The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine using the "Funnel Technique": part 1. A cadaveric study

Change of vertebral orientation, between the supine position and the prone position

PURPOSE

Our aim was to assess the change of vertebral orientation, expressed in the sagittal plane, in the transversal plane and in the frontal plane, at each level from T1 to S1 between the supine position (like in in a CT scan) and the prone position lying on bolsters like in an OR.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients were selected and included for a total number of one hundred and forty-eight vertebral levels. There were 30 females and 6 males. The mean age was 15 years and 9 months. A semi-automatic image processing technique and software (3D slicer), with a custom-made python script add-on, was used for each patient: paired preoperative CT scan and intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan were processed to acquire complete spinal reconstructions in a consistent 3D coordinate system. The aim was to automatically compute a set of sagittal, transversal, and frontal rotations of each vertebral level of the same patient describing the 3D vertebral rotation between the supine position and the prone position lying on bolsters.

RESULTS

For sagittal analysis, the results showed a behavior in the evolution of rotation depending on the level. Between T01 and T10, the rotation was between - 14° and - 8°. Between T10 and L05, the sagittal rotation increased from - 10° up to + 10°. For frontal and transversal analysis, the rotations were under 6.5°.

CONCLUSION

These results could be valuable to perform a safe virtual templating: the information given by the virtual templating seems to be more accurate in the transversal plane than in the sagittal plane.

Surgical Outcome of Spinal Fusion for Osteogenesis Imperfecta With Scoliosis: Is the Hybrid System With Pedicle Screws Applicable to Weak, Tiny, and Fragile Vertebrae?

INTRODUCTION

Corrective surgery for spinal deformity associated with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is challenging due to the severe and rigid deformity combined with extreme bone fragility. However, surgical outcomes still remain unclear. In addition, the applicability of pedicle screws (PSs) to the tiny and fragile vertebrae in patients with OI is poorly understood. This study evaluated the surgical outcome, and the accuracy and safety of PS placement in patients with OI.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with OI were included in this study. Mean age was 21.0±9.3 (10 to 49) years. Mean follow-up was 5.8±2.0 years. The Sillence classification showed 16 patients had the mildest type I, 1 patient had moderate type IV, and 8 patients had the most severe type III. Fifteen patients underwent anterior release followed by posterior fusion, and 10 patients underwent only posterior fusion. The accuracy of PS placement was evaluated with postoperative computed tomography.

RESULTS

Scoliosis was corrected from 95.6 to 65.8 degrees after surgery (correction rate 32.5%) and 68.1 degrees at final follow-up (both, P<0.01). Space available for the lung was improved from 76.3% to 84.9% (P<0.05). No implant dislodgement occurred after surgery. A total of 290 screws were placed, of which 213 screws (73.4%) were placed completely. However, 30 screws (10.3%) penetrated >2 mm. In particular, rates of >2 mm penetration was much higher in type III than type I and IV (27.8% vs. 3.0%; P<0.01). Complications related to spinal surgery included 2 transient neurological disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

PSs were applicable to spinal fusion surgery in patients with OI. However special care should be taken in placing PSs because of the weakness of the pedicle cortex, which was easily penetrated especially in Sillence type III.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The accuracy and safety of fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine in the Asian population: A CT scan analysis of 1002 screws

PURPOSE

This study investigates the safety and accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws placed using fluoroscopic guidance in the thoracolumbosacral spine among Asian patients.

METHODS

Computerized tomography scans of 128 patients who had surgery using fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pedicle screws were selected. Medial, lateral, superior, and inferior screw perforations were classified into grade 0 (no violation), grade 1 (<2 mm perforation), grade 2 (2-4 mm perforation), and grade 3(>4 mm perforation). Anterior perforations were classified into grade 0 (no violation), grade 1 (<4 mm perforation), grade 2 (4-6 mm perforation), and grade 3(>6 mm perforation). Grade 2 and grade 3 perforation were considered as "critical" perforation.

RESULTS

In total, 1002 percutaneous pedicle screws from 128 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 52.7 ± 16.6. There were 70 male patients and 58 female patients. The total perforation rate was 11.3% (113) with 8.4% (84) grade 1, 2.6% (26) grade 2, and 0.3% (3) grade 3 perforations. The overall "critical" perforation rate was 2.9% (29 screws) and no complications were noted. The highest perforation rates were at T4 (21.6%), T2 (19.4%), and T6 (19.2%).

CONCLUSION

The total perforation rate of 11.3% with the total "critical" perforation rate of 2.9% (2.6% grade 2 and 0.3% grade 3 perforations). The highest perforation rates were found over the upper to mid-thoracic region. Fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pedicle screws insertion among Asians has the safety and accuracy comparable to the current reported percutaneous pedicle screws and open pedicle screws techniques.

The Safety and Strength of a Novel Medial, Partial Nonthreaded Pedicle Screw: A Cadaveric and Biomechanical Investigation

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaveric and biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and pullout strength of medial, partial nonthreaded thoracic pedicle screws compared with conventional screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The perforation rate of the pedicle screws has been reported as high as 41%. Nerve injury and irritation can result from the compression of malpositioned screw on neural structures.

METHODS

Ten fresh cadavers were studied. Screws, 5.0 and 6.0 mm, were inserted from T1 to T6 and T7 to T12, respectively. Pedicle perforations and fractures were recorded upon screw insertion and final positioning (nonthreaded portion facing medially) after a wide laminectomy. Pullout strength of novel and conventional screws were then tested using an Instron machine in an artificial bone substitute.

