A randomized, open-label, comparative trial of zidovudine plus lamivudine versus zidovudine plus lamivudine plus didanosine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected Thai patients

Predictive factors for immunological and virological endpoints in Thai patients receiving combination antiretroviral treatment

BACKGROUND

Routine CD4 count and HIV viral load monitoring is a financial barrier in developing countries.

METHODS

We assessed factors associated with CD4 counts < or =200 cells/microL and detectable viral load in Thai HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration and the Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre (HIV-NAT). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for multiple treatment failures were used to determine factors related to CD4 counts < or =200 cells/microL and detectable viral load. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for CD4 counts < or =200 cells/microL were developed with and without viral load in order to build models applicable to contexts in which viral load is not available.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seventeen patients were included in the study. Fifty-four per cent were male, and the median CD4 count and log(10) viral load at baseline were 283 cells/microL and 4.3 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, respectively. Independent factors related to CD4 count < or =200 cells/microL were CD4 count at baseline [hazards ratio (HR) 0.20/100 cells/microL; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.23] and changes in CD4 count (HR 0.22/100 cells/microL; 95% CI 0.17-0.28). Factors in multivariate models (in which viral load was considered for inclusion) were CD4 count at baseline (HR 0.21/100 cells/microL; 95% CI 0.18-0.24), changes in CD4 count (HR 0.25/100 cells/microL; 95% CI 0.19-0.32) and detectable viral load (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.20-3.13). Predictive factors (independent of viral load) were triple ART or highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) and detectable viral load at baseline (HR 2.96; 95% CI 2.24-3.91). Conclusions CD4 count at baseline and changes in CD4 count were important in predicting CD4 counts < or =200 cells/microL. Triple ART and detectable viral load at baseline were important in predicting detectable viral load.

Three-year durability of dual-nucleoside versus triple-nucleoside therapy in a Thai population with HIV infection

We compared the long-term immunologic and virologic efficacy of the dual- and triple-nucleoside therapy for HIV infection. This was a retrospective analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials in antiretroviral-naive patients. In the dual-nucleoside group, 15 started with didanosine (ddI) monotherapy and then added stavudine (d4T) after 24 weeks, 63 started with various doses of d4T and ddI, and 53 started with zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). In the triple-nucleoside group, 53 started with ZDV, 3TC, and ddI. After 48 weeks, patients who were not failing were randomized to immediate (before treatment failure) versus delayed (at the time of virologic failure) switching from ddI and d4T to ZDV and 3TC or vice versa and from ZDV, 3TC, and ddI to d4T, 3TC, and abacavir (ABC). Failure was defined as a plasma HIV-1 RNA level>or=1 log10 above nadir or >or=10,000 copies/mL when nadir was <500 copies/mL. Patients failing therapy before week 48 received the new treatment as in the immediate switching group. Hydroxyurea was added to the last treatment regimen if patients failed after week 96. CD4 count and plasma HIV-1 RNA level (branched DNA assay with a cutoff point of 50 copies/mL) at week 144 were analyzed by intention to treat. Compared with the dual-nucleoside group, the triple-nucleoside group had a higher proportion of patients with <50 copies/mL at 144 weeks (60% vs. 18%; P<0.001), higher median CD4 count (388 cells/microL vs. 346 cells/microL; P=0.018), and longer duration of response, defined as the time from onset of viral suppression (<500 copies/mL) to the time of treatment failure (the first of 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements >500 copies/mL never followed by 2 consecutive visits showing suppressible viremia to <500 copies/mL) or discontinuation from the study (144 weeks vs. 104 weeks; P=0.002). Multivariate regression analyses showed that significant predictors for treatment success, defined as a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL at week 144, were asymptomatic clinical status at enrollment, a baseline plasma viral load <or=30,000 copies/mL, treatment with triple nucleosides, and a viral load response of <500 copies/mL by week 12. Triple-nucleoside therapy with ZDV, 3TC, and ddI or d4T, 3TC, and ABC in patients with HIV infection is more effective in inducing a sustained virologic response than the dual combinations of ZDV and 3TC or ddI and d4T.

A Prospective Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Saquinavir/Ritonavir plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Treatment-Naive Thai Patients

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), as induction therapy before enrollment in a randomized trial of structured treatment interruption strategies.

Design

Two-hundred antiretroviral-naive patients with CD4+ cell counts between 200–350 at screening were enrolled in this open-label 24week study.

Methods

Patients were followed up every 8 weeks for CD4+ cells, HIV RNA, and clinical and laboratory toxicities. Results: Two-hundred patients were enrolled with median baseline CD4+ cell count of 267 cells/μl and HIV RNA 50 118 (4.7 log10) copies/ml. After 24 weeks of treatment, 191 of 200 (96%) patients had below 400 copies/ml HIV RNA, with 177/200 (89%) below 50 copies/ml (intent to treat, missing equals failure method), with a median rise in CD4+ cell count of 122 cells/μl. There was no significant correlation between the minimum concentration of saquinavir and HIV RNA reductions at week 8 ( P=0.957) or absolute HIV RNA at week 24 ( P=0.77).

Conclusion

First-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two NRTIs showed strong antiviral efficacy over 24 weeks, and should be evaluated in larger prospective randomized clinical trials.

