Combined monitoring of evoked potentials during microsurgery for lesions adjacent to the brainstem and intracranial aneurysms:

Surgery and intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring for aneurysm clipping

This chapter describes the feasibility, utilization, and value of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) in cerebrovascular cases. Practical advice on the integration of these adjunct methods into the modern neurosurgical operating room is based on our own neurophysiologic and neurosurgical experience. Most IONM is done for anterior circulation aneurysms. Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials are the modalities of choice covering vascular territories of the internal, anterior, and middle cerebral arteries. While monitoring both hemispheres with the unoperated side as control, monitoring focus is laid upon those territories at risk and bearing the aneurysm. The specificity of IONM is close to 1, and sensitivity ranges from 0.2 to 1, depending on the categorization of transient changes. The overall likelihood of worsened neurologic outcome after any intraoperative signal deterioration (transient or permanent) is 0.4.

ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic skull-base surgery (ESBS) is employed in the management of diverse skull-base pathologies. Paralleling the increased utilization of ESBS, the literature in this field has expanded rapidly. However, the rarity of these diseases, the inherent challenges of surgical studies, and the continued learning curve in ESBS have resulted in significant variability in the quality of the literature. To consolidate and critically appraise the available literature, experts in skull-base surgery have produced the International Consensus Statement on Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgery (ICAR:ESBS).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, topics spanning the breadth of ESBS were identified and assigned a literature review, evidence-based review or evidence-based review with recommendations format. Subsequently, each topic was written and then reviewed by skull-base surgeons in both neurosurgery and otolaryngology. Following this iterative review process, the ICAR:ESBS document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:ESBS document addresses the role of ESBS in primary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, intradural tumors, benign skull-base and orbital pathology, sinonasal malignancies, and clival lesions. Additionally, specific challenges in ESBS including endoscopic reconstruction and complication management were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

A critical review of the literature in ESBS demonstrates at least the equivalency of ESBS with alternative approaches in pathologies such as CSF rhinorrhea and pituitary adenoma as well as improved reconstructive techniques in reducing CSF leaks. Evidence-based recommendations are limited in other pathologies and these significant knowledge gaps call upon the skull-base community to embrace these opportunities and collaboratively address these shortcomings.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during resection of infratentorial lesions: the surgeon's view

OBJECTIVE

Methods of choice for neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring (IOM) within the infratentorial compartment mostly include early brainstem auditory evoked potentials, free-running electromyography, and direct cranial nerve (CN) stimulation. Long-tract monitoring with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is rarely used. This study investigated the incidence of IOM alterations during posterior fossa surgery stratified for lesion location.

METHODS

Standardized CN and SEP/MEP IOM was performed in 305 patients being treated for various posterior fossa pathologies. The IOM data were correlated with lesion locations and histopathological types as well as other possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

Alterations in IOM were observed in 158 of 305 cases (51.8%) (CN IOM alterations in 130 of 305 [42.6%], SEP/MEP IOM alterations in 43 of 305 [14.0%]). In 15 cases (4.9%), simultaneous changes in long tracts and CNs were observed. The IOM alterations were followed by neurological sequelae in 98 of 305 cases (32.1%); 62% of IOM alterations resulted in neurological deficits. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of CN deficits were 98% and 77%, respectively, and 95% and 85%, respectively, for long-tract deficits. Regarding location, brainstem and petroclival lesions were closely associated with concurrent CN IOM and SEP/MEP alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of IOM alterations during surgery in the posterior fossa varied widely between different lesion locations and histopathological types. This analysis provides crucial information on the necessity of IOM in different surgical settings. Because MEP/SEP and CN IOM alterations were commonly observed during posterior fossa surgery, the authors recommend the simultaneous use of both modalities based on lesion location.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Skull Base: A Technical Guide