RESULTS

A total of 240 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted. Of them, 88.8% (213 screws) were fully contained during screw insertion. There were 5.0% (12 screws) grade 1 medial perforations and 6.2% (15 screws) grade 1 lateral perforations during screw insertion. Upon final positioning, 93.8% (225 screws) were fully contained. All grade 1 medial perforations, which occurred during insertion, were converted to grade 0. No dural or nerve root injuries occurred. Pedicle split fractures were noted in 6.7% (16 screws). The use of medial, partial nonthreaded screws reduced the overall perforation rate from 11.2% to 6.2%. The mean pullout load for the 5 mm fully threaded screw versus medial, partial nonthreaded was 1419.3±106.1 N (1275.8-1538.8 N) and 1336.6±44.2 N (1293.0-1405.1 N) respectively, whereas 6 mm pullout load averaged 2126.0±134.8 N (1986.3-2338.3 N) and 2036.5±210.0 N (1818.4-2355.9 N). The difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of medial, partial nonthreaded pedicle screws reduced the medial perforation rate from 5.0% to 0%; however, the pullout strength was not significantly reduced. The use of this novel screw can potentially reduce the incidence of nerve injury or irritation after medial pedicle perforations.

Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in patients with Marfan syndrome

BACKGROUND

There is no study concerning safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement in Marfan syndrome. The objective of this study is to investigate accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in scoliosis associated with Marfan syndrome.

METHODS

CT scanning was performed to analyze accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Pedicle perforations were classified as medial, lateral or anterior and categorized to four grades: ≤ 2 mm as Grade 1, 2.1-4.0 mm as Grade 2, 4.1-6.0 mm as Grade 3, ≥6.1 mm as Grade 4. Fully contained screws or with medial wall perforation ≤ 2 mm or with lateral wall perforation ≤ 6 mm and without injury of visceral organs were considered acceptable, otherwise were unacceptable.

RESULTS

976 pedicle screws were placed, 713 screws (73.1%) were fully contained within the cortical boundaries of the pedicle. 924 (94.7%) screws were considered as acceptable, and 52 (5.3%) as unacceptable. The perforation rate was higher using free-hand technique than O-arm navigation technique (30.8% VS. 11.4%, P < 0.05), higher in lumbar region than in thoracic region (34.1% VS. 22.3%, P < 0.05) and higher in concave side than in convex side (33.5% VS. 21.9%, P < 0.05). No injury of visceral organs especially aorta erosion was noted in the series. 7 cases of dural tear caused by misplaced screws occurred, and 4 cases developed cerebro-spinal fluid leak. Drainage and pressure dressings were applied for these patients, and no infection was observed. Leg pain was observed in 7 cases, and 2 cases simultaneously complained of leg weakness. Revision surgery was conducted to remove the misplaced screws for these 2 patients. Conservative treatment was applied for the 5 patients without leg weakness. Symptoms of leg weakness and pain resolved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Placement of pedicle screw in Marfan syndrome is accuracy and safe. O-arm navigation was an effective modality to ensure the safety and accuracy of screw placement. Special attention should be paid when screws were placed at the lumber spine and the concave side of spine deformity to avoid the higher rate of complications.

Is the Superior Articular Process a Reliable Landmark for Determining the Transverse Plane Angulation of Thoracic Pedicles in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

PURPOSE

To analyze the usefulness of the superior articular process (SAP) as an external landmark for determining the transverse plane angulation of thoracic pedicles in scoliotic spines.

METHODS

Two investigators reviewed thoracic spine CT scans of 60 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The gantry was adjusted to obtain axial images parallel to the superior endplate. Each investigator measured the Cobb angle of the thoracic curve and identified the apical vertebra. This vertebra as well as the vertebrae bordering it superiorly and inferiorly was examined. A line was subtended at a 90° angle to the surface of the SAP, with a starting point at the midpoint of the lateral half of the SAP. It was documented whether the line was contained within the pedicle or breeched it medially or laterally. Breeches were corrected to an ideal projection, and the degree and direction of correction was recorded. Curves of 50°-60° were then compared to curves ≥70°.

RESULTS

Four subjects in our cohort were excluded as a result of inadequate imaging. Of 336 measurements, 89.3% were contained in bone, resulting in a breech rate of 10.7%. A majority of wall violations were on the lateral side (94.4%), with the average degree of correction being 6.1°. Interobserver agreement was calculated to be 95%, 87.5%, and 89.3% for superior, apical, and inferior vertebral measurements, respectively. On further stratification of the patients based on a Cobb angle of 50°-60° and ≥70°, we found that patients with curves ≥70° have a greater incidence of wall breech at the apical vertebra (10% vs. 5.6%) (p = .02).

CONCLUSION

The SAP can serve as a reliable external landmark for determining the transverse plane angulation of thoracic pedicles in scoliotic spines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Pedicle screw insertion techniques: an update and review of the literature

Pedicle screw construct have become one of the most practiced procedure in spinal surgery. Despite commonly used, questions remain about their safety especially for the thoracic spine and in deformity where difficulty in positioning can lead to pedicle breach and adjacent structures injury. Misplacement rates have been reported to be from 5 to 41% in the lumbar spine and from 3 to 55% in the thoracic spine. Hence, various procedures have been described in order to improve pedicle screw insertion accuracy. Aim of this study is to evaluate current concepts on pedicle screws placement techniques to better understand recent attitude and clarify some doubts when selecting the most proper method.

