1
|
Tenório MDL, Araujo JMS, de Melo EV, Cazzaniga RA, Aragão ALF, Valois LQ, Severo J, Santos-Filho MAA, Menezes-Silva L, Machado JA, Reed SG, Duthie MS, de Almeida RP, Bezerra-Santos M, de Jesus AR. Association between asthma, rhinitis and atopic dermatitis with leprosy: A case-control study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2023; 89:834-841. [PMID: 37067141 DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_347_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Considering the cross-regulation of Th1 and Th2 responses, we hypothesised that atopic diseases (Th2) inhibit the protective Th1 immune response to Mycobacterium leprae and exacerbates leprosy. Objective In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between leprosy and atopic diseases. Methods To evaluate the association of atopic diseases with leprosy, we conducted a case-control study that included leprosy patients (n = 333) and their household contacts (n = 93). The questionnaire from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood, which is validated in several countries for epidemiological diagnosis of atopic diseases, was applied to determine the occurrence of atopic diseases, allergic rhinitis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis among leprosy patients and the household contacts. Results Considering clinical and epidemiological data, among the leprosy group 51.6% (n = 172) were determined to have at least one atopic disease, while atopy was observed less frequently at 40.86% among household contacts (n = 38). When two or more atopic diseases were assessed, the frequency was significantly higher among the leprosy patients than in the household contacts (21.9% vs. 11.8%; P-value = 0.03). Likewise, the frequency of asthma was significantly higher among leprosy patients (21%) than in the household contacts (10.8%; P-value = 0.02). Thus, our analyses revealed an association of atopic diseases with leprosy, with a significant linear increase in the occurrence of leprosy with an increase in the number of atopic diseases (P-value = 0.01). Limitation Due to the difficulties in recruiting household contacts that have prolonged contact with patients, but are not genetically related to the patient, the household contacts group is smaller than the leprosy patient group. Conclusion The data reveal an association between atopic diseases and leprosy outcomes. This knowledge could improve the treatment of leprosy patients with co-incident atopic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Débora Lira Tenório
- Department of Medicine, Dermathology Clinic, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Jonnia Maria Sherlock Araujo
- Department of Medicine, Dermathology Clinic, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Enaldo Vieira de Melo
- Department of Medicine, Dermathology Clinic, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Anselmo Cazzaniga
- Immunology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Ana-Luiza Furtado Aragão
- Department of Medicine, Dermathology Clinic, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Laís Quadros Valois
- Department of Medicine, Dermathology Clinic, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Joanna Severo
- Immunology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | | | - Lucas Menezes-Silva
- Immunology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Julianne Alves Machado
- Clinical Immunology Clinic, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Steven G Reed
- Department of Vaccines, Host Directed Therapeutics (HDT) Bio Corp, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Malcolm S Duthie
- Department of Vaccines, Host Directed Therapeutics (HDT) Bio Corp, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Roque Pacheco de Almeida
- Immunology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Marcio Bezerra-Santos
- Immunology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| | - Amélia Ribeiro de Jesus
- Immunology and Molecular Biology Laboratory, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kelleher MM, Phillips R, Brown SJ, Cro S, Cornelius V, Carlsen KCL, Skjerven HO, Rehbinder EM, Lowe AJ, Dissanayake E, Shimojo N, Yonezawa K, Ohya Y, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Morita K, Axon E, Cork M, Cooke A, Van Vogt E, Schmitt J, Weidinger S, McClanahan D, Simpson E, Duley L, Askie LM, Williams HC, Boyle RJ. Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 11:CD013534. [PMID: 36373988 PMCID: PMC9661877 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013534.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema and food allergy are common health conditions that usually begin in early childhood and often occur in the same people. They can be associated with an impaired skin barrier in early infancy. It is unclear whether trying to prevent or reverse an impaired skin barrier soon after birth is effective for preventing eczema or food allergy. OBJECTIVES Primary objective To assess the effects of skin care interventions such as emollients for primary prevention of eczema and food allergy in infants. Secondary objective To identify features of study populations such as age, hereditary risk, and adherence to interventions that are associated with the greatest treatment benefit or harm for both eczema and food allergy. SEARCH METHODS We performed an updated search of the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in September 2021. We searched two trials registers in July 2021. We checked the reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews, and scanned conference proceedings to identify further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs of skin care interventions that could potentially enhance skin barrier function, reduce dryness, or reduce subclinical inflammation in healthy term (> 37 weeks) infants (≤ 12 months) without pre-existing eczema, food allergy, or other skin condition. Eligible comparisons were standard care in the locality or no treatment. Types of skin care interventions could include moisturisers/emollients; bathing products; advice regarding reducing soap exposure and bathing frequency; and use of water softeners. No minimum follow-up was required. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures, and primary analyses used the IPD dataset. Primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of eczema and cumulative incidence of immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated food allergy by one to three years, both measured at the closest available time point to two years. Secondary outcomes included adverse events during the intervention period; eczema severity (clinician-assessed); parent report of eczema severity; time to onset of eczema; parent report of immediate food allergy; and allergic sensitisation to food or inhalant allergen. MAIN RESULTS We identified 33 RCTs comprising 25,827 participants. Of these, 17 studies randomising 5823 participants reported information on one or more outcomes specified in this review. We included 11 studies, randomising 5217 participants, in one or more meta-analyses (range 2 to 9 studies per individual meta-analysis), with 10 of these studies providing IPD; the remaining 6 studies were included in the narrative results only. Most studies were conducted at children's hospitals. Twenty-five studies, including all those contributing data to meta-analyses, randomised newborns up to age three weeks to receive a skin care intervention or standard infant skin care. Eight of the 11 studies contributing to meta-analyses recruited infants at high risk of developing eczema or food allergy, although the definition of high risk varied between studies. Durations of intervention and follow-up ranged from 24 hours to three years. All interventions were compared against no skin care intervention or local standard care. Of the 17 studies that reported information on our prespecified outcomes, 13 assessed emollients. We assessed most of the evidence in the review as low certainty and had some concerns about risk of bias. A rating of some concerns was most often due to lack of blinding of outcome assessors or significant missing data, which could have impacted outcome measurement but was judged unlikely to have done so. We assessed the evidence for the primary food allergy outcome as high risk of bias due to the inclusion of only one trial, where findings varied based on different assumptions about missing data. Skin care interventions during infancy probably do not change the risk of eczema by one to three years of age (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.31; risk difference 5 more cases per 1000 infants, 95% CI 28 less to 47 more; moderate-certainty evidence; 3075 participants, 7 trials) or time to onset of eczema (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.14; moderate-certainty evidence; 3349 participants, 9 trials). Skin care interventions during infancy may increase the risk of IgE-mediated food allergy by one to three years of age (RR 2.53, 95% CI 0.99 to 6.49; low-certainty evidence; 976 participants, 1 trial) but may not change risk of allergic sensitisation to a food allergen by age one to three years (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.71; low-certainty evidence; 1794 participants, 3 trials). Skin care interventions during infancy may slightly increase risk of parent report of immediate reaction to a common food allergen at two years (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.61; low-certainty evidence; 1171 participants, 1 trial); however, this was only seen for cow's milk, and may be unreliable due to over-reporting of milk allergy in infants. Skin care interventions during infancy probably increase risk of skin infection over the intervention period (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.75; risk difference 17 more cases per 1000 infants, 95% CI one more to 38 more; moderate-certainty evidence; 2728 participants, 6 trials) and may increase the risk of infant slippage over the intervention period (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.99; low-certainty evidence; 2538 participants, 4 trials) and stinging/allergic reactions to moisturisers (RR 2.24, 95% 0.67 to 7.43; low-certainty evidence; 343 participants, 4 trials), although CIs for slippages and stinging/allergic reactions were wide and include the possibility of no effect or reduced risk. Preplanned subgroup analyses showed that the effects of interventions were not influenced by age, duration of intervention, hereditary risk, filaggrin (FLG) mutation, chromosome 11 intergenic variant rs2212434, or classification of intervention type for risk of developing eczema. We could not evaluate these effects on risk of food allergy. Evidence was insufficient to show whether adherence to interventions influenced the relationship between skin care interventions and eczema or food allergy development. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on low- to moderate-certainty evidence, skin care interventions such as emollients during the first year of life in healthy infants are probably not effective for preventing eczema; may increase risk of food allergy; and probably increase risk of skin infection. Further study is needed to understand whether different approaches to infant skin care might prevent eczema or food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeve M Kelleher
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Section of Inflammation and Repair, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Phillips
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sara J Brown
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Suzie Cro
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Karin C Lødrup Carlsen
- Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Håvard O Skjerven
- Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva M Rehbinder
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Adrian J Lowe
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eishika Dissanayake
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Naoki Shimojo
- Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kaori Yonezawa
- Department of Midwifery and Women's Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Ohya
- Allergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kumiko Morita
- Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Emma Axon
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael Cork
- Sheffield Dermatology Research, Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Cooke
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eleanor Van Vogt
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technischen Universität (TU) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephan Weidinger
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Scheswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Danielle McClanahan
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Eric Simpson
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Lelia Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lisa M Askie
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Robert J Boyle
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Section of Inflammation and Repair, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Cochrane Skin, Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lax SJ, Harvey J, Axon E, Howells L, Santer M, Ridd MJ, Lawton S, Langan S, Roberts A, Ahmed A, Muller I, Ming LC, Panda S, Chernyshov P, Carter B, Williams HC, Thomas KS, Chalmers JR. Strategies for using topical corticosteroids in children and adults with eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 3:CD013356. [PMID: 35275399 PMCID: PMC8916090 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013356.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema is a common skin condition. Although topical corticosteroids have been a first-line treatment for eczema for decades, there are uncertainties over their optimal use. OBJECTIVES To establish the effectiveness and safety of different ways of using topical corticosteroids for treating eczema. SEARCH METHODS We searched databases to January 2021 (Cochrane Skin Specialised Register; CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; GREAT) and five clinical trials registers. We checked bibliographies from included trials to identify further trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials in adults and children with eczema that compared at least two strategies of topical corticosteroid use. We excluded placebo comparisons, other than for trials that evaluated proactive versus reactive treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods, with GRADE certainty of evidence for key findings. Primary outcomes were changes in clinician-reported signs and relevant local adverse events. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported symptoms and relevant systemic adverse events. For local adverse events, we prioritised abnormal skin thinning as a key area of concern for healthcare professionals and patients. MAIN RESULTS We included 104 trials (8443 participants). Most trials were conducted in high-income countries (81/104), most likely in outpatient or other hospital settings. We judged only one trial to be low risk of bias across all domains. Fifty-five trials had high risk of bias in at least one domain, mostly due to lack of blinding or missing outcome data. Stronger-potency versus weaker-potency topical corticosteroids Sixty-three trials compared different potencies of topical corticosteroids: 12 moderate versus mild, 22 potent versus mild, 25 potent versus moderate, and 6 very potent versus potent. Trials were usually in children with moderate or severe eczema, where specified, lasting one to five weeks. The most reported outcome was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of clinician-reported signs of eczema. We pooled four trials that compared moderate- versus mild-potency topical corticosteroids (420 participants). Moderate-potency topical corticosteroids probably result in more participants achieving treatment success, defined as cleared or marked improvement on IGA (52% versus 34%; odds ratio (OR) 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41 to 3.04; moderate-certainty evidence). We pooled nine trials that compared potent versus mild-potency topical corticosteroids (392 participants). Potent topical corticosteroids probably result in a large increase in number achieving treatment success (70% versus 39%; OR 3.71, 95% CI 2.04 to 6.72; moderate-certainty evidence). We pooled 15 trials that compared potent versus moderate-potency topical corticosteroids (1053 participants). There was insufficient evidence of a benefit of potent topical corticosteroids compared to moderate topical corticosteroids (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.89; moderate-certainty evidence). We pooled three trials that compared very potent versus potent topical corticosteroids (216 participants). The evidence is uncertain with a wide confidence interval (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.09; low-certainty evidence). Twice daily or more versus once daily application We pooled 15 of 25 trials in this comparison (1821 participants, all reported IGA). The trials usually assessed adults and children with moderate or severe eczema, where specified, using potent topical corticosteroids, lasting two to six weeks. Applying potent topical corticosteroids only once a day probably does not decrease the number achieving treatment success compared to twice daily application (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.38; 15 trials, 1821 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Local adverse events Within the trials that tested 'treating eczema flare-up' strategies, we identified only 26 cases of abnormal skin thinning from 2266 participants (1% across 22 trials). Most cases were from the use of higher-potency topical corticosteroids (16 with very potent, 6 with potent, 2 with moderate and 2 with mild). We assessed this evidence as low certainty, except for very potent versus potent topical corticosteroids, which was very low-certainty evidence. Longer versus shorter-term duration of application for induction of remission No trials were identified. Twice weekly application (weekend, or 'proactive therapy') to prevent relapse (flare-ups) versus no topical corticosteroids/reactive application Nine trials assessed this comparison, generally lasting 16 to 20 weeks. We pooled seven trials that compared weekend (proactive) topical corticosteroids therapy versus no topical corticosteroids (1179 participants, children and adults with a range of eczema severities, though mainly moderate or severe). Weekend (proactive) therapy probably results in a large decrease in likelihood of a relapse from 58% to 25% (risk ratio (RR) 0.43, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.57; 7 trials, 1149 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Local adverse events We did not identify any cases of abnormal skin thinning in seven trials that assessed skin thinning (1050 participants) at the end of treatment. We assessed this evidence as low certainty. Other comparisons Other comparisons included newer versus older preparations of topical corticosteroids (15 trials), cream versus ointment (7 trials), topical corticosteroids with wet wrap versus no wet wrap (6 trials), number of days per week applied (4 trials), different concentrations of the same topical corticosteroids (2 trials), time of day applied (2 trials), topical corticosteroids alternating with topical calcineurin inhibitors versus topical corticosteroids alone (1 trial), application to wet versus dry skin (1 trial) and application before versus after emollient (1 trial). No trials compared branded versus generic topical corticosteroids and time between application of emollient and topical corticosteroids. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Potent and moderate topical corticosteroids are probably more effective than mild topical corticosteroids, primarily in moderate or severe eczema; however, there is uncertain evidence to support any advantage of very potent over potent topical corticosteroids. Effectiveness is similar between once daily and twice daily (or more) frequent use of potent topical corticosteroids to treat eczema flare-ups, and topical corticosteroids weekend (proactive) therapy is probably better than no topical corticosteroids/reactive use to prevent eczema relapse (flare-ups). Adverse events were not well reported and came largely from low- or very low-certainty, short-term trials. In trials that reported abnormal skin thinning, frequency was low overall and increased with increasing potency. We found no trials on the optimum duration of treatment of a flare, branded versus generic topical corticosteroids, and time to leave between application of topical corticosteroids and emollient. There is a need for longer-term trials, in people with mild eczema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J Lax
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jane Harvey
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emma Axon
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Laura Howells
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Miriam Santer
- Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Sandra Lawton
- Department of Dermatology, Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK
| | - Sinéad Langan
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Nottingham Support Group for Carers of Children with Eczema, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amina Ahmed
- c/o Cochrane Skin Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ingrid Muller
- Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Long Chiau Ming
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam
| | - Saumya Panda
- Department of Dermatology, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India
| | - Pavel Chernyshov
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National Medical University, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - Ben Carter
- Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joanne R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Okoji UK, Agim NG, Heath CR. Features of Common Skin Disorders in Pediatric Patients with Skin of Color. Dermatol Clin 2021; 40:83-93. [PMID: 34799038 DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Many dermatologic conditions common in the pediatric population may have unique presentations in skin of color or occur with greater incidence. This may be due to ethnic origin, socioeconomic factors, or other influences. Awareness of the potential variations in skin of color may enhance prompt diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and/or reassurance as indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uchenna K Okoji
- Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 West Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA
| | - Nnenna G Agim
- University of Texas Southwestern, 2350 North Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX 75220, USA
| | - Candrice R Heath
