Complications of Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing of the Femur:

Knee Pain After Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing with Surgical Implant Generation Network of Femur Shaft Fractures at Public Hospitals in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia: Analysis of 6-Months Follow-Up Results

Background

The incidence of femur fractures in young and elderly people has increased, particularly in countries with limited resources like Ethiopia. Intra-medullary nailing (IM) has been an effective and cost-effective method of treating long bone shaft fractures, but it can lead to complications such as knee pain.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate knee pain and its associated factors following retrograde intramedullary nailing for femur fractures.

Patients and Methods

The study followed 110 patients diagnosed with femur fractures and treated with retrograde SIGN Standard Nail or Fin Nail from January 2020 to December 2022 at two hospitals in Ethiopia. The patients were followed up for at least 6 months, and data were collected from medical charts, patient interviews, and phone calls to patients who did not attend the follow-up appointment. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with knee pain.

Results

The study showed that 40 patients reported knee pain at 6-months follow-up, making a prevalence of 36.4%. Factors significantly associated with knee pain were a time of injury to nailing (AOR=4.23, 95% CI: 1.28-13.92), use of a screw to the medial cortex (AOR=9.30, 95% CI: 2.90-12.74), and fracture site (AOR= 2.67, 95% CI: 14.01-7.03). Specifically, the longer the time from injury to nailing, the higher the risk of knee pain. The use of a longer screw to the medial cortex and a fracture site were also positively associated with knee pain.

Conclusion

This study concludes that although retrograde intramedullary nail fixation is an effective method for femur fractures, it often results in knee pain. Approximately 4 of 10 patients suffered from knee pain in this study. Avoiding delayed surgical management and minimizing the use of prominent metalwork may reduce knee pain.

A Single Proximal Interlocking Bolt May Be Sufficient for Retrograde Nailing of Extra-articular Femur Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a single proximal interlocking bolt was sufficient during the treatment of extra-articular femur fractures with retrograde medullary nailing.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SETTING

Academic Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

The study included 136 patients with extra-articular femur fractures treated with retrograde medullary nailing who met inclusion and follow-up criteria.

INTERVENTION

The intervention included surgical treatment for a femur fracture with retrograde medullary nailing, with comparisons made between those treated with a single proximal interlocking (1 IL) bolt and those treated with 2 proximal interlocking bolts (2 IL).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The main outcome measurements were as follows: (1) rate of nonunion and (2) rate of catastrophic implant failure.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the rate of nonunion requiring surgical intervention between the 2 groups. There were no catastrophic failures in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

A single proximal interlocking bolt may be sufficient when using retrograde nailing for the treatment of extra-articular femur fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Antegrade versus retrograde nailing of proximal femur fractures: A cortical diameter based study

Background

Retrograde nailing of proximal femoral shaft fractures is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare patients with proximal femur fractures undergoing antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary nailing (AIMN vs RIMN) and determine the safety and efficacy of RIMN.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on 54 patients undergoing femoral IMN for proximal femoral shaft fractures at an urban level one trauma institution between January 2016 and July 2021.Fracture distance from the lesser trochanter (LT) was recorded and used to calculate the number of cortical diameters (NCD) from the LT. Proximal femur fractures were defined as < 3 NCD. AIMN and RIMN fixation was utilized in 31 (57.4%) and 23 (42.6%) patients, respectively. Outcomes measures included pre-/postoperative true translational and angular displacement (TTD and TAD), operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), union rate, time to union, complications, and reoperations.

Results

AIMN and RIMN groups were similar in terms of age, sex, BMI, tobacco use, diabetes, ASA classification >2, AO/OTA classification, preoperative TTD or TAD, open fractures, or ballistic fractures. The AIMN group, had a shorter measured distance from the LT (47.0 vs. 66.1 mm, p = 0.04) but the difference in NCD was not significant (1.4 vs. 2.0, p = 0.07). Among patients with isolated IMN procedures, the RIMN group had shorter operative times (142.3 vs. 178.5 min, p = 0.01) and less EBL (100 vs. 250 mL, p = 0.008). There was no observed intergroup difference in terms of postoperative TTD/TAD, union rate, time to union, complications, or reoperations.

Conclusion

RIMN is a viable treatment option for proximal femoral shaft fractures that results in less operative time, less blood loss, and no detectable differences in union, reoperations, or complications.

Level of evidence

Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Open diaphyseal long bone fractures: a reduction method using devitalized or extruded osseous fragments

Open diaphyseal and meta-diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity remain therapeutically challenging. Currently accepted treatment methods consist of a thorough irrigation and debridement of nonviable tissue combined with locked intramedullary nailing. Although exact reduction parameters remain controversial, achievement of a satisfactory reduction becomes increasingly difficult with fracture comminution and overt bone loss. We describe the simple technique of using multiple associated devitalized tibial bone fragments to obtain an accurate reduction prior to intramedullary nailing. This technique can be extended to other long bone fractures.

A protector for retrograde femoral nailing using proctoscope

An improvised method of using a proctoscope as a protector during the reaming procedure for closed retrograde femoral nailing is described. This protector is easy to handle and can be effectively used to protect the intra-articular structures, patellar cartilage and patellar tendon during the reaming process. The protector can also help minimise the reaming bone dust spilling out into the joint cavity.