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during endoscopic, endonasal approaches to the skull base is both feasible and safe. Numerous reports have recently emerged from the literature evaluating the efficacy of different neuromonitoring tests during endonasal procedures, making them relatively well-studied. The authors report on a comprehensive, multimodality approach to monitoring the functional integrity of at risk nervous system structures, including the cerebral cortex, brainstem, cranial nerves, corticospinal tract, corticobulbar tract, and the thalamocortical somatosensory system during endonasal surgery of the skull base. The modalities employed include electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, free-running and electrically triggered electromyography, transcranial electric motor evoked potentials, and auditory evoked potentials. Methodological considerations as well as benefits and limitations are discussed. The authors argue that, while individual modalities have their limitations, multimodality neuromonitoring provides a real-time, comprehensive assessment of nervous system function and allows for safer, more aggressive management of skull base tumors via the endonasal route.

Poor diagnostic accuracy of transcranial motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during brainstem cavernoma resection

OBJECTIVE

Microsurgical resection of brainstem cavernomas carries a high risk of new postoperative morbidity such as cranial nerve, motor and sensory deficits as well as functional deterioration. Intraoperative monitoring is used to avoid impending damage to these highly eloquent tracts. However, data on neurophysiological monitoring during resection of brainstem cavernomas are lacking.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with brainstem cavernomas who underwent surgical removal from June 2007 to December 2014 were retrospectively analysed. Transcranial motor-evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitorings were performed in all cases. The evoked potential (EP) monitoring data were reviewed and related to new postoperative motor and sensory deficits and postoperative imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed during follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-six consecutive patients with brainstem cavernoma underwent 27 surgical resections within this study. MEP and SSEP monitoring was technically feasible in 26 and 27 cases, respectively. MEP sensitivity and specificity were 33 and 88 %, respectively. MEP positive and negative predictive values were 28 and 78 %, respectively. SSEP sensitivity and specificity were 20 and 81 %, respectively. SSEP positive and negative predictive values were 20 and 81 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In continuous MEP and SSEP monitoring during brainstem cavernoma microsurgery, high rates of false-positive and -negative results are encountered, resulting in low positive and relatively high negative predictive values. Careful interpretation of the intraoperative monitoring results is essential in order to avoid potentially unjustified termination of brainstem cavernoma resection.

Multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during Onyx embolization of cerebrovascular malformations

General anesthesia prohibits neurological examination during embolization of cerebrovascular malformations when provocative testing prior to pedicle occlusion is needed. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has the potential to fill this gap but remains relatively unexplored. We conduct a retrospective review of consecutive patients with cerebrovascular malformations treated with Onyx (ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide) embolization under general anesthesia with IONM from 2009 to 2012. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs), visual evoked potential (VEPs), auditory brainstem response (ABR), and electroencephalography (EEG) were used selectively in all patients depending on the location of the malformation. Provocative testing combined with IONM was performed in 28 patients over 75 sessions. Three patients demonstrated changes in TcMEPs or ABR during provocative testing, which halted the planned embolization. Two patients demonstrated changes in baseline SSEPs after embolization, despite normal IONM during provocative testing, correlating with postprocedural contralateral weakness. Six patients developed visual deficits after arterial occlusion despite unchanged VEPs and occipital EEG during provocative testing and embolization. We therefore conclude that the sensitivity of TcMEPs and SSEPs is preferable to EEG, and we strongly caution against relying on occipital recorded VEPs to predict visual deficits.

Conjunct SEP and MEP monitoring in resection of infratentorial lesions: lessons learned in a cohort of 210 patients

Object

During the surgical removal of infratentorial lesions, intraoperative neuromonitoring is mostly focused on cranial nerve assessment and brainstem auditory potentials. Despite the known risk of perforating vessel injury during microdissection within the vicinity of the brainstem, there are few reports about intraoperative neuromonitoring with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) assessing the medial lemniscus and corticospinal tract. This study analyses the occurrence of intraoperative changes in MEPs and SEPs with regard to lesion location and postoperative neurological outcome.

