Effect of simvastatin on coronary flow reserve in patients with atherosclerosis and hypercholesterolemia: an intracoronary Doppler study

Effects of Oral Drugs on Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients Without Significant Stenosis of Epicardial Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Coronary Flow Reserve

Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of cardiovascular medications on the coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to 15 November 2019. Studies were included if they reported CFR from baseline to follow-up after oral drug therapy of patients without obstructive CAD. Data was pooled using random-effects modeling. The primary outcome was change in CFR from baseline to follow-up after oral drug therapy.

Results: A total of 46 studies including 845 subjects were included in this study. Relative to baseline, the CFR was improved by angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACEIs), aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARBs) [standard mean difference (SMD): 1.12; 95% CI: 0.77–1.47], and statins treatments (SMD: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.36–0.85). Six to 12 months of calcium channel blocker (CCB) treatments improved CFR (SMD: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.51–1.58). Beta-blocker (SMD: 0.24; 95% CI: −0.39–0.88) and ranolazine treatment (SMD: 0.31; 95% CI: −0.39–1.01) were not associated with improved CFR.

Conclusions: Therapy with ACEIs, ARBs, and statins was associated with improved CFR in patients with confirmed or suspicious CMD. CCBs also improved CFR among patients followed for 6–12 months. Beta-blocker and ranolazine had no impact on CFR.

Treatment strategies in coronary microvascular dysfunction: A systematic review of interventional studies

CMD has been associated with a wide spectrum of diseases and conditions, and it has proven to be a strong prognostic marker of morbidity and mortality. Despite increased attention, guideline-based treatment recommendations are lacking. We performed a systematic review of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to improve coronary perfusion, assessed by IC Doppler, TTDE, PET, CMRI, transthoracic contrast perfusion echocardiography, and dilution techniques. No restrictions were made regarding the study design (randomized, placebo-controlled/randomized with active comparators/nonrandomized with or without a control group), the cardiac condition studied, or the coronary microvascular function at baseline. An electronic database search yielded 4485 records of which 80 studies met our inclusion criteria. Included studies were sorted according to intervention and study design. Studies were small and heterogeneous in methodology, and only few were placebo-controlled. Although some treatments looked promising, we found that no specific treatment was sufficiently well documented to be recommended in any patient groups. There is a need for larger well-designed clinical trials, and we suggest that future studies stratify study populations according to pathogenic mechanisms, thereby investigating whether an individualized treatment approach would be more successful.

Improvement in endothelium dysfunction in diabetics treated with statins: a randomized comparison of atorvastatin 20 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg

AIM

To investigate the effect a 3-month treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg compared with rosuvastatin 10 mg on endothelium dysfunction in subjects with diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 22 consecutive subjects with diabetes who were not receiving statins were enrolled in the study. Endothelium function was assessed before treatment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and after 3 months of treatment (T2) with statins with brachial echo-Doppler test. Patients were randomized to receive atorvastatin 20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg. Blood samples were drawn in the meantime in order to evaluate C-reactive protein (CRP) plasmatic concentrations.

RESULTS

A total of 82% of patients enrolled showed endothelium dysfunction (hyperemic reserve <5%). Treatment with statins significantly improved endothelium function in diabetics. Subjects with endothelium dysfunction decreased from 82% (T0) to 44% (T2): mean hyperemic reserve values increased from 2.64% (T0) to 3.23% (T1) and 4% (T2) in patients treated with rosuvastatin (ANOVA P < 0.01), and from 2.74% (T0) to 2.75% (T1) and 4.40% (T2) in those treated with atorvastatin (ANOVA P < 0.01); differences were significant only comparing T2 with T0. Relative increase in endothelium reserve was 51.51% with rosuvastatin versus 60.58% with atorvastatin (P N.S.). Both statins significantly reduced plasmatic levels of CRP (3.18 +/- 2.43 mg/dL [T0] vs. 1.31 +/- 1.67 mg/dL [T2] with rosuvastatin [P < 0.01], 7.53 +/- 7.46 mg/dL [T0] vs. 2.92 +/- 2.06 mg/dL [T2] with atorvastatin [P < 0.01]). Relative reduction of CRP levels was -50.57% with rosuvastatin versus -36.28% with atorvastatin (P N.S.).

CONCLUSION

A 3-month treatment with either atorvastatin 20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg is effective in improving endothelium dysfunction in subjects with diabetes.