Analysis of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in melanoma tumours in patients treated with dacarbazine-based chemotherapy

Protocatechuic aldehyde acts synergistically with dacarbazine to augment DNA double-strand breaks and promote apoptosis in cutaneous melanoma cells

BACKGROUND

Despite rapid developments in immunotherapy and targeted therapy, dacarbazine (DTIC)-based chemotherapy still has been placed at the first-line for advanced melanoma patients who are after failure of immunotherapy or targeted therapy. However, the limited response rate and survival benefit challenge the DTIC-based chemotherapy for advanced melanoma patients.

METHODS

Two melanoma cell lines, A375 and SK-MEL-28 were cultured with PA and DTIC over a range of concentrations for 72 h and the cell viabilities were detected by CCK8 assay. The Bliss model and ZIP model were used for calculating the synergistic effect of PA and DTIC. DNA double-strand breaks in the two cell lines were examined by the Comet assay, and cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry. The short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown, Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot were performed for molecular analysis.

RESULTS

In the present study, we report that Protocatechuic aldehyde (PA) synergistically enhances the cytotoxicity of DTIC to two melanoma cell lines, A375 and SK-MEL-28. The combination of PA and DTIC augments DNA double-strand breaks and increases cell apoptosis. Further mechanism study reveals that PA destabilizes MGMT protein (O-6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase) through the ubiquitin-proteasome process and directly repairs DTIC-induced genetic lesions. Knockdown of MGMT compromises the synergistic effect between PA and DTIC.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the bioactive compound, Protocatechuic aldehyde, synergistically promotes the cytotoxicity of DTIC to melanoma cells through destabilization of MGMT protein. It could be a potential candidate for melanoma chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy in Cutaneous Melanoma: Is There Still a Role?

Purpose of Review

In the preceding decade, the management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma has been revolutionised with the development of highly effective therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (specifically CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors) and targeted therapies (BRAF and MEK inhibitors). The role of chemotherapy in the contemporary management of melanoma is undefined.

Recent Findings

Extended analyses highlight substantially improved 5-year survival rates of approximately 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with first-line therapies. However, most patients will progress on these first-line treatments. Sequencing of chemotherapy following failure of targeted and immunotherapies is associated with low objective response rates and short progression-free survival, and thus, meaningful benefits to patients are minimal.

Summary

Chemotherapy has limited utility in the contemporary management of cutaneous melanoma (with a few exceptions, discussed herein) and should not be the standard treatment sequence following failure of first-line therapies. Instead, enrolment onto clinical trials should be standard-of-care in these patients.

Molecular analysis of the dual targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor and the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase with a double arm hybrid molecule

Disordered expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been associated with induction of DNA repair genes (e.g. XRCC1, ERCC1) and resistance to radiation and genotoxic drugs. However, our previous work showed that EGFR inhibition did not affect O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-mediated resistance. In order to block uncoupled events associated with EGFR and MGMT, we designed MR30, a single molecule termed “combi-molecule” that contains a quinazoline arm targeted to EGFR and an O⁶-benzylguanine (O⁶-BG) moiety to block MGMT. Molecular analysis of the mechanism of action of its two arms showed that: (a) it could block EGFR phosphorylation, (b) down-regulate the RAF-MAPK and the PI3K-AKT pathways, and (c) covalently modify MGMT through S-benzylation, as confirmed by MALDI analysis of a direct binding assay with isolated MGMT, (d) it induced a dose-dependent down-regulation of MGMT in lung and melanoma cells. The pleiotropic mechanism of action of MR30 culminated into strong growth inhibition (IC₅₀: 0.018-6.02 μM), with superior activity when compared with an equimolar combination of gefitinib (a clinical EGFR inhibitor) and O⁶-BG (a known MGMT inhibitor). Pulse exposure experiments were required to attenuate the contribution of EGFR inhibition to the strong potency of MR30, thereby allowing to achieve the dose level required to sensitize cells to temozolomide (TMZ). Indeed, MR30 significantly sensitized EGFR-MGMT co-expressing cells to TMZ (p<0.05-0.0001). The results in toto suggest that MR30 is the first prototype of agents that may be used against tumours addicted to EGFR and to sensitize resistant tumours co-expressing EGFR and MGMT to TMZ.

