New non-invasive protocol for detection of coronary spastic angina with significant organic stenosis

Clinical Applications of Breathing Regulation

Breathing training is widely used as an aid in reducing anxiety states, but several other applications also show promise. This article reviews evidence that normalizing breathing patterns may offer help in some cases of essential hypertension, angina, functional chest disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cardiac rehabilitation. Hyperventilation and hypo-ventilation, inhibited breathing, and breath suspension are all deviations from an optimal breathing pattern in which breathing volume is closely matched to metabolic needs. Such disordered breathing has varying effects on acid/base balance, arterial diameter, and sodium retention by the kidneys. Therefore, a chronic breathing imbalance can contribute to pathophysiology, which may be remediable to an extent by altering habitual breathing patterns.

Approximately half of patients with coronary spastic angina had pathologic exercise tests

OBJECTIVES

We examined the clinical usefulness of treadmill exercise tests (TETs) in diagnosing coronary spastic angina (CSA).

METHODS

We performed the TETs and 24-h Holter monitoring in 300 CSA patients consisting of 152 patients with rest angina, 77 patients with effort angina, and 71 patients with rest and effort angina. Organic stenosis (>75%) was observed in 44 patients. Multiple spasms were recognized in 204 patients (68%).

RESULTS

Positive TETs were recognized in 113 patients (38%) and borderline was observed in 30 patients (10%). Positive response was significantly higher in patients with organic stenosis than those without fixed stenosis (63.6% vs. 33.2%, p<0.001). Moreover, ST elevation was more frequent in patients with organic stenosis than those without fixed stenosis (27.3% vs. 1.2%, p<0.001). Positive response in patients with effort angina (46.8%) was higher than those in patients with rest angina (33.6%) and rest and effort angina (36.6%), but not significant. Positive response was not different between single spasm and multiple spasms. In all 300 patients, ST segment elevation was observed in only four patients (1.3%) on the 24-h Holter monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

TET was useful in documenting ischemia in patients with CSA. More than a third of patients with CSA had positive TETs. Moreover, we obtained the pathologic TET response in approximately half of patients with CSA.

Maximal acetylcholine dose of 200 μg into the left coronary artery as a spasm provocation test: comparison with 100 μg of acetylcholine

As a spasm provocation test of acetylcholine (ACH), incremental dose up (20/50/100 μg) into the left coronary artery (LCA) is recommended in the guidelines established by Japanese Circulation Society. Recently, Ong et al. reported the ACOVA study which maximal ACH dose was 200 μg in the LCA. We compared the angiographic findings between ACH 100 μg and ACH 200 μg in the LCA and also examined the usefulness and safety of ACH 200 μg in Japanese patients without variant angina. As a spasm provocation test, we performed intracoronary injection of ACH 200 μg after ACH 100 μg in 88 patients (55 males, 68.4 ± 11.7 years old) including 59 ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients and 29 non-IHD patients. Positive spasm was defined as >99 % transient stenosis (focal spasm) or 90 % severe diffuse vasoconstriction (diffuse spasm). Positive spasm by ACH 200 μg was significantly higher than that by ACH 100 μg (36 pts: 40.9 % vs. 17 pts: 19.3 %, p < 0.01). Diffuse distal spasm on the left anterior descending artery was more recognized in ACH 200 μg than in ACH 100 μg (30.7 vs. 13.6 %, p < 0.01). In 29 rest angina patients, positive spasm by ACH 200 μg (19 pts) was significantly higher than that by ACH 100 μg (7 pts) (65.5 vs. 24.1 %, p < 0.01). No serious irreversible complications were found during ACH 200 μg. Administration of ACH 200 μg into the LCA was safe and useful. We may reexamine the maximal ACH dose into the LCA.

A long-acting calcium antagonist over one year did not improve BMIPP myocardial scintigraphic imagings in patients with pure coronary spastic angina