The Indian Basket Trick: a case of delayed paraplegia with complete recovery, caused by misplaced thoracic pedicle screw

Introduction

Pedicle screw fixation allows purchase of all three spinal columns without encroaching into the spinal canal improving fracture fixation, as well as deformity correction. Fortunately, neurologic injury associated with pedicle screw malposition is rare.

Case presentation

A 19-year-old boy was surgically treated for severe right thoracic scoliosis associated with a Chiari Type 1 malformation and a C6 to T7 syringomyelia. Six months after the initial surgery, the patient was referred to our institution after three weeks of gait disturbances and repeated falls. Imaging showed the gross misplacement of the left T5 pedicle screw, which crossed the center of the vertebral canal. The initial surgery used a freehand technique of pedicle screw insertion, with anteroposterior and lateral postoperative X-ray control. During the surgery, no SEP modifications were noted during pedicle screw placement. However, after insertion of the second rod and scoliosis correction by posterior translation technique, SEP responses decreased considerably. Revision surgery was performed to remove the misplaced screw. During the first three months after screw removal, repeated clinical examinations showed progressive recovery of the neurological deficits. Gait and bladder functions were normal six months after screw removal, and clinical signs of spasticity disappeared. SEP explorations performed at final follow-up showed similar responses to those performed before the initial surgery for scoliosis correction

Discussion and evaluation

Neurologic injury associated with pedicle screw malposition is rare. In early or delayed neurological status worsening, intraoperative or postoperative imaging must be done to detect pedicle screw misplacement. In the current case, thanks to cobalt-chromium and titanium use, MRI and CT scan allowed good visualization of the spinal canal and spinal cord. Experimental studies have shown that neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord does not detect moderate compression. In that way, neurophysiological monitoring is an all-or-nothing technique which can misdiagnose early stage of spinal cord injuries. Major penetration of the spinal canal by pedicle screw may conduct to hardware removal.

Conclusions

In early or delayed neurological status worsening, intraoperative or postoperative imaging must be done to detect pedicle screw misplacement. In the current case, thanks to cobalt-chromium and titanium use, MRI and CT scan allowed good visualization of the spinal canal and spinal cord. Major penetration of the spinal canal by pedicle screw may conduct to hardware removal.

Accuracy and safety of fluoroscopic guided percutaneous pedicle screws in thoracic and lumbosacral spine: a review of 2000 screws

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screws placed using fluoroscopic guidance in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several studies had examined the accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screws but provided large variations in their results with small number of patients or few number of pedicle screws evaluated.

METHODS

Computerized tomography of patients who had surgery with fluoroscopic guided percutaneous pedicle screws were chosen from 2 centers: (1) European patients from University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany and (2) Asian patients from University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. Screw perforations were classified into Grade 0, Grade 1 (<2 mm), Grade 2 (2-4 mm), and Grade 3 (>4 mm).

RESULTS

In total, 2000 percutaneous pedicle screws from 273 patients were analyzed: 1290 screws from 183 European patients and 710 screws from 90 Asian patients. The mean age was 59.1 ± 15.6. There were 140 male patients and 133 female patients. The total perforation rate was 9.4% with 151 (7.5%) Grade 1, 31 (1.6%) Grade 2, and 5 (0.3%) Grade 3 perforations. The total perforation rates among Europeans were 9.4% and among Asians were 9.3%. There was no difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). There were 3 distinct peaks in perforation rates (trimodal distribution) at T1, midthoracic region (T4-T7), and lumbosacral junction (L5 and S1). The highest perforation rates were at T1 (33.3%), S1 (19.4%), and T4 (18.6%).

CONCLUSION

Implantation of percutaneous pedicle screws insertion using fluoroscopic guidance is safe and has the accuracy comparable to open techniques of pedicle screws insertion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The accuracy and safety of fluoroscopically guided percutaneous pedicle screws in the lumbosacral junction and the lumbar spine

We undertook a retrospective study investigating the accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screws placed under fluoroscopic guidance in the lumbosacral junction and lumbar spine. The CT scans of patients were chosen from two centres: European patients from University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, and Asian patients from the University of Malaya, Malaysia. Screw perforations were classified into grades 0, 1, 2 and 3. A total of 880 percutaneous pedicle screws from 203 patients were analysed: 614 screws from 144 European patients and 266 screws from 59 Asian patients. The mean age of the patients was 58.8 years (16 to 91) and there were 103 men and 100 women. The total rate of perforation was 9.9% (87 screws) with 7.4% grade 1, 2.0% grade 2 and 0.5% grade 3 perforations. The rate of perforation in Europeans was 10.4% and in Asians was 8.6%, with no significant difference between the two (p = 0.42). The rate of perforation was the highest in S1 (19.4%) followed by L5 (14.9%). The accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screw placement are comparable to those cited in the literature for the open method of pedicle screw placement. Greater caution must be taken during the insertion of L5 and S1 percutaneous pedicle screws owing to their more angulated pedicles, the anatomical variations in their vertebral bodies and the morphology of the spinal canal at this location.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:1111–17.

Biomechanical study of the funnel technique applied in thoracic pedicle screw replacement

BACKGROUND

Funnel technique is a method used for the insertion of screw into thoracic pedicle.

AIM

To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of thoracic pedicle screw placement using the Funnel technique, trying to provide biomechanical basis for clinical application of this technology.

