressed and immunocompetent critically ill patients. Depending on the viral strain, transmission occurs either directly through contact with infectious materials and large droplets, or indirectly through suspended air particles (airborne transmission of droplet nuclei). Many viruses can efficiently spread within hospital environment leading to in-hospital outbreaks, sometimes with high rates of mortality and morbidity, thus infection control measures are of paramount importance. Despite the advances in detecting viral pathogens, limited progress has been made in antiviral treatments, contributing to unexpectedly high rates of unfavorable outcomes. Herein, we review the most updated data on epidemiology, common clinical features, diagnosis, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of severe community- and hospital-acquired viral infections in the ICU settings.

Different impact of rATG induction on CMV infection risk in D+R- and R+ KTRs

BACKGROUND

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction is associated with profound immunosuppression, leading to a higher risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection compared with anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibody (anti-IL-2RA). However, this risk, depending on the baseline CMV serological recipient/donor status, is still controversial.

METHODS

The CMV DNAemia-free survival between rATG- and anti-IL-2RA-treated patients was analyzed in donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+R-) and recipient-positive (R+) patients in 1 discovery cohort of 559 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and 2 independent cohorts (351 and 135 kidney KTRs). The CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) at baseline and at different time points after transplantation was assessed using an interferon γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay.

RESULTS

rATG increased the risk of CMV DNAemia in R+ but not in D+R- KTRs. In R+ CMI-positive (CMI+) patients, the CMV DNAemia rate was higher in rATG-treated than in anti-IL-2RA-treated patients; no difference was observed among R+ CMI-negative (CMI-) patients. Longitudinal follow-up demonstrated a deeper depletion of preformed CMV CMI in R+ rATG-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

D+R- KTRs have the highest risk of CMV DNAemia, but rATG adds no further risk. Among R+ KTRs, we described 3 groups, the least prone being R+CMI+ KTRs without rATG, then R+CMI+ KTRs with rATG, and finally R+CMI- KTRs. CMV serostatus, baseline CMV-specific CMI, and induction therapy may lead to personalized preventive therapy in further studies.

Compassionate Use of Letermovir in a 2-Year-Old Immunocompromised Child With Resistant Cytomegalovirus Disease

Little information on the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of letermovir among immunocompromised children is currently available. We describe here the use of letermovir in a 2-year-old immunocompromised child with ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Detailed information on therapeutic-drug-monitoring measures and dosage adjustments for letermovir is provided.

Systematic review of ganciclovir pharmacodynamics during the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in adult solid organ transplant recipients

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) represents the most common infection among recipients of solid organ transplants (SOTs). Previous meta-analysis showed 0.8% of SOT recipients developed CMV disease whilst receiving valganciclovir (ValGCV) prophylaxis. However, the clinical utility of monitoring ganciclovir (GCV) blood concentrations is unclear. We systematically reviewed the association between GCV concentrations during prophylaxis and the incidence of CMV. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies between 1946 and 2018, where GCV pharmacokinetics and incidence of CMV viraemia or disease in SOT were available. Research designs included randomised trials, comparative, prospective cohort, retrospective, or case report studies. Only human adult studies were included, with English language restriction. The 11 studies that met the eligibility criteria included 610 participants receiving GCV or ValGCV prophylaxis. Quality assessment showed 2/4 randomised trials, 4/6 cohort studies, and 1/1 case report were of high quality. Despite dose adjustments for renal impairment, mean GCV exposures for patients were heterogeneous and ranged between 28 and 53.7 μg·h/mL across three randomised trials. The incidence of CMV infection and disease ranged from 0% to 50% and 0% to 3.1%, respectively, with follow up between 3 to 9 months. One study showed statistical power in determining relationship, where GCV exposure at 40 to 50 μg·h/mL in high-risk SOT recipients was associated with a reduced risk of viraemia. Clinical monitoring for GCV exposure can be applied to high-risk SOT recipients during ValGCV prophylaxis; however, further studies are needed to determine the utility of monitoring in all SOT recipients.

