New drugs for epilepsy

The adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs in children

Efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are often equivalent, hence selection of an AED is often determined by the adverse effects (AEs). The development of neurocognitive AEs is almost inevitable with use of AEDs, especially in high-risk groups. Teratogenesis with major or minor malformations is of great concern during the first trimester of pregnancy, but an increasing body of information suggests that potential neurocognitive developmental delay may also occur with use of AEDs in the latter part of pregnancy. Decreased bone mineral density has been found in adults and children receiving both enzyme-inducing AEDs and valproate, an enzyme-inhibiting drug. AEDs may influence the lipid profile, body weight, reproductive, hormonal and other endocrine functions, and sleep architecture. There are age-specific AEs related to pharmacokinetic differences that have been highlighted in this review with emphasis on the pediatric population. A classification of AEs using different parameters is also included.

Lacosamide: a review of preclinical properties

Lacosamide (LCM), (SPM 927, (R)-2-acetamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropionamide, previously referred to as harkoseride or ADD 234037) is a member of a series of functionalized amino acids that were specifically synthesized as anticonvulsive drug candidates. LCM has demonstrated antiepileptic effectiveness in different rodent seizure models and antinociceptive potential in experimental animal models that reflect distinct types and symptoms of neuropathic as well as chronic inflammatory pain. Recent results suggest that LCM has a dual mode of action underlying its anticonvulsant and analgesic activity. It was found that LCM selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels without affecting fast inactivation. Furthermore, employing proteomic affinity-labeling techniques, collapsin-response mediator protein 2 (CRMP-2 alias DRP-2) was identified as a binding partner. Follow-up experiments confirmed a functional interaction of LCM with CRMP-2 in vitro. LCM did not inhibit or induce a wide variety of cytochrome P450 enzymes at therapeutic concentrations. In safety pharmacology and toxicology studies conducted in mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs, LCM was well tolerated. Either none or only minor side effects were observed in safety studies involving the central nervous, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and renal systems and there is no indication of abuse liability. Repeated dose toxicity studies demonstrated that after either intravenous or oral administration of LCM the adverse events were reversible and consisted mostly of exaggerated pharmacodynamic effects on the CNS. No genotoxic or carcinogenic effects were observed in vivo, and LCM showed a favorable profile in reproductive and developmental animal studies. Currently, LCM is in a late stage of clinical development as an adjunctive treatment for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, and it is being assessed as monotherapy in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Further trials to identify LCM's potential in pain and for other indications have been initiated.

Ocular complications of neurological therapy

Treatments used for several neurological conditions may adversely affect the eye. Vigabatrin-related retinal toxicity leads to a visual field defect. Optic neuropathy may result from ethambutol and isoniazid, and from radiation therapy. Posterior subcapsular cataract is associated with systemic corticosteroids. Transient refractive error changes may follow treatment with acetazolamide or topiramate, and corneal deposits and keratitis with amandatine. Intraocular pressure can be elevated in susceptible individuals by anticholinergic drugs, including oxybutynin, tolterodine, benzhexol, propantheline, atropine and amitriptyline, and also by systemic corticosteroids and by topiramate. Nystagmus, diplopia and extraocular muscle palsies can occur with antiepileptic drugs, particularly phenytoin and carbamazepine. Ocular neuromyotonia can follow parasellar radiation. Congenital ocular malformations can result from in utero exposure to maternally prescribed sodium valproate, phenytoin and carbamazepine. Neurologists must be aware of potential ocular toxicity of these drugs, and appropriately monitor for potential adverse events.

Economic evaluation of levetiracetam as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

This study provides the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of levetiracetam as an adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy from the Canadian Ministry of Health perspective. The main objective is to estimate the expected cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the incremental cost per seizure-free day gained when using levetiracetam. In addition, this study examines the potential savings that might result by reducing the number of surgical evaluations and surgery when using levetiracetam.

METHODS

A 1-year dose escalation decision-tree model comparing levetiracetam plus standard therapy with standard therapy alone was designed in order to combine probability, resource use and unit cost data (1999 Canadian dollars [$Can]). The short-term outcomes were derived from three phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials performed in 904 patients, aged 16-70 years, with at least 1 year history of epilepsy, two to four partial seizures per month, and receiving a maximum of two classic antiepileptic drugs.

RESULTS

The average gain in seizure-free days attributed to levetiracetam was 19 days per patient per year and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for levetiracetam add-on in the base-case scenario was $Can80.7 per seizure-free day gained per patient per year. Moreover, when surgical investigation and surgery are considered in the model, the use of levetiracetam may be dominant, with substantial savings to the overall healthcare budget. All univariate sensitivity analyses show that the model was robust to the assumptions made.