METHODS

14 functional spinal units (T6 to T10) were selected from thoracic spine specimens of 14 fresh adult cadavers, and randomly divided into two groups, including Funnel technique group (n = 7) and Magerl technique group (n = 7). The displacement-stiffness and pull-out strength in all kinds of position were tested and compared.

RESULTS

Two fixed groups were significantly higher than that of the intact state (P < 0.05) in the spinal central axial direction, compression, anterior flexion, posterior bending, lateral bending, axial torsion, but there were no significant differences between two fixed groups (P > 0.05). The mean pull-out strength in Funnel technique group (789.09 ± 27.33) was lower than that in Magerl technique group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Funnel technique for the insertion point of posterior bone is a safe and accurate technique for pedicle screw placement. It exhibited no effects on the stiffness of spinal column, but decreased the pull-out strength of pedicle screw. Therefore, the funnel technique in the thoracic spine affords an alternative for the standard screw placement.

The Superior Articular Process as an External Landmark for Determining the Transverse Plane Angulation of Thoracic Pedicles

STUDY DESIGN

Computed tomographic (CT) study of thoracic spine pedicles.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the usefulness of the superior articular process (SAP) as an external landmark for determining the transverse plane angulation of thoracic pedicles.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of thoracic pedicle screws has become commonplace. Although most authors report them to be safe, their use poses a risk to neurovascular structures. Previous studies have provided useful information regarding thoracic pedicle anatomy, but this information is difficult to apply intra-operatively. To avoid neurovascular injury, it is important to determine the correct transverse plane angulation of screw insertion.

METHODS

Two separate investigators reviewed thoracic spine CT scans of 53 patients, 26 years of age or younger. Measurements were taken of the angular relationship of the pedicle and the SAP of T4-T11. A 90° angle was subtended from a line parallel to the SAP with a starting point at the midpoint of the lateral half of the SAP. Measurements were then adjusted laterally for medial breeches and medially for lateral breeches, to align the trajectory down the middle of the pedicle. The degree of correction was recorded. Each investigator made 3 sets of measurements. We calculated kappa values to assess intra-observer/interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Of the 4,008 measurements, 95.2% were contained within bone, leaving 4.8% pedicle violations. The average correction made for medial and lateral breeches was 6.3% and 6.7%, respectively. The first rater had 92.6% agreement, and an intra-observer kappa value of 0.57. The second rater had a 95.3% agreement and an intra-observer kappa value of 0.40.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the hypothesis that the SAP can be a useful external landmark for determining the transverse plane angulation of thoracic pedicle screw insertion.

A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to develop a novel, patient-specific, navigational template for thoracic pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

Twenty thoracic cadaver specimens were randomly divided into two groups of 10: the navigational template group and the free-hand group. A volumetric CT scan was performed on each thoracic vertebra, and a three-dimensional reconstruction model was generated. A drill template was designed with a surface that was the inverse of the posterior vertebral surface. Each drill template and its corresponding vertebra were manufactured using a rapid prototyping technique and tested for violation. Two hundred and forty screws were implanted into the thoracic spines and the positions of the screws were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty thoracic screws were inserted using either the navigational template method or the free-hand method. The accuracy rate and incidence of risk for setting thoracic pedicle screws differed statistically between the two methods (P < 0.05): The navigational template method had a higher accuracy rate and a lower incidence of risk than the free-hand method. Moreover, the free-hand method had a significant learning curve, whereas a learning curve for the navigational template method was not obvious.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a novel, patient-specific, navigational template for thoracic pedicle screw placement with good applicability and high accuracy.

The reliability of the ball-tipped probe for detecting pedicle screw tract violations prior to instrumenting the thoracic and lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaveric.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the confidence with which surgeons should rely on a flexible ball-tipped probe to detect pedicle breeches in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The reliability of a ball-tipped probe for detecting cortical violations of the pedicle tract has not been studied among fellowship-trained surgeons.

METHODS

A total of 134 pedicles were randomized to have pedicle screw tracts with one of six possible options: no violation, anterior, superior, inferior, medial, or lateral violations. Five fellowship-trained spine surgeons examined each pedicle, using a standard flexible ball-tipped probe on three nonsequential occasions. The percentage of correctly identified violations, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the surgeons as a group and individually. The Cohen kappa coefficient was used to assess the accuracy of the observers and the interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Finally, we analyzed our results by spinal region to see whether this impacted the surgeons' ability to detect a pedicle violation.

RESULTS

The surgeons were able to correctly identify 81% of intact pedicles, 39% of superior, 68% of medial, 74% of lateral, 62% of anterior, and 50% of inferior violations. The sensitivity varied considerably by breech location and surgeon with a range of 18% to 85%. Positive predictive value for each breech location ranged from 12% to 20%. The specificity was 81% and negative predictive value 98% overall. The intraobserver reliability was moderate and interobserver reliability was low in this series. The ability to detect a pedicle violation was significantly better in the lower thoracic region (T6-T12) than in other areas of the spine.

CONCLUSION

The standard ball-tipped probe was much less reliable than expected. This technique can be used to confirm an intact pedicle but has an unacceptably high false-positive rate and should be used with caution. Our study suggests that overconfidence in pedicle probing might be dangerous.

Thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asian cadaveric specimen: does radiological pedicle profile affect outcome?

PURPOSE

Pedicle screw instrumentation has superior biomechanical as well as clinical outcome. Thoracic pedicles show great variation in different population groups, particularly in Asians who have been shown to have smaller pedicle dimensions. Although plain radiographs are widely performed prior to spine surgery, no studies have been done so far to investigate whether the thoracic pedicle profile on plain radiographs affect thoracic pedicle screw insertion. Therefore, this is a cadaveric study aimed to determine the relationship between plain radiographic thoracic pedicle profile in Asians and the outcome of pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic spine.