BACKGROUND

Calcium antagonists (Ca) have been effective in reducing angina attacks in patients with variant angina. However, there are no reports regarding the effectiveness of Ca on myocardial fatty acid metabolic images in patients with pure coronary spastic angina (CSA).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine the correlation between myocardial fatty acid metabolic images and the medical treatment of Ca in patients with pure CSA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 35 consecutive patients (28 men, mean age of 66 +/- 10 years) with angiographically confirmed coronary spasm and no fixed stenosis. Long-acting Ca was administered to all 35 patients. Isosorbide dinitrate /nicorandil/another Ca/beta-bloker were administered when chest pain was not controlled. Using an iodinated fatty acid analogue, 15-(p-[iodine-123]iodophenyl)-3-(R,S)methylpentadecanoic acid (BMIPP), myocardial scintigraphies with intravenous adenosine triphosphate infusion were performed before cardiac catheterization and 12 mo after medical therapy. According to the medical control states, these 35 patients were classified into 3 groups; response (disappearance of angina attacks, 12 pts, 60 +/- 11 years), partial response (angina attacks < 4/mo, 12 pts, 67 +/- 10 years), and no response to therapy (angina attacks > or = 4/mo, 11 pts, 71 +/- 6 years). Reduced BMIPP uptake was observed in 24 (69%) of 35 patients before the treatment. Reduced BMIPP uptake was also found in 18 patients (51%) after 12 mo. Normal BMIPP uptake after 12 mo therapy was observed in about half (response: 42%, partial response: 58%, no response: 45%) of patients among the 3 groups. There was no difference regarding the value of washout rate (WOR) (response; 10 +/- 7 (before), 14 +/- 8% (12 mo)), partial response; 11 +/- 7, 10 +/- 5%, no response; 13 +/- 9, 14 +/- 8%) among the 3 groups. The defect scores of BMIPP in the three groups were not different during at least one year medical therapy. No difference regarding the distribution of other medical therapies (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/beta-blockers/statins) was found. The administration of Ca and isosorbide dinitrate/nicorandil and 2 Ca was significantly higher in the poor than in the good control patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-acting Ca over one year did not improve myocardial fatty acid metabolic images in patients with pure CSA. This may be related to silent ischemia.

Clinical impact of selective spasm provocation tests: comparisons between acetylcholine and ergonovine in 1508 examinations

BACKGROUND

There are few reports regarding the concordance of coronary arterial response between acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER) spasm provocation tests.

OBJECTIVES

We attempted to perform selective spasm provocation tests to examine the incidence of provoked spasm in patients who had undergone first coronary angiography as much as possible and we compared the coronary arterial response and clinical usefulness between selective intracoronary injection of ACh and intracoronary administration of ER.

METHODS

We performed 1508 selective spasm provocation tests, consisting of 873 ACh tests and 635 ER tests, from 1991 to 2002. We examined the frequency of provoked spasms of each agent retrospectively. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20, 50 and 80 microg into the right coronary artery and 20, 50 and 100 microg into the left coronary artery. ER was administered as 10 microg/min over 4 min for a maximal dose of 40 microg in the right coronary artery and as 16 microg/min over 4 min for a total dose of 64 microg in the left coronary artery. Coronary spasm was defined as transient >99% luminal narrowing.

RESULTS

Intracoronary ACh provoked spasms in 36.0% of patients and intracoronary ER induced spasms in 29.8% of patients. In patients with ischemic heart disease, the incidence of provoked spasms was not different between ACh tests (50.9%) and ER tests (43.8%). In contrast, the frequency of provoked spasms with ACh tests was significantly higher than that with ER tests (11.0% compared with 6.4%, P<0.05) in patients without ischemic heart disease. Moreover, ACh provoked more spasms in patients without fixed stenosis than ER (36.2% compared with 25.5%, P<0.01) and multiple spasms were frequently observed when performing ACh tests (40.0% compared with 27.0%, P<0.01). Major complications were observed in 1.4% of patients with ACh tests and in 0.2% of patients with ER tests. The need for intracoronary administration of isosorbide dinitrate to relieve coronary spasms during ER testing before performing another coronary artery test was more frequently observed in ACh tests (5.04% compared with 1.49%, P<0.01). However, no serious irreversible complications, such as death or acute myocardial infarction, were observed in this study. There was a significant difference in sex, history of smoking and hyperlipidemia between patients with and without spasms for both tests, whereas no difference in age or hypertension was observed in either test.

CONCLUSION

Thus, both selective ACh and ER tests were useful as spasm provocation tests.

Is there a role for provocation testing to diagnose coronary artery spasm?

Spontaneous coronary artery spasm is an important cause of morbidity both in patients with coronary artery disease and in those with variant angina. A number of pharmacological agents have been identified which can provoke coronary artery spasm in susceptible patients. The role of provocation testing in the clinical diagnosis of coronary spasm is controversial. This is reflected by variations in the clinical use of provocation testing between specialist cardiac centres. Provocation testing appears to be a sensitive method of identifying patients with variant angina and active disease but such patients can often be diagnosed clinically. The specificity is less clear. There is little evidence that altering patient therapy on the basis of a positive test modifies prognosis. There may be a role for provocation testing in rare patients with refractory disease to identify a target site for coronary stenting. A more widespread use of these tests in patients with undiagnosed chest pain syndromes would not currently be recommended.

