A majority of patients with Barrett's oesophagus are unlikely to benefit from endoscopic cancer surveillance

Length of Barrett's esophagus in the presence of low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The identification and follow-up of ultra-short Barrett's esophagus (BE) is controversial. BE surveillance guidelines emphasize mainly on long-segment BE. However, in practice a substantial proportion of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are found close to the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ). Our study aims to chart the length of BE when low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and EAC arise in BE.

METHODS

Endoscopic findings from all cases with a diagnosis of LGD and HGD in BE between June 2014 and June 2019, and 100 consecutive cases of EAC diagnosed between June 2018 and August 2019, were reviewed. Additionally, 438 consecutive gastroscopies were reviewed to identify 100 cases of non-dysplastic BE.

RESULTS

99 cases of LGD and 61 cases of HGD were reviewed. LGD and HGD when diagnosed, was located in BE ≤ 1 cm in 20% and 18% cases, respectively. LGD and HGD when diagnosed, was located in BE ≤ 3 cm in 48.5% and 40.9% cases, respectively. LGD and HGD when diagnosed in BE ≤ 3 cm was found at index endoscopy in 67% and 42% cases, respectively. Of the 100 cases of EAC, only 23 had concurrent visible BE, with BE higher than the level of EAC in seven. EAC when found, had its proximal extent ≤ 1 cm from GEJ in 22% and ≤ 3 cm from GEJ in 40% cases. Of the 100 non-dysplastic BE, 53% were ≤ 1 cm and 78% were ≤ 3 cm long.

CONCLUSION

Almost 20% of all dysplasia in BE occurs in BE < 1 cm. Over 40% occurs in BE < 3 cm. Similarly, 20% of EAC occurs within 1 cm of GEJ and 40% occur within 3 cm. A majority of dysplasia diagnosed within 3 cm of the GEJ is found on index endoscopy. We propose that all lengths of columnar lined epithelium above the GEJ are recognized as BE and subjected to a thorough biopsy protocol.

Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett's esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although patients with Barrett's esophagus commonly undergo endoscopic surveillance, its effectiveness in reducing mortality from esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas has not been evaluated rigorously.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study in a community-based setting. Among 8272 members with Barrett's esophagus, we identified 351 esophageal adenocarcinoma: 70 in persons who had a prior diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (who were eligible for surveillance); 51 of these patients died, 38 as a result of the cancers (cases). Surveillance histories were contrasted with a sample of 101 living persons with Barrett's esophagus (controls), matched for age, sex, and duration of follow-up evaluation.

RESULTS

Surveillance within 3 years was not associated with a decreased risk of death from esophageal adenocarcinoma (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-2.75). Fatal cases were nearly as likely to have received surveillance (55.3%) as were controls (60.4%). A Barrett's esophagus length longer than 3 cm and prior dysplasia each were associated with subsequent mortality, but adjustment for these did not change the main findings. Although all patients should be included in evaluations of effectiveness, excluding deaths related to cancer treatment and patients who failed to complete treatment, changed the magnitude, but not the significance, of the association (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus was not associated with a substantially decreased risk of death from esophageal adenocarcinoma. The results do not exclude a small to moderate benefit. However, if such a benefit exists, our findings indicate that it is substantially smaller than currently estimated. The effectiveness of surveillance was influenced partially by the acceptability of existing treatments and the occurrence of treatment-associated mortality.

Stool DNA testing for the detection of pancreatic cancer: assessment of methylation marker candidates

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PanC) presents at late stage with high mortality. Effective early detection methods are needed. Aberrantly methylated genes are unexplored as markers for noninvasive detection by stool testing. The authors aimed to select discriminant methylated genes and to assess accuracy of these and mutant KRAS in stool to detect PanC.

