Pharmacokinetic variability caused by gender: do women have higher indinavir exposure than men?

Differences in antiretroviral safety and efficacy by sex in a multinational randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Worldwide, 50% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people are women. This study was to evaluate whether the safety and efficacy outcomes of three initial antiretroviral regimens (ARVs) differed by sex.

METHODS

Antiretroviral regimen naive participants from nine countries in four continents were assigned to ARVs with efavirenz (EFV) plus lamivudine-zidovudine, atazanavir (ATV) plus didanosine (ddI)-EC/emtricitabine (FTC) or EFV plus FTC-tenofovir-DF. The primary objective was to estimate the sex difference on efficacy outcome of treatment failure defined as one of the following: 1. Time to 1st of confirmed virologic failure, 2. WHO Stage 4 progression or 3. death with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from adjusted Cox regression models.

RESULTS

In all, 739 (47%) women and 832 (53%) men with HIV were evaluated. Women had higher pretreatment CD4+(182 vs 165 cells/mm(3); P < 0.001) and lower HIV-1 RNA (4.9 log10 vs 5.2 log10 copies/ml; P < 0.001) compared to men. Association of sex with time to regimen failure differed by treatment arm (P = 0.018). For atazanavir plus didanosine-EC plus emtricitabine, women had a longer time to treatment failure compared to men [adjusted HR (aHR) = 0.59; 95% CI 0.40-0.87]. Women were less likely to prematurely discontinue treatment prematurely (aHR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98). Women assigned to efavirenz plus lamivudine-zidovudine were more likely to have a primary safety event compared to men (aHR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.18-1.88).

CONCLUSION

Antiretroviral efficacy and safety differed by sex in this study. Consideration of potential effects of sex on antiretroviral outcomes is important for the design of future clinical trials and for HIV treatment guidelines.

Randomized clinical trial comparing the pharmacokinetics of standard- and increased-dosage lopinavir-ritonavir coformulation tablets in HIV-positive pregnant women

A lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r)-based regimen is recommended during pregnancy to reduce the risk of HIV mother-to-child transmission, but the appropriate dose is controversial. We compared the pharmacokinetics of standard and increased LPV/r doses during pregnancy. This randomized, open-label prospective study enrolled 60 pregnant women between gestational weeks 14 and 30. The participants received either the standard dose (400/100 mg twice a day [BID]) or increased dose (600/150 mg BID) of LPV/r tablets during pregnancy and the standard dose for 6 weeks after childbirth. Pharmacokinetics analysis was performed using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Adherent participants who received the standard dose presented minimum LPV concentrations of 4.4, 4.3, and 6.1 μg/ml in the second and third trimesters and postpartum, respectively. The increased-dose group exhibited values of 7.9, 6.9, and 9.2 μg/ml at the same three time points. Although LPV exposure was significantly higher in the increased-dose group, the standard dose produced therapeutic levels of LPV against wild-type virus in all adherent participants, except one patient in the third trimester; 50%, 37.5%, and 25%, and 0%, 15%, and 0% of the participants in the standard- and increased-dose groups failed to achieve therapeutic levels against resistant viruses during the second and third trimesters and after childbirth, respectively. After 12 weeks of treatment and after childbirth, all adherent participants achieved undetectable HIV viral loads, and their babies (49/54) were uninfected. No serious drug-related adverse events were observed. We conclude that the standard dose is appropriate for use during pregnancy and that an increased dose may be necessary for women harboring resistant HIV. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00605098.).

Caring for women living with HIV: gaps in the evidence

Introduction

In the management of HIV, women and men generally undergo the same treatment pathway, with gender differences being given limited consideration. This is in spite of accumulating evidence that there are a number of potential differences between women and men which may affect response to treatment, pharmacokinetics, toxicities and coping. There are also notable psychological, behavioural, social and structural factors that may have a unique impact on women living with HIV (WLWH). Despite our increasing knowledge of HIV and advances in treatment, there are significant gaps in the data relating specifically to women. One of the factors contributing to this situation is the under-representation of women in all aspects of HIV clinical research. Furthermore, there are clinical issues unique to women, including gynaecologic and breast diseases, menopause-related factors, contraception and other topics related to women's and sexual health.