Did the Widespread Use of Long-Acting Calcium Antagonists Decrease the Occurrence of Variant Angina?

BACKGROUND

We have not often encountered variant angina (VA) since the use of long-acting calcium antagonists (L-CAs) became widespread.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the frequency of VA retrospectively.

METHODS

and results: We diagnosed angiographically confirmed coronary spastic angina (CSA) in 349 consecutive patients using selective spasm provocation tests from January 1991 to December 2002. During this period, 3,148 diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and 1,515 selective spasm provocation tests were performed. Seventy-four of these 349 patients (21.2%) had VA. Coronary spasms were defined as transient luminal narrowings of > 99%, and VA was defined as an ST elevation during spontaneous attacks or noninvasive stress tests. We classified the 12 years of the study into four periods of 3 years each. No tendency to decrease for the ratio of the number of patients with CSA and the number of selective spasm provocation tests was observed among the four time periods (18%, 24%, 32%, and 23%, respectively). However, the number of patients with VA (28, 33, 9, and 4) and the VA/CSA ratio (32%, 28%, 14%, and 5%, respectively) in the four group significantly decreased. The frequency of administration of calcium antagonists (CAs) before hospital admission (49% vs 33%, respectively; p < 0.05) was significantly higher in the last time period (from 2000 to 2002) than in the first period (from 1991 to 1993). L-CAs were administered in > 90% of CSA patients who had been medicated with CAs before hospital admission in the last period (from 2000 to 2002), while L-CAs were administered in only 20% in the former period (from 1991 to 1993). The administration of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers before hospital admission gradually increased according to the period passed, but not significantly.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of VA has decreased in Japan, possibly due to the widespread use of therapy with L-CAs.

Induction of coronary artery spasm by two pharmacological agents: comparison between intracoronary injection of acetylcholine and ergonovine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There have been few studies comparing the clinical usefulness for the induction of coronary artery spasm (CAS) between acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER). This study is designed: (1) to examine the duration of effect after intracoronary injection of ACh on the responsible vessels using a 0.014 inch, 15 MHz Doppler guide wire, and (2) to evaluate the efficacy of two pharmacological agents, ACh and ER, for the induction of CAS in patients with <50% stenosis in the cardiac laboratory.

METHODS

Phasic coronary flow velocity patterns were recorded at rest and during ACh tests in 22 patients with normal or near-normal coronary arteries. The tip of the guide wire was placed on the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and mid-left anterior descending artery. We measured the time required to baseline level of average peak velocity after intracoronary injection of ACh. We performed selective intracoronary administration of both ER and ACh in the same 171 patients (106 men, 65 women, mean age of 62+/-10 years) with <50% stenosis. Under no medication, ACh was injected first in incremental doses of 20, 50, and 80 microg into the RCA and of 20, 50, and 100 microg into the left coronary artery (LCA). Ten minutes later, ER was administered at 10 microg/min for four minutes for a maximal dose of 40 microg on the RCA and at 16 microg/min over four minutes for a total dose of 64 microg on the LCA. Positive spasm was defined as > or =99% luminal narrowing.

RESULTS

The time-averaged peak velocity returned to baseline after intracoronary injection of ACh within 10 minutes in all 120 procedures, consisted of 19 with positive spasm (RCA (n=10): 245+/-33 s; LCA (n=9): 351+/-187 s) and 101 with negative spasm (RCA (n=48): 155+/-62 s, LCA (n=53): 248+/-106 s). In the overall results, there was no difference concerning the incidence of provoked spasm between the two pharmacological agents (ACh: 33% versus ER: 32%, NS). Coronary spasms were induced by either pharmacological agent in 134 vessels. Concordance in this study was 94% in all vessels, whereas the remaining 6% of vessels were different from each other. The non-concordance rate of the right coronary artery was significantly higher than that of the left coronary artery (10% versus 4%, p<0.01). However, ER provoked more focal spasms, whereas ACh provoked more diffuse and distal spasms, compared with each other. Seventy-four (55%) of the 134 vessels had coronary spasms in the same coronary arteries. Concordance of both provoked spasm sites and spasm configurations in the same coronary artery was observed in only 18 (13%) vessels. No serious or irreversible complications were observed during the two sequential tests.