METHODS

Nine target genes were assayed by real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) in bisulfite-treated DNA from microdissected frozen specimens of 24 PanC cases and 30 normal colon controls. Archived stools from 58 PanC cases and 65 controls matched on sex, age, and smoking were analyzed. Target genes from fecal supernatants were enriched by hybrid capture, bisulfite-treated, and assayed by MSP. KRAS mutations were assayed using the QuARTS technique.

RESULTS

Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) for tissue BMP3, NDRG4, EYA4, UCHL1, MDFI, Vimentin, CNTNAP2, SFRP2, and TFPI2 were 0.90, 0.79, 0.78, 0.78, 0.77, 0.77, 0.69, 0.67, and 0.66, respectively. The top 4 markers and mutant KRAS were evaluated in stool. BMP3 was the most discriminant methylation marker in stool. At 90% specificity, methylated BMP3 alone detected 51% of PanCs, mutant KRAS detected 50%, and combination detected 67%. AUCs for methylated BMP3, mutant KRAS, and combination in stool were 0.73, 0.75, and 0.85, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that stool assay of a methylated gene marker can detect PanC. Among candidate methylated markers discriminant in tissue, BMP3 alone performed well in stool. Combining methylated BMP3 and mutant KRAS increased stool detection over either marker alone.

Stool DNA testing for the detection of pancreatic cancer: assessment of methylation marker candidates

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PanC) presents at late stage with high mortality. Effective early detection methods are needed. Aberrantly methylated genes are unexplored as markers for noninvasive detection by stool testing. The authors aimed to select discriminant methylated genes and to assess accuracy of these and mutant KRAS in stool to detect PanC.

METHODS

Nine target genes were assayed by real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) in bisulfite-treated DNA from microdissected frozen specimens of 24 PanC cases and 30 normal colon controls. Archived stools from 58 PanC cases and 65 controls matched on sex, age, and smoking were analyzed. Target genes from fecal supernatants were enriched by hybrid capture, bisulfite-treated, and assayed by MSP. KRAS mutations were assayed using the QuARTS technique.

RESULTS

Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) for tissue BMP3, NDRG4, EYA4, UCHL1, MDFI, Vimentin, CNTNAP2, SFRP2, and TFPI2 were 0.90, 0.79, 0.78, 0.78, 0.77, 0.77, 0.69, 0.67, and 0.66, respectively. The top 4 markers and mutant KRAS were evaluated in stool. BMP3 was the most discriminant methylation marker in stool. At 90% specificity, methylated BMP3 alone detected 51% of PanCs, mutant KRAS detected 50%, and combination detected 67%. AUCs for methylated BMP3, mutant KRAS, and combination in stool were 0.73, 0.75, and 0.85, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that stool assay of a methylated gene marker can detect PanC. Among candidate methylated markers discriminant in tissue, BMP3 alone performed well in stool. Combining methylated BMP3 and mutant KRAS increased stool detection over either marker alone.

Modelling a population with Barrett's oesophagus from oesophageal adenocarcinoma incidence data

OBJECTIVE

A recent study of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus (ACO) incidence rates in Denmark showed a steep fall in the over-80 population, interpreted as the result of a decline in the prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus (BO) in this age group, for which three hypotheses were advanced: the specific mortality from ACO and, superimposed, either excess mortality from causes of death unrelated to ACO or a birth cohort effect. The aim of this study was to create models estimating the BO population fitting each of these three hypotheses, in order to select the most plausible hypothesis and to gain insight into the Danish BO population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Models were designed for these three hypotheses, conforming to the generally accepted 0.4-0.5% annual ACO incidence in BO patients. These models employed expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms, Danish life tables and the observed ACO incidence rates. The models enabled the estimation of a BO population for each hypothesis.

RESULTS

After testing against set criteria, the most plausible model was found to be that describing a birth cohort effect which predicted a +/-5% annual rise in the prevalence of BO and, consequently, in the incidence rate of ACO in Denmark. This prediction was borne out over the subsequent decade.

