Corticosteroids: effects on voice:

Dysphonia associated with the use of inhaled corticosteroids

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the relationship between inhaled corticosteroids and dysphonia, with discussion of the therapeutic use of inhaled steroids in laryngeal disease and a review of negative laryngeal effects of this class of medication in patients with reactive airway disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although prescribed for their anti-inflammatory effects (predominantly for pulmonary disease and less often for laryngeal conditions), corticosteroid inhalers can cause laryngeal inflammation. This may relate to chemical irritation from the inhaler itself as well as fungal inflammation related to opportunistic candidiasis that may accompany inhaler use. Patients who suffer from dysphonia because of inhaler use may improve if switched to another inhaler. Studies suggest that ciclesonide metered-dose inhaler may have less oropharyngeal deposition and therefore be associated with reduced oropharyngeal candidiasis and dysphonia compared with other inhaled corticosteroids.

SUMMARY

Corticosteroid inhalers are a common cause of dysphonia and their use should be investigated in any patient with laryngeal complaints.

Use of inhaled versus oral steroids for acute dysphonia

Acute dysphonia is a frequent condition in clinical practice. Its treatment, especially in adults, is not well established in the literature. Steroids are the most recommended drug treatment. However, the existing studies are not enough to establish superiority among the different steroids and the best route of administration.

Objective

This prospective clinical study aimed at comparing the effect of inhaling steroids as a dry powder with the effect of oral steroids to treat acute dysphonia.

Method

We assessed 32 adult patients, broken down into two groups of 16 patients in each one of the treatments, before and seven days after the use of the medication. The patients were submitted to videolaryngoscopy and perceptive and acoustic voice assessment.

Result

Oral and inhalation treatment significantly reduced hyperemia and edema, and improved the muco-ondulatory movement; nonetheless, edema reduction was statistically more significant (p = 0.012) in the patients treated with the inhalation form of the drug. However, comparing the values of the auditory perceptive analysis and the acoustic measures after treatment between the groups was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

There was a significant improvement in the acute laryngitis concerning the assessments carried out in all the patients assessed, concerning the two treatments. The inhalation steroid treatment was significantly more effective in reducing the edema.