Variceal bleeding and portal hypertensive gastropathy

Expert consensus on emergency procedures for portal hypertension bleeding (2022)

Expert consensus proposes an emergency treatment protocol for portal hypertension bleeding. Herein, the emergency treatment procedures, which include first aid, medical, interventional, and surgical treatments, are described. In addition, the indications, contraindications, operating norms, precautions, and prevention of complications of portal hypertension are described to optimize the first aid process.

A comparative study of propranolol versus silver nitrate cautery in the treatment of recurrent primary epistaxis in children

Background

Epistaxis is a common medical problem in pediatric population. Although in most cases it is mild and self-limiting, a proportion of childhood epistaxis is massive, recurrent, or resistant to conventional management.

Objective

To compare effectiveness of propranolol as a treatment option for childhood epistaxis versus conventional silver nitrate cautery.

Study design and methodology

This is a prospective interventional comparative study that was carried out during a period of 1 year (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013) at Qena University Hospital and Assiut University Children’s Hospital. One hundred children aged 6–12 years who presented with epistaxis to Qena University Hospital and Assiut University Children’s Hospital during the study period and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study. They were randomly assigned into one of two interventional groups, where 50 children were treated with oral propranolol (propranolol treatment group) and another 50 children were treated with conventional silver nitrate cautery (cauterization treatment group) for their epistaxis. Propranolol was given at a dose of 1.5–2 mg/kg/day (divided into three doses). Patients were followed for 6 months after their discharge for recurrence of epistaxis.

Results

Both groups of patients showed minimal recurrent epistaxis with rates of 14% for propranolol treated group and 12% for cauterization group, with no statistically significant difference between both groups. Local pain was found to be more in patients treated with silver nitrate cauterization.

Conclusion

Treatment of primary epistaxis with propranolol or silver nitrate cautery showed equal rates of recurrence, and local nasal pain was slightly more among silver nitrate cauterization treated group. Propranolol could be a favorable treatment option for patients with primary epistaxis. Further studies that include multiple centers and larger number of patients are recommended for more clarification of the effectiveness of such treatment option.

Proton pump inhibitor administration delays rebleeding after endoscopic gastric variceal obturation

AIM: To clarify the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) after endoscopic variceal obturation (EVO) with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate.

METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 16 liver cirrhosis patients with gastric variceal bleeding that received EVO with injections of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate at a single center (Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong) from January 2008 to December 2012. Medical records including patient characteristics and endoscopic findings were reviewed. Treatment results, liver function, serum biochemistry and cirrhosis etiology were compared between patients receiving PPIs and those that did not. Furthermore, the rebleeding interval was compared between patients that received PPI treatment after EVO and those who did not.

RESULTS: The patient group included nine males and seven females with a mean age of 61.8 ± 11.7 years. Following the EVO procedure, eight of the 12 patients that received PPIs and three of the four non-PPI patients experienced rebleeding. There were no differences between the groups in serum biochemistry or patient characteristics. The rebleeding rate was not significantly different between the groups, however, patients receiving PPIs had a significantly longer rebleeding interval compared to non-PPI patients (22.2 ± 11.2 mo vs 8.5 ± 5.5 mo; P = 0.008). The duration of PPI use was not related to the rebleeding interval. A total of six patients, who had ulcers at the injection site, exhibited a shorter rebleeding interval (16.8 ± 5.9 mo) than patients without ulcers (19.9 ± 3.2 mo), though this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: PPI therapy can extend the rebleeding interval, and should therefore be considered after EVO treatment for gastric varices.