CONCLUSIONS

This rising ACO incidence rate is likely to continue into the foreseeable future. The use of EM algorithms enabled a first estimate of the BO population at risk of ACO, although, owing to the limitations imposed by the models, the age- and gender-specific ACO risk for the entire Danish BO population could not as yet be ascertained.

The prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus in a cohort of 1040 Canadian primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia undergoing prompt endoscopy

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus in patients undergoing gastroscopy may be influenced by possible referral bias.

AIM

To present the prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus from the the Canadian Adult Dyspepsia Empirical Therapy Prompt Endoscopy study and to explore potential risk factors for its presence.

METHODS

Patients had not been on treatment for dyspepsia for 2-4 weeks prior to endoscopy, which was performed within 10 working days of presentation.

RESULTS

Barrett's oesophagus was endoscopically suspected in 53 of 1040 cases (5%) and histologically confirmed by the presence of intestinal metaplasia in 25 (2.4%). The prevalence of biopsy-proven Barrett's oesophagus was 4% in patients with dominant reflux-like symptoms. Sixty-four percent with confirmed Barrett's oesophagus had dominant reflux-like symptoms compared with 37% without Barrett's oesophagus. Barrett's oesophagus was more common in patients >50 years of age; 68% of cases were males. The mean duration of symptoms was 10 years, yet 16% had symptoms of <1-year duration. Endoscopic reflux oesophagitis was present in 68% of confirmed Barrett's oesophagus patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Barrett's oesophagus is confirmed on biopsy in about half of endoscopically suspected Barrett's oesophagus patients. Barrett's oesophagus is more common in males, in those with dominant reflux-like symptoms, and in patients with a longer symptom history.

Barrett's surveillance is worthwhile and detects curable cancers. A prospective cohort study addressing cancer incidence, treatment outcome and survival

OBJECTIVES

To establish whether Barrett's surveillance is worthwhile in terms of incident cancers and whether outcomes are favourable.

METHODS

A prospective non-randomized single centre Barrett's surveillance programme commencing 1 January 1992 through 1 April 2001 (112 months). Oesophagectomy recommended for high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma.

RESULTS

Of 23 725 patients, 506 were diagnosed as Barrett's oesophagus and 24 (5%) had carcinoma at diagnosis (prevalence cancers). One hundred and twenty-six patients had at least one surveillance endoscopy; 248 surveillance endoscopies were performed spanning 338 patient years. Thirteen surveillance (incidence) cancers were detected. In the prevalence cancer group 12 of the 24 patients underwent oesophagectomy. Lymph nodes showed evidence of metastases in 10 of the 12 resections. In the surveillance group 10 patients underwent oesophagectomy. Lymph nodes showed evidence of metastases in one of the 10 resections. One patient in the prevalence cancer group (4% of group; 8% of those operated) and seven patients in the surveillance cancer group (54% of group; 70% of those operated) remain disease-free more than 2 years post-oesophagectomy. The cost per cancer cured is 7546 pounds. One curable cancer was detected per 48 patient years of surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

Few Barrett's surveillance studies have addressed treatment outcomes and survival. In our study 5% of Barrett's patients undergoing endoscopy have prevalent cancers. If surveillance is performed, 4% per year develop cancer and 2% per year are cured of their cancers. Most surveillance cancers are operable and of those undergoing surgery 70% are cured. Barrett's surveillance is cost-effective compared with other cancer screening or surveillance initiatives.

The incidence of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus in an institutionalized population

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the incidence rate of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus (ACE) in a stable population of 28,000 institutionalized intellectually disabled individuals (IDI) in whom the prevalence rate of Barrett's esophagus (BE) was previously estimated in a representative sample by 24 h pH monitoring and endoscopy, and in which all cases of ACE were ascertained over a 6-year period. These IDI do not smoke or drink alcohol and are known to have exceptionally high prevalence rates of gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and consequently of BE.

METHODS

A population comprising 52,038 person-years was observed and all cases of ACE were ascertained. On the basis of the representative sample, the percentage of this population with BE was estimated to be 10.8%. ACE incidence rates could then be estimated and compared with those found in a free-living BE cohort after correction for age and gender differences.

