Acute humoral renal allograft rejection

Increased CD64 expression on polymorphonuclear neutrophils indicates infectious complications following solid organ transplantation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of monitoring CD64 antigen upregulation on polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) for the identification of infectious complications in the postoperative course of solid organ transplanted patients. Twenty-five kidney, 13 liver, and four pancreas-kidney transplanted patients were included. Beginning with preoperative values up to postoperative values after 3 months for each patient, the PMN CD64 Index, HLA-DR on monocytes, NKp44+ NK and NK/T cells, CXCR3+ NK cells, CXCR3+ T helper cells, CXCR3+ NK/T cells, and CD4/CD8 ratio were measured by flow cytometry. Subsequently they were correlated with confirmed postoperative complications. Measuring the PMN CD64 Index reached a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 65% in the detection of infectious complications. Concerning this matter, it was a significantly better marker than all other included parameters except CXCR3+ NK/T cells. In contrast, according to our results the PMN CD64 Index has no diagnostic relevance in detection of rejections. The combination of included parameters showed no improved diagnostic value. Due to its high sensitivity and specificity for infectious complications CD64 on PMN could be proven a very good indicator in evaluating suspected infectious complications in the postoperative course of transplanted patients.

An experimental model of acute humoral rejection of renal allografts associated with concomitant cellular rejection

Acute humoral rejection (AHR), which occurs in up to 8% of kidney transplant recipients, is a significant cause of renal allograft dysfunction and loss. More efficacious treatment modalities are needed to eliminate or curtail alloantibody production and its deleterious effects on the kidney. The availability of animal models mimicking human AHR is essential to understand its pathophysiology and develop new treatment strategies. Using a mouse kidney transplant model, we demonstrate that presensitization of recipients with donor skin grafts results in rejection of subsequent renal allografts. All presensitized mice developed renal failure 8.6 +/- 4.3 days after engraftment, with serum creatinine values near 100 micromol/dl. Graft histology revealed mild, diffuse, interstitial, mononuclear cell infiltrates; prominent peritubular capillary inflammatory cell margination; patchy interstitial hemorrhage; interstitial edema; and focal glomerular fibrin deposition. Complement (C3d) deposition was diffuse and prominent in peritubular capillaries. Serum analysis demonstrated high levels of circulating alloantibodies with broad cross-reactivity to many MHC haplotypes. The clinical setting and histological findings of our model strongly resemble AHR, which is frequently associated with cellular rejection, a situation commonly encountered in human renal allograft recipients. This animal model provides a valuable tool to study the pathogenesis of AHR, its relationship to cellular alloimmunity, its contribution to graft injury, and the effects of various potential therapeutic interventions.

Acute antibody-mediated rejection of renal transplant: pathogenetic and diagnostic considerations

CONTEXT

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged recently as an important cause of graft failure.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathogenetic, clinicopathologic, and diagnostic considerations of AMR.

DATA SOURCES

Review of literature and the authors' experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute antibody-mediated rejection is mediated by antibodies specific for donor antigens, which bind to target antigens and activate the complement system, culminating in tissue injury. The clinical manifestation of AMR is not specific, and transplant biopsy is needed for diagnosis. The glomeruli show thrombosis or neutrophils or mononuclear leukocytes in capillary lumens. The tubulointerstitial compartment shows edema, hemorrhage, necrosis, mild inflammation, and neutrophils or mononuclear leukocytes in the peritubular capillary lumens. The blood vessels show thrombosis, thrombotic microangiopathy, fibrinoid necrosis, or transmural vasculitis. Strong staining for C4d in the peritubular capillaries is characteristic. A definitive diagnosis of AMR requires (1) morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury, (2) immunopathologic evidence for antibody action, and (3) serologic evidence of circulating donor-specific antibodies. Acute antibody-mediated rejection should be suspected if some but not all 3 criteria are met. Since effective treatment is currently available, accurate and timely diagnosis of AMR is essential.