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, 3401 North Broad Street, 5-OPB Dermatology, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kelleher MM, Cro S, Cornelius V, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Skjerven HO, Rehbinder EM, Lowe AJ, Dissanayake E, Shimojo N, Yonezawa K, Ohya Y, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Morita K, Axon E, Surber C, Cork M, Cooke A, Tran L, Van Vogt E, Schmitt J, Weidinger S, McClanahan D, Simpson E, Duley L, Askie LM, Chalmers JR, Williams HC, Boyle RJ. Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 2:CD013534. [PMID: 33545739 PMCID: PMC8094581 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013534.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema and food allergy are common health conditions that usually begin in early childhood and often occur together in the same people. They can be associated with an impaired skin barrier in early infancy. It is unclear whether trying to prevent or reverse an impaired skin barrier soon after birth is effective in preventing eczema or food allergy. OBJECTIVES Primary objective To assess effects of skin care interventions, such as emollients, for primary prevention of eczema and food allergy in infants Secondary objective To identify features of study populations such as age, hereditary risk, and adherence to interventions that are associated with the greatest treatment benefit or harm for both eczema and food allergy. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to July 2020: Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We searched two trials registers and checked reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We contacted field experts to identify planned trials and to seek information about unpublished or incomplete trials. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs of skin care interventions that could potentially enhance skin barrier function, reduce dryness, or reduce subclinical inflammation in healthy term (> 37 weeks) infants (0 to 12 months) without pre-existing diagnosis of eczema, food allergy, or other skin condition were included. Comparison was standard care in the locality or no treatment. Types of skin care interventions included moisturisers/emollients; bathing products; advice regarding reducing soap exposure and bathing frequency; and use of water softeners. No minimum follow-up was required. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures, and primary analyses used the IPD dataset. Primary outcomes were cumulative incidence of eczema and cumulative incidence of immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated food allergy by one to three years, both measured by the closest available time point to two years. Secondary outcomes included adverse events during the intervention period; eczema severity (clinician-assessed); parent report of eczema severity; time to onset of eczema; parent report of immediate food allergy; and allergic sensitisation to food or inhalant allergen. MAIN RESULTS This review identified 33 RCTs, comprising 25,827 participants. A total of 17 studies, randomising 5823 participants, reported information on one or more outcomes specified in this review. Eleven studies randomising 5217 participants, with 10 of these studies providing IPD, were included in one or more meta-analysis (range 2 to 9 studies per individual meta-analysis). Most studies were conducted at children's hospitals. All interventions were compared against no skin care intervention or local standard care. Of the 17 studies that reported our outcomes, 13 assessed emollients. Twenty-five studies, including all those contributing data to meta-analyses, randomised newborns up to age three weeks to receive a skin care intervention or standard infant skin care. Eight of the 11 studies contributing to meta-analyses recruited infants at high risk of developing eczema or food allergy, although definition of high risk varied between studies. Durations of intervention and follow-up ranged from 24 hours to two years. We assessed most of this review's evidence as low certainty or had some concerns of risk of bias. A rating of some concerns was most often due to lack of blinding of outcome assessors or significant missing data, which could have impacted outcome measurement but was judged unlikely to have done so. Evidence for the primary food allergy outcome was rated as high risk of bias due to inclusion of only one trial where findings varied when different assumptions were made about missing data. Skin care interventions during infancy probably do not change risk of eczema by one to two years of age (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.31; moderate-certainty evidence; 3075 participants, 7 trials) nor time to onset of eczema (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.14; moderate-certainty evidence; 3349 participants, 9 trials). It is unclear whether skin care interventions during infancy change risk of IgE-mediated food allergy by one to two years of age (RR 2.53, 95% CI 0.99 to 6.47; 996 participants, 1 trial) or allergic sensitisation to a food allergen at age one to two years (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.28 to 2.69; 1055 participants, 2 trials) due to very low-certainty evidence for these outcomes. Skin care interventions during infancy may slightly increase risk of parent report of immediate reaction to a common food allergen at two years (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.61; low-certainty evidence; 1171 participants, 1 trial). However, this was only seen for cow's milk, and may be unreliable due to significant over-reporting of cow's milk allergy in infants. Skin care interventions during infancy probably increase risk of skin infection over the intervention period (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.77; moderate-certainty evidence; 2728 participants, 6 trials) and may increase risk of infant slippage over the intervention period (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.99; low-certainty evidence; 2538 participants, 4 trials) or stinging/allergic reactions to moisturisers (RR 2.24, 95% 0.67 to 7.43; low-certainty evidence; 343 participants, 4 trials), although confidence intervals for slippages and stinging/allergic reactions are wide and include the possibility of no effect or reduced risk. Preplanned subgroup analyses show that effects of interventions were not influenced by age, duration of intervention, hereditary risk, FLG mutation, or classification of intervention type for risk of developing eczema. We could not evaluate these effects on risk of food allergy. Evidence was insufficient to show whether adherence to interventions influenced the relationship between skin care interventions and risk of developing eczema or food allergy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Skin care interventions such as emollients during the first year of life in healthy infants are probably not effective for preventing eczema, and probably increase risk of skin infection. Effects of skin care interventions on risk of food allergy are uncertain. Further work is needed to understand whether different approaches to infant skin care might promote or prevent eczema and to evaluate effects on food allergy based on robust outcome assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeve M Kelleher
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Section of Inflammation and Repair, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Suzie Cro
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Karin C Lodrup Carlsen
- Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Håvard O Skjerven
- Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva M Rehbinder
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Adrian J Lowe
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eishika Dissanayake
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Naoki Shimojo
- Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kaori Yonezawa
- Department of Midwifery and Women's Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Ohya
- Allergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kumiko Morita
- Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Emma Axon
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christian Surber
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Cork
- Sheffield Dermatology Research, Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Cooke
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lien Tran
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Van Vogt
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technischen Universität (TU) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephan Weidinger
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Scheswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Danielle McClanahan
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Eric Simpson
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Lelia Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lisa M Askie
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Joanne R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Robert J Boyle
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Section of Inflammation and Repair, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sawangjit R, Dilokthornsakul P, Lloyd-Lavery A, Lai NM, Dellavalle R, Chaiyakunapruk N. Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 9:CD013206. [PMID: 32927498 PMCID: PMC8128359 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013206.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema is a common and chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disorder. It seriously impacts quality of life and economic outcomes, especially for those with moderate to severe eczema. Various treatments allow sustained control of the disease; however, their relative benefit remains unclear due to the limited number of trials directly comparing treatments. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of different types of systemic immunosuppressive treatments for moderate to severe eczema using NMA and to generate rankings of available systemic immunosuppressive treatments for eczema according to their efficacy and safety. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to August 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic immunosuppressive agents for moderate to severe atopic eczema when compared against placebo or any other eligible eczema treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We synthesised data using pair-wise analysis and NMA to compare treatments and rank them according to their effectiveness. Effectiveness was assessed primarily by determining the proportion of participants who achieved at least 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) and improvement in the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Safety was evaluated primarily by considering the proportion of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs) and infection. We deemed short-term follow-up as ≤ 16 weeks and long-term follow-up as > 16 weeks. We assessed the certainty of the body of evidence from the NMA for these primary outcomes using six domains of CiNEMA grading. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 74 studies, with 8177 randomised participants. Approximately 55% of participants were male, with average age of 32 years (range 2 to 84 years), although age and gender were unreported for 419 and 902 participants, respectively. Most of the included trials were placebo controlled (65%), 34% were head-to-head studies (15% assessed the effects of different doses of the same drug), and 1% were multi-armed studies with both an active comparator and a placebo. All trials included participants with moderate to severe eczema, but 62% of studies did not separate data by severity; 38% of studies assessed only severe eczema. The total duration of included trials ranged from 2 weeks to 60 months, whereas treatment duration varied from a single dose (CIM331, KPL-716) to 60 months (methotrexate (MTX)). Seventy studies were available for quantitative synthesis; this review assessed 29 immunosuppressive agents from three classes of interventions. These included (1) conventional treatments, with ciclosporin assessed most commonly; (2) small molecule treatments, including phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors; and (3) biological treatments, including anti-CD31 receptors, anti-interleukin (IL)-22, anti-IL-31, anti-IL-13, anti-IL-12/23p40, anti-OX40, anti-TSLP, anti-CRTH2, and anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibodies, but most commonly dupilumab. Most trials (73) assessed outcomes at a short-term duration ranging from 2 to 16 weeks, whereas 33 trials assessed long-term outcomes, with duration ranging from 5 to 60 months. All participants were from a hospital setting. Fifty-two studies declared a source of funding, and of these, pharmaceutical companies funded 88%. We rated 37 studies as high risk; 21, unclear risk, and 16, low risk of bias, with studies most commonly at high risk of attrition bias. Network meta-analysis suggests that dupilumab ranks first for effectiveness when compared with other biological treatments. Dupilumab is more effective than placebo in achieving EASI75 (risk ratio (RR) 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.51 to 3.69) and improvement in POEM score (mean difference 7.30, 95% CI 6.61 to 8.00) at short-term follow-up (high-certainty evidence). Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain of the effects of dupilumab when compared with placebo, in terms of the proportion of participants who achieve EASI75 (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.60) at longer-term follow-up. Low-certainty evidence indicates that tralokinumab may be more effective than placebo in achieving short-term EASI75 (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.34), but there was no evidence for tralokinumab to allow us to assess short-term follow-up of POEM or long-term follow-up of EASI75. We are uncertain of the effect of ustekinumab compared with placebo in achieving EASI75 (long-term follow-up: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.45; short-term follow-up: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.28 to 2.97; both very low certainty). We found no evidence on ustekinumab for the POEM outcome. We are uncertain whether other immunosuppressive agents that targeted our key outcomes influence the achievement of short-term EASI75 compared with placebo due to low- or very low-certainty evidence. Dupilumab and ustekinumab were the only immunosuppressive agents evaluated for longer-term EASI75. Dupilumab was the only agent evaluated for improvement in POEM during short-term follow-up. Low- to moderate-certainty evidence indicates a lower proportion of participants with SAEs after treatment with QAW039 and dupilumab compared to placebo during short-term follow-up, but low- to very low-certainty evidence suggests no difference in SAEs during short-term follow-up of other immunosuppressive agents compared to placebo. Evidence for effects of immunosuppressive agents on risk of any infection during short-term follow-up and SAEs during long-term follow-up compared with placebo was of low or very low certainty but did not indicate a difference. We did not identify differences in other adverse events (AEs), but dupilumab is associated with specific AEs, including eye inflammation and eosinophilia. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that dupilumab is the most effective biological treatment for eczema. Compared to placebo, dupilumab reduces eczema signs and symptoms in the short term for people with moderate to severe atopic eczema. Short-term safety outcomes from clinical trials did not reveal new safety concerns with dupilumab. Overall, evidence for the efficacy of most other immunosuppressive treatments for moderate to severe atopic eczema is of low or very low certainty. Given the lack of data comparing conventional with newer biological treatments for the primary outcomes, there remains high uncertainty for ranking the efficacy and safety of conventional treatments such as ciclosporin and biological treatments such as dupilumab. Most studies were placebo-controlled and assessed only short-term efficacy of immunosuppressive agents. Further adequately powered head-to-head RCTs should evaluate comparative long-term efficacy and safety of available treatments for moderate to severe eczema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ratree Sawangjit
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand
| | - Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
| | - Antonia Lloyd-Lavery
- Department of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Nai Ming Lai
- School of Medicine, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | | | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kelleher MM, Cro S, Cornelius V, Axon E, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Skjerven HO, Rehbinder EM, Lowe A, Dissanayake E, Shimojo N, Yonezawa K, Ohya Y, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Morita K, Surber C, Cork M, Cooke A, Tran L, Askie LM, Duley L, Chalmers JR, Williams HC, Boyle RJ. Skincare interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maeve M Kelleher
- Imperial College London; Department of Medicine, Section of Paediatrics; St Mary's Campus London UK
| | - Suzie Cro
- Imperial College London; Imperial Clinical Trials Unit; 1st Floor, Stadium House 68 Wood Lane London UK W12 7RH
| | - Victoria Cornelius
- Imperial College London; Imperial Clinical Trials Unit; 1st Floor, Stadium House 68 Wood Lane London UK W12 7RH
| | - Emma Axon
- University of Nottingham; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; King's Meadow Campus Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| | - Karin C Lodrup Carlsen
- Oslo University Hospital; Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine; Oslo Norway NO-0424
- University of Oslo; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine; PO Box 4956 Nydalen Oslo Norway NO-0424
| | - Håvard Ove Skjerven
- Oslo University Hospital; Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine; Oslo Norway NO-0424
| | - Eva Maria Rehbinder
- University of Oslo; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine; PO Box 4956 Nydalen Oslo Norway NO-0424
- Oslo University Hospital; Department of Dermatology; Oslo Norway
| | - Adrian Lowe
- University of Melbourne; Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia 3053
| | - Eishika Dissanayake
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Department of Pediatrics; Madison Wisconsin USA
| | - Naoki Shimojo
- Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University; Department of Pediatrics; 1-8-1 Inohana Chuo-Ku Chiba Japan 260-8670
| | - Kaori Yonezawa
- Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo; Department of Midwifery and Women's Health; Tokyo Japan
| | - Yukihiro Ohya
- National Center for Child Health and Development; Allergy Center; Tokyo Japan 157-8535
| | | | - Kumiko Morita
- Keio University School of Medicine; Department of Pediatrics; Tokyo Japan
| | - Christian Surber
- University Hospital Zurich; Department of Dermatology; Gloriastrasse 31 Zurich Switzerland 8091
- University Hospital Basel; Department of Dermatology; Petersgraben 4 Basel Switzerland 4031
| | - Michael Cork
- The University of Sheffield; Sheffield Dermatology Research, Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease; Beech Hill Road Sheffield UK S10 2RX
| | - Alison Cooke
- The University of Manchester; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences; Room 4.338, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road Manchester UK M13 9PL
| | - Lien Tran
- Imperial College London; Imperial Clinical Trials Unit; 1st Floor, Stadium House 68 Wood Lane London UK W12 7RH
| | - Lisa M Askie
- University of Sydney; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre; Locked Bag 77 Camperdown NSW Australia 2050
| | - Lelia Duley
- Nottingham Health Science Partners; Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit; C Floor, South Block Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham UK NG7 2UH
| | - Joanne R Chalmers
- University of Nottingham; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; King's Meadow Campus Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| | - Hywel C Williams
- University of Nottingham; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; King's Meadow Campus Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| | - Robert J Boyle
- Imperial College London; Department of Medicine, Section of Paediatrics; St Mary's Campus London UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu X, van Galen LS, Koh MJA, Bajpai R, Thng S, Yew YW, Ho VPY, Alagappan U, Järbrink KSA, Car J. Factors influencing quality of life in children with atopic dermatitis and their caregivers: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2019; 9:15990. [PMID: 31690745 PMCID: PMC6831568 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51129-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Better understanding of atopic dermatitis' effect on quality of life could enhance current management and therapeutic strategies. Studies investigating factors related to the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of children with atopic dermatitis and their caregivers are limited. This cross-sectional study included 559 children (<16 years) with atopic dermatitis and their caregivers. Disease severity was associated with infants' HRQOL (moderate: IRR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.67; severe: IRR: 1.72, 95% CI 1.32-2.24). Age and disease severity were associated with children's HRQOL (age: IRR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00; moderate: IRR: 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14). Quality of life subdomains itching/scratching, emotional distress and sleep disturbance were most reported and increased with higher disease severity. Both caregivers' mental and physical health were negatively affected by children's HRQOL (physical: IRR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00; mental: IRR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99). Sociodemographic characteristics (gender, ethnicity, educational attainment of carers, number of children) did not demonstrate significance in children's HRQOL model. In conclusion, current atopic dermatitis diagnostics and treatment have to be extended to the factors influencing both children' as their caregivers' quality of life and adapting management accordingly. Itching/scratching, emotional distress and sleep disturbance deserve attention. Sociodemographic characteristics in children's HRQOL models also merit attention in further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomeng Xu
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Louise Sandra van Galen
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.,Section of Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Jean Aan Koh
- Dermatology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ram Bajpai
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Yik Weng Yew
- National Skin Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Skin Research Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Uma Alagappan
- Dermatology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Krister Sven Ake Järbrink
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Josip Car
- Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
George SMC, Karanovic S, Harrison DA, Rani A, Birnie AJ, Bath‐Hextall FJ, Ravenscroft JC, Williams HC. Interventions to reduce Staphylococcus aureus in the management of eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD003871. [PMID: 31684694 PMCID: PMC6818407 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003871.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) can cause secondary infection in eczema, and may promote inflammation in eczema that does not look infected. There is no standard intervention to reduce S. aureus burden in eczema. It is unclear whether antimicrobial treatments help eczema or promote bacterial resistance. This is an update of a 2008 Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to reduce S. aureus for treating eczema. SEARCH METHODS We updated our searches of the following databases to October 2018: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS. We searched five trials registers and three sets of conference proceedings. We checked references of trials and reviews for further relevant studies. We contacted pharmaceutical companies regarding ongoing and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of products intended to reduce S. aureus on the skin in people diagnosed with atopic eczema by a medical practitioner. Eligible comparators were a similar treatment regimen without the anti-staphylococcal agent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our key outcomes were participant- or assessor-rated global improvement in symptoms/signs, quality of life (QOL), severe adverse events requiring withdrawal, minor adverse events, and emergence of antibiotic-resistant micro-organisms. MAIN RESULTS We included 41 studies (1753 analysed participants) covering 10 treatment categories. Studies were conducted mainly in secondary care in Western Europe; North America; the Far East; and elsewhere. Twelve studies recruited children; four, adults; 19, both; and six, unclear. Fifty-nine per cent of the studies reported the mean age of participants (range: 1.1 to 34.6 years). Eczema severity ranged from mild to severe. Many studies did not report our primary outcomes. Treatment durations ranged from 10 minutes to 3 months; total study durations ranged from 15 weeks to 27 months. We considered 33 studies at high risk of bias in at least one domain. We present results for three key