Clinical significance of post-prophylaxis cytomegalovirus infection in lung transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has been associated with the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after transplantation. However, the relevance of CMV replication occurring after the discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis on the development of CLAD has not been fully established. Patients who underwent lung transplantation during 2004-2014 were included. All patients received antiviral prophylaxis for 3-6 months, followed by monitoring of CMV replication during the first year post-transplantation (preemptive therapy). Risk factors for the development of CLAD were assessed by Cox models. A linear regression model with an interaction coefficient between time and CMV infection was used to evaluate the influence of CMV infection on the evolution of FEV₁ . Overall, 69 patients were included, 30/69 (43%) patients developed at least 1 episode of significant CMV infection, and 8/69 (11.5%) patients developed CMV disease. After a median follow-up of 3.67 years, 25/69 (36%) patients developed CLAD and 14/69 (20%) patients died. In the univariate Cox analysis, significant CMV infection (HR 1.177, P = .698), CMV disease (HR 1.001, P = .998), and duration of CMV replication (HR 1.004, P = .758) were not associated with CLAD. Only bacterial pneumonia tended to be associated with CLAD in the multivariate model (HR 2.579, P = .062). We did not observe a significant interaction between CMV replication and evolution FEV₁ (interaction coefficient 0.006, CI 95% [-0.084 to 0.096], P = .890). In this cohort of lung transplant recipients receiving antiviral prophylaxis and monitored by preemptive therapy post-prophylaxis, CMV infection did not have impact on long-term allograft lung function.

Immune Monitoring for CMV in Transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune monitoring to determine when and how the recovery of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cells occurs post-transplantation may help clinicians to risk stratify individuals at risk of complications from CMV. We aimed to review all recent clinical studies using CMV immune monitoring in the pre- and post-transplant setting including the use of recently developed standardized assays (Quantiferon-CMV and the CMV ELISPOT) to better understand in whom, when, and how immune monitoring is best used.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pre-transplant assessment of CMV immunity in solid-organ transplant recipients where CMV seropositive recipients had undetectable cell-mediated responses despite past immunity has shown that they are at a much higher risk of developing CMV reactivation. Post-transplant CMV immune monitoring can guide (shorten or prolong) the duration of antiviral prophylaxis, identify recipients at risk of post-prophylaxis CMV disease, and predict recurrent CMV reactivation. Thus, CMV immune monitoring, in addition to current clinical and DNA-based monitoring for CMV, has the potential to be incorporated into routine clinical care to better improve CMV management in both the stem and solid-organ transplant population.

Current characteristics and outcome of cytomegalovirus infections after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The clinical course of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in the current era is poorly described. We characterized the symptoms and outcome of all CMV infections in a large cohort of kidney transplant recipients. Among 1129 kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2004 and 2011 in Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Helsinki University Hospital, 297 patients with CMV infection were characterized.

RESULTS

CMV disease occurred in 217/1129 patients (19.2%), and CMV infection in 297/1129 (26.3%). Gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded in 58% and fever in 47% patients with primary CMV disease, compared to 46% and 27% patients with symptomatic CMV reactivation, whereas leukopenia or thrombocytopenia were seen in only 17-28% patients, and malaise in 9-10%. Tissue-invasive CMV gastroenteritis was confirmed in 11% and CMV pneumonia in only 1% of patients with CMV disease. Only 1 patient died because of CMV infection (mortality 0.3%). Virus-related factors or the use of secondary prophylaxis did not predict the risk of recurrence, which occurred in 33% patients.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, CMV disease remains a common problem after kidney transplantation. Gastrointestinal symptoms were common, especially in patients with primary CMV infection, whereas bone marrow suppression, hepatopathy, or malaise were seen less frequently.

Valganciclovir to prevent or treat cytomegalovirus disease in organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is generally considered the most significant pathogen to infect patients following organ transplantation. Significant improvements have been achieved in the management of CMV disease over recent years, especially since the introduction of oral drugs such as oral ganciclovir followed by valganciclovir (VGC), a prodrug of ganciclovir with enhanced bioavailability. Several randomized controlled trials have shown that VGC is an efficacious and convenient oral drug to prevent or treat CMV disease in solid-organ transplant recipients. In this article, we discuss the clinical and pharmacological experience with the use of VGC for the management of CMV in solid-organ transplant recipients. Finally, novel strategies to further reduce the incidence of CMV disease after transplantation are also reviewed.

