Nutritional support in sepsis: still skeptical?

Effect of an immune-enhancing diet on lymphocyte in head-injured rats: What is the role of arginine?

OBJECTIVE

The benefit of immune-enhancing diets (IEDs) in the intensive care unit remains controversial. Considering their complexity, the role of each component, in particular arginine (Arg), in their properties is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the role of arginine in the immunomodulatory effects of an IED (Crucial) in head-injured rats.

DESIGN

Thirty-four rats were randomized into five groups: AL (ad libitum), HI (head-injured), HI-STD (HI + standard enteral nutrition, EN), HI-STD-Arg (HI + standard EN + Arg in equimolar concentration to Arg in IED), and HI-IED (HI + IED). These isocaloric and isonitrogenous diets were administered over 4 days. After death, the thymus was removed and weighed. The density of CD25, CD4 and CD8 on lymphocytes from blood and from Peyer patches was evaluated. Mesenteric lymph nodes, liver and spleen were cultured for analysis of enterobacterial translocation and dissemination.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

HI induced an atrophy of the thymus which was not corrected by the standard diet (HI 0.27 +/- 0.03, HI-STD 0.35 +/- 0.03 vs. AL 0.49 +/- 0.02 g; p < 0.05). However, the standard diet supplemented with arginine limited the thymic atrophy and the IED restored thymus weight. CD25 density and interleukin-2 production were increased only in the HI-STD-Arg and HI-IED groups (p < 0.05). Head injury induced enterobacterial translocation and dissemination which were blunted only in the HI-STD-Arg group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this rat HI model, arginine appears to be safe, contributes to a large extent to the immunomodulatory effects of the IED, and seems to limit enterobacterial translocation and dissemination more efficiently alone than in an IED.

ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Intensive care

Enteral nutrition (EN) via tube feeding is, today, the preferred way of feeding the critically ill patient and an important means of counteracting for the catabolic state induced by severe diseases. These guidelines are intended to give evidence-based recommendations for the use of EN in patients who have a complicated course during their ICU stay, focusing particularly on those who develop a severe inflammatory response, i.e. patients who have failure of at least one organ during their ICU stay. These guidelines were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with officially accepted standards and are based on all relevant publications since 1985. They were discussed and accepted in a consensus conference. EN should be given to all ICU patients who are not expected to be taking a full oral diet within three days. It should have begun during the first 24h using a standard high-protein formula. During the acute and initial phases of critical illness an exogenous energy supply in excess of 20-25 kcal/kg BW/day should be avoided, whereas, during recovery, the aim should be to provide values of 25-30 total kcal/kg BW/day. Supplementary parenteral nutrition remains a reserve tool and should be given only to those patients who do not reach their target nutrient intake on EN alone. There is no general indication for immune-modulating formulae in patients with severe illness or sepsis and an APACHE II Score >15. Glutamine should be supplemented in patients suffering from burns or trauma.

Nutritional requirements of the critically ill patient

The presence or development of malnutrition during critical illness has been unequivocally associated with increased morbidity and mortality in people. Recognition that malnutrition may similarly affect veterinary patients emphasizes the need to properly address the nutritional requirements of hospitalized dogs and cats. Because of a lack in veterinary studies evaluating the nutritional requirements of critically ill small animals, current recommendations for nutritional support of veterinary patients are based largely on sound clinical judgment and the best information available, including data from experimental animal models and human studies. This, however, should not discourage the veterinary practitioner from implementing nutritional support in critically ill patients. Similar to many supportive measures of critically ill patients, nutritional interventions can have a significant impact on patient morbidity and may even improve survival. The first step of nutritional support is to identify patients most likely to benefit from nutritional intervention. Careful assessment of the patient and appraisal of its nutritional needs provide the basis for a nutritional plan, which includes choosing the optimal route of nutritional support, determining the number of calories to provide, and determining the composition of the diet. Ultimately, the success of the nutritional management of critically ill dogs and cats will depend on close monitoring and frequent reassessment.

Nutritional support in critical care

Despite the key role of nutrition in health and the almost universal use of supplemental feeding in the ICU, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice. Enteral nutrition is superior to TPN in almost all circumstances and most patients in the ICU can be fed successfully by this route. There is little evidence to support the use of special feeds and the role of immunonutrients remains unproven. Nutritional support cannot completely prevent the adverse effects of catabolic illness and overfeeding should be avoided.

Nutrition support in critically ill septic patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infection and sepsis remain major challenges in the critically ill. How nutritional therapy can effect real clinical outcomes is not easily apparent from the clinical data. Despite reducing infectious incidence, many studies show little difference in meaningful clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Confusion over the role that nutrition and nutrition practice in intensive care plays in preventing infection, and later how nutrition aids recovery from sepsis perhaps explains many of the misconceptions and difficulties with the evidence.

SUMMARY

Encouraging new evidence will help our decision making and shows that outcome can be improved by performing relatively simple therapies well.