HIV disease progression in a patient cohort treated via a clinical research network in a resource limited setting

OBJECTIVE

To examine HIV disease progression in a cohort of adult patients treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) via a clinical research network in Thailand.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION

A cohort of 417 patients enrolled in a series of randomized ART trials, between 1996 and December 2002.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Progression to combined endpoint of AIDS defining illness or death according to baseline characteristics, ART used, immunological and virological responses to initial 6 months of ART.

RESULTS

During 1677 person years of follow-up, 29 of 417 patients progressed; tuberculosis was the most common event defining progression (14 of 29 events). The rates of progression to combined endpoint or death alone were 1.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-2.4] and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.3) per 10 person years respectively. Compared to patients with baseline CD4 cell counts > or =350 x 10/l, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for progression was 3.67 (95% CI, 1.31-10.27) for patients with <200 x 10 cells/l. Responses to 6 months of therapy were the strongest predictors of disease progression; compared to patients with undetectable viral load at 6 months, HR for progression was 4.95 (95% CI, 2.14-11.46) for viral load >4 log10. Compared to patients with a 6-month CD4 cell count > or =350 x 10/l, HR for progression was 5.22 (95% CI, 1.90-14.37) for patients with <200 x 10 cells/l.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-infected patients in Thailand who had access to ART, appropriate care, CD4 cell and viral load monitoring facilities via a clinical research network had progression rates comparable to those in developed countries. In this setting, ART initiation could generally be delayed until the CD4 cell count approaches 200 x 10/l.

The Problems Faced When Assessing the Prevalence and Incidence of Antiretroviral-Related Toxicities

Although the dramatic effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in reducing morbidity and mortality must not be underestimated, it is also important to consider the incidence and prevalence of HAART-related toxicities. Although several studies have investigated HAART-related toxicities, there has been great variety between them in the reported incidence and prevalence rates of these toxicities. Various factors, including whether the study type was a clinical trial or an observational study, the definition of the toxicity endpoints, the demographic characteristics of the study populations and the effect of calendar year on analyses, may all influence the rates observed. We investigated the possible explanations for the differences in the incidence and prevalence rates of HAART-related toxicities between studies, focussing on metabolic and hepatotoxic disorders.

Nucleoside analogue mutations and Q151M in HIV-1 subtype A/E infection treated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

To investigate genotypic drug resistance in HIV-1 subtype A/E infection associated with failure of double/triple-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

Patients from HIV-NAT 002 [stavudine (d4T)/didanosine (ddI) dose reduction study] and HIV-NAT 003 (zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine (3TC) versus ZDV/3TC/ddI) whose HIV-1 RNA was > 1000 copies/ml at week 48 and/or week 96 were tested for genotypic resistance. In both studies, after 48 weeks, patients were switched to the other dual or triple-nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTI) either according to randomization or to the occurrence of virological failure.

RESULTS

Resistance mutations found in the d4T/ddI, ZDV/3TC, and ZDV/3TC/ddI groups: none at baseline; at week 48, nucleoside analogue mutations (NAM), 2/17 (12%), 2/10 (20%), and 1/8; Q151M complex, 3/17 (18%), 0%, and 0%; M184V, 0%, 10/10 (P < 0.001), 3/8; V75T, 3/17 (18%), 0%, and 0%; L74V, 3/7 (18%), 0%, and 0%, respectively. At week 96, among the switchers, i.e., group A d4T/ddI to ZDV/3TC, group B ZDV/3TC to d4T/ddI, and group C ZDV/3TC/ddI to d4T/3TC/abacavir: NAM, 12/21 (57%), 4/7 and 1/3; Q151M, 4/21 (19%), 0% and 1/3, respectively. Interestingly, four or more NAM were observed in a higher proportion in group A (4/17 versus none in the others).

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-NRTI resistance (NAM and Q151M) and M184V (only in 3TC failure) are commonly found in HIV-1 subtype A/E infection associated with NRTI failure. Suboptimal d4T/ddI therapy led to a high incidence of V75T and L74V mutations. Switching from d4T/ddI to ZDV/3TC may be associated with a higher incidence of four or more NAM. Thus, suboptimal and dual NRTI therapy is not recommended for global application.

Mutagenically separated PCR assay for rapid detection of M41L and K70R zidovudine resistance mutations in CRF01_AE (subtype E) human immunodeficiency virus type 1

A rapid zidovudine (ZDV) resistance genotypic assay was developed based on the mutagenically separated PCR (MS-PCR) technique to detect two ZDV-resistant mutations, M41L and K70R in CRF01_AE (subtype E). Endpoint dilution analysis revealed that the newly constructed MS-PCR assay could successfully detect three to nine copies of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 template RNA. The test against wild-type and mutant template mixtures in different ratios demonstrated that the assay could detect 10% minor population, at least. Fifty-one subtype E clinical samples were analyzed by the newly constructed MS-PCR assay and direct nucleotide sequencing. The concordance of the two assays was 92 and 100% in codons 41 and 70, respectively. The MS-PCR assay is a rapid, simple, and inexpensive assay that is highly sensitive in detecting mutant targets, including minor populations. Thus, it could be used as a powerful tool for epidemiological surveillance of drug-resistant mutations in developing countries.