Impact of a preemptive strategy after 3 months of valganciclovir cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

We assessed the impact of a preemptive strategy after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis in the prevention of late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing kidney transplantation at the University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) between November 2003 and November 2007 were included if they were donor or recipient (D/R) seropositive for CMV. All patients received 3 months of prophylaxis with valganciclovir, followed by monitoring of CMV DNAemia by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) every 15 days during 3 additional months. Valganciclovir was restarted if CMV PCR was more than or equal to 10,000 copies/mL. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of late-onset CMV disease. RESULTS.: Eighty-six kidney transplant recipients were included; 30 patients were D+/R- and 56 patients were R+ for CMV. At 6 months posttransplant, CMV DNAemia had occurred in 31 of 86 (36%) patients: 13 of 30 (43%) in the D+/R- group and 18 of 56 (32%) in the R+ group (P = 0.35). In the D+/R- group, among the 13 patients with CMV DNAemia, 7 (54%) patients developed late-onset CMV disease, simultaneously to the first positive viral load (n = 5) or after detection of low-grade viremia (n = 2). Only two patients received a preemptive treatment. In the R+ group, all positive PCR results were below the established cutoff. Thus, these 18 patients were not treated, and none of them developed late-onset CMV disease (R+ vs. D+/R-: P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of a noncontrolled study, our data indicate that a preemptive strategy after 3 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis for CMV is not useful in R+ kidney transplant recipients. In D+/R- patients, this approach should be further evaluated.

Variable viral clearance despite adequate ganciclovir plasma levels during valganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus disease in D+/R- transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir, the oral prodrug of ganciclovir, has been demonstrated equivalent to iv ganciclovir for CMV disease treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Variability in ganciclovir exposure achieved with valganciclovir could be implicated as a contributing factor for explaining variations in the therapeutic response. This prospective observational study aimed to correlate clinical and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load response (DNAemia) with ganciclovir plasma concentrations in patients treated with valganciclovir for CMV infection/disease.

METHODS

Seven CMV D+/R- transplant recipients (4 kidney, 2 liver and 1 heart) were treated with valganciclovir (initial dose was 900-1800 mg/day for 3-6.5 weeks, followed by 450-900 mg/day for 2-9 weeks). DNAemia was monitored by real time quantitative PCR and ganciclovir plasma concentration was measured at trough (Ctrough) and 3 h after drug administration (C3h) by HPLC.

RESULTS

Four patients presented with CMV syndrome, two had CMV tissue-invasive disease after prophylaxis discontinuation, and one liver recipient was treated pre-emptively for asymptomatic rising CMV viral load 5 weeks post-transplantation in the absence of prophylaxis. CMV DNAemia decreased during the first week of treatment in all recipients except in one patient (median decrease: -1.2 log copies/mL, range: -1.8 to 0) despite satisfactory ganciclovir exposure (AUC0-12 = 48 mgxh/L, range for the 7 patients: 40-118 mgxh/L). Viral clearance was obtained in five patients after a median of time of 34 days (range: 28-82 days). Two patients had recurrent CMV disease despite adequate ganciclovir exposure (65 mgxh/L, range: 44-118 mgxh/L).

CONCLUSIONS

Valganciclovir treatment for CMV infection/disease in D+/R- transplant recipients can thus result in variable viral clearance despite adequate ganciclovir plasma concentrations, probably correlating inversely with anti-CMV immune responses after primary infection.

Population pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir in solid-organ transplant recipients receiving oral valganciclovir

