Minimally invasive procedures as an alternative to medical management for lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Medical and minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Over the last decade, management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has changed with a substantial decrease in the use of transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) and a simultaneous increase in the use of medical therapy and minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST). The goal of management of this chronic progressive condition is not only to provide relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) but also to reduce the lifetime risk of adverse outcomes. Recent clinical evidence has demonstrated a clear role for medical therapy, particularly with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) either alone or in combination with alpha-blockers, to reduce the risk of acute urinary retention and need for surgery and provide symptom relief. Clinical data on MISTs also indicate a more pronounced short-term effect; however, the long-term durability of these therapies remains uncertain. Minimally invasive surgical therapies confer treatment benefits in a single 1-h treatment session under local anesthesia. Recovery times and adverse events are improved compared with TURP, but issues such as hematuria, prolonged catheterization, urinary tract infection and retreatment remain commonly reported issues. Today, urologists are faced with the challenge of identifying the most appropriate treatment option for the long-term management of BPH. The initial choice for any given patient will depend on his presenting circumstances and the influence of treatment risks on these circumstances. Providing patients with informed treatment decisions is a key element of management.

Changing aspects in the evaluation and treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Lower urinary tract symptoms are a common clinical symptom among men and a frequent reason for referring to a urologist. The most important information comes from the patient history because evaluation of symptoms is fundamental in the diagnosis and treatment planning for LUTS. Other aspects of the initial evaluation, such as the physical examination and initial laboratory values, can provide valuable additional information about the severity of the disease and the need for treatment. If treatment is warranted based on this information, additional diagnostic tests may be appropriate to set a pretreatment baseline, rule out other conditions, and plan treatment approach. Fortunately, a variety of effective medical and surgical treatments are available to treat this common disease.

Gadolinium-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of minimally invasive treatments of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic findings

OBJECTIVES

To explore the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium enhancement as a noninvasive method to image the extent of ablation after minimally invasive treatment. Minimally invasive methods for ablating prostatic tissue have emerged as a viable option in the treatment of prostate disease. As these devices enter the mainstream of patient care, imaging methods that verify the exact location, extent, and pattern of the ablation are needed.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with prostate cancer were evaluated. All received some type of minimally invasive treatment, post-treatment gadolinium-enhanced MRI sequences, and radical retropubic prostatectomy for histopathologic evaluation. Visual comparisons of gadolinium defects and areas of coagulation necrosis as seen on histopathologic evaluation were made by us. Volumetric and two-dimensional area measurements of the ablation lesions were also compared for correlation between the MRI and histopathologic results.

RESULTS

Gadolinium-enhanced MRI could be matched to histopathologic findings by visual comparison in 17 of the 19 cases. Surgically distorted histopathologic specimens and a small periurethral lesion caused 2 patients to have MRI and histopathologic results that could not be matched. Complete volumetric measurements were available for 16 of the 19 patients and correlated strongly (r = 0.924). The two-dimensional area data for all patients also showed significant correlation (r = 0.886).

CONCLUSIONS

Correlation with histopathologic findings showed gadolinium-enhanced MRI to be useful for determining the location, pattern, and extent of necrosis caused within the prostate by minimally invasive techniques. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI gives the urologist a useful tool to evaluate the effectiveness of new minimally invasive therapies.

Histological changes of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: clinical implications

PURPOSE

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is near universal in aging men, creating tremendous costs in morbidity and surgical treatment. In the last decade numerous nonsurgical minimally invasive methods have emerged for ablation of prostatic tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the recently published English language literature on minimally invasive techniques for treating BPH and cancer with an emphasis on histopathological findings.

RESULTS

We compared the spectrum of contemporary minimally invasive treatments for BPH and cancer, with an emphasis on histopathological results. Clinical results were summarized briefly for each treatment method. These procedures ablate tissue by thermal, cryogenic, chemical or enzymatic injury. The 5-year results for some techniques were promising, although long-term durability is still uncertain, and other methods were in preclinical or early clinical stages. Invariably the treated tissue was devitalized with a thin border of granulation tissue and fibrosis. These procedures have applications for BPH and prostate cancer, although some studies are limited to only 1 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive procedures show promise of a durable replacement for surgical resection.