METHODS

A pre-insertion radiograph with an enlargement reference scale was performed and surgeons were blinded to the plain radiographic morphometry of the thoracic pedicles. From the pre-insertion radiograph, the normalized pedicle width and height (which controls for any magnification error) as well as the pedicle width:body width (PWBW) and pedicle width:pedicle height (PWPH) ratio was derived. 240 pedicle screws were inserted in ten Asian cadavers from T1 to T12 using the funnel technique. 5.0 mm screws were used from T1 to T6 while 6.0 mm screws were used from T7 to T12. Perforations were detected by direct visualization via wide laminectomies after pedicle screw insertion. The outcome of thoracic pedicle screw insertion was correlated with the radiological profile using independent t-test. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to investigate the correlation between the ratios and the normalised pedicle width and height.

RESULTS

The narrowest pedicle width is from T3 to T6 determined from normalized measurement of the pedicle width. T5 pedicle width is the smallest measuring 4.1 ± 1.3 mm. The overall perforation rate is 10.4% (25 perforations). There is only one significant perforation. There were twice as many lateral and inferior perforations compared to the medial perforations. 48% of the perforations occurred at T1, T2 and T3. Pedicles <4.0 mm in width and upper thoracic pedicles are risk factors for pedicle perforation. The normalised pedicle width has a high degree of linear correlation with PWBW and a normalised pedicle width of 4.0 mm correlated with a PWBW ratio of 0.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Plain radiographic thoracic pedicle morphometry has an influence on the outcome of thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asian cadavers. Pedicle width <4.0 mm is associated with higher risk of pedicle perforation. This critical value corresponds to a PWBW ratio of 0.3. Identification of such pedicle profile warrants full evaluation of the morphometry of the thoracic pedicles and possibly extra-pedicular techniques should be employed to avert the risk of critical pedicle perforation.

The effect of starting point placement technique on thoracic transverse process strength: an ex vivo biomechanical study

Background

The use of thoracic pedicle screws in spinal deformity, trauma, and tumor reconstruction is becoming more common. Unsuccessful screw placement may require salvage techniques utilizing transverse process hooks. The effect of different starting point placement techniques on the strength of the transverse process has not previously been reported. The purpose of this paper is to determine the biomechanical properties of the thoracic transverse process following various pedicle screw starting point placement techniques.

Methods

Forty-seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebrae from T2 to T9 were disarticulated and matched by bone mineral density (BMD) and transverse process (TP) cross-sectional area. Specimens were randomized to one of four groups: A, control, and three others based on thoracic pedicle screw placement technique; B, straightforward; C, funnel; and D, in-out-in. Initial cortical bone removal for pedicle screw placement was made using a burr at the location on the transverse process or transverse process-laminar junction as published in the original description of each technique. The transverse process was tested measuring load-to-failure simulating a hook in compression mode. Analysis of covariance and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the data.

Results

Technique was a significant predictor of load-to-failure (P = 0.0007). The least squares mean (LS mean) load-to-failure of group A (control) was 377 N, group B (straightforward) 355 N, group C (funnel) 229 N, and group D (in-out-in) 301 N. Significant differences were noted between groups A and C, A and D, B and C, and C and D. BMD (0.925 g/cm² [range, 0.624-1.301 g/cm²]) was also a significant predictor of load-to-failure, for all specimens grouped together (P < 0.0001) and for each technique (P <0.05). Level and side tested were not found to significantly correlate with load-to-failure.

Conclusions

The residual coronal plane compressive strength of the thoracic transverse process is dependent upon the screw starting point placement technique. The funnel technique significantly weakens transverse processes as compared to the straightforward technique, which does not significantly weaken the transverse process. It is also dependent upon bone mineral density, and low failure loads even in some control specimens suggest limited usefulness of the transverse process for axial compression loading in the osteoporotic thoracic spine.

Safety of thoracic pedicle screw application using the funnel technique in Asians: a cadaveric evaluation

The objective of this cadaveric study is to determine the safety and outcome of thoracic pedicle screw placement in Asians using the funnel technique. Pedicle screws have superior biomechanical as well as clinical data when compared to other methods of instrumentation. However, misplacement in the thoracic spine can result in major neurological implications. There is great variability of the thoracic pedicle morphometry between the Western and the Asian population. The feasibility of thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asians has not been fully elucidated yet. A pre-insertion radiograph was performed and surgeons were blinded to the morphometry of the thoracic pedicles. 240 pedicle screws were inserted in ten Asian cadavers from T1 to T12 using the funnel technique. 5.0 mm screws were used from T1 to T6 while 6.0 mm screws were used from T7 to T12. Perforations were detected by direct visualization via a wide laminectomy. The narrowest pedicles are found between T3 and T6. T5 pedicle width is smallest measuring 4.1 +/- 1.3 mm. There were 24 (10.0%) Grade 1 perforations and only 1 (0.4%) Grade 2 perforation. Grade 2 or worse perforation is considered significant perforation which would threaten the neural structures. There were twice as many lateral and inferior perforations compared to medial perforations. 48.0% of the perforations occurred at T1, T2 and T3 pedicles. Pedicle fracture occurred in 10.4% of pedicles. Intra-operatively, the absence of funnel was found in 24.5% of pedicles. In conclusion, thoracic pedicle screws using 5.0 mm at T1-T6 and 6.0 mm at T7-T12 can be inserted safely in Asian cadavers using the funnel technique despite having smaller thoracic pedicle morphometry.