Chemotherapy Resistance Mechanisms in Advanced Skin Cancer

Melanoma is a most dangerous and deadly type of skin cancer, and considered intrinsically resistant to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. It has become a major public health concern as the incidence of melanoma has been rising steadily over recent decades with a 5-year survival remaining less than 5%. Detection of the disease in early stage may be curable, but late stage metastatic disease that has spread to other organs has an extremely poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 10 months. Since metastatic melanoma is unresponsive to therapy that is currently available, research is now focused on different treatment strategies such as combinations of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The molecular basis of resistance to chemotherapy seen in melanoma is multifactorial; defective drug transport system, altered apoptotic pathway, deregulation of apoptosis and/or changes in enzymatic systems that mediate cellular metabolic machinery. Understanding of alterations in molecular processes involved in drug resistance may help in developing new therapeutic approaches to treatment of malignant melanoma.

Vulvar and vaginal melanoma: A unique subclass of mucosal melanoma based on a comprehensive molecular analysis of 51 cases compared with 2253 cases of nongynecologic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatments for vulvar and vaginal melanomas (VVMs) have not been identified. Herein, the authors compare molecular profiles between VVM and nongynecologic melanoma (NGM) subtypes with the objective of identifying novel, targetable biomarkers.

METHODS

In total, 2304 samples of malignant melanoma that were submitted to Caris Life Sciences between 2009 and 2015 were reviewed. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were used to assess copy numbers and protein expression of selected genes. Sequenced variants were analyzed using a proprietary cancer panel.

RESULTS

In total, 51 VVMs (14 vaginal and 37 vulvar melanomas) were compared with 2253 malignant NGMs, including 2127 cutaneous, 105 mucosal, and 21 acral melanomas. In VVMs, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) was the most frequently mutated gene (26%) compared with 8.3% of mucosal NGMs (P = .008). In BRAF-mutated tumors, fewer VVMs (50%), compared with NGMs (82.1%), had a variant within the valine codon 600 (V600) domain. The KIT mutation rate was highest in VVMs (22%) compared with 3% in cutaneous (P < .001) and 8.8% in mucosal (P = .05) melanoma subtypes. NRAS mutations were rare in VVMs compared with cutaneous (25.9%; P = .009) and acral (40.6%; P = .002) melanoma subtypes. PD-L1 (56%) and PD-1 (75%) were frequently expressed in VVM, whereas PI3KCA pathway mutations and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor expression were rare. Compared with VVMs that had KIT mutations, wild-type KIT VVMs were more likely to express molecular markers suggestive of platinum resistance (ERCC1), alkylating sensitivity (MGMT), and anthracycline sensitivity (TOP2A).

CONCLUSIONS

The unique molecular features of VVM render this disease a distinct subtype of melanoma. Gene-based molecular therapy and immunotherapies may be promising and should be evaluated in clinical trials. Cancer 2017;123:1333-1344. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Immunohistochemical analysis of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in human melanoma in comparison with skin squamous cell carcinoma

Alkylating agents, often used for chemotherapy in patients with melanoma, can produce O(6)-alkylguanine (O(6)AG) which is related to tumor cell killing after treatment with alkylating agents. O(6)AG is effectively eliminated by O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (O(6)MGMT) and its level is correlative to the resistance to alkylating agents. However, little is known about the relationship of O(6)MGMT to the characteristics of melanoma. This study investigated the expression of O(6)MGMT in 12 melanomas and compared it with that in 11 skin squamous cell cancers (SCCs) immunohistochemically to evaluate the O(6)MGMT activity in melanoma and its clinical significance. All of the SCC samples had high O(6)MGMT expression, while the expression of O(6)MGMT in melanoma was diverse and 4 out of 12 samples had no or extremely low O(6)MGMT activity. Out of 6 lesions obtained from metastasis, 4 had a high O(6)MGMT activity. Two out of 3 cases with a low O(6)MGMT activity in each primary lesion did not show any evidence of metastasis or local recurrence. The evaluation of O(6)MGMT activity in melanoma may, therefore, be useful to determine the characteristics of tumor in each melanoma case. In addition, the present study implies the possibility of selective cancer chemotherapy for melanoma in the near future.