Methods

The authors analyzed 210 cases in which patients (mean age 49 ± 13 years, 109 female) underwent surgeries involving the skull base (n = 104), cerebellum (n = 63), fourth ventricle (n = 28), brainstem (n = 12), and foramen magnum (n = 3).

Results

Of 210 surgeries, 171 (81.4%) were uneventful with respect to long-tract monitoring. Nine (23%) of the 39 SEP and/or MEP alterations were transient and were only followed by a slight permanent deficit in 1 case. Permanent deterioration only was seen in 19 (49%) of 39 cases; the deterioration was related to tumor dissection in 4 of these cases, and permanent deficit (moderate-severe) was seen in only 1 of these 4 cases. Eleven patients (28%) had losses of at least 1 modality, and in 9 of these 11 cases, the loss was related to surgical microdissection within the vicinity of the brainstem. Four of these 9 patients suffered a moderate-to-severe long-term deficit. For permanent changes, the positive predictive value for neuromonitoring of the long tracts was 0.467, the negative predictive value was 0.989, the sensitivity was 0.875, and the specificity 0.918. Twenty-eight (72%) of 39 SEP and MEP alterations occurred in 66 cases involving intrinsic brainstem tumors or tumors adjacent to the brainstem. Lesion location and alterations in intraoperative neuromonitoring significantly correlated with patients' outcome (p < 0.001, chi-square test).

Conclusions

In summary, long-tract monitoring with SEPs and MEPs in infratentorial surgeries has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value with respect to postoperative neurological status. It is recommended especially in those surgeries in which microdissection within and in the vicinity of the brainstem might lead to injury of the brainstem parenchyma or perforating vessels and a subsequent perfusion deficit within the brainstem.

Motor evoked potential monitoring during surgery of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring has been widely used in brain or spine surgery to recognize potential damage of the pyramidal motor system. However, its ability to detect ischemic injury during middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm surgery remains unclear. A prospective cohort study was designed to evaluate MEP changes during MCA aneurysm surgery.

METHODS

From January 2009 to August 2011, 89 patients underwent MCA aneurysm surgery and were prospectively divided into 2 groups: MEP monitoring group and control group. Based on an amplitude decrement of >50% or loss, a 2-stage warning criterion of MEP changes was established. Concomitant somatosensory evoked potential changes were also recorded. MEP changes occurred in 15 patients, and various methods were used to avoid continued brain ischemia. Indocyanine green angiography and Doppler ultrasonography were performed if needed. A head computed tomography scan was performed immediately and the day after the operation.

RESULTS

At discharge, neither motor status nor Glasgow Coma Scale score was significantly different between the 2 groups. However, at the latest follow-up (mean, 31.9 months), motor status of the patients in the monitoring group was better (P = 0.037). MEP monitoring was identified as an independent prognostic factor for motor outcome in long-term results by multivariate analysis (P = 0.042). Both wave loss and >50% amplitude decrement of MEP monitoring showed good predictive value when used as part of a 2-stage warning criterion.

CONCLUSIONS

MEP monitoring is reliable for evaluation of the ischemic status of the pyramidal motor system during MCA aneurysm surgery and can improve surgical outcomes when used appropriately.

Somatosensory Evoked Potential Changes in Neuroendovascular Procedures

BACKGROUND:

Neurophysiological monitoring is routinely used during neurosurgical procedures. Use of neurophysiological monitoring has extended to neuroendovascular procedures, but evidence of its impact on clinical outcome in this arena is limited.

OBJECTIVE:

To report the incidence of significant intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) changes during neuroendovascular surgery and to correlate SSEP changes with clinical outcomes.

METHODS:

Patients who underwent neuroendovascular surgery at our institution between 2011 and 2013 were included in the analysis. Medical charts and imaging studies were reviewed retrospectively for sex, age, lesion type and size, clinical presentation, type of endovascular procedure, duration of SSEP change, reversibility of SSEP change, incidence of intraoperative complications and related mortalities, presence of new infarction within 72 hours of intervention, and discharge outcome.