Methods

Using scoping review methodology, articles from the literature from 1980 to 2012 were identified using appropriate MeSH headings reflecting the clinical status of WLWH, particularly in the areas of clinical management, sexual health, emotional wellbeing and treatment access. Titles and abstracts were scanned to determine whether they were relevant to non-reproductive health in WLWH, and papers meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed.

Results

This review summarizes our current knowledge of the clinical status of WLWH, particularly in the areas of clinical management, sexual health, emotional wellbeing and treatment access. It suggests that there are a number of gender differences in disease and treatment outcomes, and distinct women-specific issues, such as menopause and co-morbidities, that pose significant challenges to the care of WLWH.

Conclusions

Based on a review of this evidence, outstanding questions and areas where further studies are required to determine gender differences in the efficacy and safety of treatment and other clinical and psychological issues specifically affecting WLWH have been identified. Well-controlled and adequately powered clinical studies are essential to help provide answers to these questions and to contribute to activities aimed at improving the health and wellbeing of WLWH.

Sex differences in lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics among HIV-infected women and men

The authors compared the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir (LPV) and ritonavir (RTV) between women and men. This 2-step, multicenter, pharmacokinetic study enrolled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults on lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) capsules (400/100 mg bid) plus 1 or more nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. All participants underwent 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling. The pharmacokinetic sampling was repeated in participants receiving the LPV/r tablet formulation. Step 1 enrolled 37 women and 40 men; step 2 included 42 participants from step 1 plus 35 new participants (39 women and 38 men). LPV pharmacokinetics in women and men were not significantly different with either formulation. Women had significantly higher median RTV AUC(0-12 h) with both the soft-gel capsule (SGC) and tablet formulations (SGC: 5395 vs 4119 ng·h/mL, P = .026; tablet: 5310 vs 3941 ng·h/mL, P = .012), higher median C(max) (SGC: 802 vs 635 ng/mL, P = .032; tablet: 773 vs 570 ng/mL, P = .006), and lower median CL/F (SGC: 18.54 vs 24.31 L/h, P = .026; tablet: 18.83 vs 25.37 L/h, P = .012). RTV CL/F was slower in women after weight adjustment with both formulations. The pharmacokinetics of LPV in the SGC and tablet formulations are comparable in HIV-infected patients. Women had higher RTV AUC(0-12 h) and lower CL/F with both formulations. The mechanism of the sex difference in RTV CL/F warrants elucidation.

Sociodemographic factors predict early discontinuation of HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

HIV infection has a devastating impact on individual and public health, and affects populations disproportionately. Treatment with antiretroviral therapy (ART) saves lives, but long-term adherence to ART is critical to its success. We performed an observational cohort study to determine the influence of race, sex and other sociodemographic factors on early ART discontinuations among HIV-infected persons.

METHODS

TennCare-enrolled adults of black or white non-Hispanic race beginning ART with either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) between 1996-2003 (N=3654) were assessed for early discontinuation. A subgroup of discontinuations was validated using the primary medical record.

RESULTS

Blacks were more likely than whites to discontinue NNRTIs (37 vs. 28%; P=0.003) and PIs (36 vs. 25%; P < or = 0.001). In multivariable models adjusting for race, sex, age, early HIV-related medical encounter, urban residence and TennCare enrollment category, black race, female sex and younger age were independent predictors of discontinuation among those starting PIs. Among persons starting NNRTIs, black race, younger age and a disability-based enrollment category predicted early drug discontinuation, but female sex did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that sociodemographic factors were associated with early NNRTI and PI discontinuation in this population, and some factors were ART class specific.

Antiretroviral pharmacokinetic profile: a review of sex differences

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that female sex may be associated with increased risk of developing antiretroviral toxicities. Although the mechanisms of sex-related antiretroviral pharmacodynamic differences remain poorly understood and may be multifactorial, they appear to be mediated through a common pathway of pharmacokinetic variability between the sexes.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of the major classes of antiretroviral drugs currently approved for HIV treatment by the US Food and Drug Administration, identifies knowledge gaps, and provides recommendations for future research directions.