O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in normal tissues and tumors: enzyme activity, promoter methylation and immunohistochemistry

O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a suicide enzyme that repairs the pre-mutagenic, pre-carcinogenic and pre-toxic DNA damage O(6)-methylguanine. It also repairs larger adducts on the O(6)-position of guanine, such as O(6)-[4-oxo-4-(3-pyridyl)butyl]guanine and O(6)-chloroethylguanine. These adducts are formed in response to alkylating environmental pollutants, tobacco-specific carcinogens and methylating (procarbazine, dacarbazine, streptozotocine, and temozolomide) as well as chloroethylating (lomustine, nimustine, carmustine, and fotemustine) anticancer drugs. MGMT is therefore a key node in the defense against commonly found carcinogens, and a marker of resistance of normal and cancer cells exposed to alkylating therapeutics. MGMT also likely protects against therapy-related tumor formation caused by these highly mutagenic drugs. Since the amount of MGMT determines the level of repair of toxic DNA alkylation adducts, the MGMT expression level provides important information as to cancer susceptibility and the success of therapy. In this article, we describe the methods employed for detecting MGMT and review the literature with special focus on MGMT activity in normal and neoplastic tissues. The available data show that the expression of MGMT varies greatly in normal tissues and in some cases this has been related to cancer predisposition. MGMT silencing in tumors is mainly regulated epigenetically and in brain tumors this correlates with a better therapeutic response. Conversely, up-regulation of MGMT during cancer treatment limits the therapeutic response. In malignant melanoma, MGMT is not related to the therapeutic response, which is due to other mechanisms of inherent drug resistance. For most cancers, studies that relate MGMT activity to therapeutic outcome following O(6)-alkylating drugs are still lacking.

Regional treatment strategies for in-transit melanoma metastasis

For in-transit melanoma confined to the extremities, regional chemotherapy in the form of hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion and isolated limb infusion are effective treatment modalities carrying superior response rates to current standard systemic therapy. Despite high response rates, most patients will eventually recur, supporting the role for novel research aimed at improving durable responses and minimizing toxicity. Although the standard cytotoxic agent for regional chemotherapy is melphalan, alternative agents such as temozolomide are currently being tested, with promising preliminary results. Current strategies for improving chemosensitivity to regional chemotherapy are aimed at overcoming classic resistance mechanisms such as drug metabolism and DNA repair, increasing drug delivery, inhibiting tumor-specific angiogenesis, and decreasing the apoptotic threshold of melanoma cells. Concurrent with development and testing of these agents, genomic profiling and biomolecular analysis of acquired tumor tissue may define patterns of tumor resistance and sensitivity from which personalized treatment may be tailored to optimize efficacy. In this article rational strategies for treatment of in-transit melanoma are outlined, with special emphasis on current translational and clinical research efforts.

Genomic and molecular profiling predicts response to temozolomide in melanoma

PURPOSE

Despite objective response rates of only approximately 13%, temozolomide remains one of the most effective single chemotherapy agents against metastatic melanoma, second only to dacarbazine, the current standard of care for systemic treatment of melanoma. The goal of this study was to identify molecular and/or genetic markers that correlate with, and could be used to predict, response to temozolomide-based treatment regimens and that reflect the intrinsic properties of a patient's tumor.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Using a panel of 26 human melanoma-derived cell lines, we determined in vitro temozolomide sensitivity, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) activity, MGMT protein expression and promoter methylation status, and mismatch repair proficiency, as well as the expression profile of 38,000 genes using an oligonucleotide-based microarray platform.

