Oral topotecan for refractory and relapsed neuroblastoma: a retrospective analysis

Radioimmunoscintigraphy and Pretreatment Dosimetry of 131I-Omburtamab for Planning Treatment of Leptomeningeal Disease

Radiolabeled antibody treatment with 131I-omburtamab, administered intraventricularly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space, can deliver therapeutic absorbed doses to sites of leptomeningeal disease. Assessment of distribution and radiation dosimetry is a key element in optimizing such treatments. Using a theranostic approach, we performed pretreatment 131I-omburtamab imaging and dosimetric analysis in patients before therapy. Methods: Whole-body planar images were acquired 3 ± 1, 23 ± 2, and 47 ± 2 h after intracranioventricular administration of 75 ± 5 MBq of 131I-omburtamab via an Ommaya reservoir. Multiple blood samples were also obtained for kinetic analysis. Separate regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn to include the lateral ventricles, entire spinal canal CSF space, and over the whole body. Count data in the ROIs were corrected for background and physical decay, converted to activity, and subsequently fitted to an exponential clearance function. The radiation absorbed dose was estimated to the CSF, separately to the spinal column and ventricles, and to the whole body and blood. Biodistribution of the injected radiolabeled antibody was assessed for all patients. Results: Ninety-five patients were included in the analysis. Biodistribution showed prompt localization in the ventricles and spinal CSF space with low systemic distribution, noted primarily as hepatic, renal, and bladder activity after the first day. Using ROI analysis, the effective half-lives were 13 ± 11 h (range, 5-75 h) for CSF in the spinal column, 8 ± 3 h (range, 3-17 h) for ventricles, and 41 ± 11 (range, 23-81 h) for the whole body. Mean absorbed doses were 0.63 ± 0.38 cGy/MBq (range, 0.24-2.25 cGy/MBq) for CSF in the spinal column, 1.03 ± 0.69 cGy/MBq (range, 0.27-5.15 cGy/MBq) for the ventricular CSF, and 0.45 ± 0.32 mGy/MBq (range, 0.05-1.43 mGy/MBq) for the whole body. Conclusion: Pretherapeutic imaging with 131I-omburtamab allows assessment of biodistribution and dosimetry before the administration of therapeutic activity. Absorbed doses to the CSF compartments and whole body derived from the widely applicable serial 131I-omburtamab planar images had acceptable agreement with previously reported data determined from serial 124I-omburtamab PET scans.

Early-phase clinical trial eligibility and response evaluation criteria for refractory, relapsed, or progressive neuroblastoma: A consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting

BACKGROUND

International standardized criteria for eligibility, evaluable disease sites, and disease response assessment in patients with refractory, progressive, or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma enrolled in early-phase clinical trials are lacking.

METHODS

A National Cancer Institute-sponsored Clinical Trials Planning Meeting was convened to develop an international consensus to refine the tumor site eligibility criteria and evaluation of disease response for early-phase clinical trials in children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

RESULTS

Standardized data collection of patient and disease characteristics (including specified genomic data), eligibility criteria, a definition of evaluable disease, and response evaluations for primary and metastatic sites of disease were developed. Eligibility included two distinct patient groups: progressive disease and refractory disease. The refractory disease group was subdivided into responding persistent disease and stable persistent disease to better capture the clinical heterogeneity of refractory neuroblastoma. Requirements for defining disease evaluable for a response assessment were provided; they included requirements for biopsy to confirm viable neuroblastoma and/or ganglioneuroblastoma in those patients with soft tissue or bone disease not avid for iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine. Standardized evaluations for response components and time intervals for response evaluations were established.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of international consensus eligibility, evaluability, and response criteria for early-phase clinical studies will facilitate the collection of comparable data across international trials and promote more rapid identification of effective treatment regimens for high-risk neuroblastoma.