C4d in pediatric renal allograft biopsies: a marker for negative outcome in steroid-resistant rejection

Recently, deposition of C4d, reflecting complement activation via the classical pathway, has been established as marker of antibody-mediated rejection. As C4d can be detected in paraffin sections, it allows for retrospective analysis in populations with low case loads, such as in pediatric transplantation. In this study we re-evaluated consecutive renal transplant biopsies obtained since 1990 in 36 children (18 boys, 18 girls) who had received their allograft (nine living, 27 cadaveric) at an age of 10.12+/-4.4 yr. Clinical indications for biopsy were 16 acute steroid resistant rejections (ASRs), 11 chronic rejections and nine other diagnoses. Overall, C4d deposition was found in nine cases (25%), eight of them with diagnosed ASR. Six out of these eight allografts were lost during 36 months of clinical follow-up, a significantly higher rate than in C4d-negative biopsies (p<0.05). C4d status therefore turned out to be an excellent predictor for inferior graft survival following ASR. None of the other histopathologic markers were sensitive for humoral rejections. In conclusion, the high prevalence of C4d-positive staining in ASR demonstrates the importance of the humoral part of the immune system in pediatric transplantation. The worse outcome of C4d-positive rejections despite massive immunosuppressive therapy clearly indicates the need for innovative therapies in this high-risk population.

Comparison of C4d Immunostaining Methods in Renal Allograft Biopsies

Immunostaining of renal allograft biopsies for C4d deposition has become an important diagnostic tool in the recognition of humoral-mediated graft rejection. The majority of studies have been performed on frozen tissue sections with one of several commercially available antibody reagents. However, only a single small series that compared reagents or methods, including staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, has been published. Two different staining methods in 138 renal allograft biopsies were compared directly: A mAb (Quidel, San Diego, CA) on frozen tissue sections with indirect immunofluorescence (IF) and a polyclonal antibody (Biomedica Gruppe, distributed by ALPCO, Windham, NH) applied to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue with immunohistochemical (IHC) detection. An initial data set of 107 consecutive cases showed complete agreement between staining methods in 104 (97%) cases. Overall, nine of 107 cases were positive with one or both methods, representing 8.4% of all allograft biopsies tested, 15% of clinically indicated biopsies, and 24% of biopsies with a histologic diagnosis of acute cellular rejection. A second set of 31 cases included 17 cases that were positive by either method, with concordance in 29 of 31 cases. Combining the two data sets, the overall specificity of the IHC method compared with IF was 98%, and sensitivity was 87.5%. Direct comparison demonstrates that IHC staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue with anti-C4d polyclonal antibody has acceptable sensitivity and specificity, as compared with IF staining of frozen tissue with the Quidel mAb.

Immunosuppression and immune monitoring after renal transplantation

Monitoring of immunosuppression therapy in renal transplant recipients is essential for good patient and graft survival. Monitoring includes frequent laboratory assays of serum immunosuppression levels, patient visits to assess and treat side effects, and vigilance for medication interactions. We review the various immunosuppression medications commonly used in renal transplantation, including usual dosing and side effects. Monitoring assays are discussed, as well as the frequency of monitoring and patient visits. Finally, we discuss several common clinical scenarios that often require adjustment of immunosuppression medications or regimens.

C4d Deposition in Cardiac Allografts Correlates With Alloantibody

BACKGROUND

The presence of C4d along the peritubular capillaries in kidney allografts correlates with the presence of anti-donor serum alloantibodies. We applied C4d staining to cardiac allograft and non-allograft biopsies to determine if C4d staining in heart allografts correlates with anti-donor serum alloantibodies.

METHODS

We stained for C4d all available frozen tissue biopsies from cardiac transplant recipients between 1997 and 2002, including autopsies. Two hundred twenty-one tissue samples from 124 patients were analyzed. Included in both groups were a variety of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grades of rejection plus post-implant cardiac ischemic injury (PIMI), and biopsies from patients who had received OKT3. Patients were matched by age, gender and interval after transplantation. Forty-four additional controls were included from patients biopsied for non-transplant-related cardiac disease.

RESULTS

C4d staining of the myocardial capillaries correlated well with the presence of anti-donor alloantibodies. Twenty-one of 25 biopsies from patients with anti-donor alloantibodies showed C4d staining (84%), whereas only 7 of 60 without anti-donor alloantibodies stained for C4d. C4d staining did not correlate with ischemia or OKT3 therapy. Only 4 of 44 non-transplant biopsies stained for C4d (9%). An example of the clinical utility of C4d staining in patient care is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

C4d staining of the capillaries in cardiac allografts correlates well with anti-donor serum alloantibodies, is a useful assay to verify alloantibody deposition, and can be used to establish one of the criteria for antibody-mediated cardiac rejections.

