Medical Therapy of Ulcerative Proctitis and Proctosigmoiditis, Including Refractory Disease:

Beclomethasone dipropionate versus mesalazine in distal ulcerative colitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Topical beclomethasone diproprionate has shown efficacy in ulcerative colitis.

AIM

To assess, in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, the tolerability and safety of topical beclomethasone diproprionate (3mg) enema and foam versus mesalazine (2g) enema and foam in mild-moderate distal ulcerative colitis.

PATIENTS

In 15 referral gastrointestinal units, 99 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were enrolled. This number was lower than planned according to the statistical analysis, due to a low recruitment rate.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to random preparations (beclomethasone diproprionate enema, beclomethasone diproprionate foam, mesalazine enema, mesalazine foam) once nightly for 8 weeks, with clinical and endoscopical assessment (Disease Activity Index score) at baseline (T0), 4 (T4) and 8 weeks (T8). Results were expressed as median and range (95% confidence interval). The efficacy was assessed by comparing the Disease Activity Index value at T4 and T8 by using the Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Efficacy was comparable in the beclomethasone diproprionate or mesalazine groups at both T4 and T8 (response at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 78% [95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8] versus mesalazine 79% [95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8]; T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 84% [95% confidence interval 0.7-0.9] versus mesalazine 90% [95% confidence interval 0.7-1.0]; p=n.s.; remission at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 24% [95% confidence interval 0.1-0.3] versus mesalazine 28% [95% confidence interval 0.1-0.3]; remission at T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 36% [95% confidence interval 0.2-0.5] versus mesalazine 52% [95% confidence interval 0.3-0.6]; p=n.s.). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T4 and T8 versus T0 in the four groups (T4 versus T0: beclomethasone diproprionate foam Disease Activity Index 2 versus 6 p<0.0001; beclomethasone diproprionate enema 4 versus 6, mesalazine enema 3 versus 6, mesalazine foam 3.5 versus 7, p<0.001 for all three groups; T8 versus T0: p<0.01). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T8 versus T4 in the beclomethasone diproprionate enema and foam (Disease Activity Index: 2 versus 4 and 1 versus 4, respectively; p<0.05) and in the mesalazine enema (Disease Activity Index: 1.5, range 0-4 versus 3, range 0-12; p<0.01), but not in the mesalazine foam group (Disease Activity Index: 1, range 0-9 versus 3.5, range 0-8; p=n.s.). The safety profile was favourable for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Beclomethasone diproprionate and mesalazine enema and foam show a comparable tolerability and efficacy in mild active distal ulcerative colitis.

Maintenance treatment of ulcerative proctitis with mesalazine suppositories: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The Italian IBD Study Group

OBJECTIVES

A multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of two different therapeutic schedules of mesalazine suppositories in patients with ulcerative proctitis.

METHODS

From 1990 to 1993, 111 patients with ulcerative proctisis in remission, limited to the rectum (< or = 15 cm from anus), were enrolled. After obtaining informed consent, patients were randomized to three treatment groups: 500 mg mesalazine b.i.d. (36 patients), 500 mg mesalazine u.i.d. (40 patients), and placebo (35 patients). The treatment lasted 1 yr. Follow-up consisted of periodic clinical, endoscopic, and histological assessments. An endoscopic score > 1 according to the Baron scale defined relapse occurrence. The three groups were homogeneous as regards main demographic, diagnostic, and prognostic features.

RESULTS

The cumulative relapse rates at 12 months were 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0-21) in the mesalazine b.i.d. group, 32% (95% CI: 16-49) in the mesalazine u.i.d. group, and 47% (95% CI: 29-65) in the placebo group. The comparison between the mesalazine b.i.d. group and the mesalazine u.i.d. group cumulative relapse rates gave a p value of 0.0334, whereas the corresponding comparison between the mesalazine b.i.d. group and the placebo group gave a p value of 0.007 (log-rank test). The dose-response relationship was statistically significant (p = 0.008 by Cox analysis). Two patients in the mesalazine b.i.d. group, two patients in the mesalazine u.i.d. group, and one patient in the placebo group withdrew from the study due to nonserious adverse events; four, three, and four patients per group, respectively, dropped out because of poor compliance. Two patients in the mesalazine u.i.d. group and two in the placebo group were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm the therapeutic efficacy of mesalazine suppositories in the maintenance treatment of ulcerative proctitis. According to our experience the most effective therapeutic schedule is 500 mg mesalazine b.i.d.

Short-chain fatty acids in ulcerative colitis

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), a by-product of anaerobic fermentation of undigested carbohydrates within the colon, are an important energy source for colonic epithelial cells. It has been proposed that ulcerative colitis, a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon, may result from a metabolic defect in SCFA oxidation in the colon and that this defect may be corrected by supraphysiologic luminal levels of SCFA in the colon. Clinical trials published to date suggest that topical SCFA provide an effective primary and/or adjunctive treatment in patients with mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis at substantial cost savings and without significant side effects.