Invasive and non-invasive techniques for detecting portal hypertension and predicting variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a review

Portal hypertension is a severe syndrome that may derive from pre-sinusoidal, sinusoidal, and post-sinusoidal causes. As a consequence, several complications (i.e. ascites, oesophageal varices) may develop. In sinusoidal portal hypertension, hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is a reliable method for defining the grade of portal pressure, establishing the effectiveness of the treatment, and predicting the occurrence of complications; however, some questions exist regarding its ability to discriminate bleeding from non-bleeding varices in cirrhotic patients. Other imaging techniques (transient elastography, endoscopy, endosonography, and duplex Doppler sonography) for assessing causes and complications of portal hypertensive syndrome are available and may be valuable for the management of these patients. In this review, we evaluate invasive and non-invasive techniques currently employed to obtain a clinical prediction of deadly complications, such as variceal bleeding in patients affected by sinusoidal portal hypertension, in order to create a diagnostic algorithm to manage them. Again, HVPG appears to be the reference standard to evaluate portal hypertension and monitor the response to treatment, but its ability to predict several complications and support management decisions might be further improved through the diagnostic combination with other imaging techniques.

The therapeutic efficacy of propranolol in children with recurrent primary epistaxis

We hypothesized that some characteristics of beta-blockers, including negative inotropic, peripheral vasoconstrictor, and antiangiogenic effects, might be potentially useful in treating children with epistaxis. From June 2010 to March 2012, a total of seven children with recurrent primary epistaxis resistant to conventional management were observed at our institution. An overall effectiveness of propranolol was noted in all seven children when given a dose of 1.5–2 mg/kg/day (divided into three doses) as a second line therapy for terminating epistaxis. Based on our first experience, we believe that propranolol could be a favorable treatment option for patients with primary epistaxis.

Immediate effects of different schedules of somatostatin on portal pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Somatostatin (SST) is used for the treatment of acute variceal bleeding based on its ability to decrease portal pressure and collateral blood flow. To date, no studies have focused on the immediate-early effects (between 1 and 30 min) of SST. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different schedules of SST therapy with placebo on portal pressure in patients with portal hypertension treated with portal-azygous disconnection and to test whether an increase in bolus or infusion dose can improve the clinical efficacy of SST therapy.

METHODS

  Patients were treated with four different schedules: (a) standard dose (n = 11): one 250 μg bolus + a continuous infusion of 250 μg/h; (b) medium dose (n = 10): 500 μg bolus + a continuous infusion of 250 μg/h; (c) high dose (n = 10): 250 μg bolus + a continuous infusion of 500 μg/h; (d) control (n = 10): an injection of placebo (saline) followed by a placebo infusion. Following SST or placebo administration, portal pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), systemic blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were measured at 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 30 min.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

  The three schedules of SST induced a marked, rapid and highly significant decrease in portal pressure. The decline in portal pressure was moderate at 1 min (P < 0·040), achieved a peak effect at 5 min (P < 0·009) and remained decreased at 30 min. The effect of SST on portal pressure was significantly greater than placebo from 1 min after administration. There were no significant differences in portal pressure decrease between the three schedules of SST. The three schedules of SST and the placebo schedule did not induce significant changes in HR, systemic blood pressure and CVP.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

  This study shows that SST is effective in decreasing portal pressure within 30 min of administration in patients with liver cirrhosis. The clinical schedule used in this study was reasonable and safe.

Avaliação do volume de fluxo portal em pacientes esquistossomóticos: estudo comparativo entre ressonância magnética e ultrassom Doppler

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a concordância entre o ultrassom Doppler e a ressonância magnética e a reprodutibilidade interobservador desses métodos na quantificação do volume de fluxo portal em indivíduos esquistossomóticos. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi realizado estudo transversal, observacional e autopareado, avaliando 21 pacientes portadores de esquistossomose hepatoesplênica submetidos a mensuração do fluxo portal por meio de ressonância magnética (utilizando-se a técnica phase-contrast) e ultrassom Doppler. RESULTADOS: Observou-se baixa concordância entre os métodos (coeficiente de correlação intraclasse: 34,5% [IC 95%]). A reprodutibilidade interobservador na avaliação pela ressonância magnética (coeficiente de correlação intraclasse: 99,2% [IC 95%] / coeficiente de correlação de Pearson: 99,2% / média do fluxo portal = 0,806) e pelo ultrassom Doppler (coeficiente de correlação intraclasse: 80,6% a 93,0% [IC 95%] / coeficiente de correlação de Pearson: 81,6% a 92,7% / média do fluxo portal = 0,954, 0,758 e 0,749) foi excelente. CONCLUSÃO: Há uma baixa concordância entre o ultrassom Doppler e a ressonância magnética na mensuração do volume de fluxo na veia porta. A ressonância magnética e o ultrassom Doppler são métodos reprodutíveis na quantificação do fluxo portal em pacientes portadores de hipertensão porta de origem esquistossomótica, apresentando boa concordância interobservador