comparisons. All time point measurements were taken from baseline. We classed outcomes as short-term when treatment duration was less than four weeks, and long-term when treatment was given for more than four weeks. Fourteen studies evaluated topical steroid/antibiotic combinations compared to topical steroids alone (infective status: infected (two studies), not infected (four studies), unspecified (eight studies)). Topical steroid/antibiotic combinations may lead to slightly greater global improvement in good or excellent signs/symptoms than topical steroid alone at 6 to 28 days follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.21; 224 participants; 3 studies, low-quality evidence). There is probably little or no difference between groups for QOL in children, at 14 days follow-up (mean difference (MD) -0.18, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.04; 42 participants; 1 study, moderate-quality evidence). The subsequent results for this comparison were based on very low-quality evidence, meaning we are uncertain of their validity: severe adverse events were rare (follow-up: between 6 to 28 days): both groups reported flare of dermatitis, worsening of the condition, and folliculitis (325 participants; 4 studies). There were fewer minor adverse events (e.g. flare, stinging, itch, folliculitis) in the combination group at 14 days follow-up (218 participants; 2 studies). One study reported antibiotic resistance in children at three months follow-up, with similar results between the groups (65 participants; 1 study). Four studies evaluated oral antibiotics compared to placebo (infective status: infected eczema (two studies), uninfected (one study), one study's participants had colonisation but no clinical infection). Oral antibiotics may make no difference in terms of good or excellent global improvement in infants and children at 14 to 28 days follow-up compared to placebo (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.18 to 3.50; 75 participants; 2 studies, low-quality evidence). There is probably little or no difference between groups for QOL (in infants and children) at 14 days follow-up (MD 0.11, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.32, 45 participants, 1 study, moderate-quality evidence). The subsequent results for this comparison were based on very low-quality evidence, meaning we are uncertain of their validity: adverse events requiring treatment withdrawal between 14 to 28 days follow-up were very rare, but included eczema worsening (both groups), loose stools (antibiotic group), and Henoch-Schönlein purpura (placebo group) (4 studies, 199 participants). Minor adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and stomach and joint pains, at 28 days follow-up were also rare and generally low in both groups (1 study, 68 infants and children). Antibiotic resistance at 14 days was reported as similar in both groups (2 studies, 98 infants and children). Of five studies evaluating bleach baths compared to placebo (water) or bath emollient (infective status: uninfected (two studies), unspecified (three studies)), one reported global improvement and showed that bleach baths may make no difference when compared with placebo at one month follow-up (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.63; 36 participants; low-quality evidence). One study showed there is probably little or no difference in QOL at 28 days follow-up when comparing bleach baths to placebo (MD 0.90, 95% CI -1.32 to 3.12) (80 infants and children; moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain if the groups differ in the likelihood of treatment withdrawals due to adverse events at two months follow-up (only one dropout reported due to worsening itch (placebo group)) as the quality of evidence was very low (1 study, 42 participants). One study reported that five participants in each group experienced burning/stinging or dry skin at two months follow-up, so there may be no difference in minor adverse events between groups (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.87, 36 participants, low-quality evidence). Very low-quality evidence means we are also uncertain if antibiotic resistance at four weeks follow-up is different between groups (1 study, 80 participants ≤ 18 years). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found insufficient evidence on the effects of anti-staphylococcal treatments for treating people with infected or uninfected eczema. Low-quality evidence, due to risk of bias, imprecise effect estimates and heterogeneity, made pooling of results difficult. Topical steroid/antibiotic combinations may be associated with possible small improvements in good or excellent signs/symptoms compared with topical steroid alone. High-quality trials evaluating efficacy, QOL, and antibiotic resistance are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susannah MC George
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton General HospitalDepartment of DermatologyBrighton General Hospital, Elm GroveBrightonUKBN2 3EW
| | - Sanja Karanovic
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital BirminghamDepartment of DermatologyMindelsohn WayBirminghamUKB15 2TH
| | - David A Harrison
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research CentreNapier House24 High HolbornLondonUKWC1V 6AZ
| | - Anjna Rani
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology(c/o) Cochrane Skin GroupThe University of NottinghamRoom A103, King's Meadow Campus, Lenton LaneNottinghamUKNG7 2NR
| | - Andrew J Birnie
- East Kent Hospitals University Foundation NHS TrustDepartment of DermatologyKent & Canterbury HospitalEthelbert RoadCanterburyUKCT1 3NG
| | - Fiona J Bath‐Hextall
- University of NottinghamSchool of Health SciencesB Floor, South Block LinkQueens Medical CentreNottinghamUKNG7 2HA
| | - Jane C Ravenscroft
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustDermatologyDerby RoadQueen's Medical Centre CampusNottinghamUKNG7 2UH
| | - Hywel C Williams
- University of NottinghamCentre of Evidence Based DermatologyQueen's Medical CentreDerby RoadNottinghamUKNG7 2UH
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chalmers JR, Axon E, Harvey J, Santer M, Ridd MJ, Lawton S, Langan S, Roberts A, Ahmed A, Muller I, Long CM, Panda S, Chernyshov P, Carter B, Williams HC, Thomas KS. Different strategies for using topical corticosteroids in people with eczema. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne R Chalmers
- University of Nottingham; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; Room A103, King’s Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| | - Emma Axon
- University of Nottingham; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; Room A103, King’s Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| | - Jane Harvey
- University of Nottingham; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; Room A103, King’s Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| | - Miriam Santer
- University of Southampton; Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences; Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close Southampton UK SO16 5ST
| | - Matthew J Ridd
- University of Bristol; 25-27 Belgrave Road Bristol UK BS8 2AA
| | - Sandra Lawton
- Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Dermatology; Moorgate Road Rotherham UK S60 2UD
| | - Sinéad Langan
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Keppel Street London UK WC1E 7HT
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Nottingham Support Group for Carers of Children with Eczema; Nottingham UK NG5 4FG
| | - Amina Ahmed
- University of Nottingham; c/o Cochrane Skin Group; King's Meadow Campus Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| | - Ingrid Muller
- University of Southampton; Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences; Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close Southampton UK SO16 5ST
| | - Chiau Ming Long
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania; Department of Pharmacy; Hobart Australia
| | - Saumya Panda
- KPC Medical College and Hospital; Department of Dermatology; 18D/11, Anupama Housing Complex Phase I Kolkata India 700052
| | - Pavel Chernyshov
- National Medical University; Department of Dermatology and Venereology; Bulvar Shevchenko, 13 Kiev Ukraine 01601
| | - Ben Carter
- King's College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience; Biostatistics and Health Informatics; Denmark Hill London UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- University of Nottingham; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; Room A103, King’s Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| | - Kim S Thomas
- University of Nottingham; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; Room A103, King’s Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham UK NG7 2NR
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matterne U, Böhmer MM, Weisshaar E, Jupiter A, Carter B, Apfelbacher CJ. Oral H1 antihistamines as 'add-on' therapy to topical treatment for eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 1:CD012167. [PMID: 30666626 PMCID: PMC6360926 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012167.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The symptoms of eczema can lead to sleeplessness and fatigue and may have a substantial impact on quality of life. Use of oral H1 antihistamines (H1 AH) as adjuvant therapy alongside topical agents is based on the idea that combining the anti-inflammatory effects of topical treatments with the blocking action of histamine on its receptors in the skin by H1 AH (to reduce the principal symptom of itch) might magnify or intensify the effect of treatment. Also, it would be unethical to compare oral H1 AH alone versus no treatment, as topical treatment is the standard management for this condition. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of oral H1 antihistamines as 'add-on' therapy to topical treatment in adults and children with eczema. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to May 2018: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and the GREAT database (Global Resource of EczemA Trials; from inception). We searched five trials registers and checked the reference lists of included and excluded studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also searched the abstracts of four conference proceedings held between 2000 and 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA We sought RCTs assessing oral H1 AH as 'add-on' therapy to topical treatment for people with eczema compared with topical treatment plus placebo or no additional treatment as add-on therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Primary outcome measures were 'Mean change in patient-assessed symptoms of eczema' and 'Proportion of participants reporting adverse effects and serious adverse events'. Secondary outcomes were 'Mean change in physician-assessed clinical signs', 'Mean change in quality of life', and 'Number of eczema flares'. MAIN RESULTS We included 25 studies (3285 randomised participants). Seventeen studies included 1344 adults, and eight studies included 1941 children. Most studies failed to report eczema severity at baseline, but they were conducted in secondary care settings, so it is likely that they recruited patients with more severe cases of eczema. Trial duration was between three days and 18 months. Researchers studied 13 different H1 AH treatments. We could not undertake pooling because of the high level of diversity across studies in terms of duration and dose of intervention, concomitant topical therapy, and outcome assessment. Risk of bias was generally unclear, but five studies had high risk of bias in one domain (attrition, selection, or reporting bias). Only one study measured quality of life, but these results were insufficient for statistical analysis.Although this review assessed 17 comparisons, we summarise here the results of three key comparisons in this review.Cetirizine versus placeboOne study compared cetirizine 0.5 mg/kg/d against placebo over 18 months in 795 children. Study authors did not report patient-assessed symptoms of eczema separately for pruritus. Cetirizine is probably associated with fewer adverse events (mainly mild) (risk ratio (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 