The role of thoracic surgery in diagnosing interstitial lung disease

Visual Outcome in Ocular Sarcoidosis: Retrospective Evaluation of Risk Factors

Purpose.

To analyze risk factors associated with poor visual outcome in patients with ocular sarcoidosis.

Methods.

In this retrospective study, charts of 44 patients with uveitis and biopsy-proven sarcoidosis were reviewed. Ocular parameters evaluated were as follows: location, type of uveitis, visual acuity, presence of posterior synechia, iris nodules, vitritis, snowballs, chorioretinal lesions, retinal vasculitis, papillitis, macular edema, cataract, and glaucoma. Final visual acuity of the worst-seeing eye at last follow-up was the outcome considered in univariable and multivariable analyses. Visual acuity of the worst-seeing eye was stratified into 2 categories according to the threshold 20/50 (≤20/50 and >20/50).

Results.

A total of 44 patients with bilateral uveitis were studied. The majority of patients presented with panuveitis (52%), granulomatous type (61%), posterior synechia (62%). The most frequent vision-threatening complications were cystoid macular edema (56%) and cataract (56%). The median best-corrected visual acuity in the worst-seeing eye at presentation and at end of follow-up was respectively 0.4 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.26–0.80) and 0.63 (IQR 0.36–1.00). At univariable analysis, the presence of iris nodules (p=0.049), cystoid macular edema (p=0.007), and cataract (p=0.007) were clinically significant conditions for a visual outcome of 20/50 or worse in the worst-seeing eye. In multivariable analysis, cystoid macular edema (p=0.034) was the only statistically significant predictor associated with unfavorable visual outcome.

Conclusions.

In this study, we attempted to find risk factors related to poor visual outcome in patients with ocular sarcoidosis. The results suggest that only the presence of cystoid macular edema was significantly associated with worst visual outcome.

A randomized controlled trial of standard vs endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with suspected sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal lymph nodes has been found to be more accurate than standard TBNA in the setting of malignancy. In patients with suspected sarcoidosis, the smaller ultrasound needle may yield inadequate material to make a histologic diagnosis of granulomatous inflammation. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of EBUS-guided TBNA to TBNA performed with a standard 19-gauge needle in patients with mediastinal adenopathy and a clinical suspicion of sarcoidosis.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was performed in a university medical center, enrolling 50 patients (of 61 screened, 2 declined, and 9 did not meet entry criteria) with hilar and/or mediastinal adenopathy and a clinical suspicion of sarcoidosis. Twenty-four patients were randomized to undergo EBUS-guided TBNA and 26 to undergo TBNA using a standard 19-gauge needle.

RESULTS

The primary outcome measure of diagnostic yield was 53.8% vs 83.3% in favor of the EBUS-guided TBNA group, an absolute increase of 29.5% (p < 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.6 to 55.4%). After blinded research pathology review, diagnostic yield was 73.1% vs 95.8%, in favor of the EBUS-guided TBNA group, an absolute increase of 22.7% (p = 0.05; 95% CI, 1.9 to 42.2%). Sensitivity and specificity were 60.9% and 100%, respectively, in the standard TBNA group, and 83.3% and 100%, respectively, in the EBUS-guided TBNA group (absolute increase in sensitivity, 22.5%; p = 0.085; 95% CI, 3.2 to 44.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of EBUS-guided TBNA is superior to TBNA using a standard 19-gauge needle for sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with a clinical suspicion of sarcoidosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00373555.

Diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), a broad heterogeneous group of parenchymal lung disorders, can be classified into those with known and unknown causes. The definitions and diagnostic criteria for several major forms of ILDs have been revised in recent years. Although well over 100 distinct entities of ILDs are recognized, a limited number of disorders, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, and connective tissue disease-related ILDs, account for most ILDs encountered clinically. In evaluating patients with suspected ILD, the clinician should confirm the presence of the disease and then try to determine its underlying cause or recognized clinicopathologic syndrome. Clues from the medical history along with the clinical context and radiologic findings provide the initial basis for prioritizing diagnostic possibilities for a patient with ILD. High-resolution computed tomography of the chest has become an invaluable tool in the diagnostic process. A confident diagnosis can sometimes be made on the basis of high-resolution computed tomography and clinical context. Serologic testing can be helpful in selected cases. Histopathologic findings procured through bronchoscopic or surgical lung biopsy are often needed in deriving a specific diagnosis. An accurate prognosis and optimal treatment strategy for patients with ILDs depend on an accurate diagnosis, one guided by recent advances in our understanding of the causes and pathogenetic mechanisms of ILDs.

Surgical biopsy: its appropriateness in diagnosing interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our goal is to update advances in the use of surgical lung biopsy in the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. We discuss an approach for identifying patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias who may benefit from surgical lung biopsy, newer surgical approaches and complications and risks of surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

A consensus statement on idiopathic interstitial pneumonias has described the natural history and response to therapy of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. The statement discussed selection of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias for surgical lung biopsy and avoidance of unneeded biopsy, particularly for patients with 'classical' radiographic findings of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy continues to be the standard procedure for surgical lung biopsy. Newer approaches have used outpatient surgery for selected patients, earlier removal of chest tubes and modifications of surgical technique. At-risk patients include those with respiratory failure, rapid progression of disease, pulmonary hypertension and advanced disease.

SUMMARY

Standard video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy should be considered in patients with interstitial lung diseases of unknown cause who have a subacute course, ground-glass opacities on high-resolution computed tomography or features atypical for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, as these patients may respond to therapy. A step-wise process for selection of patients for surgical lung biopsy is recommended.

Current concepts in the classification of interstitial lung disease

The diagnosis and classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias continue to be problematic areas for pathologists. The recently proposed American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias defines specific clinical, radiologic, and pathologic criteria for each of the pulmonary disorders that encompass the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. In this review, the highlights of this classification are presented, along with recommended guidelines for handling lung biopsy specimens and diagnosing interstitial lung diseases.

Use and abuse of lung biopsy

The lung biopsy is widely recognized as a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of diverse pulmonary disorders. The transbronchial lung biopsy, open lung biopsy, and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery biopsy are the principal tools that have been developed for obtaining lung tissue for histopathological examination. Whereas these various types of lung biopsies are highly sensitive and specific tests available for diagnosis, they may be fraught with potential problems. This review hopes to inform the reader of the indications and limitations of the lung biopsy.

Role of Thoracic Surgeons in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Lung Disease

The interstitial lung disorders are a heterogenous group of pulmonary disorders in which the interstitium is the predominant tissue type involved in the disease process. The idiopathic interstitial pneumonias represent a subgroup of these disorders that can be distinguished by unique clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features. Recent changes have been made in the classification system, with important distinctions between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and the other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Surgical lung biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. However, controversy exists regarding the methods and indications for biopsy. In this article, we review the salient clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features of these unique disorders as well as the updated classification scheme. We also discuss the current methods, approaches, and indications for biopsy.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a rapidly progressive illness of unknown cause characterized by sequential acute lung injury with subsequent scarring and end-stage lung disease. Treatment at present remains largely supportive, with evidence that patients' satisfaction and survival may be improved by referral to centers specializing in the evaluation of interstitial lung diseases. Although no drug therapy has clearly been demonstrated to benefit patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a number of novel investigational agents hold promise for future study. Given the poor prognosis associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, patients should be referred to regional centers of expertise for enrollment in therapeutic clinical trials or for lung transplantation.