Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation: viral load as a guide to treating clinical infection

Human cytomegalovirus: a survey of end-organ diseases and diagnostic challenges in solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most important infectious complications in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, early detection and prompt treatment are imperative to improve transplant outcomes. This article highlights the clinical characteristics of the most common CMV end-organ diseases in SOT recipients and their diagnostic modalities and challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

CMV can cause a variety of end-organ diseases in SOT recipients. Although CMV nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is frequently employed to detect CMV reactivation or infection, its predictive value for various CMV end-organ diseases remains uncertain. Given the limitation of PCR or other noninvasive tests, confirmation of CMV end-organ disease may require tissue biopsy, which may not be feasible or available, or may cause untoward complications.

SUMMARY

The utility of PCR to diagnose CMV end-organ disease is limited. As CMV can infect any organ system(s), clinicians caring for SOT recipients need to maintain vigilance for any signs and symptoms of end-organ disease to allow early recognition and prompt treatment. Invasive procedures might be needed to confirm the diagnosis and minimize the empirical use of antiviral therapy that may have substantial drug toxicities.

CMV infection, diagnosis and antiviral strategies after liver transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant pathogen complicating the post-transplant course of organ recipients. In liver transplant patients, the febrile clinical illness caused by CMV may be associated with end-organ disease, such as hepatitis or infection of the gastrointestinal tract. In addition to direct effects, CMV may have indirect effects including the risk of other infections or graft rejection. Recently, major advances in the management of CMV infection have been achieved through the development of new diagnostic techniques and antiviral strategies to prevent CMV disease. Quantitative nucleic acid testing to monitor viral load is now commonly used to diagnose and guide the treatment of CMV infections. The standardization of the testing, however, needs to be improved. There are two main strategies to prevent CMV disease after liver transplantation: prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy. Both strategies are effective, but also have disadvantages. The disadvantages of prophylaxis include prolonged drug exposure, the development of resistance and, most of all, the development of delayed and late-onset CMV disease. On the other hand, the pre-emptive strategy is based on frequent laboratory monitoring of viral loads, and some patients may develop symptomatic infection before the diagnosis of CMV. This overview summarizes the current status of CMV in liver transplantation.

Gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus infections in organ transplant patients

A cytomegalovirus (CMV) az immunszupprimált szervtranszplantált betegek egyik veszélyes fertőzése. A transzplantáltak 80-90%-ánál a fertőzés inaktív; a tünetekkel járó CMV-betegség gyakorisága 30-40%-os. Gastrointestinalis CMV-betegség a szervátültetettek mintegy 10%-ában fordul elő, a kórkép a tápcsatorna bármelyik szakaszát érintheti. A CMV-betegség leggyakrabban a nyálkahártya károsodásával, fekélyekkel, eróziókkal, vérzésekkel jár, oka lehet a tápcsatorna motilitási zavarának, ritkábban gastrointestinalis gyulladásos teriméknek, perforációknak. A diagnosztika alapja az endoszkópos vizsgálat biopsziás mintavétellel. A biopsziás minta szövettani vizsgálatakor keresni kell a CMV-fertőzésre jellemző cytomegaliás sejteket intranukleáris („bagolyszem”) és intracitoplazmatikus zárványokkal. A vírus kimutatására számos mikrobiológiai, immunhisztokémiai és molekuláris biológiai módszer létezik. Igazolt kórkép esetén a kezelés kettős: az elváltozásoknak, tüneteknek megfelelő gasztroenterológiai kezelés mellett meg kell kezdeni az antivirális terápiát általában intravénás ganciclovirrel és/vagy orális valganciclovirrel. Lényeges a betegség kialakulásának megelőzése is: a magas rizikójú betegcsoportban általános profilaxis javasolt per os valganciclovirrel, speciális esetekben hiperimmunglobulinnal; közepes kockázat esetén a mikrobiológiai surveillance eredménye alapján preemptív kezelés kezdhető.

Follow-up of 28 HCMV seropositive renal-transplant recipients: comparison of clinical, biological and virological parameters in the groups of treated versus untreated infected patients

BACKGROUND

A pre-emptive strategy for prevention of Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) disease depends on accurate detection of HCMV infection and clinical and/or biological abnormalities.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to evaluate a therapeutic strategy based on the presence of either minimal clinical and/or biological symptoms or high HCMV viral load assessed by quantitative real-time PCR from whole blood as previously described.