METHODS

To identify pertinent articles for this review, the MEDLINE database was searched from 1990 to June 2006 using the terms sex, gender, antiretroviral therapy, ART, HAART, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, NRTI, NNRTI, and protease inhibitors. Search results were restricted to English language and human studies. The reference lists of identified articles were also used, as well as abstracts from relevant conferences. In addition, individual antiretroviral drugs were searched by sex/gender or by pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Current evidence, though limited, does suggest the existence of a sex disparity in antiretroviral pharmacokinetics, and such disparity has been shown to have pharmacodynamic implications for some drugs. Sex-mediated intracellular pharmaco-enhancement was associated with superior antiviral activities for the zidovudine and lamivudine members of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor class. There appears to be divergent opinions about whether sex is a significant determinant of either nevirapine or efavirenz plasma concentrations. For certain protease inhibitors (PIs) (eg, saquinavir [SQV] and indinavir [IDV]), clinically significant relationships between sex differences in plasma drug concentrations and clinical outcomes have been observed. There appears to be a trend toward higher drug exposure in women than in men when PIs are boosted with ritonavir (RTV). Nelfinavir, the only PI that is currently administered unboosted with RTV, does not exhibit a sex difference in its plasma concentrations. Unboosted amprenavir exposure was lower in women compared with men. Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of SQV and IDV were observed only in the setting of RTV boosting.

CONCLUSIONS

A common weakness in many studies addressing sex-based differences in the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs is the relatively small number of women participating. Many of these studies were retrospective in design, and some had limited pharmacokinetic parameters for comparison. Antiretroviral treatment trials should be designed with sufficient power (adequate female participation) to detect sex-based differences both in pharmacokinetics and in clinical response. Future studies should explore the molecular basis for sex-based differences in plasma drug concentrations and antiretroviral drug response. The roles of drug transporter proteins and cellular kinases, and the activities of metabolizing enzymes in mediating differential plasma and intracellular antiretroviral concentrations, should be further assessed.

Genetic, ethnic, and gender differences in the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral agents

Variable antiretroviral therapy (ART) drug response likely reflects the combined influence of environment, underlying disease, concurrent drugs, and genetics. Gender exerts modest or negligible effects on ART disposition, and it is expected to have limited clinical implication, although it should be accounted for in large population studies. Ethnic denominations have, with the notable exception of efavirenz, no clear influence on ART disposition. Exploration of genetic factors might offer a better comprehension to the largely unpredictable and unresolved variability in ART concentrations and related toxicity or treatment outcome. Despite the negative perception of genetic research among the general public, this type of investigation is now widely accepted by concerned parties: patients, relatives, and study volunteers.

Lack of sex-related differences in saquinavir pharmacokinetics in an HIV-seronegative cohort

AIMS

To examine the influence of sex on steady-state saquinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-seronegative volunteers administered saquinavir without a concomitant protease inhibitor.

METHODS

Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (14 female) received saquinavir soft-gel capsules 1200 mg three times daily for 3 days to achieve steady-state conditions. Following administration of the 10th dose, blood was collected serially over 8 h for measurement of saquinavir plasma concentrations. Saquinavir pharmacokinetic parameter values were determined using noncompartmental methods and compared between males and females. CYP3A phenotype (using oral midazolam) and MDR-1 genotypes at positions 3435 and 2677 were determined for all subjects in order to characterize possible mechanisms for any observed sex-related differences.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in saquinavir AUC(0-8) or any other pharmacokinetic parameter value between the sexes. These findings persisted after mathematically correcting for total body weight. The mean weight-normalized AUC(0-8) was 29.9 (95% confidence interval 15.5, 44.3) and 29.8 (18.6, 40.9) ng h(-1) ml(-1) kg(-1) for males and females, respectively. No significant difference in CYP3A phenotype was observed between the groups; likewise, the distribution of MDR-1 genotypes was similar for males and females.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to previous study findings, results from this investigation showed no difference in saquinavir pharmacokinetics between males and females. The discrepancy between our findings and those previously reported may be explained by the fact that we evaluated HIV-seronegative volunteers and administered saquinavir in the absence of concomitant protease inhibitors such as ritonavir. Caution must be exercised when extrapolating pharmacokinetic data from healthy volunteer studies (including sex-based pharmacokinetic differences) to HIV-infected populations or to patients receiving additional concurrent medications.