RESULTS

The results showed a broad spectrum of temozolomide sensitivity across the panel of cell lines, with IC(50) values ranging from 100 micromol/L to 1 mmol/L. There was a significant correlation between measured temozolomide sensitivity and a gene expression signature-derived prediction of temozolomide sensitivity (P < 0.005). Notably, MGMT alone showed a significant correlation with temozolomide sensitivity (MGMT activity, P < 0.0001; MGMT expression, P <or= 0.0001). The promoter methylation status of the MGMT gene, however, was not consistent with MGMT gene expression or temozolomide sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that melanoma resistance to temozolomide is conferred predominantly by MGMT activity and suggest that MGMT expression could potentially be a useful tool for predicting the response of melanoma patients to temozolomide therapy.

A phase I study of extended dosing with lomeguatrib with temozolomide in patients with advanced melanoma

Lomeguatrib, an O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase inactivator, was evaluated in an extended dosing regimen with temozolomide, designed according to pharmacodynamic data from previous studies. Patients with unresectable stage 3 or 4 cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma metastases were treated with lomeguatrib 40 mg, b.i.d. for 10 or 14 days and temozolomide 75–100 mg m⁻² on days 1–5. Drugs were administered orally with cycles repeated every 28 days, for up to six cycles. A total of 32 patients were recruited to the study. Lomeguatrib for 10 days with temozolomide 75 mg m⁻² was established as the optimal extended lomeguatrib dosing schedule, with haematological toxicity being dose limiting. There were two partial responses to treatment giving an overall response rate of 6.25%. Extending lomeguatrib administration beyond that of temozolomide requires a reduced dose of the latter agent. Only limited clinical activity was seen, suggesting no advantage for this regimen over conventional temozolomide administration in the treatment of melanoma.

Temozolomide- and fotemustine-induced apoptosis in human malignant melanoma cells: response related to MGMT, MMR, DSBs, and p53

Malignant melanomas are highly resistant to chemotherapy. First-line chemotherapeutics used in melanoma therapy are the methylating agents dacarbazine (DTIC) and temozolomide (TMZ) and the chloroethylating agents BCNU and fotemustine. Here, we determined the mode of cell death in 11 melanoma cell lines upon exposure to TMZ and fotemustine. We show for the first time that TMZ induces apoptosis in melanoma cells, using therapeutic doses. For both TMZ and fotemustine apoptosis is the dominant mode of cell death. The contribution of necrosis to total cell death varied between 10 and 40%. The O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) activity in the cell lines was between 0 and 1100 fmol mg⁻¹ protein, and there was a correlation between MGMT activity and the level of resistance to TMZ and fotemustine. MGMT inactivation by O⁶-benzylguanine sensitized all melanoma cell lines expressing MGMT to TMZ and fotemustine-induced apoptosis, and MGMT transfection attenuated the apoptotic response. This supports that O⁶-alkylguanines are critical lesions involved in the initiation of programmed melanoma cell death. One of the cell lines (MZ7), derived from a patient subjected to DTIC therapy, exhibited a high level of resistance to TMZ without expressing MGMT. This was related to an impaired expression of MSH2 and MSH6. The cells were not cross-resistant to fotemustine. Although these data indicate that methylating drug resistance of melanoma cells can be acquired by down-regulation of mismatch repair, a correlation between MSH2 and MSH6 expression in the different lines and TMZ sensitivity was not found. Apoptosis in melanoma cells induced by TMZ and fotemustine was accompanied by double-strand break (DSB) formation (as determined by H2AX phosphorylation) and caspase-3 and -7 activation as well as PARP cleavage. For TMZ, DSBs correlated significantly with the apoptotic response, whereas for fotemustine a correlation was not found. Melanoma lines expressing p53 wild-type were more resistant to TMZ and fotemustine than p53 mutant melanoma lines, which is in marked contrast to previous data reported for glioma cells treated with TMZ. Overall, the findings are in line with the model that in melanoma cells TMZ-induced O⁶-methylguanine triggers the apoptotic (and necrotic) pathway through DSBs, whereas for chloroethylating agents apoptosis is triggered in a more complex manner.

