Comparison of drug eluting stents with bare metal stents in daily practice for bifurcation lesions in Chinese patients:

Off-label use of drug-eluting versus bare metal stents: a lesion-specific systematic review of long-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate differences in lesion-specific outcomes with the "off-label" use of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare metal stents (BMS).

METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, the Cochrane databases, and other Web were searched for studies evaluating off-label use of DES and BMS with the same characteristics. Of 1,258 abstracts or manuscripts reviewed, 112 studies were included (total N = 23,438). Studies were excluded if patients received both types of stent or no stent; lesion type was unknown; lesion-specific outcomes for ≥6 months were unavailable; or <25 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Overall mortality at 6-12 months was approximately 3% for BMS and DES for off-label use. Increase in mortality was greater from 6-12 months to 2 years with BMS than with DES (3.3%-9.1%; 2.8%-4.1%); however, rates were similar at 3 years (BMS: 18.8%; DES:15.3%). Myocardial Infarction rates were similar for both types at 6-12 months (BMS: 6.5%; DES: 6.0%). Overall rates of stent thrombosis were 1.8% and 1.7% for BMS and DES, respectively. Similar or slightly lower rates of stent thrombosis were seen for most lesion types, except higher rates for small vessels for BMS (5.2%) and true bifurcation for DES (3.3%). Rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were 7.5% for BMS and 19.6% for DES at 6-12 months. At 2-years TLR remained lower than DES. When the combined group was compared to registry data alone, similar values were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and stent thrombosis were similar in patients receiving BMS or DES, while TLR rates were lower in DES patients.

Stent thrombosis following 2 drug-eluting stent implantations for coronary bifurcation lesion: a single-center analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of stent thrombosis (ST) following 2 drug-eluting stent (DES) implantations for coronary bifurcation lesions needs to be identified.

METHODS

From April 2004 to April 2009, 705 consecutive patients with true bifurcation lesions who underwent a double stenting procedure with DES at the Fu Wai Hospital were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six (0.85%) patients had a definite ST, all of them had an early (4 acute and 2 subacute) definite ST. Probable ST occurred in 4 patients; in all of these cases, the event occurred early and was adjudicated because of the occurrence of sudden death within 30 days of the procedure. Therefore, a total of 10/705 (1.42%) patients had a definite or probable ST. Possible stent thrombosis was adjudicated only in 1 patient 371 days after the initial PCI in whom the cause of death was unexplained. Compared to the patients without definite and probable ST, patients with definite and probable ST were older, had more unstable angina, lower LVEF, and more left main bifurcation lesions (63.2 +/- 8.9 vs. 56.8 +/- 10.9 yrs; P = 0.049, 100% vs. 64.7%; P = 0.018, 50.6 +/- 9.9 vs. 60.3 +/- 12.4%; P = 0.019 and 70.0% vs. 36.1%; P = 0.043). Logistic analysis results indicated that only LVEF (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.93; P = 0.017) was associated with definite and probable ST.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that modern 2-DES technique for bifurcation lesions was comparatively safe with a low incidence of ST.