The clinical implications of antiretroviral pharmacogenomics

Heterogeneity exists in the effectiveness and toxic effects of antiretroviral agents between individuals and populations. Although patient-related clinical variables such as age, sex and ethnic origin have been associated with drug response, inherited predispositions may have a significant effect on treatment outcome. The role of host and pathogen pharmacogenomics is gaining increasing interest in the field of both antiretrovirals in development, such as the chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) inhibitors, and in established therapies where toxicity and efficacy may be predicted. Despite numerous studies available in the literature, the interpretation of the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and clinical outcomes is often posed with many confounding variables, making clinical interpretations of these results difficult. This review summarizes the key findings in the growing knowledge between human genetics and response to antiretroviral drugs and how these findings may be effectively applied in a clinical context.

Host determinants of antiretroviral drug activity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As physicians are confronted with a diversity of adverse events and variability in response to medication among patients, this review will focus on the available evidence regarding the impact of genetic variation on drug response. Specifically, variation in drug metabolizing enzymes such as the cytochrome P450s, drug transporters and human leucocyte antigen (for idiosyncratic drug reactions). The potential role of pharmacogenetics in the management of HIV-1 infected individuals and drug discovery will be discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Wide inter-individual variability of antiretroviral therapy efficacy and toxicity in HIV-infected patients has been extensively reported in the literature. Since treatment involves multiple drugs and drug classes with the potential for significant variability in drug-host as well as drug-drug interactions, antiretroviral drug therapy represents a significant challenge. Despite this inherent complexity, considerable recent advances have led to a greater understanding of interactions between genetic and host factors that influence the efficacy and toxicity of these agents.

SUMMARY

The goal of pharmacogenetics in antiretroviral therapy is to outline differences within a given population that influence drug efficacy and toxicity. Although to date, despite the numerous studies available in the literature, conclusions on how the analysis of the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms and drug efficacy may not always be clinically useful. Further studies are warranted to clarify the role of pharmacogenetics and antiretroviral drug management.

Sex differences in HIV: Natural history, pharmacokinetics, and drug toxicity

In the early years of the HIV epidemic, the burden of the disease was principally among men. In recent years, HIV infection among women has become a growing problem worldwide. There is now an increasing awareness that HIV may affect men and women differently. New data have emerged from studies that have focused on HIV-infected women, suggesting the existence of sex-related differences in natural history, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity of antiretroviral therapy. This paper reviews the current literature with an emphasis on recent data regarding sex differences in HIV that have implications for clinical practice.

Population pharmacokinetics of indinavir in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Indinavir is currently used at a fixed dose of 800 mg either three times a day or twice a day in combination with 100 mg of ritonavir. Dosage individualization based on plasma concentration monitoring might, however, be indicated. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of indinavir in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus to characterize interpatient and intrapatient variability and to build up a Bayesian approach for dosage adaptation. A population analysis was performed with the NONMEM computer program with 569 plasma samples from a cohort of 239 unselected patients receiving indinavir. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption was adapted, and the influences of clinical characteristics on oral clearance (CL) and distribution volume (V) were examined. Predicted average drug exposure and trough and peak concentrations were derived for each patient and correlated with efficacy and toxicity markers. The population estimates of CL were 32.4 liters/h for female and 42.0 liters/h for male patients; oral V was 65.7 liters; and the rate constant of absorption (K(a)) was 1.0 h(-1). CL decreased by 63% with ritonavir intake and was moderately correlated to body weight. Both interpatient variability, best assigned to oral CL (coefficient of variation [CV], 39%) and K(a) (CV, 67%), and intrapatient variability were large (CV, 41%; standard deviation, 670 microg/liter). In conclusion, initial indinavir dosage should be decided according to ritonavir intake and sex, prior to plasma concentration measurements. The high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability represents an argument for therapeutic drug monitoring.