Mitotic Arrest, Apoptosis, and Sensitization to Chemotherapy of Melanomas by Methionine Deprivation Stress

Methionine deprivation stress (MDS) eliminates mitotic activity in melanoma cells regardless of stage, grade, or TP53 status, whereas it has a negligible effect on normal skin fibroblasts. In most cases, apoptosis accounts for the elimination of up to 90% of tumor cells from the culture within 72 hours after MDS, leaving a scattered population of multinucleated resistant cells. Loss of mitosis in tumor cells is associated with marked reduction of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 1 transcription and/or loss of its active form (CDK1-P-Thr(161)), which is coincident with up-regulation of CDKN1A, CDKN1B, and CDKN1C (p21, p27, and p57). Expression of the proapoptotic LITAF, IFNGR, EREG, TNFSF/TNFRSF10 and TNFRSF12, FAS, and RNASEL is primarily up-regulated/induced in cells destined to undergo apoptosis. Loss of Aurora kinase B and BIRC5, which are required for histone H3 phosphorylation, is associated with the accumulation of surviving multinucleated cells. Nevertheless, noncycling survivors of MDS are sensitized to temozolomide, carmustin, and cisplatin to a much greater extent than normal skin fibroblasts possibly because of the suppression of MGMT/TOP1/POLB, MGMT/RAD52/RAD54, and cMET/RADD52, respectively. Sensitivity to these and additional genotoxic agents and radiation may also be acquired due to loss of cMET/OGG1, reduced glutathione reductase levels, and a G(2)-phase block that is a crucial step in the damage response associated with enhancement of drug toxicity. Although the genes controlling mitotic arrest and/or apoptosis in response to low extracellular methionine levels are unknown, it is likely that such control is exerted via the induction/up-regulation of tumor suppressors/growth inhibitor genes, such as TGFB, PTEN, GAS1, EGR3, BTG3, MDA7, and the proteoglycans (LUM, BGN, and DCN), as well as the down-regulation/loss of function of prosurvival genes, such as NFkappaB, MYC, and ERBB2. Although MDS targets several common genes in tumors, mutational variability among melanomas may decide which metabolic and signal transduction pathways will be activated or shutdown.

Modulation of chemotherapy resistance in regional therapy: a novel therapeutic approach to advanced extremity melanoma using intra-arterial temozolomide in combination with systemic O6-benzylguanine

This study investigated whether the therapeutic index of regional melanoma therapy using parenteral temozolomide could be improved by chemomodulation with O6-benzylguanine (O6BG), an inhibitor of the DNA repair enzyme O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT). Using a nude rat s.c. human melanoma xenograft model of the extremity, tumors were analyzed for AGT level 2 to 3 hours after the i.p. injection of 3.5 to 70.0 mg/kg O6BG to inhibit AGT activity. Survival studies were conducted using animals that were treated with a 15-minute isolated limb infusion with 10% DMSO in PBS (control), temozolomide alone, or temozolomide in conjunction with single or multiple doses of i.p. O6BG. Tumor volume and toxicity level were monitored every other day. Administration of 3.5 mg/kg O6BG depleted tumor AGT activity by 93.5% (P < 0.01). Groups treated with regional temozolomide alone (350 mg/kg), systemic temozolomide with O6BG, or vehicle combined with O6BG showed no significant tumor responses compared with controls. Whereas use of regional temozolomide alone at a higher dose (750 mg/kg) showed some degree of tumor response, regional temozolomide given in conjunction with multiple dosages of O6BG showed a marked (P < 0.01) reduction in tumor growth with minimal toxicity. Our findings suggest that AGT modulation by the administration of O6BG in combination with temozolomide regional chemotherapy leads to a significant improvement in melanoma antitumor responses. Clinical trials using chemotherapy modulation may improve response rates in future regional infusion and perfusion drug trials.