1.01) and the need for slightly less additional H1 AH use as an indication of eczema flare rate (P = 0.035; no further numerical data given). Physician-assessed clinical signs (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index (SCORAD)) were reduced in both groups, but the difference between groups was reported as non-significant (no P value given). Evidence for this comparison was of moderate quality.One study assessed cetirizine 10 mg/d against placebo over four weeks in 84 adults. Results show no evidence of differences between groups in patient-assessed symptoms of eczema (pruritus measured as part of SCORAD; no numerical data given), numbers of adverse events (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.45; mainly sedation, other skin-related problems, respiratory symptoms, or headache), or physician-assessed changes in clinical signs, amount of local rescue therapy required, or number of applications as an indicator of eczema flares (no numerical data reported). Evidence for this comparison was of low quality.Fexofenadine versus placeboCompared with placebo, fexofenadine 120 mg/d taken in adults over one week (one study) probably leads to a small reduction in patient-assessed symptoms of pruritus on a scale of 0 to 8 (mean difference (MD) -0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.07; n = 400) and a greater reduction in the ratio of physician-assessed pruritus area to whole body surface area (P = 0.007; no further numerical data given); however, these reductions may not be clinically meaningful. Results suggest probably little or no difference in adverse events (mostly somnolence and headache) (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.50; n = 411) nor in the amount of 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate used (co-intervention in both groups) as an indicator of eczema flare, but no numerical data were given. Evidence for this comparison was of moderate quality.Loratadine versus placeboA study of 28 adults compared loratadine 10 mg/d taken over 4 weeks versus placebo. Researchers found no evidence of differences between groups in patient-assessed pruritus, measured by a 100-point visual analogue scale (MD -2.30, 95% CI -20.27 to 15.67); reduction in physician-assessed clinical signs (SCORAD) (MD -4.10, 95% CI -13.22 to 5.02); or adverse events. Study authors reported only one side effect (folliculitis with placebo) (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.01 to 5.76). Evidence for this comparison was of low quality. Number of eczema flares was not measured for this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on the main comparisons, we did not find consistent evidence that H1 AH treatments are effective as 'add-on' therapy for eczema when compared to placebo; evidence for this comparison was of low and moderate quality. However, fexofenadine probably leads to a small improvement in patient-assessed pruritus, with probably no significant difference in the amount of treatment used to prevent eczema flares. Cetirizine was no better than placebo in terms of physician-assessed clinical signs nor patient-assessed symptoms, and we found no evidence that loratadine was more beneficial than placebo, although all interventions seem safe.The quality of evidence was limited because of poor study design and imprecise results. Future researchers should clearly define the condition (course and severity) and clearly report their methods, especially participant selection and randomisation; baseline characteristics; and outcomes (based on the Harmonising Outcome Measures in Eczema initiative).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Matterne
- University of RegensburgMedical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineRegensburgGermany
| | - Merle Margarete Böhmer
- University of RegensburgMedical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineRegensburgGermany
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Social MedicineThibautstrasse 3HeidelbergGermany69115
| | - Aldrin Jupiter
- Heidelberg University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Social MedicineThibautstrasse 3HeidelbergGermany69115
| | - Ben Carter
- King's College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceBiostatistics and Health InformaticsDenmark HillLondonUK
| | - Christian J Apfelbacher
- University of RegensburgMedical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineRegensburgGermany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yew YW, Zheng Q, Kok WL, Ho MSL, Teoh J, Wong YKY, Shi L, Chan ESY. Topical treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis. Hippokratia 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yik Weng Yew
- Department of Dermatology; National Skin Centre; Singapore Singapore
| | - Qishi Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology; Singapore Clinical Research Institute; Singapore Singapore
| | - Wai Leong Kok
- Department of Dermatology; National Skin Centre; Singapore Singapore
| | | | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Medicine; National University of Singapore; Singapore Singapore
| | | | - Luming Shi
- Department of Epidemiology; Singapore Clinical Research Institute; Singapore Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sawangjit R, Dilokthornsakul P, Lloyd-Lavery A, Chua S, Lai NM, Dellavalle R, Chaiyakunapruk N. Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis. Hippokratia 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ratree Sawangjit
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University; Department of Clinical Pharmacy; 41/20 Kham Riang Kantharawichai Mahasarakham Thailand 44150
| | - Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
- Naresuan University; Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences; 99 Tha Pho Muang Phitsanulok Thailand 65000
| | - Antonia Lloyd-Lavery
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Dermatology; Churchill Hospital Roosevelt Drive Oxford UK OX3 7LE
| | - Sean Chua
- urong East St21 Blk288A #03-358 Singapore Singapore 601288
| | - Nai Ming Lai
- Taylor's University; School of Medicine; Subang Jaya Malaysia
| | - Robert Dellavalle
- University of Colorado School of Medicine; Denver VA Medical Center 1055 Clermont St. #165 Denver Colorado USA 80220
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ferguson L, Futamura M, Vakirlis E, Kojima R, Sasaki H, Roberts A, Mori R. Leukotriene receptor antagonists for eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10:CD011224. [PMID: 30343498 PMCID: PMC6517006 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011224.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema is a common, chronic, inflammatory skin condition that is frequently associated with atopic conditions, including asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) have a corticosteroid-sparing role in asthma, but their role in eczema remains controversial. Currently available topical therapies for eczema are often poorly tolerated, and use of systemic agents is restricted by their adverse effect profile. A review of alternative treatments was therefore warranted. OBJECTIVES To assess the possible benefits and harms of leukotriene receptor antagonists for eczema. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases to September 2017: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and the GREAT database. We also searched five trial registries, and handsearched the bibliographies of all extracted studies for further relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of LTRAs alone or in combination with other (topical or systemic) treatments compared with other treatments alone such as topical corticosteroids or placebo for eczema in the acute or chronic (maintenance) phase of eczema in adults and children. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome measures were change in disease severity, long-term symptom control, and adverse effects of treatment. Secondary outcomes were change in corticosteroid requirement, reduction of pruritis, quality of life, and emollient requirement. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS Only five studies (including a total of 202 participants) met the inclusion criteria, all of which assessed oral montelukast; hence, we found no studies assessing other LTRAs. Treatment ranged from four to eight weeks, and outcomes were assessed at the end of treatment; therefore, we could only report short-term measurements (defined as less than three months follow-up from baseline). Montelukast dosing was 10 mg for adults (age 14 years and above) and 5 mg for children (age 6 years to 14 years). One study included children (aged 6 years and above) among their participants, while the remaining studies only included adults (participant age ranged from 16 to 70 years). The participants were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe eczema in four studies and moderate eczema in one study. The study setting was unclear in two studies, multicentre in two studies, and single centre in one study; the studies were conducted in Europe and Bangladesh. Two studies were industry funded. The comparator was placebo in three studies and conventional treatment in two studies. The conventional treatment comparator was a combination of antihistamines and topical corticosteroids (plus oral antibiotics in one study).Four of the studies did not adequately describe their randomisation or allocation concealment method and were considered as at unclear risk of selection bias. Only one study was at low risk of performance and detection bias. However, we judged all studies to be at low risk of attrition and reporting bias.We found no evidence of a difference in disease severity of moderate-to-severe eczema after short-term use of montelukast (10 mg) when compared with placebo. The outcome was assessed using the modified EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) score and SASSAD (Six Area, Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis) severity score (standardised mean difference 0.29, with a positive score showing montelukast is favoured, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.81; 3 studies; n = 131; low-quality evidence).When short-term montelukast (10 mg) treatment was compared with conventional treatment in one study, the mean improvement in severity of moderate-to-severe eczema was greater in the intervention group (measured using SCORAD (SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis) severity index) (mean difference 10.57, 95% CI 4.58 to 16.56; n = 31); however, another study of 32 participants found no significant difference between groups using the same measure (mean improvement was 25.2 points with montelukast versus 23.9 points with conventional treatment; no further numerical data provided). We judged the quality of the evidence as very low for this outcome, meaning the results are uncertain.All studies reported their adverse event rate during treatment. Four studies (136 participants) reported no adverse events. In one study of 58 participants with moderate eczema who received montelukast 10 mg (compared with placebo), there was one case of septicaemia and one case of dizziness reported in the intervention group, both resulting in study withdrawal, although whether these effects were related to the medication is unclear. Mild side effects (e.g. headache and mild gastrointestinal disturbances) were also noted, but these were fairly evenly distributed between the montelukast and placebo groups. The quality of evidence for this outcome was low.No studies specifically evaluated emollient requirement or quality of life. One study that administered treatment for eight weeks specifically evaluated pruritus improvement at the end treatment and topical corticosteroid use during treatment. We found no evidence of a difference between montelukast (10 mg) and placebo for both outcomes (low-quality evidence, n = 58). No other study assessed these outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review are limited to montelukast. There was a lack of evidence addressing the review question, and the quality of the available evidence for most of the measured outcomes was low. Some primary and secondary outcomes were not addressed at all, including long-term control.We found no evidence of a difference between montelukast (10 mg) and placebo on disease severity, pruritus improvement, and topical corticosteroid use. Very low-quality evidence means we are uncertain of the effect of montelukast (10 mg) compared with conventional treatment on disease severity. Participants in only one study reported adverse events, which were mainly mild (low-quality evidence).There is no evidence that LTRA is an effective treatment for eczema. Serious limitations were that all studies focused on montelukast and only included people with moderate-to-severe eczema, who were mainly adults; and that each outcome was evaluated with a small sample size, if at all.Further large randomised controlled trials, with a longer treatment duration, of adults and children who have eczema of all severities may help to evaluate the effect of all types of LTRA, especially on eczema maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Ferguson
