1
|
Piccoli GB, Moio MR, Fois A, Sofronie A, Gendrot L, Cabiddu G, D'Alessandro C, Cupisti A. The Diet and Haemodialysis Dyad: Three Eras, Four Open Questions and Four Paradoxes. A Narrative Review, Towards a Personalized, Patient-Centered Approach. Nutrients 2017; 9:E372. [PMID: 28394304 PMCID: PMC5409711 DOI: 10.3390/nu9040372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2017] [Revised: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The history of dialysis and diet can be viewed as a series of battles waged against potential threats to patients' lives. In the early years of dialysis, potassium was identified as "the killer", and the lists patients were given of forbidden foods included most plant-derived nourishment. As soon as dialysis became more efficient and survival increased, hyperphosphatemia, was identified as the enemy, generating an even longer list of banned aliments. Conversely, the "third era" finds us combating protein-energy wasting. This review discusses four questions and four paradoxes, regarding the diet-dialysis dyad: are the "magic numbers" of nutritional requirements (calories: 30-35 kcal/kg; proteins > 1.2 g/kg) still valid? Are the guidelines based on the metabolic needs of patients on "conventional" thrice-weekly bicarbonate dialysis applicable to different dialysis schedules, including daily dialysis or haemodiafiltration? The quantity of phosphate and potassium contained in processed and preserved foods may be significantly different from those in untreated foods: what are we eating? Is malnutrition one condition or a combination of conditions? The paradoxes: obesity is associated with higher survival in dialysis, losing weight is associated with mortality, but high BMI is a contraindication for kidney transplantation; it is difficult to limit phosphate intake when a patient is on a high-protein diet, such as the ones usually prescribed on dialysis; low serum albumin is associated with low dialysis efficiency and reduced survival, but on haemodiafiltration, high efficiency is coupled with albumin losses; banning plant derived food may limit consumption of "vascular healthy" food in a vulnerable population. Tailored approaches and agreed practices are needed so that we can identify attainable goals and pursue them in our fragile haemodialysis populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, University of Torino, 10100 Torino, Italy.
- Nephrologie, Centre Hospitalier le Mans, Avenue Roubillard, 72000 Le Mans, France.
| | - Maria Rita Moio
- Nephrologie, Centre Hospitalier le Mans, Avenue Roubillard, 72000 Le Mans, France.
| | - Antioco Fois
- Nefrologia, Ospedale Brotzu, 09100 Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Andreea Sofronie
- Nephrologie, Centre Hospitalier le Mans, Avenue Roubillard, 72000 Le Mans, France.
| | - Lurlinys Gendrot
- Nephrologie, Centre Hospitalier le Mans, Avenue Roubillard, 72000 Le Mans, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Worthington P, Balint J, Bechtold M, Bingham A, Chan LN, Durfee S, Jevenn AK, Malone A, Mascarenhas M, Robinson DT, Holcombe B. When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017; 41:324-377. [PMID: 28333597 DOI: 10.1177/0148607117695251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Parenteral nutrition (PN) represents one of the most notable achievements of modern medicine, serving as a therapeutic modality for all age groups across the healthcare continuum. PN offers a life-sustaining option when intestinal failure prevents adequate oral or enteral nutrition. However, providing nutrients by vein is an expensive form of nutrition support, and serious adverse events can occur. In an effort to provide clinical guidance regarding PN therapy, the Board of Directors of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) convened a task force to develop consensus recommendations regarding appropriate PN use. The recommendations contained in this document aim to delineate appropriate PN use and promote clinical benefits while minimizing the risks associated with the therapy. These consensus recommendations build on previous ASPEN clinical guidelines and consensus recommendations for PN safety. They are intended to guide evidence-based decisions regarding appropriate PN use for organizations and individual professionals, including physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and other clinicians involved in providing PN. They not only support decisions related to initiating and managing PN but also serve as a guide for developing quality monitoring tools for PN and for identifying areas for further research. Finally, the recommendations contained within the document are also designed to inform decisions made by additional stakeholders, such as policy makers and third-party payers, by providing current perspectives regarding the use of PN in a variety of healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jane Balint
- 2 Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Angela Bingham
- 4 University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Sharon Durfee
- 6 Central Admixture Pharmacy Services, Inc, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | | | | | - Maria Mascarenhas
- 9 The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel T Robinson
- 10 Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Beverly Holcombe
- 11 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lawson CS, Campbell KL, Dimakopoulos I, Dockrell ME. Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the MUST and MST Nutrition Screening Tools in Renal Inpatients. J Ren Nutr 2012; 22:499-506. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2011.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2011] [Revised: 07/12/2011] [Accepted: 08/09/2011] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
4
|
Fuhrman MP. Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition and Intraperitoneal Nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract 2009; 24:470-80. [DOI: 10.1177/0884533609339072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
|
5
|
Korzets A, Azoulay O, Ori Y, Zevin D, Boaz M, Herman M, Chagnac A, Gafter U. THE USE OF INTRADIALYTIC PARENTERAL NUTRITION IN ACUTELY ILL HAEMODIALYSED PATIENTS. J Ren Care 2008; 34:14-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2008.00005.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|