Molecular features of adult glioma associated with patient race/ethnicity, age, and a polymorphism in O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for adult glioma in the San Francisco Bay Area include well-known demographic features such as age and race/ethnicity, and our previous studies indicated that these characteristics are associated with the TP53 mutation status of patients' tumors. We enlarged our study to assess the relationships of risk factors with TP53 as well as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and murine double minute-2 (MDM2) gene amplification and expression and the germ line Leu84Phe polymorphism in the DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT). MGMT expression may depend on the TP53 status of cells.

METHODS

Molecular analyses were carried out on 556 incident astrocytic tumors. MGMT genotype data were collected on germ line DNA from 260 of these cases.

RESULTS

The tumor data confirm the inverse relationships between TP53 mutation and MDM2 (P = 0.04) or EGFR (P = 0.004) amplification and that patients whose tumors contain TP53 mutations are younger than those without (P < 0.001). Although there was little difference in age of patient by EGFR amplification or expression among glioblastoma multiforme cases, EGFR gene amplification was associated with much older age of onset of anaplastic astrocytoma; for example, EGFR-amplified anaplastic astrocytoma cases were on average 63 years old compared with 48 years for nonamplified cases (P = 0.005). An increased prevalence of TP53 mutation positive glioblastoma multiforme was noted among nonwhites (African American and Asian) compared with whites (Latino and non-Latino; P = 0.004). Carriers of the MGMT variant 84Phe allele were significantly less likely to have tumors with TP53 overexpression (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.71) and somewhat less likely to have tumors with any TP53 mutation (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.69) after adjusting for age, gender, and ethnicity. Interestingly, EGFR gene amplification and EGFR protein overexpression were also inversely associated with the MGMT 84Phe allele.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are consistent with ethnic variation in glioma pathogenesis. The data on MGMT show that an inherited factor involving the repair of methylation and other alkylation damage, specifically to the O6 position of guanine, may be associated with the development of tumors that proceed in their development without TP53 mutations or accumulation of TP53 protein and possibly also those that do not involve amplification of the EGFR locus.

DNA repair pathways in drug resistance in melanoma

Metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis due to resistance to multiple chemotherapy regimens. The mainstay of treatment remains dacarbazine, with cisplatin being a commonly used alternative. Melanoma displays marked resistance to the DNA-damaging effects of these drugs. Intrinsic and acquired resistance involves multiple cellular pathways of damage recognition, repair and apoptosis. Increased understanding of these pathways is identifying novel targets that it is hoped will make inroads into the treatment of this lethal disease.

O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase expression and gene polymorphisms in relation to chemotherapeutic response in metastatic melanoma

In a retrospective study, O⁶-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal human anti-MGMT antibody in melanoma metastases in patients receiving dacarbazine (DTIC) as single-drug therapy or as part of combination chemotherapy with DTIC–vindesine or DTIC–vindesine–cisplatin. The correlation of MGMT expression levels with clinical response to chemotherapy was investigated in 79 patients with metastatic melanoma. There was an inverse relationship between MGMT expression and clinical response to DTIC-based chemotherapy (P=0.05). Polymorphisms in the coding region of the MGMT gene were also investigated in tumours from 52 melanoma patients by PCR/SSCP and nucleotide sequence analyses. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in exon 3 (L53L and L84F) and in exon 5 (I143V/K178R) were identified. There were no differences in the frequencies of these polymorphisms between these melanoma patients and patients with familial melanoma or healthy Swedish individuals. Functional analysis of variants MGMT-I143V and -I143V/K178R was performed by in vitro mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. There was no evidence that these variants decreased the MGMT DNA repair activity compared to the wild-type protein. All melanoma patients with the MGMT 53/84 polymorphism except one had tumours with high MGMT expression. There was no significant correlation between any of the MGMT polymorphisms and clinical response to chemotherapy, although an indication of a lower response rate in patients with SNPs in exon 5 was obtained. Thus, MGMT expression appears to be more related to response to chemotherapy than MGMT polymorphisms in patients with metastatic melanoma.