Diameter, length, and direction of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine: analysis by multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography

STUDY DESIGN

A morphometric study of thoracic and lumbar spine in scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the appropriate values of diameter, length, and direction of pedicle screws with a straightforward trajectory in scoliosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several authors have analyzed the pedicle shape and evaluated the feasibility of pedicle screws in the scoliotic spine. To date, however, none of them have reported analysis by multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography.

METHODS

Computed tomography with a thickness of 1.25 mm was obtained before surgery in 41 Japanese with scoliosis. A total of 1100 pedicles were evaluated by simulating screw placement with the straightforward approach in a multiplanar reconstruction image. We chose the optimal slice where the insertion point and direction were determined to get the largest diameter of a screw in every vertebra. Length from the insertion point to the tip of the simulated screw was measured.

RESULTS

Screws of L1 and L2 were significantly smaller than those of T12 and L3 (P < 0.001). On the concave side, 37% of T3-T9 pedicles did not accept a 4-mm diameter screw even with 25% expansion. Length on the convex side was shorter at T5 and T7-T9 than that on the concave side (P < 0.05). On the convex side, 11% at T4-T8 vertebrae did not accept a 25-mm length screw. Average angle of screws of T1, T2, and L5 was greater than 15 degrees and 17% of the screws at T7-T10 were placed in the lateral direction.

CONCLUSION

In T3-T9 on the concave side, pedicle screws with a straightforward trajectory are not held within 37% of pedicles even with plastic deformation. We recommend that surgeons consider combined use of various types of anchoring when preoperative evaluation reveals narrow pedicles for screw placement.

Free-hand pedicle screw placement during revision spinal surgery: analysis of 552 screws

STUDY DESIGN

: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

: To evaluate the safety of free-hand pedicle screw placement during revision surgery at levels with a solid posterior fusion mass and/or identified pseudarthroses of the thoracic and lumbosacral spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

: Placement of pedicle screws into previous fusion masses or pseudarthrosis levels of the spine is challenging because of the loss of anatomic landmarks. We are aware of no study focusing on screw placement without any type of radiographic or navigational assistance.

METHODS

: Thirty-seven patients underwent revision spinal surgery with posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion using 552 transpedicular screws by a single surgeon from 1994 to 2003. Among 552 screws, 184 were inserted into virgin levels, 60 were inserted into the vertebral body through previous screw holes, 208 were inserted into fusion masses, and 100 were inserted into pseudarthrosis levels. We used the quadrangulation method to gain pedicle access in a prior fusion mass after diligent exposure of any and all visible anatomic landmarks. All screws were analyzed using radiographs, intraoperative monitoring data, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

: There were 29 women and 8 men. The mean age of patients at the time of surgery was 38 + 6 years (range, 8-75 years). Six screws were removed intraoperatively according to the triggered electromyography criteria and 4 of them were repositioned after checking the integrity of the pedicle by a careful probing technique (1.09%). Six screws were removed after checking the intraoperative radiographs and 5 screws were misplaced, as noted, in postoperative radiographs (1.99%). Two patients underwent revision surgery at 3 days and 6 weeks after initial surgery, respectively, for root decompression at the osteotomy site although screw positions were correct.

CONCLUSION

: The free-hand technique of thoracic and lumbosacral pedicle screw placement in revision spinal surgery is reliable and safe when using the quadrangulation method of gaining pedicle access in a prior fusion mass or at pseudarthrosis levels.

A new paradigm for staging pedicle screw–based spinal procedures: rationale, feasibility, safety, and efficacy

Object

The aims of this study were to present the rationale for and the evolution of a staged, two-procedure paradigm for spinal surgery requiring pedicle screw instrumentation, and to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the technique.

Methods

The rationale for the new algorithm is presented for consideration in the form of unproven hypotheses subject to verification by subsequent studies. The first stage of the two-staged algorithm, performed in an interventional radiology (IR) setting, involves percutaneous placement of either headless pedicle screws or K-wire fragment placeholders of the trajectory for pedicle screws. The second stage, performed days or weeks later, involves open surgical completion of instrumentation placement and other surgical objectives. The techniques for IR percutaneous K-wire fragment and percutaneous screw placement evolved over the duration of the study.

Instrumentation was placed in 126 pedicles in 25 patients. Efficacy was equated to the accuracy of screw placement, which was evaluated using computed tomography (CT). Algorithms incorporating correction for metal artifact were developed to determine deviation of the screws and K-wire fragments from proper position. Over 1500 measurements were made to evaluate K-wire fragment and screw position in the 116 instrumented pedicles for which CT data were available.

Results

Accuracy of placement (relative to both cortical and pedicle breaches or to only pedicle breaches) was 98 to 100% for K-wire fragments, 96 to 98% for screws following K-wire fragments, and 100% for percutaneous screws. The only adverse consequence of pedicle screw placement by this method was one infection that occurred 8 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

The staged, two-procedure paradigm for pedicle screw placement proved, within the limits of this study, to be feasible, safe, and effective; therefore, the unproven rationale behind the new paradigm merits further evaluation in a larger cohort of patients with randomized, matched controls.

A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws

Object

The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement aided by two different image-guidance modalities.