Valganciclovir (VGC) is an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV) recently introduced for prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection. Optimal concentration exposure for effective and safe VGC therapy would require either reproducible VGC absorption and GCV disposition or dosage adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We examined GCV population pharmacokinetics in solid organ transplant recipients receiving oral VGC, including the influence of clinical factors, the magnitude of variability, and its impact on efficacy and tolerability. Nonlinear mixed effect model (NONMEM) analysis was performed on plasma samples from 65 transplant recipients under VGC prophylaxis or treatment. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption appropriately described the data. Systemic clearance was markedly influenced by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), patient gender, and graft type (clearance/GFR = 1.7 in kidney, 0.9 in heart, and 1.2 in lung and liver recipients) with interpatient and interoccasion variabilities of 26 and 12%, respectively. Body weight and sex influenced central volume of distribution (V(1) = 0.34 liter/kg in males and 0.27 liter/kg in females [20% interpatient variability]). No significant drug interaction was detected. The good prophylactic efficacy and tolerability of VGC precluded the demonstration of any relationship with GCV concentrations. In conclusion, this analysis highlights the importance of thorough adjustment of VGC dosage to renal function and body weight. Considering the good predictability and reproducibility of the GCV profile after treatment with oral VGC, routine TDM does not appear to be clinically indicated in solid-organ transplant recipients. However, GCV plasma measurement may still be helpful in specific clinical situations.

Case report: human herpesvirus 6 reactivation associated with colitis in a lung transplant recipient

Whereas human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) reactivation is frequent in solid organ transplant recipients, symptomatic disease is rare. A case of colitis associated with HHV-6B reactivation was observed in a lung transplant recipient. This case report suggests that symptomatic HHV-6 infection may occur in the absence of detectable viremia.

Cost-effectiveness of a new combined immunosuppressive and anti-infectious regimen in kidney transplantation

Objectives:The aims of this study were to assess the 1-year cost-effectiveness of a new combined immunosuppressive and anti-infectious regimen in kidney transplantation to prevent both rejection and infectious complications.

Methods:Patients (pts) transplanted from January 2000 to March 2003 (Group A) and treated with a conventional protocol were compared with pts submitted to a combined regimen including universal cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis between April 2003 and July 2005 (Group B). Costs were computed from the hospital accounting system for hospital stays, and official tariffs for outpatient visits. Patients with incomplete costs data were excluded from analysis.

Results:Fifty-three patients were analyzed in Group A, and 60 in Group B. Baseline characteristics including CMV serostatus were not significantly different between the two groups. Over 12 months after transplantation, acute rejections decreased from 41.5 percent in Group A to 6.7 percent in Group B (p&lt; .001), and CMV infections from 47 percent to 15 percent (p&lt; .001). Overall, readmissions decreased from 68 percent to 55 percent (p= .160), and average hospital days from 28 ± 19 to 20 ± 11 days (p&lt; .007). The average number of outpatient visits decreased from 49 ± 10 to 39 ± 8 (p&lt; .001). Average 1-year immunosuppressive and CMV prophylaxis costs (per patient) increased from CHF20,402 ± 7,273 to 27,375 ± 6,063 (p&lt; .001), graft rejection costs decreased from CHF4,595 ± 10,182 to 650 ± 3,167 (p= .005), CMV treatment costs from CHF2,270 ± 6,161 to 101 ± 326 (p= .008), and outpatient visits costs from CHF8,466 ± 1’721 to 6,749 ± 1,159 (p&lt; .001). Altogether, 1-year treatment costs decreased from CHF39’957 ± 16,573 to 36,204 ± 6,901 (p= .115).

Conclusions: The new combined regimen administered in Group B was significantly more effective, and its additional costs were more than offset by savings associated with complications avoidance.

Prevention of CMV disease in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: evaluation of pp67 NASBA-based pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy combined with CMV hyperimmune globulin prophylaxis in high-risk patients

A new prevention strategy for CMV infection was evaluated in our pediatric kidney transplant unit. This approach comprises a pre-emptive therapy, based upon the monitoring of CMV pp67 mRNA in whole blood by the qualitative NASBA, combined with prophylactic CMV-IG in high risk (R-/D+) children. Thirty-one kidney transplant children were followed for six months with serial measurements of CMV pp67 mRNA in the blood. The R-/D+ patients were given prophylactic CMV-IG for the first 16 wk after transplantation. I.v. ganciclovir was administered upon CMV detection by NASBA and was discontinued after two consecutive negative results. CMV infection, detected by NASBA, developed in 11 (35%) recipients: one (33%) of the R+/D- patients and 10 (72%) of the R-/D+ patients. CMV disease developed in 9.6% of the patients (3/31), exclusively in the R-/D+ group. These three patients presented concurrently with CMV viremia and disease. It is noteworthy that two of the three patients could not receive a complete course of CMV-IG, and one of the latter two subjects had been treated for acute rejection 15 days before CMV infection. Ganciclovir was given for the 11 cases of primary infection, and for three cases of relapsed CMV infection. pp67 NASBA-based pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy, combined with prophylactic CMV-IG in high-risk patients leads to a lower rate of CMV disease, as long as a complete course of CMV-IG has been administered and ganciclovir is given during the period of treatment for acute rejection in high-risk populations.