CONCLUSIONS

The economic analysis presented in this paper suggests, given a wide range of assumptions, that the increased cost of treating patients (with refractory epilepsy) with levetiracetam may be partially offset by a reduction in other direct medical costs (from the Canadian Ministry of Health perspective), as a consequence of an increase in the number of seizure-free days. Moreover, potential cost savings may be foreseen when it is assumed that levetiracetam may reduce the number of candidates for surgical evaluation and surgery through a reduction of seizure frequency.

Focal treatment for refractory epilepsy: hope for the future?

Despite advances in anti-epileptic drug therapy and epilepsy surgery in recent years, intractable epilepsy remains a large clinical problem. Surgical resection, which can have an excellent outcome, is appropriate for only a minority of patients in whom an identifiable focus in non-eloquent brain can be identified. Systemic drug delivery is inevitably limited by the potential for unwanted side effects, due to actions both outside the CNS and in non-epileptic brain regions. Thus for a substantial number of patients novel treatment approaches are urgently needed. Both focal drug delivery and neuronal stem cell grafting have been evaluated in a variety of experimental epilepsy models in recent years, targeting either the seizure focus or key propagation pathways. The literature in this field is critically reviewed and considered in a clinical context. Studies in both areas are hampered by the limitations of available animal models, and by uncertainties in discerning which changes in the epileptic brain directly promote seizures, and which are compensatory. However, in many cases promising, though short-term, results have been obtained. Before such studies could be considered in humans further investigations that include long-term seizure and behavioural outcomes, in clinically relevant experimental models, are required. However, the current literature does provide proof in principle for a focal treatment approach, which may offer hope for many currently intractable patients for whom drug developments and surgical advances have proved disappointing.

Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for topiramate analysis in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid: validation and comparison with fluorescence-polarization immunoassay

SUMMARY

The authors report the development and validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay (LC/MS/MS assay) for the analysis of topiramate (2,3:4,5-bis-o-(-1-methyl)-beta-D-fructopyranose sulfamate) in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Comparison is made with the commercially available fluorescence-polarization immunoassay (FPIA).

LC/MS/MS ASSAY

Using the internal standard, 1,2:3,4-bis-o-(1-methylethylidene-alpha-D-galactopyranose sulfamate), a structural isomer, the calibration curve in plasma was linear in the concentration range of 0.02-20.0 mg/L (r(2) = 0.9998). The coefficients of variation in plasma were < or = 3%, and the accuracy ranged from 100% to 101% in the therapeutically relevant concentration range of 0.4-16.0 mg/L. In CSF, the mean recovery was 98%, and there was linearity between the nominal and the estimated concentration in the range of 1.5-20.0 mg/L (r(2)= 0.9996). FPIA: The calibration curve was linear in the concentration interval of 1.6-24.3 mg/L (r(2) = 0.9994), and the mean recovery was 96%. Accuracy in plasma was 99- 104%, and precision was 3.2-6.0%. In CSF, there was linearity between the nominal concentration and the estimated concentration in the range of 1.5-20.0 mg/L (r(2) = 0.9995), and the mean recovery was 100%. COMPARISON BETWEEN FPIA AND LC/MS/MS: There was a high correlation between the FPIA and the LC/MS/MS assay (r(2) = 0.9965 in plasma and r(2) = 0.9996 in CSF, P < 0.001 for both). In plasma and CSF, the two methods showed equal results, evaluated as the ratio between the two methods (plasma: median ratio = 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.02, paired-sample test, P = 0.79; and CSF: median ratio = 1.00, 95% CI, 0.99-1.02, paired-sample test, P = 0.75). The coefficient of variation on the ratios between the two methods had similar levels: 5% in plasma and 3% in CSF.

CONCLUSION

The new LC/MS/MS assay has favorable characteristics, being highly precise and accurate. FPIA also proved precise and accurate, and there was a high agreement with the LC/MS/MS assay in plasma and CSF. Either method displayed sufficient precision and accuracy and may thus be implemented in daily routine.

Economic evaluation of epilepsy treatment: a review of the literature

This article provides an overview of methods used and findings from economic analyses in epilepsy. Cost-effectiveness studies have evaluated different drugs for monotherapy and add-on therapy, and compared alternative treatment modalities for refractory epilepsy. The methodological characteristics of these studies are examined, and their results are compared and interpreted. Health outcome measures are defined and data sources described. Methods for assessing the direct and indirect costs, and/or cost savings, with a treatment's use, are explored. Directions for future research are identified and discussed.