Methods

The charts of 40 consecutive patients who had undergone stabilization of the thoracic spine between January 2003 and January 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Three patients were excluded from the study because, on the basis of preoperative findings, small pedicle diameter precluded the use of pedicle screws. Thus, a total of 37 patients had 277 screws placed with the aid of either virtual fluoroscopy or isocentric C-arm 3D navigation. The indications for surgery included trauma, degenerative disease, and tumor, and were similar in both groups. All 37 patients underwent postoperative computed tomography scanning, and an independent reviewer graded all screws based on axial, sagittal, and coronal projections for a full determination of the placement of the screw in the pedicle.

Results

The rate of unintended perforations was found to depend on pedicle diameter (p < 0.0001). There were no statistical differences between groups with regard to rate or grade of cortical perforations. Overall, the rate and grade of perforations was low, and there were no neurological or vascular complications.

Conclusions

The authors have shown that either image-guidance system may be used with a high degree of accuracy and safety. Because both systems were found to be comparably safe and accurate, the choice of image-guidance modality may be determined by the level of surgeon comfort and/or availability of the system.

Thoracic pedicle screw placement: analysis using anatomical landmarks without image guidance

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective laboratory study analyzing the technique of pedicle screw placement in a cadaveric model.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a freehand technique without image guidance can be used to safely place pedicle screws in the thoracic spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of thoracic pedicle screws for the treatment of spinal deformity has been gaining increased acceptance among surgeons. Although these implants improve deformity correction, there is still concern regarding the risks to neurological and vascular structures and regarding the experience level needed to use this implant. This study was designed to determine whether these implants could be placed safely without imaging modalities.

METHODS

Six fresh cadaveric specimens were instrumented from vertebral segments T4-T11. Ninety-six screws were placed along the anatomical axis of the pedicle. Pedicles were dissected to determine the wall violations, the position of neural structures, and the lateral coverage of the pedicle by the rib head.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven percent of screws had less than 1 mm of wall violation, with 84 screws (87.5%) fully contained within the pedicle. Four screws (4.16%) violated the medial cortex. No violations occurred superiorly, inferiorly, or anteriorly. Nerve roots were in contact with the inferior pedicle wall at all levels. The average distance from nerve to the superior pedicle ranged from 3.85 to 5.04 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Placing pedicle screws along the anatomical axis without image guidance produced a low level of pedicle wall disruption. This technique uses a reproducible start point at each level, and the results are equal to or better than those of other cadaveric studies that have used guidance systems.

Ideal entry point for the thoracic pedicle screw during the free hand technique

We have attempted to determine the spatial orientation of the base of the superior articular process in relation to the centre of the pedicle and then measure the transverse and sagittal screw angles using this ideal pedicle screw entry point - the base of the superior articular process at the junction of the lateral one-third and medial two-thirds. The proposed advantages of this technique are the easily identifiable entry point, the well-defined transverse and sagittal screw angles and a very low incidence of medial and inferior pedicle violation.

Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of the published literature was conducted specifically looking at accuracy and the postoperative methods used for the assessment of pedicle screw placement in the human spine.

OBJECTIVES

This study specifically aimed to identify postoperative methods used for pedicle screw placement assessment, including the most common method, and to report cumulative pedicle screw placement study statistics from synthesis of the published literature.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Safety concerns have driven specific interests in the accuracy and precision of pedicle screw placement. A large variation in reported accuracy may exist partly due to the lack of a standardized evaluation method and/or the lack of consensus to what, or in which range, is pedicle screw placement accuracy considered satisfactory.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was executed covering the span from 1966 until 2006, and references from identified papers were reviewed. An extensive database was constructed for synthesis of the identified studies. Subgroups and descriptive statistics were determined based on the type of population, in vivo or cadaveric, and separated based on whether the assistance of navigation was employed.

RESULTS

In total, we report on 130 studies resulting in 37,337 total pedicle screws implanted, of which 34,107 (91.3%) were identified as accurately placed for the combined in vivo and cadaveric populations. The most common assessment method identified pedicle screw violations simply as either present or absent. Overall, the median placement accuracy for the in vivo assisted navigation subgroup (95.2%) was higher than that of the subgroup without the use of navigation (90.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Navigation does indeed provide a higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws for most of the subgroups presented. However, an exception is found at the thoracic levels for both the in vivo and cadaveric populations, where no advantage in the use of navigation was found.

Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement for Upper and Middle Thoracic Pathologies Without Coronal Plane Spinal Deformity Using Conventional Methods

There is a growing interest in the implantation of pedicle screws into the middle and upper thoracic spine. However, usage of the technique is still under debate for these levels because the pedicles in these regions are small and exhibit a high degree of inter- and intraspecimen variability. Twenty-four consecutive patients treated for upper and middle thoracic pathologies by pedicle screw instrumentation under biplanar or uniplanar fluoroscopy were evaluated retrospectively. The rate of screw misplacement on postoperative computerized tomography and complications caused by misplaced screws were determined. In 24 cases, a total of 113 upper-middle thoracic pedicle screws were inserted. Fifty-one of them were inserted between T2 and T5 with guidance of biplanar fluoroscopy, and 62 were inserted between T6 and T8 with uniplanar fluoroscopy. The rate of misplacement was 20.3% for 113 screws (27.4% for T2 to T5 screws, and 14.5% for 62 T6 to T8 screws). Four screws were incorrectly inserted which could have clinical significance (3.5%), and 1 of them required revision. The difference between the upper and middle thoracic screws was not statistically significant (P=0.089). Screw insertion with laminectomy did not cause significant difference in both upper and middle thoracic regions. Only 2 complications were seen because of screw insertion. Pedicle screw insertion with guidance of fluoroscopy may be a reliable and safe method for upper and middle thoracic pathologies.