Modelling Factors Causing Mortality in Oesophageal VaricesPatients in King Abdul Aziz University Hospital

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to reach a model defining factors precipitating short survival in patients with oesophageal varices and improving the understanding of such factors. Models would help to prioritize the clinical goals and intervention for saving the lives of patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to King Abdul Aziz University Hospital who had been diagnosed with oesophageal varices. The patients' demographics, disease history, physical examination, viral infections, parasitic infections, blood pictures, cancer biomarkers, liver enzymes and bleeding details were collected, tested for correlation with mortality to formulate a model.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients were included in this study. 37 clinical variables were studied only 15 factors were found to have a statistical significance. These factors were PT (RC=0.17338 P-value 0.00011), APTT (RC=0.07916, P-value 0.00002), haemoglobin level (RC=-0.44748, P-value <0.0001), WBC (RC = 0.22255, P-value 0.00001), serum albumin level (RC=-0.12953, P-value 0.00001), serum creatinine (RC=0.01483, P-value 0.00002), at least one incidence of encephalopathy (RC=1.80500, P-value 0.00014), total bilirubin (RC=0.01371, P-value 0.00016), direct bilirubin (RC=0.01298, P-value 0.00357, serum AST (RC=0.00914, P-value 0.00462), presence of at least bleeding event (RC=1.03373, P-value 0.00613), ascites grade I (RC=-1.57435, P-value 0.00967), SBP (RC=1.47216, P-value 0.01581), platelets count (RC=0.00398, P-value 0.03476) and oesophageal varices (RC = -1.42139, P-value 0.03673). Only 5 factors were likely to affect the mortality status. These factors were encephalopathy, spontaneous SBP, bleeding, ascites and grade of oesophageal varices. Six models were then formulated.

CONCLUSION

These models should be retested in larger study groups to test their reliability in order to use them as surrogate end point in future clinical studies.

Antacids for preventing oesophagogastric variceal bleeding and rebleeding in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

Ruptured gastroesophageal varices are the most severe and frequent cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients, leading to death in 5% to 8% of patients during the first 48 hours and oesophagogastric varices account for 60% to 80% of first bleeding in patients with portal hypertension. Antacids are often used for emergency treatment of bleeding oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis of the liver.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of antacids for preventing oesophagogastric bleeding and rebleeding.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified relevant randomised clinical trials by searching The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (June 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2007), MEDLINE (1950 to June 2007), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database) (1980 to June 2007), and the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) (1945 to June 2007). Additional randomised trials were sought from the reference lists of the trials found and reviews identified by the electronic searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised clinical trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We planned to summarise data using Cochrane Collaboration methodologies.

MAIN RESULTS

We could not find any randomised clinical trials on antacids for preventing oesophagogastric variceal bleeding and bleeding in cirrhotic patients.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

it is not possible to determine whether antacids are beneficially effective or harmful for preventing oesophagogastric variceal bleeding and rebleeding in cirrhotic patients since randomised clinical trials investigating it are lacking.

Noncirrhotic portal fibrosis/idiopathic portal hypertension: APASL recommendations for diagnosis and treatment

The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) Working Party on Portal Hypertension has developed consensus guidelines on the disease profile, diagnosis, and management of noncirrhotic portal fibrosis and idiopathic portal hypertension. The consensus statements, prepared and deliberated at length by the experts in this field, were presented at the annual meeting of the APASL at Kyoto in March 2007. This article includes the statements approved by the APASL along with brief backgrounds of various aspects of the disease.

