A comparison of clinical and angiographic outcomes after Excel bioabsorbable polymer versus Firebird durable polymer rapamycin-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary artery disease in a “real world” setting: six-month follow-up results:

Canonical Transient Potential Receptor-3 Channels in Normal and Diseased Airway Smooth Muscle Cells

All seven canonical transient potential receptor (TRPC1-7) channel members are expressed in mammalian airway smooth muscle cells (ASMCs). Among this family, TRPC3 channel plays an important role in the control of the resting [Ca²⁺]_i and agonist-induced increase in [Ca²⁺]_i. This channel is significantly upregulated in molecular expression and functional activity in airway diseases. The upregulated channel significantly augments the resting [Ca²⁺]_i and agonist-induced increase in [Ca²⁺]_i, thereby exerting a direct and essential effect in airway hyperresponsiveness. The increased TRPC3 channel-mediated Ca²⁺ signaling also results in the transcription factor nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation via protein kinase C-α (PKCα)-dependent inhibitor of NFκB-α (IκBα) and calcineurin-dependent IκBβ signaling pathways, which upregulates cyclin-D1 expression and causes cell proliferation, leading to airway remodeling. TRPC3 channel may further interact with intracellular release Ca²⁺ channels, Orai channels and Ca²⁺-sensing stromal interaction molecules, mediating important cellular responses in ASMCs and the development of airway diseases.

Clinical performance of drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymeric coating: a meta-analysis and systematic review

AIMS

Different biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents have not yet been systematically analysed. We sought to; 1) evaluate the risk of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and definite stent thrombosis (DST) among different groups of biodegradable-polymer (BioPol) DES, and 2) to compare them with permanent polymer (PermPol) DES.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed and relevant sources from January 2005 until October 2010. Inclusion criteria were (a) Implantation of a drug-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer; (b) available follow-up data for at least one of the clinical end-points (TLR/DST) at short term (30 days) and/or mid-term (one year). A total of 22 studies, including randomised and observational studies, with 8264 patients met the selection criteria; nine studies (2042 patients) in whom biodegradable-polymer sirolimus eluting stents (BioPol-SES) were implanted, eight studies (1731 patients) in whom biodegradable-polymer paclitaxel eluting stents (BioPol-PES) were implanted, and seven studies (4491 patients) in whom biodegradable-polymer biolimus-A9 eluting stents (BioPol-BES) were implanted. At 30 days, there was a higher risk of DST (p=0.04) and subsequently TLR (p=0.006) in the BioPol-BES compared to BioPol-SES, with no significant difference in the other stent comparisons. At 1-year, there was higher risk of TLR in the BioPol-PES (p=0.01), and the BioPol-SES (p=0.04) compared to BioPol-BES. One-year stent thrombosis was not statistically different between the studied groups (overall p=0.2). In another analysis comprising seven randomised trials comparing BioPol-DES (3778 patients) and PermPol-DES (3291 patients), the risks of TLR and stent thrombosis at 1-year were not significantly different (p=0.5 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of different BioPol-DES seems to vary from each other. The short- and mid-term success rates may not be superimposable. Furthermore, they may not be necessarily better than PermPol-DES.