STUDY DESIGN

Between June 2002 and July 2003, 70 HCMV seropositive patients underwent a renal transplantation. Virological monitoring was performed every 2 weeks until day 90 then every 3-4 weeks until day 180. Biochemical and haematological parameters were also prospectively monitored.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (40%) showed at least one positive HCMV DNA in whole blood. Based on the following criteria: HCMV viral load greater than 4log(10)/ml, or the persistence of a HCMV DNAemia in two consecutive blood samples, or fever, or leucopenia or neutropenia, or increase in alanine aminotransferase level, 14 of the 28 patients received IV ganciclovir as a pre-emptive treatment. Immunosuppressive therapy and demographical data were comparable in both groups. As far as virological, haematological and biochemical parameters are concerned, no statistical significant difference was observed between treated and untreated patients. Moreover no adverse outcome was observed among untreated patients always having a HCMV viral load below 4log(10)/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reinforces the need of monitoring of HCMV seropositive renal-transplant recipients based on HCMV diagnosis and quantification by real-time PCR. The results showed that HCMV viraemic patients may benefit of absence of antiviral treatment when they have a low viral load (below 4log(10)/ml) and absence of clinical and/or biological abnormalities. Further studies are required now to validate the threshold value at which we should begin pre-emptive therapy.

Strategies for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in pediatric liver transplantation recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic infection following solid organ transplantation. Prevention and management of CMV infection has assumed a higher priority as transplantation has become a frequent treatment for many congenital and acquired disorders, as more potent immunosuppressive agents have become available, new molecular and virologic assays to detect CMV have made their way from research to clinical laboratories and new antiviral medications and biologics have been developed. Management strategies are diverse; however, there are little or no data from large controlled pediatric trials demonstrating the superiority of any particular approach. This review outlines the current strategies employed to prevent CMV infection and disease and summarizes the strengths and limitations of each regimen to guide clinicians in the selection of the optimal preventative approach.

Clinical utility of cytomegalovirus viral load testing for predicting CMV disease in D+/R- solid organ transplant recipients

Despite prophylaxis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is common in donor seropositive (D+)/recipient seronegative (R-) transplant patients after cessation of prophylaxis. Early detection of CMV may allow for pre-emptive therapy to prevent active disease. The clinical utility of quantitative plasma viral load measurements for predicting CMV disease was determined in 364 D+/R- organ transplant patients receiving prophylaxis (100 d of valganciclovir or oral ganciclovir). Measurements were performed every 2 weeks until day 100 and at months 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 8 and 12 post-transplant. CMV disease occurred in 64 (17.6%) patients by 12 months. Using a positive cut-off value of >400 copies/mL, sensitivity was 38%, specificity 60%, positive predictive value 17%, and negative predictive value 82% for prediction of CMV disease. Therefore, routine monitoring would have predicted disease in only 24/64 (38%) patients. The test characteristics were not improved by changing the viral load cut-off point for defining a positive result. Similarly, single time point measures at the end of prophylaxis or month 4 had low sensitivity for disease prediction. Overall, regular CMV plasma viral load measurements were only of modest value in predicting CMV disease.

Current status of liver transplantation in children

There are two critical issues on opposite ends of the timeline for patients who are eligible for liver transplantation. On the one hand, the crisis in the cadaveric organ supply makes surviving to transplant ever more risky. On the other hand, patients who receive successful transplants face the consequences of long-term immunosuppression and its potentially life-threatening complications. The donor shortage is forcing difficult decisions that affect all patients who await liver transplantation. It is important to scrutinize carefully the results of all policies that govern allocation and the ethics of the solutions we advocate to ensure that no patient subgroup is being at a disadvantage. Current immunosuppression practices are being challenged by an increasing understanding of the immunologic events triggered by the allograft and the goal to free patients from consequences of a lifetime of immunosuppression. Clinicians can expect, and perhaps require, that new immunosuppressive protocols will address how the planned intervention might be expected to advance the understanding of tolerance mechanisms. As knowledge increases, clinicians can anticipate innovative new immunosuppressive proposals. Calcineurin and steroid-free induction, the use of donor-derived bone marrow infusion, recipient pretreatment, costimulatory blockade, and new antibody induction approaches are all being proposed--often in combination--for clinical trials. Researchers face additional challenges in defining endpoints if the goal is not just the short-term reduction in rejection but the minimization, and eventual discontinuation, of immunosuppressive drugs while maintaining excellent long-term graft function. How much "failure" will be accepted and how will it be defined? How will clinicians interpret liver biopsies if they begin to accept that some lymphocytic infiltrates may be beneficial mediators of the ongoing immune activation necessary for the maintenance of tolerance? How will they adjust immunosuppression practices to the dynamic processes in the immune response that maintain tolerance? Remarkable short-term successes in providing transplants for thousands of children with liver failure have brought these challenges into sharp focus. Clinicians must seek to move the life-giving science of transplantation toward a new goal: providing long lifetimes of excellent graft function with minimal toxicity from immunosuppressive drugs and the hope of freedom from immunosuppression altogether. Pediatric liver recipients, whose grafts have inherent tolerogenic potential and for whom we can anticipate decades of life after transplant, may prove to be an ideal study population to further these goals.