1
|
Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, van Akkooi A, Bataille V, Bastholt L, Dreno B, Dummer R, Fargnoli MC, Forsea AM, Harwood CA, Hauschild A, Hoeller C, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets NW, Lallas A, Leiter U, Malvehy J, Del Marmol V, Moreno-Ramirez D, Pellacani G, Peris K, Saiag P, Tagliaferri L, Trakatelli M, Ioannides D, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Arenberger P, Eggermont AMM, Röcken M, Grob JJ, Lorigan P. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Part 2. Treatment-Update 2023. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193:113252. [PMID: 37708630 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
In order to update recommendations on treatment, supportive care, education, and follow-up of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), a multidisciplinary panel of experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), and the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed. Recommendations were based on an evidence-based literature review, guidelines, and expert consensus. Treatment recommendations are presented for common primary cSCC (low risk, high risk), locally advanced cSCC, regional metastatic cSCC (operable or inoperable), and distant metastatic cSCC. For common primary cSCC, the first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment or micrographically controlled surgery. Achieving clear surgical margins is the most important treatment consideration for patients with cSCCs amenable to surgery. Regarding adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with high-risk localised cSCC with clear surgical margins, current evidence has not shown significant benefit for those with at least one high-risk factor. Radiotherapy should be considered as the primary treatment for non-surgical candidates/tumours. For cSCC with cytologically or histologically confirmed regional nodal metastasis, lymph node dissection is recommended. For patients with metastatic or locally advanced cSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 agents are the first-line systemic treatment, with cemiplimab being the first approved systemic agent for advanced cSCC by the Food and Drugs Administration/European Medicines Agency. Second-line systemic treatments for advanced cSCC, include epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab) combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary board decisions are mandatory for all patients with advanced cSCC, considering the risks of toxicity, the age and frailty of patients, and co-morbidities, including immunosuppression. Patients should be engaged in informed, shared decision-making on management and be provided with the best supportive care to improve symptom management and quality of life. The frequency of follow-up visits and investigations for subsequent new cSCC depends on underlying risk characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Clio Dessinioti
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Université Paris Cite, Dermato-Oncology AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, Cancer Institute APHP. Nord-Université Paris Cite, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Brigitte Dreno
- Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302/EMR6001, Nantes, France
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Skin Cancer Centre at University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maria Concetta Fargnoli
- Dermatology Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ana Maria Forsea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Department of Oncologic Dermatology, Elias University Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catherine A Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicole Wj Kelleners-Smeets
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Dermatology Department of Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de enfermedades raras, Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Moreno-Ramirez
- Department of Medical and Surgical Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Ketty Peris
- UOC di Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino Metaboliche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Philippe Saiag
- Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise-Paré hospital, APHP, and EA 4340 'Biomarkers in Cancerology and Hemato-oncology', UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A, Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Myrto Trakatelli
- Department of Dermatology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University Department of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Ricardo Vieira
- Department of Dermatology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Petr Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University Munich and Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Röcken
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brami I, Ini D, Sassonker N, Zaknoun M, Zuckerman T, Lewis EC. Immunosuppressive Drugs Alter α1-Antitrypsin Production in Hepatocytes: Implications for Epithelial Gap Repair. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 26:625-633. [PMID: 31899361 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Immunosuppressive drugs are an inherent component of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Circulating α1-antitrypsin (AAT), a serine-protease inhibitor produced predominantly by hepatocytes that rises during acute phase responses, is lost in patient's stool due to gastrointestinal GVHD, and its augmentation has been found to attenuate GVHD. Here we explored the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on hepatocyte production of AAT and intestinal epithelial gap repair. The effect of commonly used immunosuppressants on AAT production was examined in vitro using HepG2 cells and primary mouse hepatocytes, and their impact on human intestinal epithelial cell line gap repair was evaluated. Sera from 12 allogeneic HSCT recipients, obtained at 14 days post-transplantation, predating the diagnosis of GVHD (n = 6), were examined for reepithelialization, with added clinical-grade AAT. Rapamycin compromised AAT production under inflammatory conditions. Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine A (CSA) inhibited reepithelialization; AAT minimized the effect of CSA. Patient sera displayed superior gap repair with exogenous AAT. Functional insufficiency in circulating AAT may be the result of drug toxicities leading to ineffective gut reepithelization and compromised gut lining. Taken together, our data strengthen the rationale for incorporating AAT augmentation therapy into immunosuppressive treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Brami
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Faculty of Health Sciences, Be'er Sheva, Israel.
| | - Dor Ini
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Faculty of Health Sciences, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | - Nofit Sassonker
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Faculty of Health Sciences, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | - Melodie Zaknoun
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Faculty of Health Sciences, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | - Tsila Zuckerman
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Eli C Lewis
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Faculty of Health Sciences, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Postoperative Complications of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30:1012-1015. [PMID: 30946229 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000005511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As the number of organ transplants and the survival rate increase, solid organ transplant patients will need more plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, such patients take immunosuppressants, including prednisone, which makes wound healing slower and plastic surgeons more hesitate to operate. In this study, we examined postoperative complications of organ transplant patients who have undergone plastic and reconstructive surgery. MATERIALS & METHODS Between 2002 and 2018, the total number of patients who visited our clinic after receiving organ transplants was 77. Retrospective reviews were performed on 35 patients, excluding those who received conservative treatment. Demographics, underlying diseases, causes of organ transplantation, immunosuppressive regimen, types of procedures, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 35 patients received 42 procedures. Eleven patients had undergone kidney transplantation, and 24 had undergone liver transplantation. The type of procedures were local flap (23.8%), primary closure (23.8%), skin graft (11.9%), and free flap (2.4%). There were 2 cases of aesthetic surgery. Among all the cases, complications occurred in 8 procedures (19%). Hematoma was the most common complication, followed by skin necrosis. All except 3 patients were completely healed within 6 weeks. DISCUSSION This study showed that hematoma was the most frequently occurring complication. In a few cases, wound healing was delayed. So, bleeding control was very important to prevent the development of hematoma. And organ transplants may not be a problem for plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
|
4
|
Huffman DM, Schafer MJ, LeBrasseur NK. Energetic interventions for healthspan and resiliency with aging. Exp Gerontol 2016; 86:73-83. [PMID: 27260561 DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Revised: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Several behavioral and pharmacological strategies improve longevity, which is indicative of delayed organismal aging, with the most effective interventions extending both life- and healthspan. In free living creatures, maintaining health and function into old age requires resilience against a multitude of stressors. Conversely, in experimental settings, conventional housing of rodents limits exposure to such challenges, thereby obscuring an accurate assessment of resilience. Caloric restriction (CR) and exercise, as well as pharmacologic strategies (resveratrol, rapamycin, metformin, senolytics), are well established to improve indices of health and aging, but some paradoxical effects have been observed on resilience. For instance, CR potently retards the onset of age-related diseases, and improves lifespan to a greater extent than exercise in a variety of models. However, exercise has proven more consistently beneficial to organismal resilience against a broad array of stressors, including infections, surgery, wound healing and frailty. CR can improve cellular stress defenses and protect from frailty, but also impairs the response to infections, bed rest and healing. How an intervention will impact not only longevity, health and function, but also resiliency, is critical to better understanding translational implications. Thus, organismal robustness represents a critical, albeit understudied aspect of aging, which needs more careful attention in order to better inform on how putative age-delaying strategies will impact preservation of health and function in response to stressors with aging in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek M Huffman
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; Institute for Aging Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | - Marissa J Schafer
- Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|