Pediatric phase I trial of oral sorafenib and topotecan in refractory or recurrent pediatric solid malignancies

Targeted kinase inhibitors and camptothecins have shown preclinical and clinical activity in several cancers. This trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose‐limiting toxicities of sorafenib and topotecan administered orally in pediatric patients with relapsed solid tumors. Sorafenib was administered twice daily and topotecan once daily on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28‐day course. The study utilized a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Three dose levels (DL) were evaluated: (1) sorafenib 150 mg/m² and topotecan 1 mg/m²; (2) sorafenib 150 mg/m² and topotecan 1.4 mg/m²; and (3) sorafenib 200 mg/m² and topotecan 1.4 mg/m². Pharmacokinetics were ascertained and treatment response assessed. Thirteen patients were enrolled. DL2 was the determined MTD. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia delaying therapy for >7 days was observed in one of six patients on DL2, and grade 4 neutropenia that delayed therapy in two of three patients on DL3. A patient with preexisting cardiac failure controlled with medication developed a transient drop in the left ventricular ejection fraction that improved when sorafenib was withheld. Sorafenib exposure with or without topotecan was comparable, and the concentration‐time profiles for topotecan alone and in combination with sorafenib were similar. One objective response was noted in a patient with fibromatosis. We determined MTD to be sorafenib 150 mg/m² twice daily orally on days 1–28 combined with topotecan 1.4 mg/m² once daily on days 1–5 and 8–12. While these doses are 1 DL below the MTD of the agents individually, pharmacokinetic studies suggested adequate drug exposure without drug interactions. The combination had limited activity in the population studied.

Rapid screening of novel agents for combination therapy in sarcomas

For patients with sarcoma, metastatic disease remains very difficult to cure, and outcomes remain less than optimal. Treatment options have not largely changed, although some promising gains have been made with single agents in specific subtypes with the use of targeted agents. Here, we developed a system to investigate synergy of combinations of targeted and cytotoxic agents in a panel of sarcoma cell lines. Agents were investigated alone and in combination with varying dose ratios. Dose-response curves were analyzed for synergy using methods derived from Chou and Talalay (1984). A promising combination, dasatinib and triciribine, was explored in a murine model using the A673 cell line, and tumors were evaluated by MRI and histology for therapy effect. We found that histone deacetylase inhibitors were synergistic with etoposide, dasatinib, and Akt inhibitors across cell lines. Sorafenib and topotecan demonstrated a mixed response. Our systematic drug screening method allowed us to screen a large number of combinations of sarcoma agents. This method can be easily modified to accommodate other cell line models, and confirmatory assays, such as animal experiments, can provide excellent preclinical data to inform clinical trials for these rare malignancies.

Preclinical assessment of strategies for enhancement of metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy of neuroendocrine tumors

By virtue of its high affinity for the norepinephrine transporter (NET), [(131)I]metaiodobenzylguanidine ([(131)I]MIBG) has been used for the therapy of tumors of neuroectodermal origin for more than 25 years. Although not yet universally adopted, [(131)I]MIBG targeted radiotherapy remains a highly promising means of management of neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma, and carcinoids. Appreciation of the mode of conveyance of [(131)I]MIBG into malignant cells and of factors that influence the activity of the uptake mechanism has indicated a variety of means of increasing the effectiveness of this type of treatment. Studies in model systems revealed that radiolabeling of MIBG to high specific activity reduced the amount of cold competitor, thereby increasing tumor dose and minimizing pressor effects. Increased radiotoxicity to targeted tumors might also be achieved by the use of the α-particle emitter [(211)At]astatine rather than (131)I as radiolabel. Recently it has been demonstrated that potent cytotoxic bystander effects were induced by [(131)I]MIBG, [(123)I]MIBG, and [(211)At]meta-astatobenzylguanidine. Discovery of the structure of bystander factors could increase the therapeutic ratio achievable by MIBG targeted radiotherapy. [(131)I]MIBG combined with topotecan produced supra-additive cytotoxicity in vitro and tumor growth delay in vivo. The enhanced antitumor effect was consistent with a failure to repair DNA damage. Initial findings suggest that further enhancement of efficacy might be achieved by triple combination therapy with drugs that disrupt alternative tumor-specific pathways and synergize not only with [(131)I]MIBG abut also with topotecan. With these ploys, it is expected that advances will be made toward the optimization of [(131)I]MIBG therapy of neuroectodermal tumors.