RESULTS:

Of 873 consecutive patients, 52 (6%) had clinically significant intraoperative SSEP changes. Twenty-four patients (46%) had SSEP changes that were corrected, and 28 patients (54%) had changes that were not reversed before the end of surgery. Both decreased duration and reversal of SSEP changes were associated with a lower incidence of postoperative infarction and more favorable clinical outcome on discharge. The positive predictive value of an irreversible SSEP change for postoperative infarction in our study was 21%, and the negative predictive value was 83%.

CONCLUSION:

The approximate incidence of SSEP changes is 6% during neuroendovascular procedures. Rapid reversal of SSEP changes is associated with better outcomes. SSEP monitoring may be a valuable tool for preventing complications after neuroendovascular interventions.

Motor evoked potential monitoring of the vagus nerve with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgeries

Object

Dysphasia is one of the most serious complications of skull base surgeries and results from damage to the brainstem and/or cranial nerves involved in swallowing. Here, the authors propose a method to monitor the function of the vagus nerve using endotracheal tube surface electrodes and transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgeries.

Methods

Fifteen patients with skull base or brainstem tumors were enrolled. The authors used surface electrodes of an endotracheal tube to record compound electromyographic responses from the vocalis muscle. Motor neurons were stimulated using corkscrew electrodes placed subdermally on the scalp at C3 and C4. During surgery, the operator received a warning when the amplitude of the vagal motor evoked potential (MEP) decreased to less than 50% of the control level. After surgery, swallowing function was assessed clinically using grading criteria.

Results

In 5 patients, vagal MEP amplitude permanently deteriorated to less than 50% of the control level on the right side when meningiomas were dissected from the pons or basilar artery, or when a schwannoma was dissected from the vagal rootlets. These 5 patients had postoperative dysphagia. At 4 weeks after surgery, 2 patients still had dysphagia. In 2 patients, vagal MEPs of one side transiently disappeared when the tumors were dissected from the brainstem or the vagal rootlets. After surgery, both patients had dysphagia, which recovered in 4 weeks. In 7 patients, MEP amplitude was consistent, maintaining more than 50% of the control level throughout the operative procedures. After surgery all 7 patients were neurologically intact with normal swallowing function.

Conclusions

Vagal MEP monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation and endotracheal tube electrode recording was a safe and effective method to provide continuous real-time information on the integrity of both the supranuclear and infranuclear vagal pathway. This method is useful to prevent intraoperative injury of the brainstem corticobulbar tract or the vagal rootlets and to avoid the postoperative dysphagia that is often associated with brainstem or skull base surgeries.

Feasibility and efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring in neuroendovascular surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neurophysiological monitoring for neuroendovascular procedures typically involves EEG and SSEP monitoring via cutaneous electrodes. MEP monitoring has been used less frequently because, traditionally, this has required subdural electrode placement. With the advent of transcutaneous techniques, MEP monitoring use has increased. However, little has been published regarding the use of this technique in therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures. The purpose of this study was therefore to determine whether TcMEP monitoring is feasible and efficacious in therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our data base of therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures performed with the use of TcMEP monitoring. We specifically determined the incidence of TcMEP changes compared with changes in either SSEP or EEG. We then correlated these changes to actual adverse neurologic events.

RESULTS

Although TcMEP monitoring was technically successful in all of the 140 patients in which it was attempted, we observed significant changes in TcMEP signals in only 1 patient. This patient experienced changes involving all 3 monitoring modalities after intraprocedural aneurysm rupture. In contrast, changes in SSEP tracings alone were found in 9 patients. Of these, 2 patients were known to be moribund before their procedures and neither recovered. Among the remaining 7 patients, temporary SSEP changes tended to correlate with temporary neurologic deficits, while permanent changes were associated with permanent or long-lasting deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that TcMEP monitoring is feasible in therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures. However, it appears that the addition of TcMEP monitoring provides no added benefit to SSEP and EEG monitoring alone.