RESULTS

In IDI an incidence rate of ACE of 2.5/1000 person-years was found against 6.3/1000 person-years in the free-living BE cohort. However, the age distributions of the IDI and of the free-living BE cohort were very different, and after correction for this factor there was no significantly lower incidence rate of ACE in the IDI (relative risk, 0.79; P = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first reported incidence study of ACE in a stable, well-defined population. In contrast to squamous cell carcinoma, our findings suggest only a minor role for smoking and alcohol in the etiology of ACE.

Risk stratification of Barrett's esophagus: updated prospective multivariate analysis

OBJECTIVES

Prospective evaluation of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in order to determine what demographic, endoscopic, and histologic features are predictive of the prevalence and incidence of Barrett's high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and adenocarcinoma (Ca).

METHODS

Newly diagnosed BE patients were entered into and followed in a standardized surveillance protocol. The following features were examined using either forward, stepwise multiple regression analysis, or Cox proportional hazards to determine their ability to predict the presence of HGD or Ca at index BE diagnosis as well as their ability to predict progression of BE during follow-up: age, race, gender, length of BE in cm, size of a hiatal hernia, severity of dysplasia at index diagnosis as well as during surveillance, gastric Helicobacter pylori infection status, and type of medical acid-reflux treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 550 patients were diagnosed with BE over the study period. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed three factors significantly associated with index diagnosis of HGD or Ca: hiatal hernia (larger size), Barrett's length (longer length), and absence of H. pylori infection. Three hundred and twenty-four BE entered the surveillance protocol. Cox proportional hazards models revealed a significant and independent association for five factors predictive of the time to progression of BE: presence of dysplasia at index diagnosis (p < 0.001), severity of dysplasia during surveillance (p < 0.001), length of Barrett's epithelium (p= 0.012), size of hiatal hernia (p= 0.006), and gastric H. pylori infection status (p= 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic and histologic features of BE at initial diagnosis are predictive of index HGD and cancer as well as with risk of BE progression.

Quality of life in relation to symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-- an analysis based on the ProGERD initiative

AIMS

To determine the impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on the quality of life, to assess changes in the quality of life during treatment with esomeprazole and to define factors that can predict these changes.

METHODS

Patients with GERD (n=6215) were included in a prospective cohort study (ProGERD). All patients underwent endoscopy and received esomeprazole. At baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment, symptoms and quality of life were assessed. Factors that influenced changes in the quality of life were determined by multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

At baseline, the quality of life in GERD patients was lower than that in the general population, and was similar to that in patients after acute coronary events. No differences in symptoms or quality of life were observed between the subgroups of patients with non-erosive GERD, erosive GERD and Barrett's oesophagus. After treatment with esomeprazole, the symptoms and quality of life were improved in all subscales within 2 weeks (P<0.001). The mean score of the disease-specific quality of life instrument (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Patients) increased from 4.6 to 6.2 points, representing a highly relevant clinical improvement. The generic quality of life (SF-36) reached levels similar to those in the general population, but, again, no difference was found between the three different subgroups of GERD patients. The main factors associated with an improvement in the quality of life after treatment were symptom relief, severe erosive reflux disease, absence of extra-oesophageal disorders, avoidance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake and positive Helicobacter pylori status.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD causes a significant impairment in the quality of life that can be attenuated or normalized within a time period as short as 2 weeks by treatment with esomeprazole. These findings were similar across the whole GERD patient spectrum.