Neuroblastoma: Therapeutic strategies for a clinical enigma

Neuroblastoma, the most common extracranial pediatric solid tumor remains a clinical enigma with outcomes ranging from cure in >90% of patients with locoregional tumors with little to no cytotoxic therapy, to <30% for those >18months of age at diagnosis with metastatic disease despite aggressive multimodality therapy. Age, stage and amplification of the MYCN oncogene are the most validated prognostic markers. Recent research has shed light on the biology of neuroblastoma allowing more accurate stratification of patients which has permitted reducing or withholding cytotoxic therapy without affecting outcome for low-risk patients. However, for children with high-risk disease, the development of newer therapeutic strategies is necessary. Current surgery and radiotherapy techniques in conjunction with induction chemotherapy have greatly reduced the risk of local relapse. However, refractory or recurrent osteomedullary disease occurs in most patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Toxicity limits for high-dose chemotherapy appear to have been reached without further clinical benefit. Neuroblastoma is the first pediatric cancer for which monoclonal-antibody-based immunotherapy has been shown to be effective, particularly for metastatic osteomedullary disease. Radioimmunotherapy appears to be a critical component of a recent, successful regimen for treating patients who relapse in the central nervous system, a possible sanctuary site. Efforts are under way to refine and enhance antibody-based immunotherapy and to determine its optimal use. The identification of newer tumor targets and the harnessing of cell-mediated immunotherapy may generate novel therapeutic approaches. It is likely that a combination of therapeutic modalities will be required to improve survival and cure rates.

Gefitinib in combination with oral topotecan and cyclophosphamide in relapsed neuroblastoma: pharmacological rationale and clinical response

AIM

Activity and toxiciy of gefitinib in combination with topotecan and cyclophosphamide (CPA) were evaluated in a case-series of relapsed neuroblastoma (NB) patients. The in vitro activity of the combination was also assessed.

PROCEDURE

Gefitinib (250 mg/day), topotecan (0.8 mg/m(2)/day), and CPA (50 mg/m(2)/day) (GTC) were administered orally for 14 consecutive days out of 28 days. Antitumor activity of gefitinib as single agent and in combination with either topotecan or CPA was assessed in a panel of NB cell lines.

RESULTS

Ninety-two courses were given in 10 patients. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 7/92 courses (8%) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 8/92 (9%). Two patients had a grade 2 liver toxicity, four a grade 1/2 skin toxicity, and two a grade 1/2 diarrhea. Dose reduction of topotecan and/or CPA was required in eight patients. After four courses, three patients were in partial response (PR) and four with a stable disease (SD), while three experienced a progressive disease (PD). Time to progression (TTP) was 9 months (range, 1-27). After a median follow-up of 16 months (range 5-54), seven patients are died of disease (DOD) and three alive with disease (AWD). All but one patient discontinued oral chemotherapy because of a PD, whilst one patient stopped chemotherapy after 27 months with a SD. In vitro, gefitinib was synergistic with topotecan and additive with CPA.

CONCLUSION

The GTC combination was well tolerated and the TTP was encouraging. These promising results, also supported by in vitro evidence, should be further confirmed in a phase II study.

New approaches to pharmacotherapy of tumors of the nervous system during childhood and adolescence

Tumors of the nervous system are among the most common and most chemoresistant neoplasms of childhood and adolescence. Malignant tumors of the brain collectively account for 21% of all cancers and 24% of all cancer-related deaths in this age group. Neuroblastoma, a peripheral nervous system tumor, is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood, and 65% of children with this tumor have only a 10 or 15% chance of living 5 years beyond the time of initial diagnosis. Novel pharmacological approaches to nervous system tumors are urgently needed. This review presents the role of and current challenges to pharmacotherapy of malignant tumors of the nervous system during childhood and adolescence and discusses novel approaches aimed at overcoming these challenges.

Prolonged response to oral gefitinib, cyclophosphamide, and topotecan in heavily pretreated relapsed stage 4 neuroblastoma: a case report

A girl with metastatic neuroblastoma diagnosed at 4 years of age experienced an early disseminated relapse after high-dose chemotherapy. After reinduction, compassionate treatment with gefitinib (250 mg/d fixed dose) with oral topotecan (0.8 mg/m(2)/d) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/m(2)/d) for 14 consecutive days, each course repeated every 28 days, was administered. Complete marrow clearance and metaiodobenzylguanidine response were achieved after 4 courses. After the first course, topotecan and cyclophosphamide were reduced by 25% for grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Subsequent courses were well tolerated. The girl remained progression free for 27 months. This combination may represent a viable therapeutic option and deserves further evaluation in resistant neuroblastoma.

Topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (TCE) in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of a phase-II trial

PURPOSE

Relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma patients still have a poor prognosis. This phase-II trial assessed a new topotecan containing chemotherapy approach in patients with active disease.

METHODS

Chemotherapy consisted of topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2)/day 168-h continuous infusion), cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2)/day 1-h-infusion days 1-7 starting 6 h prior to topotecan), and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)/day 1-h-infusion days 8-10). Patients with relapsed neuroblastoma were scheduled for six cycles, untreated patients for two cycles followed by standard high-risk treatment.