CONCLUSIONS

As a spasm provocation test, there were no differences between ACh and ER. We recommend the supplementary use of these two pharmacological agents for the induction of CAS in the cardiac laboratory, if available.

Intracoronary administration of a thromboxane A2 synthase inhibitor relieves acetylcholine-induced coronary spasm

This study sought to clarify the effectiveness of intracoronary administration of a thromboxane (TX) A2 synthase inhibitor, Ozagrel Na, to relieve coronary spasms induced by intracoronary injection of acetylcholine (ACh). An ACh spasm provocation test was performed in 92 consecutive patients with coronary spastic angina using incremental doses of 20, 50, and 80 microg into the right coronary artery, and 20, 50, and 100 microg into the left coronary artery within 20s. A coronary spasm was defined as TIMI 0 or 1 flow and an intracoronary injection of 20 mg Ozagrel Na was administered when it was provoked. Within 2 min of the administration of the TXA2 synthase inhibitor, ACh-induced coronary spasms were relieved (TIMI 3 flow) in 88.1% of procedures without complications. In only 4 cases (4.3%), it took more than 3 min to relieve the coronary spasms. Intracoronary administration of 20mg Ozagrel Na when ACh-induced spasms occurred, shortened the spasm relief time in all 7 patients (200 +/- 59s vs 111 +/- 23s, p < 0.01), improved the maximal ST segment elevation in 5 of them (3.9 +/- 3.7 mm vs 0.7 +/- 1.5 mm, p < 0.05), and stopped chest pain in 4 patients. In 4 patients who had ACh-induced coronary spasm of the left anterior descending artery, the TXB2 concentration in the coronary sinus decreased after intracoronary administration of Ozagrel Na into the left coronary artery (463 +/- 562 vs 96 +/- 45, p < 0.01). In conclusion, intracoronary administration of a TXA2 synthase inhibitor can relieve ACh-induced coronary spasms by inhibiting TXA2 synthesis in the local coronary circulation.

New protocol to detect coronary spastic angina without fixed stenosis

A new combined test, accelerated exercise following mild hyperventilation (HV), was examined to determine whether it is effective at detecting a positive response in patients with pharmacologically-induced coronary vasospasm and near normal coronary arteries. Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent both triple non-invasive spasm provocation tests and diagnostic coronary angiography were enrolled. They all had pharmacologically-induced coronary vasospasms and no significant organic stenosis. In these patients, an HV test was performed first, followed by a treadmill exercise test (TET), and finally the new combined test under no medication within 3 days. Of the 58 patients, positive responses were observed in 9 patients to the HV, in 15 to the TET, and in 35 to the newly combined test. The remaining 21 patients had negative responses although the triple sequential tests were perfomed. Thus, the sensitivities of the HV test, TET, and newly combined test were 16% (9/58), 26% (15/58), and 63% (35/56), respectively. Forty-six subjects with near normal coronary arteries and no ACh-provoked spasm served as controls. None of these subjects had positive responses to any of these three tests, and thus their specificity was all 100%. No serious or irreversible complications were seen in this study. We recommend this newly-combined protocol for the induction of coronary artery spasm in patients with vasospastic angina pectoris and without significant stenosis as a diagnostic tool.

Clinical and angiographical characteristics of acetylcholine- induced spasm: relationship to dose of intracoronary injection of acetylcholine

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to clarify clinical and angiographical characteristics of acetylcholine (ACh)-induced spasm in the right and left coronary artery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed 557 consecutive procedures of spasm provocation tests of ACh from January 1991 to December 2000 in patients without significant stenosis. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20, 50 and 80 microg into the right coronary artery and in incremental doses of 20, 50 and 100 microg into the left coronary artery if spasm had not been provoked. Coronary spasm was defined as positive with more than 99% transient luminal narrowing. Proximal spasm was defined as that of segments 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 11 and distal spasm as that of segments 3, 4, 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14. Low-ACh-dose-induced spasms showed the clinical findings and angiographical characteristics of higher incidence of variant angina, proximal spasms, focal spasms, more ST elevation and ischemic heart disease. In contrast, angiographical characteristics of high-Ach-dose-induced spasms were distal spasms and diffuse spasms and there was less variant angina and less ST elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower ACh doses induced spasms more proximally and focally in the coronary artery, while higher doses of ACh provoked spasms more distally and diffusely.