Multiple intraoperative monitoring-assisted microneurosurgical treatment for anterior circulation cerebral aneurysm

This study investigated the efficacy of multiple intraoperative monitoring techniques including indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) in the clinical outcome of microneurosurgical treatment for anterior circulation cerebral aneurysm. Fifty-two anterior circulation cerebral aneurysms (Hunt and Hess [H&H] grades 0, 1 or 2) from 45 Chinese in-patients were completely clipped. In one patient, ICGA directed neurosurgeons to readjust aneurysmal clips in order to eliminate a residual aneurysm and restore patency of a branching artery. SSEP/MEP directed neurosurgeons to implement intervention measures in 12 patients for recovery of SSEP/MEP changes, and SSEP/MEP changes partially/totally recovered in 11 of these 12 patients (91.6%). Postoperative motor deficits were observed in three patients, two of which were Glasgow Outcome Scale level 3 (4.4%). In conclusion, for patients with anterior circulation cerebral aneurysm (H&H grade < 3), multiple intraoperative monitoring was beneficial for finding residual aneurysms, detecting ischaemic events in the perforating arteries and reducing severe postoperative motor deficiency.

Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) during brainstem surgery to preserve corticospinal function

BACKGROUND

Brainstem surgery bears a risk of damage to the corticospinal tract (CST). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are used intraoperatively to monitor CST function in order to detect CST damage at a reversible stage and thus impede permanent neurological deficits. While the method of MEP is generally accepted, warning criteria in the context of brainstem surgery still have to be agreed on.

METHOD

We analyzed 104 consecutive patients who underwent microsurgical resection of lesions affecting the brainstem. Motor grade was documented prior to surgery, early postoperatively and at discharge. A baseline MEP stimulation intensity threshold was defined and intraoperative testing aimed to keep MEP response amplitude constant. MEPs were considered deteriorated and the surgical team was notified whenever the threshold was elevated by ≥20 mA or MEP response fell under 50%.

FINDINGS

On the first postoperative day, 18 patients experienced new paresis that resolved by discharge in 11. MEPs deteriorated in 39 patients, and 16 of these showed new postoperative paresis, indicating a 41% risk of new paresis. In the remaining 2/18 patients, intraoperative MEPs were stable, although new paresis appeared postoperatively. In one of these patients, intraoperative hemorrhage caused postoperative swelling, and the new motor deficit persisted until discharge. Of all 104 patients, 7 deteriorated in motor grade at discharge, 92 remained unchanged, and 5 patients have improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjustment of surgical strategy contributed to good motor outcome in 33/39 patients. MEP monitoring may help significantly to prevent motor deficits during demanding neurosurgical procedures on the brainstem.

Feasibility of intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring for skull base tumors with a high risk of postoperative motor deterioration

OBJECTIVE

To establish the validity and utility of motor-evoked potential (MEPs) monitoring for skull base tumor resection, we explored the relationship between MEP monitoring results and postoperative motor function.

METHODS

MEPs were successfully monitored during 76 operations in 68 patients with a high risk of motor morbidity. MEP monitoring data were correlated with perioperative clinical motor function.

RESULTS

MEPs remained stable in 56 operations (73.7%), and no postoperative motor deterioration was observed. Transient or permanent deterioration of MEPs (<50% of the initial amplitude before surgery) occurred in 20 operations (26.3%). This deterioration was reversible after intervention in seven cases (9.2%). Irreversible deterioration in MEPs was seen in 13 cases (17.1%). In five cases, the final amplitude was greater than 10%. Two of these patients experienced transient loss of MEPs and moderate to severe hemiparesis. Both patients showed full recovery within 6 months after the operation. The other three patients experienced no postoperative worsening of motor function. The final MEP amplitude was less than 10% in the other eight patients, including five with permanent MEP loss. All of these patients experienced severe postoperative motor dysfunction. Recovery of motor function was worse in most participants in this group compared with those in the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative MEP monitoring is a valid indicator of pyramidal tract pathway function for skull base tumor surgery.