Incidence of C4d stain in protocol biopsies from renal allografts: results from a multicenter trial

C4d staining of renal allografts is regarded as an in situ marker of active humoral rejection. Few data are available about the incidence of C4d deposition in protocol biopsies compared to indication biopsies. To evaluate whether center-specific factors influence the incidence of C4d detection, we performed a multicenter study. From three European centers, 551 protocol and 377 indication biopsies were reclassified according to the updated Banff criteria and stained for C4d. C4d results were recorded as diffuse or focal positive and statistically correlated to clinical parameters, morphology and graft survival. In the protocol biopsies, a diffuse C4d stain was found in 2.0%, and a focal stain in 2.4%. In indication biopsies, 12.2% were diffusely and 8.5% focally C4d positive (protocol:indication p < 0.0001). The incidence of C4d deposition varied significantly between centers, attributable to variable numbers of presensitized patients with more C4d positive indication and protocol biopsies. Diffuse and focal C4d stain correlated with morphology of humoral rejection in protocol as well as in indication biopsies. Protocol biopsies show a significantly lower incidence of C4d deposition than indication biopsies. Subclinical C4d detection in protocol biopsies had no significant impact on allograft survival in our series.

Humoral theory of transplantation

According to the humoral theory of transplantation, antibodies cause allograft rejection. Publications are cited showing that antibodies: (1). cause hyperacute kidney rejection, (2). lead to C4d deposits associated with early kidney graft failures, (3). are a good indicator of presensitization leading to early acute rejections, (4). were present in 96% of 826 patients who rejected a kidney graft, (5). are associated with chronic rejection in 33 studies of kidney, heart, lung and liver grafts, and (6). in three studies, appeared in the circulation BEFORE evidence of bronchiolitis obliterans in lung transplants, and BEFORE kidney rejection. In addition, a prospective cooperative study of 1629 patients in 24 centers demonstrated that antibodies foretold subsequent failures after a follow-up period of 6 months (p = 0.05). The specificity of antibodies detected in the serum of rejecting patients were often not donor specific, presumably because they were absorbed by the rejecting organ. If the humoral theory is accepted, even provisionally, transplanted patients who have antibodies could be treated with immunosuppression until the antibodies disappear to determine whether chronic rejection can be blocked. If successful, in patients who do not have antibodies, immunosuppression could be reduced until antibodies appear.

Tissue injury and repair in allografts: novel perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent research achievements might considerably alter scientific concepts of pathways involved in tissue injury and repair.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accumulating evidence for an important role of alloantibodies in acute and chronic allograft rejection led to a renewed interest in humoral kidney transplant rejection. Studies reassessing the mechanisms of antibody- and complement-mediated injury now shed new light on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying acute or chronic graft dysfunction and injury. A closer look at humoral effector mechanisms revealed that endothelial cell activation and injury may play a key role in humoral rejection, and further uncovered an important interplay between humoral and cellular alloimmunity. Regeneration of cells after injury has been thought to rely on activation of local progenitor cells. Recent investigation indicates that regeneration of grafted solid organs is not exclusively based on self-renewal of tissues but obviously also involves repopulation of the graft by recipient cells, creating chimerism in the vasculature and other compartments. Besides reparative compensation of cell loss, chimerism of endothelial cells might also alter immunologic properties of the graft, thus favoring adaptation and graft survival. On the other hand, however, myofibroblasts mediating deleterious arterial intimal proliferation may also be of recipient origin. A possible source of graft-repopulating recipient cells are bone marrow-derived adult stem cells with the amazing capacity of differentiating into cell types of all three germ cell layers.

SUMMARY

Reliable diagnosis of humoral mechanisms in allograft rejection and identification of involved effector mechanisms should provide the basis for development and targeted application of specific anti-humoral treatment. Recently emerged new concepts of mechanisms underlying tissue regeneration might pave the way for entirely new therapeutic approaches in human disease.

When renal allografts turn DARC

BACKGROUND

The Duffy antigen-receptor for chemokines (DARC) is a chemokine-binding protein that is up-regulated on peritubular capillaries (PTC) during cellular renal allograft rejection. C4d deposition and accumulation of inflammatory cells in PTC are indicators of humoral renal allograft rejection. Because DARC is expressed at the site of C4d deposition and might be involved in inflammatory cell recruitment, the authors evaluated the expression of DARC in different forms of human renal allograft rejection.