Cost minimization analysis of antiepileptic drugs in newly diagnosed epilepsy in 12 European countries

A recent United Kingdom cost minimization analysis (CMA) of four antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used to treat newly diagnosed adult epilepsy demonstrated that a new drug, lamotrigine (LTG), incurred higher costs than carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), and valproate (VPA), whose costs were similar. This analysis took account of each drug's side-effect and tolerability profile. The present analysis investigated the costs of treatment with LTG, CBZ, PHT, and VPA in 12 European countries. Data were derived from published sources and from a panel of locally based experts. When no published data were available, estimates were obtained using expert opinion by a consensus method. These data were incorporated into a treatment pathway model, which considered the treatment of patients during the first 12 months after diagnosis. The primary outcome considered was seizure freedom. Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that the drugs considered are equally effective in terms of their ability to achieve seizure freedom, and thus the most appropriate form of economic evaluation is a CMA. These trials provided data on the incidence of side effects, dosages, and retention rates. The economic perspective taken was that of society as a whole and the analysis was calculated on an "intent-to-treat" basis. Only direct medical costs were considered. In each country considered, LTG was twofold to threefold more expensive than the other drugs considered. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that varying each of the assumptions (range defined by expert panels) did not significantly alter the results obtained.

Prognostic factors affecting long-term retention of topiramate in patients with chronic epilepsy

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term retention rate of topiramate (TPM) therapy in patients with chronic epilepsy and to identify the relevant prognostic factors that influence retention.

METHODS

All patients with chronic epilepsy (n = 393) prescribed TPM between October 1, 1995, and December 31, 1998, at a tertiary referral centre for epilepsy were analysed. The retention rate for TPM was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and the prognostic factors influencing retention were analysed by using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of patients prescribed TPM, 30% continued taking the drug beyond 3 years. Discontinuation was mainly due to adverse events and lack of efficacy. Use of more than one new concurrent antiepileptic drug (AED) and lower maximal daily doses were more likely to result in treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Older age at onset of epilepsy, a history of having previously taken more than one new AED [lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), or vigabatrin (VGB)], and lower maximal daily doses were more likely to lead to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

A third of patients with chronic epilepsy started on TPM therapy will continue on treatment for >3 years. Absence of learning disabilities, late age at onset of seizures, previous use of more than one new AED, two or more concurrent AED use, and low maximal daily doses of TPM are more likely to result in discontinuation of medication. These factors should be taken into account when considering the use of TPM for the treatment of chronic epilepsy.

The anticonvulsant effects of the enantiomers of losigamone

1 Losigamone is a novel anticonvulsant undergoing phase III clinical trials in patients with partial and secondary generalized seizures. This study investigated the effects of the S(+)- and R(-)- enantiomers of losigamone on endogenous amino acid release from BALB/c mouse cortical slices, spontaneous depolarizations in the cortical wedge preparation of the DBA/2 mouse and audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice. 2 S(+)-losigamone (100 and 200 microM) significantly reduced both potassium- and veratridine-elicited release of glutamate and aspartate from cortical slices. R(-)-losigamone had no effect on release at concentrations up to 400 microM. 3 Cortical wedges exhibit spontaneous depolarizations when perfused with magnesium-free artificial cerebrospinal fluid. S(+)-losigamone significantly reduced these depolarizations at 50-200 microM whilst R(-)-losigamone had a significant effect at 200-800 microM. 4 DBA/2 mice are susceptible to audiogenic seizures and S(+)-losigamone dose-dependently (5, 10 and 20 mg kg-1, i.p.) significantly inhibited clonic/tonic convulsions with 91% of the mice protected at 20 mg kg-1. There was no protection at 20 mg kg-1 with R(-)-losigamone. 5 These results, from both in vitro and in vivo experiments, confirm that the pharmacological activity profiles of the two losigamone enantiomers are not identical and suggest further that excitatory amino acid-mediated processes are involved in the mode of action of S(+)-losigamone whereas R(-)-losigamone does not possess such properties. For the treatment of neurological conditions involving exaggerated excitatory amino acid function the use of S(+)-losigamone might therefore be more effective clinically than losigamone or its R(-)-enantiomer.

The long-term use of gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin in patients with chronic epilepsy

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term retention of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), and vigabatrin (VGB) by patients with chronic epilepsy and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. To assess the likelihood of seizure freedom, seizure-related injury/hospital admission and mortality after these drugs were commenced.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-records survey in five tertiary referral epilepsy centres in the U.K. The retention times on treatment (from initiation to discontinuation) for the different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were compared by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression. Incidences of seizure freedom and seizure-related injury/hospital admissions and standardised mortality ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 1,375 patients with chronic epilepsy included; 361 were taking GBP, 1,050 LTG, and 713 VGB. The retention of GBP, LTG, or VGB was <40% at 6 years. Fewer than 4% of patients become seizure free while taking one of the drugs. There was no reduction in mortality or seizure-related injury/admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of these new AEDs on chronic epilepsy can be described only as modest. This view may be revised, however, as more experience is gained with new drugs in previously untreated patients.