RESULTS

Main toxicity observed during 153 cycles were grade 3-4 leukopenia (97% of cycles), thrombocytopenia (92%), neutropenic fever (52%), and mucositis (10%). No treatment related fatal toxicity occurred. Complete or partial response was achieved in 19 of 31 (61%) evaluable relapsed patients and 8 of 11 (72%) untreated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide is tolerable and effective in relapsed and untreated neuroblastoma. Myelotoxicity is the main side effect but seems justified in view of the encouraging response rates. A randomized phase-III trial in primary disease has been commenced.

Topotecan and etoposide in the treatment of relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: results of a phase 2 trial

We initiated a phase 2 trial with a combination of topotecan and etoposide (TE) in patients with relapse after intensive first line chemotherapy for neuroblastoma. TE chemotherapy consisted of topotecan (schedule A: 1.0 mg/m2/d 30-minute-infusion days 1 to 5, B: 0.7 mg/m2/d continuous infusion days 1 to 7, and C: 1.0 mg/m2/d continuous infusion days 1 to 7) followed by etoposide (100 mg/m2/d 1-hour-infusion days 8 to 10). TE was repeated every 28 days. The treatment was continued until severe nonhematopoietic toxicity or progression occurred or the treating physician chose alternative consolidation treatment after response to TE. Forty patients received 153 TE cycles. Grades 3 to 4 leukopenia was frequently observed in all schedules (A 51% of cycles, B 48%, and C 74%, P=0.141). Thrombocytopenia (A 69%, B 63%, and C 93%, P=0.004) and neutropenic fever (A 12%, B 29%, and C 37%, P=0.048) occurred more frequently in schedule C. No treatment-related fatal toxicity was observed. Among 36 patients evaluable for response, 4 patients achieved complete and 13 patients achieved partial remission (47%). We conclude that the combination of TE is effective and tolerable in the treatment of relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma.

[131I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine and topotecan combination treatment of tumors expressing the noradrenaline transporter

PURPOSE

Both [(131)I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine ([(131)I]MIBG) and the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan are effective as single-agent treatments of neuroblastoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of [(131)I]MIBG in combination with topotecan in vitro and in vivo.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The cell lines used were SK-N-BE(2c) (human neuroblastoma) and UVW/NAT (glioma cell line transfected with the noradrenaline transporter gene). Three different treatment schedules were assessed: topotecan given before (schedule 1), after (schedule 2), or simultaneously (schedule 3) with [(131)I]MIBG. DNA strand breakage was evaluated by comet assay, and cytotoxicity was determined by clonogenic survival. Efficacy was also measured by growth delay of tumor xenografts in nude mice.

RESULTS

Combination schedules 2 and 3 caused more cytotoxicity than schedule 1. Similarly, significant DNA damage was observed following treatment schedules 2 and 3 (P < 0.005) but not schedule 1. The mean number of days for a doubling in volume of SK-N-BE(2c) tumors and a 10-fold increase in volume of UVW/NAT tumors were 10.4 and 18.6 (untreated), 19.7 and 25.3 (topotecan alone), 22.8 and 31.9 ([(131)I]MIBG alone), 26.3 and 37.1 (combination schedule 1), 34.3 and 49.7 (combination schedule 2), and 53.2 and >71 (combination schedule 3), respectively. The highest rate of cure of both xenografts was observed following treatment with combination schedule 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of topotecan and [(131)I]MIBG compared with either treatment alone gave rise to greater than additive DNA damage, clonogenic cell kill, and tumor growth delay. These effects were dependent on the scheduling of the two agents.

The novel lipophilic camptothecin analogue gimatecan is very active in vitro in human neuroblastoma: A comparative study with SN38 and topotecan

Neuroblastoma is one of the most common extracranial solid tumours in childhood with a poor prognosis in its advanced stage. Treatment failure is often associated to the occurrence of drug resistance. To date, treatment of paediatric neuroblastoma is still dismal, and therefore novel effective drugs are awaited. In recent years, an increasing interest has concentrated on camptothecin analogues. Topotecan and irinotecan, the only two clinically relevant camptothecin derivatives to date, have entered clinical trials in neuroblastoma but so far the results have been disappointing. Gimatecan (ST1481, LBQ707; 7-t-butoxyiminomethylcamptothecin), is a novel lipophilic camptothecin derivative that was selected from a series of lipophilic analogues rationally designed and synthesized in order to overcome some of the main drawbacks of conventional camptothecins, limiting their clinical efficacy. Gimatecan is endowed with potent antitumour activity, strong topoisomerase I inhibition, stable drug-target interactions and a better pharmacological profile. The present study deals with the comparative evaluation of cellular pharmacology features of gimatecan, topotecan and SN38 in neuroblastoma cell lines. We show that, despite the lowest intracellular accumulation, gimatecan was the most active among the camptothecin analogues studied. Our findings suggest that the high activity of gimatecan in neuroblastoma is related to the ability of this novel analogue to cause a very high number of DNA breaks as assessed by the Comet assay in both cellular or sub-cellular systems. We propose that DNA strand breaks efficiency as measured by the Comet assay might provide important information about the stability of the ternary complexes induced by camptothecin compounds.