[Surgery for oesophageal cancer: current controversies]

Any attempt to define the present role of surgery in the treatment of oesophageal cancer should integrate the dramatic changes that occurred within this disease over the last 2 decades: major shift in the histologic type of tumours, improved staging methods, spectacular reduction of operative risks, standardization of oncologic principles focusing on the completeness of resection, and development of multimodality therapeutic strategies. Surgery has still a pivotal role. Esophagectomy should be performed by trained surgeons in high-volume institutions. Radical surgery with en-bloc resection and 2 fields lymphadenectomy, should be encouraged in low-risk patients with subcarinal tumors. Although multimodality treatment strategy is commonly applied for locally advanced disease, few data support its superiority over surgical resection alone, followed by adjuvant therapy when appropriate. One may thus hypothesize that the risk/benefit ratio of such strategies is probably optimal in case of early stage tumors, and future studies may further clarify this issue. Conversely, locally advanced tumors, particularly those located in the upper mediastinum and the neck, may be managed alternatively without surgery. However, surgery remains an important tool to ensure optimal palliation of dysphagia, to achieve local control, and finally to improve quality of life. In that way, video-assisted techniques and/or trans hiatal approaches aiming to minimize the surgical insult may have a place in the treatment of patients who have substantially responded to induction therapy. Tumors located close to the pharyngo-oesophageal junction are best managed with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Finally, salvage surgery may be considered in highly selected patients in case of non-response or local relapse without distant metastases.

Endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus

There are many questions regarding the screening and surveiliance of BE for which there are currently no answers. Despite the use of models and extrapolations by some authors to suggest that screening and surveiliance for a cancer of such low incidence will never be justified, others argue just as vociferously that given the continued epidemic rise in incidence of this cancer, the uniformly fatal outcome of these cancers if dianosed after symptoms occur, and the enormous pool of patients remaining at risk for future cancer development, a focused and prudent screening and surveillance strategy for Barrett's-related esophageal adenocarcinoma is justified. The data also show that a single screening examination is probably as effective as almost all subsequent surveilance examinations in detecting advanced neoplasia, and much of the current resource use and energy for screening and surveillance in BE should be directed toward screening. Whether screening should be offered or recommended to only older patients (> 50-55 years), whites, and men is unknown, but it is premature to adopt this strategy until better evidence exist supporting a restricted screening policy. Regarding the optimal surveilance frequency and technique, examinations more frequent than every 3 to 5 years are not justifiable, and until proven otherwise, biopsy specimens should be obtained with the largest forceps that can be used with the endoscopic instrument and "saturation" biopsies from the Barrett's obtained. It is unlikely that too many biopsy specimens can be taken. Furthermore, the safety of this approach has been, proven. It is quite likely that the inverse is not true; clinicians likely can do much more harm by taking too few biopsy specimens. It is hoped that the current intense interest in Barrett's neoplasia allows clinicians to address these critical issues in the years to come and resolve this clinical conundrum.

The impact of upper GI endoscopy referral volume on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications: a 1-year cross-sectional study in a referral area with 260,000 inhabitants

OBJECTIVES

Less than half of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have endoscopic erosive esophagitis (endoscopy positive GERD). Symptomatic GERD and Barrett's esophagus (BE), however, are risk factors for esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas. The aim of the present study was to examine the prevalence of GERD-related findings on endoscopy according to the volume of referrals to upper GI endoscopy.