A multicentred clinical comparative study on curative effect and safety of acetic octreotide in treatment of esophageal varices bleeding

AIM: To evaluate curative effect and safety of acetic octreotide in the treatment of esophageal varices blee-ding (EVB) in comparison with octreotide (Sandostatin).

METHODS: EVB patients were randomly and double-blinded assigned into acetic octreotide group (n = 70) and Sandostatin group (n = 66). Both kinds of drugs were dissolved in normal saline and then given to the patients at the rate of 50 mg/h for 48 h. The amount of bleeding and vital signs of all the patients were observed and comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS: The frequencies and amount of hemateme-sis, the excreted frequencies and amount of black feces were significantly different before and after treatment with both kinds of drugs (P <0.05), but there was no marked difference between the two groups (P >0.05). The vital signs such as heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as symptoms of nausea, swirling, heart-throb, sweatiness, and thirst were notably improved after treatment (P <0.05), but there was still no obvious difference between the two groups (P >0.05). Adverse drug reaction was also different between the two groups 1.43% (1.43% vs 1.52%, P >0.05). The total effective rates in acetic octreotide and Sandostatin group were 97.14% and 92.42%, respectively (P >0.05).

CONCLUSION: Acetic octreotide is safe and effective in the treatment of EVB, and its effect is not significan-tly different from Sandostatin's.

Combination endoscopic band ligation and sclerotherapy compared with endoscopic band ligation alone for the secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal hemorrhage: a meta-analysis

Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is the community-accepted standard therapy for the secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Recent data indicate that combination EBL and sclerotherapy may be a more effective therapy than EBL alone. Yet existing data are conflicting. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of EBL and sclerotherapy versus EBL alone for the secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal hemorrhage. We performed a systematic review of two computerized databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) along with manual-searching of published abstracts to identify relevant citations without language restrictions from 1990 to 2002. Eight studies met explicit inclusion criteria. We performed meta-analysis of these studies to pool the relative risk for the following outcomes: esophageal variceal rebleeding, death, number of endoscopic sessions to achieve variceal obliteration, and therapeutic complications. There were no significant differences between EBL and sclerotherapy versus EBL alone in the risk of esophageal variceal rebleeding (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.67-1.64; P = 0.83), death (RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.68-1.44; P = 0.96), or number of endoscopic sessions to variceal obliteration (RR = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.055-0.51; P = 0.11). However, the incidence of esophageal stricture formation was significantly higher in the EBL group than in the sclerotherapy group. There is no evidence that the addition of sclerotherapy to endoscopic band ligation changes clinically relevant outcomes (variceal rebleeding, death, time to variceal obliteration) in the secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Moreover, combination EBL and sclerotherapy had more esophageal stricture formation than EBL alone.

Review article: portal vein thrombosis -- new insights into aetiology and management

Portal vein thrombosis may occur in the presence or absence of underlying liver disease, and a combination of local and systemic factors are increasingly recognized to be important in its development. Acute and chronic portal vein thrombosis have traditionally been considered separately, although a clear clinical distinction may be difficult. Gastrooesophageal varices are an important complication of portal vein thrombosis, but they follow a different natural history to those with portal hypertension related to cirrhosis. Consensus on optimal treatment continues to be hampered by a lack of randomized trials, but recent studies demonstrate the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in acute thrombosis, and the apparent safety and benefit of anticoagulation in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis.

