Immunologic aspects of small bowel transplantation:

Study of the impact of liver transplantation on the outcome of intestinal grafts in children

BACKGROUND

Successful small bowel transplantation remains a challenge due to the septic and immune content of the gut. The possible beneficial role of the liver was assessed in pediatric recipients of isolated intestinal and liver intestinal combined transplantation, receiving the same immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

Fifteen children who underwent small bowel transplantation (seven SbTx) or combined liver-small bowel transplantation (eight LSbTx) at a single center between 1994 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with fifteen controls (eight normal and seven appendicitis as inflammatory control). Transplant and patient survival, acute rejection episodes were analyzed and compared. Epithelial apoptotic body counts (ABC) and NF-kB (p65), Caspase-3 and Bax intestinal immunostaining from days 0 to 20 after transplantation were assessed.

RESULTS

Graft and patient survivals at 5 years were respectively 75% and 75% in LSbTx; 43% and 57% in SbTx (NS). Histological analysis showed higher ABC in LSbTx intestinal mucosa (P = 0.05 on day 5, P < 0.01 thereafter). Immunostaining of biopsies on day 0 after reperfusion showed different expression of NF-kB, Caspase-3 and Bax on endothelial (P < 0.05 for NF-kB and Bax), mononuclear (P < 0.05 for Bax) and epithelial cells in LSbTx and SbTx.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a protective role of the liver toward intestinal transplantation even in absence of significative difference, probably due to the small number of children. Early changes in NF-kB immunostaining in the biopsies sampled on day 0, pointed to a possible beneficial effect of the liver in the very early phase following transplantation, perhaps through the differential control of ischemia-reperfusion.

Enhanced in situ expression of NF-kappaBp65 is an early marker of intestinal graft rejection in rats

BACKGROUND

Although intestinal transplantation provides a unique situation of free access to the graft because of the presence of temporary enterostomas, evaluation of local immunosuppression is still an unresolved issue and may constitute one of the causes of grafting failure.

AIMS

To study in a rat model of allogeneic intestinal transplantation the expression of transcription factors involved in lymphocyte activation in situ in the graft and to identify factors reflecting the efficiency of drug immunosuppression.

METHODS

Intestinal transplantation was performed in a Brown Norway (RT1n-donors)-Lewis (RT1(l)-recipients) rat strain combination. The animals were treated with tacrolimus to induce tolerance or left untreated. Syngeneic intestinal grafts and intestine from donor rats with peritonitis were used as controls. NF-kappaBp65, p-c-Jun, interleukin 2 receptor (CD25), and major histocompatibility complex class II antigen (OX-6) expression was studied in graft biopsies on days 2 and 5 by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

On day 2, before the onset of histologic signs of rejection, the number of cells expressing NF-kappaBp65 in the pericryptic lamina propria was significantly higher in untreated recipients of allogeneic grafts than in the other groups (P = .009). NF-kappaBp65 expression then fell between days 2 and 5 (P = .009). Classic markers of T-cell activation (CD25 and OX-6) were expressed during rejection in the lamina propria and on crypt enterocytes, respectively. p-c-Jun expression did not differ among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

NF-kappaBp65 expression in intestinal grafts is a precocious sign of local activation during rejection and could thus serve to optimize the management of immunosuppressive therapy.

Therapy for acute rejection in pediatric organ transplant recipients

Despite the availability of potent immunosuppressive drugs, rejection after organ transplantation in children remains a serious concern, and may lead to significant morbidity, graft loss, and death of the patient. Acute graft rejection in pediatric recipients is first treated with methylprednisolone pulses, followed by progressive taper of corticosteroid doses. After control of the rejection episode, baseline immunosuppression has to be adjusted and closely monitored since rejection (especially late episodes, occurring more than 6 months after transplantation) may be due to a lack of compliance or sub-therapeutic drug concentrations. The management of corticosteroid resistant rejection is not standardized, and depends on the transplanted organ and previous immunosuppressive regimen. In patients experiencing corticosteroid resistant acute rejection while on a cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen, cyclosporine is generally changed to tacrolimus. In case of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, tacrolimus blood levels may be increased, and/or mycophenolate mofetil (which nowadays tends to replace azathioprine) or sirolimus may be added, although pharmacodynamic data and clinical studies with these agents are still scarce in pediatric recipients. The use of antithymocyte globulins or monoclonal anti-CD3 antibodies, muromonab CD3 (OKT3) is hampered by numerous adverse effects, including a significant risk of over-immunosuppression. These therapies are nowadays indicated in very selected cases. Other treatments such as plasmapheresis and high dose immunoglobulins may be useful in difficult cases. In patients with refractory rejection despite therapeutic escalation, the risks of over-immunosuppression, including opportunistic infections and malignancies (especially the Epstein-Barr virus related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease) have to be balanced with the consequences of graft loss due to rejection. Detransplantation or retransplantation may, in some instances, be preferable to severe infectious or tumoral complications.