METHODS

The following data were gathered on all GERD patients who were sent for upper GI endoscopy by general practitioners (GPs) during 1 yr in our hospital referral area of 260,000 inhabitants: the number of referrals to endoscopy in health care units, and the numbers of endoscopy positive GERD, BE, and esophageal neoplasms. Patients with symptoms or signs suggesting acute upper GI bleeding and those attending follow-up endoscopy (e.g., for BE, peptic ulcer, or dysplasia) were excluded, as were patients with previous esophagogastric surgery or Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 3378 patients, with a mean age of 58.1 yr (95% CI = 57.5-58.6) and a male:female ratio of 1:1.3. Of the 760 patients who underwent endoscopy because of heartburn or regurgitation, 254 (33.4%) had endoscopy positive (erosive) GERD, 11 (1.4%) BE (one with esophageal adenocarcinoma), six (0.8%) esophageal ulcer, and one peptic esophageal stricture (0.1%). Between health care units, the referrals to endoscopy (number of endoscopies/population/yr) varied from 0.6 to 9.2/1000 inhabitants/yr (median 3.3/1000/yr). In health care units with "high" referral volumes (> or = 3.3 referrals/1000/yr, N = 15, 1297 patients) and "low" referral volumes (< 3.3/1000/yr, N = 15, 2081 patients), the numbers of endoscopy positive GERD were 281 (21.7%) versus 308 (14.9%, p < 0.001), esophageal ulcer 13 (1.0%) versus 14 (0.7%, p = 0.3), esophageal stricture five (0.4%) versus seven (0.3%, p = 0.4), Barrett's esophagus eight (0.6%) versus 16 (0.8%, p = 0.6), and esophageal neoplasm two (0.2%) versus six (0.3%, p = 0.2). Five of the neoplasms were squamous cell carcinomas, two were adenocarcinomas, and one was lymphoma. Multivariate analyses showed that independent risk factors for endoscopy positive GERD were male sex (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7), GERD symptoms (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 2.7-4.0), dysphagia (OR = 1.4,95% CI = 1.0-2.1), and living in a high referral area (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7). Independent risk factors for BE were male sex (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1-6.1) and GERD symptoms (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.3-6.6), whereas the only independent risk factor for esophageal neoplasm was dysphagia (OR = 40.0 (95% CI = 7.7-207.5).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in GPs' referrals for endoscopy. Increasing the referral volume significantly increases the proportion of endoscopy positive GERD cases, but not that of GERD complications such as BE, esophageal ulcer, peptic stricture, or esophageal neoplasms.

Barrett esophagus

A number of publications have provided valuable insight into and data on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, risk factor evaluation, and treatment of patients with Barrett esophagus. Although the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has rapidly increased over the past two decades, it is not clear whether there has been a parallel increase in the frequency of Barrett esophagus. The issue of surveillance endoscopy in patients with Barrett esophagus remains controversial; prospective data are still lacking. Bile reflux plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Barrett esophagus; however, this usually occurs in the presence of acid. Newer technology and techniques, including chromoendoscopy, magnification endoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and spectroscopy, have opened the field by providing a more accurate and "nonbiopsy" diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia. The field of biomarkers remains continues to expand and is providing insight into risk stratification of patients with Barrett esophagus. The exact role of acid suppression in patients with this premalignant disease remains controversial, and endoscopic therapies appear promising.

Surveillance in Barrett's oesophagus: a personal view

Barrett's oesophagus is defined as columnar-lined oesophagus of any length containing specialised intestinal metaplasia. Diagnosis depends on close corroboration between the endoscopist and histopathologist. It occurs in 10% of patients presenting endoscopically with reflux symptoms and has an adenocarcinoma incidence of 0.4% to 2%. Surveillance is performed to detect precancerous change (dysplasia) and early stage disease has a good surgical prognosis. Computer models suggest cost efficacy comparable to other health measures. However most patients with Barrett's do not die of oesophageal cancer and elective oesophagectomy has an appreciable mortality. Endoscopic ablation techniques and improved definition of high risk subgroups will help shape future surveillance programmes.

Barrett's oesophagus: better left alone?

The risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's oesophagus is overrated in most publications, including meta-analyses. The upper limit of the overall risk is currently estimated at 0.5 per 100 patients per year. This means that one cancer may occur out of 200 patients followed for one year. Furthermore, a large fraction of patients with Barrett's oesophagus have a precarious health status, either from advanced age or from a chronic severe disease. Management is based upon a careful index endoscopy; accordingly, patients positive for dysplasia must be strictly observed or treated. Endoscopic surveillance protocols aiming at early detection of neoplasia--and treatment--in patients without dysplasia are unjustified in most cases. On the other hand, a minority of male patients--providing a good performance status--should enter into surveillance protocols when high-risk factors such as a long history of reflux symptoms and smoking habits are present.