Non-pulsatile hepatic and portal vein waveforms in patients with liver cirrhosis: concordant and discordant relationships

The relationship between hepatic vein waveform and portal vein waveform (HVW and PVW) was evaluated in 54 healthy subjects and 148 patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension using spectral Doppler ultrasound recordings. In all healthy subjects, the HVW was triphasic and the PVW was slightly pulsatile. 51 of 148 patients (34.5%) had flat non pulsatile HVW with a significantly higher incidence in Child C vs Child A patients (48.9% vs 20.7%, respectively; p<0.01) while 56 of 148 patients (37.8%) had flat PVW, also with significantly higher incidence in Child C vs Child A patients (46.7% vs 25.9%, respectively; p<0.05). Of the 86 patients having flat waves (HVW or PVW), only 21 (24.4%) had concordant flat waves (flat both HVW and PVW) while discordance was detected in the remaining 75.6% patients. Only 22 patients (14.9%) had a triphasic HVW but with broad spectrum and absent window in 20 (90.9%) and significantly lower pre-systolic:systolic (PS) ratio (Vmax of the pre-systolic retrograde wave/Vmax of the systolic antegrade wave) compared with healthy subjects (0.23+/-0.1 vs 0.42+/-0.18, respectively; p<0.001). In conclusion, spectral broadening with window absence and dampening of the retrograde pre-systolic wave mark are the earliest changes in HVW in cirrhotic patients even in the presence of a triphasic pattern. The transmission of hepatic vein pulsatility is not a major factor responsible for portal vein pulsatility.

The cost-effectiveness of hepatic venous pressure gradient monitoring in the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent variceal hemorrhage is common following an initial bleed in patients with cirrhosis. The current standard of care for secondary prophylaxis is endoscopic band ligation (EBL). Combination of beta-blocker and nitrate therapy, guided by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) monitoring, is a novel alternative strategy. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of these competing strategies.

METHODS

Decision analysis with Markov modeling was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of three competing strategies: (1) EBL; (2) beta-blocker and nitrate therapy without HVPG monitoring (HVPG-); and (3) beta-blocker and nitrate therapy with HVPG monitoring (HVPG+). Patients in the HVPG+ strategy who failed to achieve an HVPG decline from medical therapy were offered EBL. Cost estimates were from a third-party payer perspective. The main outcome measure was the cost per recurrent variceal hemorrhage prevented.

RESULTS

Under base-case conditions, the HVPG+ strategy was the most effective yet most expensive approach, followed by EBL and HVPG-. Compared to the EBL strategy, the HVPG+ strategy cost an incremental 5,974 dollars per recurrent bleed prevented. In a population with 100% compliance with all therapies, the incremental cost of HVPG-versus EBL fell to 5,270 dollars per recurrent bleed prevented. The model results were sensitive to the cost of EBL, the cost of HVPG monitoring, and the probability of medical therapy producing an adequate HVPG decline.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to EBL for the secondary prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding, combination medical therapy guided by HVPG monitoring is more effective and only marginally more expensive.

Comparison of the efficacy of octreotide, vasopressin, and omeprazole in the control of acute bleeding in patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy: a controlled study

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertensive gastropathy is an important complication of liver cirrhosis and it contributes to acute gastric bleeding. Effective management of this condition remains a clinical challenge. We assessed and compared the efficacy of octreotide, vasopressin, and omeprazole in the treatment of acute bleeding in patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy were randomized into Octreotide, Vasopressin, and Omeprazole groups. Bleeding was monitored by observing the contents of the nasogastric tube. Blood transfusion requirements and side-effects of drugs were recorded. Repeat endoscopies were scheduled 2 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Complete bleeding control after 48 h of drug infusion was achieved in all patients receiving octreotide (100%), 14/22 patients receiving vasopressin (64%), and 13/22 patients receiving Omeprazole (59%). Octreotide required much less time and significantly fewer blood transfusions to control bleeding. Patients receiving vasopressin experienced more side-effects than those receiving octreotide and omeprazole. In the 17 patients whose bleeding was not controlled within 48 h by either vasopressin or omeprazole, complete bleeding control was achieved by combined use of these two agents. Follow-up endoscopy showed dramatic improvement in gastric mucosal erosions, superficial ulceration and erythema.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide appeared to be more effective in controlling acute bleeding in patients with hypertensive gastropathy, with significantly rapid action, smaller transfusion requirements, and minor side-effects. Simultaneous administration of vasopressin and omeprazole appeared to have additive effects.