- St Helier HospitalDepartment of DermatologyWrythe LaneCarshaltonSurreyUKSM5 1AA
| | - Masaki Futamura
- Nagoya Medical CenterDepartment of Pediatrics4‐1‐1 SannomaruNaka‐kuNagoyaJapan460‐0001
| | - Efstratios Vakirlis
- Aristotle University Medical SchoolA' Department of DermatologyKanari 13ThessalonikiGreece54644
| | - Reiji Kojima
- School of Medicine, University of YamanashiDepartment of Health SciencesYamanashiJapan
| | - Hatoko Sasaki
- National Center for Child Health and DevelopmentDepartment of Health Policy2‐10‐1 Okura, SetagayaTokyoTokyoJapan157‐8535
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Nottingham Support Group for Carers of Children with EczemaNottinghamUKNG5 4FG
| | - Rintaro Mori
- National Center for Child Health and DevelopmentDepartment of Health Policy2‐10‐1 Okura, SetagayaTokyoTokyoJapan157‐8535
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gilles S, Akdis C, Lauener R, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Bieber T, Schäppi G, Traidl-Hoffmann C. The role of environmental factors in allergy: A critical reappraisal. Exp Dermatol 2018; 27:1193-1200. [PMID: 30099779 DOI: 10.1111/exd.13769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Allergies are usually referred to as type I hypersensitivity reactions against innocuous environmental antigens, characterized by a Th2/IgE-dominated inflammation. They can manifest themselves in various organs, such as skin, gastrointestinal and respiratory tract, and comprise diseases as diverse as allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, oral allergy syndrome, food allergy, urticaria and atopic eczema, but also anaphylactic shock. Within the last decades, there was a significant global increase in allergy prevalence, which has been mostly attributed to changes in environment and lifestyle. But which, among all factors discussed, are the most relevant, and what are the mechanisms by which these factors promote or prevent the development of allergic diseases? To answer this, it is necessary to go back to the two key questions that have occupied allergy researchers for the last decades: Firstly, what makes an allergen an allergen? Secondly, why are more and more individuals affected? Within the last decade, we have made considerable progress in answering these questions. This review gives an overview over scientific progress in the field, summarizes latest findings and points out future prospective and research needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Gilles
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine, UNIKA-T, Technical University of Munich, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Cezmi Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, University of Zürich, Davos, Switzerland.,Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE), Davos, Switzerland
| | - Roger Lauener
- Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE), Davos, Switzerland.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier
- Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE), Davos, Switzerland.,Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Bieber
- Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE), Davos, Switzerland.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Georg Schäppi
- Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE), Davos, Switzerland.,Hochgebirgsklinik Davos, Davos-Wolfgang, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine, UNIKA-T, Technical University of Munich, Augsburg, Germany.,Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE), Davos, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shin D, Choi W, Bae H. Bee Venom Phospholipase A2 Alleviate House Dust Mite-Induced Atopic Dermatitis-Like Skin Lesions by the CD206 Mannose Receptor. Toxins (Basel) 2018; 10:toxins10040146. [PMID: 29614845 PMCID: PMC5923312 DOI: 10.3390/toxins10040146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 03/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by highly pruritic, erythematous, and eczematous skin plaques. We previously reported that phospholipase A2 (PLA2) derived from bee venom alleviates AD-like skin lesions induced by 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) and house dust mite extract (Dermatophagoides farinae extract, DFE) in a murine model. However, the underlying mechanisms of PLA2 action in actopic dermatitis remain unclear. In this study, we showed that PLA2 treatment inhibited epidermal thickness, serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and cytokine levels, macrophage and mast cell infiltration in the ear of an AD model induced by DFE and DNCB. In contrast, these effects were abrogated in CD206 mannose receptor-deficient mice exposed to DFE and DNCB in the ear. These data suggest that bvPLA2 alleviates atopic skin inflammation via interaction with CD206.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dasom Shin
- Department of Science in Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 kyungheedae-ro, dongdaemoon-ku, Seoul 02447, Korea.
| | - Won Choi
- Department of Science in Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 kyungheedae-ro, dongdaemoon-ku, Seoul 02447, Korea.
| | - Hyunsu Bae
- Department of Science in Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 kyungheedae-ro, dongdaemoon-ku, Seoul 02447, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bee Venom Phospholipase A2 Ameliorates House Dust Mite Extract Induced Atopic Dermatitis Like Skin Lesions in Mice. Toxins (Basel) 2017; 9:toxins9020068. [PMID: 28218721 PMCID: PMC5331447 DOI: 10.3390/toxins9020068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a biphasic inflammatory skin disease that is provoked by epidermal barrier defects, immune dysregulation, and increased skin infections. Previously, we have demonstrated that bvPLA2 evoked immune tolerance by inducing regulatory T cells (Treg), and thus alleviated Th2 dominant allergic asthma in mice. Here, we would like to determine whether treatment with bvPLA2 exacerbates the AD-like allergic inflammations induced by house dust mite extract (DFE) in a murine model. Epidermal thickness, immune cell infiltration, serum immunoglobulin, and cytokines were measured. Ear swelling, skin lesions, and the levels of total serum IgE and Th1/Th2 cytokines were elevated in DFE/DNCB-induced AD mice. Topical application of bvPLA2 elicited significant suppression of the increased AD symptoms, including ear thickness, serum IgE concentration, inflammatory cytokines, and histological changes. Furthermore, bvPLA2 treatment inhibited mast cell infiltration into the ear. On the other hand, Treg cell depletion abolished the anti-atopic effects of bvPLA2, suggesting that the effects of bvPLA2 depend on the existence of Tregs. Taken together, the results revealed that topical exposure to bvPLA2 aggravated atopic skin inflammation, suggesting that bvPLA2 might be a candidate for the treatment of AD.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bulat Lokas S, Plavec D, Rikić Pišković J, Živković J, Nogalo B, Turkalj M. Allergen-Specific IgE Measurement: Intermethod Comparison of Two Assay Systems in Diagnosing Clinical Allergy. J Clin Lab Anal 2016; 31. [PMID: 27604174 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to examine the performance of IMMULITE 2000 assay for specific IgE (sIgE) by comparing it with ImmunoCAP technology in light of a clinical background. METHODS Measurements of sIgE were done in a selected patient group (N = 569; varied sample size for each allergen) and in a random sample group (N = 100; 8 allergens). sIgE results were correlated with skin-prick test results (selected patients) and medical history (nonselected patients). RESULTS We have detected fair to excellent correlation and agreement between the results of both assays, despite their methodological differences, both in selected and nonselected patient group (ρc = 0.431-0.976; ρc = 0.390-0.972, respectively). Associations of sIgE levels with skin-prick test (SPT) levels and medical history have shown significant correlation for both assays for majority of tested allergens, where applicable (D. pteronyssinus, cat dander, egg white, milk, peanut, orchard grass, Alternaria tenuis, and common ragweed in selected patients; birch, cat dander, common ragweed, D. pteronyssinus, and orchard grass in nonselected; P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS Laboratory testing for sIgE can be successfully accomplished by IMMULITE 2000 immunoanalyzer at a diagnostic accuracy relative to SPT, comparable to the results acquired by CAP technology but not fully comparable on the level of an individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davor Plavec
- Children's Hospital Srebrnjak, Zagreb, Croatia.,Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
| | | | | | - Boro Nogalo
- Children's Hospital Srebrnjak, Zagreb, Croatia.,Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
| | - Mirjana Turkalj
- Children's Hospital Srebrnjak, Zagreb, Croatia.,Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vaccaro JA, Niego J, Huffman FG. Dietary factors, body weight, and screen time in U.S. children with and without asthma. CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/02739615.2014.948165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
20
|
|
21
|
Akcay A, Tamay Z, Hocaoglu A, Ergin A, Guler N. Risk factors affecting asthma prevalence in adolescents living in Istanbul, Turkey. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2014; 42:449-58. [PMID: 23969072 DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2013.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2013] [Revised: 05/27/2013] [Accepted: 05/29/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma is one of the most important diseases of childhood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of asthma symptoms and risk factors affecting asthma. METHODS In a cross-sectional study design, 9991 children, aged 13-14 years in 61 primary schools in 32 districts of Istanbul were evaluated. Asthma prevalence among the children was assessed using the ISAAC protocol. RESULTS In our study, a total of 10,894 questionnaires were distributed to 13-14 years old children, and of these 9991 questionnaires were suitable for analysis with an overall response rate of 91.7%. The rates of wheeze ever, wheezing in last 12 months and lifetime doctor diagnosed asthma prevalence were 17.4%, 9.0%, and 11.8%, respectively. There were 4746 boys (47.9%) and 5166 girls (52.1%) with M/F ratio of 0.92. Atopic family history, fewer than three siblings living at home, tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy history, consumption of fermented foods, mixed pickles, margarine and meat were found to be associated with an increased asthma risk. Use of paracetamol in the last 12 months, consumption of fruit and animal fats acted as a protective factor against asthma. The Mediterranean-style diet was not associated with the prevalence of asthma. CONCLUSIONS Lifetime doctor diagnosed asthma prevalence was found to be 11.8% in 13-14 year olds. History of tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy and consumption of fermented foods, mixed pickles, margarine and meat may increase the symptoms of asthma. Usage of paracetamol and consumption of animal fats may be investigated as a protective factor against asthma.
