Choosing a professional code for ethical conduct in occupational and environmental medicine. The AOEC Board of Directors. Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics

Communications with research participants and communities: foundations for best practices

Communities and research participants increasingly feel that they have rights to be equal partners with researchers and to have access to the results of studies to which they have contributed. Concurrently, research sponsors have become aware of legal liabilities, societal repercussions, and credibility impacts of ignoring research communication responsibilities. However, issues related to research communications are rarely discussed at professional meetings or taught in academic programs. As a result, individual investigators may not be clear about their duties to communicate the results of their research. It is important to address this gap between expectations and abilities, because researchers' lack of communication fosters a climate of distrust in science and implies disinterest or disrespect for participants and communities. Ethical, legal, and professional frameworks and practices were reviewed to develop insights about principles, guidelines, and means that can be used to promote best practices. A review of general research guidance and specific requests for proposals revealed sponsors' communication priorities. While there are barriers to research communication, there is an increasing awareness among sponsors and investigators that effective and responsive communication is not a cheap or uniform add-on to a project or proposal. Communications must be tailored to the project considering all potential stakeholders, and resources need to be allocated specifically for communication activities within projects. Researchers, sponsors, professional societies and academia all have opportunities to improve principles, policies, frameworks, guidelines and strategies to foster "best practice" communication of research results.

Integrating occupational health services and occupational prevention services

BACKGROUND

Despite the human and monetary costs of occupational injury and illness, occupational health care has focused more on treatment than prevention, and prevention is not part of many clinical occupational health practices. This represents a failure of occupational health care to meet the health care needs of the working patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE searches were conducted for literature on occupational medical treatment and the prevention of occupational injury and illness were reviewed to for linkages between prevention and treatment. Policy discussions which identify examples of programs that integrated prevention and treatment were included.

RESULTS

Although examples of the integration of clinical and preventive occupational health services exist, there are challenges and barriers to such integration. These include inaction by clinicians who do not recognize their potential role in prevention; the absence of a relationship between the clinician and an employer willing to participate in prevention; economic disincentives against prevention; and the absence of tools that evaluate clinicians on their performance in prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Research is needed to improve and promote clinical occupational health preventive services.

Ethical aspects of genetic testing

No research study or significant medical treatment can be done involving patients without their informed consent. In workplaces and environmental settings, individuals are often exposed to mutagenic or carcinogenic substances, usually without their knowledge, and not with their informed consent. Such exposures can lead to evermore easily documentable genetic changes. As genetic testing becomes more widespread, there are significant ethical implications regarding employment, insurance coverage, and confidentiality regarding medical information. With an increased ability to detect genetic changes, or 'unfavorable' genetic polymorphisms, this information should not be used to deny employment or increase insurance rates. Rather, such information should be used to increasingly provide appropriately safe workplaces, and place workers in less hazardous settings.