Alternative administration of camptothecin analogues

In order to improve the therapeutic index of camptothecin (CPT) analogues, alternative administration of CPT analogues is being evaluated. Topotecan, irinotecan, rubitecan, lurtotecan and 9-aminocamptothecin have been administered orally with response rates equivalent to that seen after intravenous administration, where applicable. Oral availability and administration of some of the newer CPT analogues, including diflomotecan (BN80915) and grimatecan (ST1481), have also shown promising results. Aerosolisation of liposomal 9-nitrocamptothecin has been studied in patients with advanced malignancies involving the lung, demonstrating systemic antitumour activity. Intrathecal administration of topotecan has been studied in children with refractory neoplastic meningitis. It is well tolerated and associated with some antitumour activity. Intraperitoneal administration of topotecan as consolidation therapy in patients with ovarian cancer has shown promising results. Transdermal administration of rubitecan has been studied in mice. So far, no CPT has been approved for an alternative route of administration.

Five-day courses of irinotecan as palliative therapy for patients with neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

The authors describe a large experience using short courses of irinotecan for palliative therapy in patients with neuroblastoma (NB). Quality of life was a major issue in choosing this regimen for patients whose disease was resistant to standard anti-NB therapies.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were followed by the Department of Pediatrics at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and treated for resistant NB with irinotecan at 50 mg/m2 per day for 5 days as a 1-hour intravenous infusion. Treatment was outpatient, and there was a minimum 2-week rest period between courses. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used to keep the absolute neutrophil count >500-1000/mL.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients had been treated aggressively and/or extensively before they received one or more five-day courses of irinotecan. Emetogenic, diarrheal, and myelosuppressive effects were readily managed. Hospitalizations were limited to three patients with bacteremia. Twenty-three patients had a change in therapy, although they did not have progressive disease (PD) after receiving 1 (n=10), 2 (n=3), 3 (n=1), 4 (n=6), 7 (n=1 patient), 22 (n=1 patient), or 24 (n=1) courses. The most common reasons for changing treatment were to intensify retrieval therapy or to pursue immunotherapy. Of those 23 patients, 15 patients had stable disease, 7 were not evaluable for response because of concurrent radiotherapy, and 1 patient had a major response. Twenty-one patients had PD after 1 (n=3, 2 (n=9), 4 (n=2), 5 (n=1), 6 (n=3), 7 (n=1), 9 (n=1), and 11 (n=1) courses.

CONCLUSIONS

In heavily treated patients, the regimen studied was well tolerated, allowed patients to continue most normal life activities, and produced anti-NB effects. Its modest toxicity supported use with other antitumor agents.

Phase I study of oral cyclophosphamide and oral topotecan for children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors

BACKGROUND

To determine the maximum-tolerated duration and dose-limiting toxicity of a daily schedule of orally administered cyclophosphamide and topotecan in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory malignant solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients received oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg/m2/dose) in the morning followed by topotecan (0.8 mg/m2/dose) 8-12 hr later for an escalating number of consecutive days (10, 14, and 17 days).

RESULTS

Seventeen pediatric patients were treated with oral cyclophosphamide and topotecan for durations of 10-17 days for a total of 58 treatment courses. Reversible hematologic toxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) was the dose-limiting toxicity. Nonhematologic toxicities of greater than grade 3 were not observed. A partial response (neuroblastoma following myeloablative chemotherapy and stem cell rescue) and prolonged stable disease (medulloblastoma) were each observed in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended duration of therapy with a daily schedule of both oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg/m2/day) and topotecan (0.8 mg/m2/day) for previously treated pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors is 14 consecutive days. The observed dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reversible neutropenia. This regimen was well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients and demonstrated activity against recurrent pediatric solid tumors.