Collapse
|
22
|
van Velsen SGA, Knol MJ, van Eijk RLA, de Vroede MA, de Wit TC, Lam MGEH, Haeck IM, de Bruin-Weller MS, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CAFM, Pasmans SGMA. Bone mineral density in children with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63:824-31. [PMID: 20850893 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2009] [Revised: 12/10/2009] [Accepted: 12/12/2009] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported in 30.4% of adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of low BMD in children with moderate to severe AD and to investigate the relation between BMD and corticosteroid and cyclosporine therapy. METHODS Lumbar spine BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 60 children (age 5-16 years) with moderate to severe AD. BMD (in g/cm(2)) was expressed in Z-scores, the number of SD above or below the mean value of an age- and sex-matched reference population. In children, low BMD was defined as a Z-score less than -2. Information on lifestyle parameters and bone fractures were collected by use of a standardized questionnaire. The cumulative dose of corticosteroids and cyclosporine therapy was calculated for the previous 5-year period. RESULTS Three patients (5%) had low BMD; one patient (1.7%) had osteoporosis. The observed prevalence of low BMD in this study (6.7%; 95% confidence interval 1.8%-16.2%) does not differ from the expected prevalence of low BMD in the general population (P = .06). Overall, use of topical corticosteroids in the previous 5 years was not associated with a decrease in BMD (Z-score). When children received additional systemic treatment (oral corticosteroids and/or cyclosporine) in the previous 5 years, BMD decreased, although the decrease was not statistically significant. Correction for lifestyle parameters did not change these associations. LIMITATIONS The number of patients studied was limited. The cumulative dose of corticosteroids and cyclosporine therapy was only registered for the previous 5 years, and relatively low amounts of topical corticosteroids were used. The definition of low BMD differs between adults (Z-score < -1) and children (Z-score < -2). Because there is no Dutch BMD reference population for children, normative BMD references were obtained from a different population (US children). CONCLUSIONS Low BMD did not occur more frequently in this population of children with moderate to severe AD compared with the general population. Use of topical corticosteroids in the previous 5 years was not associated with a decrease in BMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Gertrudes Anna van Velsen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Wilhelmina's Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hol J, de Jongste JC, Nieuwenhuis EE. Quoting a landmark paper on the beneficial effects of probiotics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 124:1354-6.e9. [PMID: 19818483 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2009] [Revised: 07/21/2009] [Accepted: 07/23/2009] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
24
|
A Practical Management of Atopic Dermatitis-Palliative Care to Contact Dermatitis. JOURNAL OF THE DERMATOLOGY NURSES ASSOCIATION 2009. [DOI: 10.1097/jdn.0b013e3181970df1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
25
|
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is commonly associated with immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody-related mechanisms, which are the focus of this article. The vast majority of patients with AD exhibit hyperproduction of IgE, particularly during disease onset or flare. IgE-dependent late-phase reactions may influence the chronic inflammatory response in AD. Clearly, genetics plays a major role in determining who develops AD. However, the recent increase in AD prevalence suggests that a complex interaction between environmental factors and susceptibility genes results in clinical expression of the disorder. These immunologic "triggers" differ among individuals and include various foods, airborne allergens, irritants and contactants, hormones, stress, climate, and microorganisms. Although much about AD remains to be elucidated, our current understanding of its pathophysiology has provided clinicians with the ability to construct more rational therapeutic interventions, including multiple-agent regimens that provide both immediate relief and effective long-term management. Future advances will come from identification of the genes causing this disease and further elucidation of the immunoregulatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of AD.
Collapse
|
26
|
Luskin A, Bukstein D, Kocevar VS, Yin DD. Asthma rescue and allergy medication use among asthmatic children with prior allergy prescriptions who initiated asthma controller therapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005; 95:129-36. [PMID: 16136761 DOI: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61201-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma and allergic rhinitis are frequently comorbid conditions. Montelukast is effective in treating both diseases and may reduce total medication use among children with asthma and allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE To determine the differences in respiratory and allergy medication use and costs, as proxies for control, in pediatric patients with asthma and allergy who initiated asthma controller therapy. METHODS A 24-month, retrospective, pre-post cohort study using a pharmacy claims database of children (age < 16 years) with 2 or more consecutive asthma controller prescriptions and 1 or more allergy prescription (within 12 months before initial controller prescription). Children taking inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and montelukast were matched one to one based on age, days of prior allergic rhinitis therapy supply, duration of controller therapy, and propensity score. Differences in costs of rescue or acute asthma medications, prescription allergy medications, other respiratory medications, and the number of days of rescue or acute asthma medication use and allergy medication use were calculated. RESULTS A total of 1,236 children were matched into ICS and montelukast groups (n = 618 each). Montelukast patients had a smaller cost increase overall compared with ICS patients (combined cost for rescue or acute asthma medications, allergy medications, and other respiratory medications: $5.55 vs $12.08, P < .001). Cost increase for rescue or acute asthma medications was significantly lower in the montelukast group ($0.94 vs $3.82, P = .003). The cost increase for allergy medications ($5.29 vs $10.06, P < .001) was also significantly lower in the montelukast group. Patients taking montelukast also had fewer days of therapy with asthma rescue medication and allergy medication compared with patients taking ICSs. CONCLUSIONS Initiating therapy with montelukast was associated with better asthma and allergy control demonstrated via lower increase in use and costs of asthma rescue and allergy medications compared with initiating ICS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Luskin
- Respiratory Institute, Dean Medical Center, and University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We will review data supporting the link between allergic rhinitis and asthma, examine recent progress made towards understanding the influence of allergic rhinitis on asthma regarding future development or progression of asthma, and discuss possible mechanisms through which this occurs and potential preventive measures. RECENT FINDINGS Several recent reviews have concluded that a close relationship exists between allergic rhinitis and asthma. It has even been proposed that allergic rhinitis and asthma are manifestations of the same disease entity and that they represent a continuum of disease. Allergic rhinitis often precedes the onset of clinical asthma and is a risk factor for the development of asthma. Recognition of this relationship between allergic rhinitis and asthma is highlighted by the recent development of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders by the international Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma workshop. The mechanisms by which allergic rhinitis may be a risk factor for asthma are not entirely understood, although a few recent studies have addressed this question. Some clues in regard to the identification of subjects at risk of developing asthma have been provided by recent studies. Several recent reports support the belief that early introduction of immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis reduces subsequent development of asthma, whereas it remains to be studied whether timely pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis may prevent the progression to asthma. SUMMARY Because asthma is generally permanent at the time of diagnosis, it would be of great benefit to identify individuals at increased risk of developing asthma in order to provide a window of opportunity in which the progression to asthma could be prevented. As recognition and early treatment of allergic rhinitis could have important consequences in terms of reducing the prevalence and severity of asthma, there is a need to perform further clinical studies that address this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Yull Koh
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| | | |
Collapse
|