CMV-hyperimmune globulin for preventing cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid organ transplant recipients: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin (CMVIG) on cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, CMV disease, and mid-term survival in solid organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases were searched since their inceptions until 2006. Inclusion criteria comprised: prospective randomized trials, in solid organ transplantation which received CMV prophylaxis including CMVIG on one of the treatment arms. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) and meta-regression was employed to explain study heterogeneity. Stratified analyses were conducted and Funnel plot was used to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

Literature searches identified 11 randomized trials (698 patients; median follow-up: 12 months, range: 3-22 months) including six randomized trials (302 patients) after kidney transplantation. The analysis demonstrated a beneficial effect of the prophylactic use of CMVIG on total survival [RR (95% confidence interval; CI): 0.67 (0.47-0.95)] and prevention of CMV-associated death [RR (95% CI): 0.45 (0.24-0.84)] in solid organ transplant recipients but not kidney transplant recipients [RR (95% CI): 0.35 (0.12-1.04)]. CMV disease was significantly reduced in all recipients receiving prophylactic CMVIG [RR (95% CI): 0.697 (0.57-0.85)]. CMVIG had no impact on CMV-infections and clinically relevant rejections.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic administration of CMVIG after solid organ transplantation is associated with improved total survival, reduced CMV disease, and CMV-associated deaths.

Late-onset cytomegalovirus disease in patients with solid organ transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review existing data regarding late cytomegalovirus disease occurring after antiviral prophylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a continued debate as to the respective merits of the preemptive and the prophylactic approach to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. Arguably, by allowing some infection, the preemptive approach helps build immunity in contrast to prophylaxis, explaining the occurrence of late cytomegalovirus disease in the latter approach. No study comparing directly both approaches is large enough to definitely determine whether the preemptive approach leads to a faster development of immune response protective from late disease nor whether late disease is clinically different after prophylaxis compared to early cytomegalovirus diseases. While risk factors for late cytomegalovirus disease all point to a delay in mounting immune responses, there are no identified markers that would help predict the risk for late disease at the time of prophylaxis discontinuation. Various approaches to prevent late cytomegalovirus disease have been developed: prolonged prophylaxis, microbiological surveillance and preemptive treatment after prophylaxis discontinuation. Considering the identifying risk factors for late disease, it would also make sense to envision vaccinating cytomegalovirus-seronegative recipients.

SUMMARY

The best approach to prevent or manage late cytomegalovirus disease associated with cytomegalovirus prophylaxis remains to be defined.

The case for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies have been debated for the past decade. This review argues in favour of the prophylaxis strategy. Clinical trials comparing prophylaxis to pre-emptive therapy have, thus far, had insufficient power to differentiate strategies, especially with regard to the indirect effects of CMV. From meta-analyses, prospective trials, observational studies, and case control studies, there is evidence that prophylaxis prevents cytomegalovirus infection and disease, reduces the indirect effects of cytomegalovirus, including organ rejection and transplant associated, all cause mortality as well as opportunistic infection, and even bacteremia as well as post transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Prophylaxis has also been shown to be cost effective. One must recognise that with the current prophylaxis regimens employed for 3 months post-transplantation, late onset cases of cytomegalovirus disease may occur. Cytomegalovirus replication monitoring may be necessary after cessation of prophylaxis, especially in the high risk cytomegalovirus seropositive donor to cytomegalovirus seronegative recipient. Future trials with longer periods of prophylaxis are being undertaken.

Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Valganciclovir

Valganciclovir (VGC) has proved efficacious and safe for the prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) in high-risk transplant recipients and for the treatment of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients. We used VGC for the treatment of CMV infection (viremia without symptoms) or disease (CMV syndrome or tissue-invasive disease) in kidney, heart, and lung transplant recipients. Fourteen transplant recipients were treated: five for asymptomatic CMV infection and nine for CMV disease. VGC was administered in doses adjusted to renal function for 4 to 12 weeks (induction and maintenance therapy). Clinically, all nine patients with CMV disease responded to treatment. Microbiologically, treatment with VGC turned blood culture negative for CMV within 2 weeks in all patients and was associated with a > or =2 log decrease in blood CMV DNA within 3 weeks in 8 of 8 tested patients. With a follow-up of 6 months (n = 12 patients), asymptomatic recurrent CMV viremia was noted in five cases, and CMV syndrome noted in one case (all cases in the first 2 months after the end of treatment). VGC was clinically well tolerated in all patients; however, laboratory abnormalities occurred in three cases (mild increase in transaminases, thrombocytopenia, and pancytopenia). This preliminary experience strongly suggests that therapy with VGC is effective against CMV in organ transplant recipients; however, the exact duration of therapy remains to be determined: a longer course may be necessary to prevent early recurrence.

Comparison of combined prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin plus ganciclovir versus cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin alone in high-risk heart transplant recipients1

BACKGROUND

Seronegative heart transplant recipients who receive an allograft from seropositive donors have a higher risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and dysfunction. Neither CMV-specific hyperimmune globulin nor ganciclovir as sole CMV prophylaxis is sufficient to prevent CMV disease in high-risk patients. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of CMV-hyperimmune globulin with and without ganciclovir in 207 D+/R- heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

The study population was divided into two groups: Group A was composed of 96 patients who received CMV hyperimmune globulin as sole CMV prophylaxis, and group B was composed of 111 patients who received combined CMV prophylaxis. All recipients were subjected to quadruple cytolytic immunosuppression. Primary and secondary end points included prevention of CMV-associated death, CMV disease and productive infection, CAV, and overall infection.

RESULTS

There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups. Four patients in the group A died of CMV sepsis, whereas no CMV-associated death was observed in group B (P =0.0326). The actuarial incidence of CMV disease was significantly lower in patients who received double CMV prophylaxis (32.29 vs. 11.71, P =0.0003). Although no difference was observed with regard to productive CMV infection (53.12 vs. 65.77, P =not significant), CAV and overall infection rates were significantly higher in the first group (7.29 vs. 0.9, P =0.0157 and 70.83 vs. 62.16, P =0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Double CMV prophylaxis consisting of CMV hyperimmune globulin and ganciclovir is able to abolish CMV death and prevent CMV disease in high-risk heart transplant recipients. Therefore, the use of a combination regimen is recommended for seronegative recipients with seropositive donors.

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection in solid-organ transplant recipients by an ultrasensitive plasma PCR assay

Early and accurate monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid-organ transplant recipients is of major importance. We have assessed the potential benefit of an ultrasensitive plasma-based PCR assay for renal transplant recipients. The pp65 CMV antigen (pp65 Ag) assay using leukocytes was employed as a routine test for the monitoring of CMV in 23 transplant recipients. We compared the pp65 antigenemia with the CMV load quantified by an ultrasensitive PCR (US-PCR) with a limit of detection of 20 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. CMV infection was detected in 215 (67%) of 321 plasma samples by the US-PCR compared with 124 (39%) of 321 samples by the pp65 Ag assay. The US-PCR assay permitted the detection of CMV infection episodes following transplantation a median of 12 days earlier than the pp65 Ag assay. Moreover, during CMV infection episodes, DNA detection by the US-PCR was consistently positive, whereas false negative results were frequently observed with the pp65 Ag assay. We found a good correlation between the two assays, and the peak viral loads were significantly higher in patients with CMV-related complications (median, 5000 DNA copies/ml) than in those without symptoms (1160 DNA copies/ml) (P = 0.048). In addition, patients that did not require preemptive therapy based on the results of the pp65 assay had CMV loads significantly lower (median, 36 DNA copies/ml) than those that needed treatment (median, 4703 DNA copies/ml) (P < 0.001). These observations provided cutoff levels that could be applied in clinical practice. The ultrasensitive plasma-based PCR detected CMV infection episodes earlier and provided more consistent results than the pp65 Ag assay. This test could improve the monitoring of CMV infection or reactivation in renal transplant recipients.