METHODS

Deposition of C4d and DARC expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 42 renal transplant biopsy specimens. Biopsy specimens were subdivided according to histologic and immunohistochemical results, that is, C4d-negative biopsy specimens with (Banff 1, n=8) or without signs of cellular rejection (n=16), and C4d-positive biopsies (humoral rejection) with (Banff 1 rejection, n=7) or without cellular rejection (n=11).

RESULTS

DARC expression was found on a small number of PTC and veins in patients without rejection. Cellular and humoral rejection led to a comparable increase in the number of DARC-positive PTC (9.7 and 8.7 vs. 2.6 vessels per high-power field [HPF], respectively). The highest numbers were found in biopsy specimens with signs of both humoral and cellular rejection (17.5 vessels per HPF).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that demonstrates an induction of a chemokine-binding protein at the site of C4d deposition in humoral allograft rejection. The additive effect of humoral and cellular rejection on DARC expression might imply different pathways of DARC induction for different forms of allograft rejection.

Flow cytometry based detection of HLA alloantibody mediated classical complement activation

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) panel reactive antibody (PRA) testing is used to assess recipient presensitization and post-transplant alloantibody formation in transplant recipients. However, CDC test results can be affected by false-positive reactions brought about by autoantibodies or antilymphocyte reagents. As an alternative to the CDC-PRA assay, detection of HLA alloantibodies using HLA antigen-coated microbeads (FlowPRA test) was recently established. FlowPRA testing, however, does not distinguish between (presumably more harmful) complement-fixing and noncomplement-fixing alloantibodies. In this study, we established a novel assay allowing flow cytometric detection of HLA alloantibody dependent classical complement activation using the FlowPRA test. For the detection of complement activation, FlowPRA beads were incubated with sera from highly sensitized dialysis patients (CDC-PRA reactivity >60%) and then stained for C4 (C4d, C4c) and C3 (C3d, C3c) fragments, as well as C1q deposition using indirect immunofluorescence. We demonstrate alloantibody induced induction of C4 fragment, and in parallel C1q deposition to HLA class I or class II beads. As shown by immunoblotting, C4 staining was not due to the presence of preformed C4 fragment-IgG/M complexes. Indeed, C4 fragment deposition in our in vitro system was demonstrated to result from de novo complement activation. First, inactivation of C4 by treatment of sera with methylamine, which inhibits cleavage of the internal thioester, completely abolished C4 fragment deposition. Second, C4 fragment deposition was not observed in the evaluation of C4-free immunoadsorption eluates obtained from highly sensitized dialysis patients. After supplementation with complement, however, eluates induced C4 deposition. Deposition of C4 split products and C1q was temperature-dependent with maximum binding after incubation at 4 degrees C for 60 min. In contrast, maximum C3 fragment deposition was found at 37 degrees C. At this temperature, C3 deposition occurred in an alloantibody and C4-independent fashion, presumably as a result of alternative complement activation. In summary, we describe a novel cell-independent and easy-to-perform PRA test that permits flow cytometry based detection of alloantibody induced classical complement activation. Future studies will have to evaluate its possible relevance as an alternative to CDC-PRA testing in clinical transplantation.

Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d in renal allografts is associated with basement membrane injury in peritubular and glomerular capillaries: a contribution of humoral immunity to chronic allograft rejection

Endothelial deposition of the complement split product C4d is an established marker of antibody-mediated acute renal allograft rejection. A contribution of alloantibody-dependent immune reactions to chronic rejection is under discussion. In this study, the association of immunohistochemically detected endothelial C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC) with morphologic features of chronic renal allograft injury was investigated in a large study cohort. C4d deposits in PTC were detected in 73 (34%) of 213 late allograft biopsies performed in 213 patients more than 12 mo after transplantation (median, 4.9 yr) because of chronic allograft dysfunction. Endothelial C4d deposition was found to be associated with chronic transplant glomerulopathy (CG) (P < 0.0001), with basement membrane multilayering in PTC (P = 0.01), and with an accumulation of mononuclear inflammatory cells in PTC (P < 0,001). Furthermore, C4d deposits in PTC (in biopsies with normal glomerular morphology) were associated with development of CG in follow-up biopsies. Other morphologic features of chronic allograft nephropathy (with exception of tubular atrophy) were not associated with C4d deposits in PTC. Analyses of previous and follow-up biopsies revealed that C4d deposits may occur de novo and may also disappear at any time after transplantation. In conclusion, the data suggest that complement activation in renal microvasculature, indicating humoral alloreactivity, contributes to chronic rejection characterized by chronic transplant glomerulopathy and basement membrane multilayering in PTC.