Unstable upper and middle thoracic fractures. Preliminary experience with a posterior transpedicular correction-fixation technique

A number of conservative and operative approaches have been described for the treatment of unstable traumatic upper and middle thoracic fractures. The advantage of surgical correction and fixation/fusion lies in its potential to restore sagittal and coronal alignment, thereby indirectly decompressing the spinal cord. A consecutive series of 8 patients with unstable traumatic upper and middle thoracic fractures is reviewed. In all patients, polyaxial pedicle screws were inserted bilaterally into the two levels above and below the fracture. Rods that were less contoured ("undercontoured") than the regional hyperkyphosis at the injured level, were anchored to the caudal four screws. The cranial four screws, with the vertebrae to which they were inserted, were then progressively pulled posteriorly onto the undercontoured rods with rod reducers, thus correcting the hyperkyphosis and anterolisthesis. The mean follow-up was 15 months. The mean regional kyphosis was 23 degrees preoperatively, 17 degrees postoperatively and 18 degrees at follow-up. The mean anterolisthesis was 8 mm preoperatively, 1 mm postoperatively and 1 mm at follow-up. No hardware failure occurred. Five patients with complete spinal cord injury at presentation made no neurological recovery, two patients with incomplete spinal cord injury initially (ASIA B), recovered substantially (to ASIA D), and the patients who were neurologically intact at presentation remained so.

Treatment options for thoracolumbar spine fractures

A decision for operative versus nonoperative management of thoracolumbar fractures should NEVER be based solely on one factor. Only after a thorough physical, neurological, and spinal examination, and an assessment of a patient's prior activity, social and educational background and patient's expectations, one should review the patient's radiographs and CT scans to determine risks and benefits of operative versus nonoperative care. Both treatment options are discussed in this paper. As a surgical option our preference is short-segment instrumentation and fusion. Careful and appropriate patient selection and an excellent operative technique insure the minimum complications.

Evaluation of a Novel Pedicle Probe for the Placement of Thoracic and Lumbosacral Pedicle Screws

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw instrumentation is common in the lumbar spine and is gaining acceptance in the thoracic spine. The pedicle is generally cannulated with a gearshift probe or curette. SafePath (Mekanika, Boca Raton, FL) is an alternative pedicle probe designed for pedicle cannulation. This is a blunt-tipped, nonaggressive drill that seeks the cancellous portion of the pedicle.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this device in comparison with techniques commonly used for pedicle cannulation.

METHODS

Four osteoligamentous fresh-frozen thoracic to sacral cadaveric spines were studied. The pedicles of one side of each cadaver were cannulated with the SafePath device. The contralateral pedicles were cannulated with either a gearshift probe or a 3-0 cervical curette. The accuracy of pedicle probe placement was evaluated by radiography, computed tomography (CT) scan, and direct observation via dissection.

RESULTS

By direct observation, 51 of 128 pedicles were violated (40%). There were not significant differences between the results obtained with the gearshift probe or curette; there were 2 of 22 lumbosacral violations (9%) and 14 of 45 thoracic violations (33%). With the SafePath device, there were 0 of 22 lumbosacral violations (0%) and 34 of 45 thoracic violations (76%). SafePath performed significantly better in the lumbar spine and significantly worse in the thoracic spine. The accuracy for determining pedicle violation was 88% for radiography and 85% for CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this in vitro study suggest that the SafePath device may represent an alternative to traditional pedicle cannulation techniques in the lumbosacral spine. However, the opposite is true in the thoracic spine, where SafePath performed significantly worse than traditional techniques.

Prospective evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopic imaging

BACKGROUND

In this prospective 18-month study, 29 patients underwent posterior thoracic instrumentation with placement of 209 transpedicular screws guided by intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging and anatomic landmarks. We assessed the safety, accuracy, complications, and early stability of this technique.

METHODS

Pedicle and pedicle-rib units were measured, and screw cortical penetrations were graded on anatomy and depth of penetration. All 29 patients underwent preoperative computed tomographic (CT) imaging, and 28 underwent postoperative CT imaging (199/209 screws).

RESULTS

From T2 to T12, screw diameters were >or=5 mm with mean medial screw angulation measuring 20-25 degree. Of the 209 screws placed from T1 to T12, 111 had diameters greater than or equal to the pedicle width. From T3 to T9, the mean diameter of the pedicle screws exceeded the mean pedicle width. Lateral pedicle wall penetration occurred significantly more often than superior, inferior, and medial pedicle wall penetrations and anterolateral vertebral body penetration. Five of six high-risk screw penetrations occurred in one patient when intraoperative technique was compromised. We observed no new postoperative neurologic deficits, visceral injuries, or pedicle screw instrumentation failures. The three high-risk anterolateral vertebral body penetrations at T1 and T2 were associated with a significantly decreased mean screw transverse angle; the three high-risk medial pedicle wall penetrations occurring from T3 to T9 were associated with a significantly increased mean screw transverse angle. Among all 26 patients available at postoperative follow-up (mean 11.9 months), the mean loss of kyphosis correction was 2.0 degree.

CONCLUSIONS

Guided by intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging and anatomic landmarks, thoracic pedicle screws can be placed safely. Early clinical follow-up reveals excellent results with minimal loss of kyphosis correction.