Virologic diagnosis and follow-up of children born to mothers infected by HIV-1 group O

Serological Evidence of Hepatitis B and E and Dengue Coinfection in Chadian Patients and Impact on Lipidemia Profile

OBJECTIVE

Viral hepatitis is an endemic disease in Chad. However, few studies have documented coinfection cases and their impact on cardiovascular risk. This study is aimed at analyzing hepatitis B, E and dengue coinfection in a Chadian cohort and gauge its effect on lipidemia. Patients and Methods. From February to May 2021, 179 subjects were recruited from the Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine of the National Reference University Hospital of N'Djamena and tested for viral hepatitis markers, including HBsAg and IgM/IgG anti-HEV and dengue infection, using the NS1/IgM/IgG kit. Serum transaminases and biomarkers of lipid profiles were assayed by colorimetry, and atherogenic indexes (AI) and coronary risk (CRI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 179 subjects surveyed, 21.22% (38/179) tested positive for hepatitis B, 20% (27/135) for hepatitis E, and 1.66% (2/120) for dengue. However, most of the patients were found to be asymptomatic. Hepatitis B/E coinfection was more frequent in the study population (5.02%; 9/179) than dengue/hepatitis E coinfection (0.83%; 1/120; IgM). The prevalence of anti-HEV IgG antibodies was higher (18.52%) than that of IgM (1.48%). Furthermore, IgG antibodies levels in HEV-monoinfected subjects (11.05 ± 1.93 IU/mL, N = 15) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in coinfected patients (5.40 ± 1.31 IU/mL, N = 9). Subjects coinfected with HEV/HBV were associated with a significantly higher risk of lipodystrophy (coronary risk: 88.89% vs. 35.3%, relative risk (RR) = 2.55; p = 0.014), than HEV-monoinfected subjects, as evidenced by higher mean levels of triglycerides levels (219.88 ± 14.67 mg/dL vs. 191.82 ± 4.66  mg/dL, p < 0.05), more reduced HDL-C levels (9.05 ± 1.62 mg/dL vs. 18.93 ± 2.35 mg/dL, p < 0.05), increased mean CRI (13.81 ± 2.39 vs. 6.89 ± 1.93, p < 0.01), and AI (1.46 ± 0.10 vs. 1.05 ± 0.05, p < 0.01) values. However, they had normal transaminase values and a lower risk of developing a liver injury, although not significant (alanine aminotransferase: 0% vs. 29.4%, RR = 1, p = 0.128; aspartate aminotransferase: 0% vs. 5.88%, p = 1) than this group.

CONCLUSION

HBV/HEV coinfection is frequent in the Chadian cohort and associated with an important risk of dyslipidemia. Further research is required to elucidate the mechanism of action.

Comparative Immunovirological and Clinical Responses to Antiretroviral Therapy Between HIV-1 Group O and HIV-1 Group M Infected Patients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about impact of genetic divergence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O (HIV-1/O) relative to HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) on therapeutic outcomes. We aimed to determine if responses to standardized combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) were similar between groups despite strain divergence.

METHODS

We performed an open nonrandomized study comparing the immunological, virological, and clinical responses to cART based on 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus 1 ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, in naive and paired HIV-1/O vs HIV-1/M infected (+) patients (ratio 1:2), matched on several criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with undetectable plasma viral load (pVL, threshold 60 copies/mL) at week (W) 48. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with undetectable pVL at W24 and W96 and CD4 evolution between baseline and W24, W48, and W96.

RESULTS

Forty-seven HIV-1/O+ and 94 HIV-1/M+ patients were included. Mean pVL at baseline was significantly lower by 1 log for HIV-1/O+ vs HIV-1/M+ patients. At W48, no significant difference was observed between populations with undetectable pVL and differences at W24 and W96 were not significant. A difference in CD4 gain was observed in favor of HIV-1/M at W48 and W96, but this was not significant when adjusted on both matched criteria and pVL at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate similar immunovirological and clinical response between HIV-1/O+ and HIV-1/M+ patients. They also reveal significantly lower baseline replication for HIV-1/O variants, suggesting specific virological properties and physiopathology that now need to be addressed.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT00658346.

Novel Time-Resolved Fluorescence Europium Nanoparticle Immunoassay for Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Group O Viruses Using Microplate and Microchip Platforms

Accurate detection and quantification of HIV-1 group O viruses have been challenging for currently available HIV assays. We have developed a novel time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) europium nanoparticle immunoassay for HIV-1 group O detection using a conventional microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a microchip platform. We screened several antibodies for optimal reactivity with several HIV-1 group O strains and identified antibodies that can detect all the strains of HIV-1 group O that were available for testing. The antibodies were used to develop a conventional ELISA format assay and an in-house developed europium nanoparticle-based assay for sensitivity. The method was evaluated on both microwell plate and microchip platforms. We identified two specific and sensitive antibodies among the six we screened. The antibodies, C65691 and ANT-152, were able to quantify 15 and detect all 17 group O viruses, respectively, as they were broadly cross-reactive with all HIV-1 group O strains and yielded better signals compared with other antibodies. We have developed a sensitive assay that reflects the actual viral load in group O samples by using an appropriate combination of p24 antibodies that enhance group O detection and a highly sensitive TRF-based europium nanoparticle for detection. The combination of ANT-152 and C65690M in the ratio 3:1 was able to give significantly higher signals in our europium-based assay compared with using any single antibody.

Non-M variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

The AIDS pandemic that started in the early 1980s is due to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group M (HIV-M), but apart from this major group, many divergent variants have been described (HIV-1 groups N, O, and P and HIV-2). The four HIV-1 groups arose from independent cross-species transmission of the simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs) SIVcpz, infecting chimpanzees, and SIVgor, infecting gorillas. This, together with human adaptation, accounts for their genomic, phylogenetic, and virological specificities. Nevertheless, the natural course of non-M HIV infection seems similar to that of HIV-M. The virological monitoring of infected patients is now possible with commercial kits, but their therapeutic management remains complex. All non-M variants were principally described for patients linked to Cameroon, where HIV-O accounts for 1% of all HIV infections; only 15 cases of HIV-N infection and 2 HIV-P infections have been reported. Despite improvements in our knowledge, many fascinating questions remain concerning the origin, genetic evolution, and slow spread of these variants. Other variants may already exist or may arise in the future, calling for close surveillance. This review provides a comprehensive, up-to-date summary of the current knowledge on these pathogens, including the historical background of their discovery; the latest advances in the comprehension of their origin and spread; and clinical, therapeutic, and laboratory aspects that may be useful for the management and the treatment of patients infected with these divergent viruses.

A new real-time quantitative PCR for diagnosis and monitoring of HIV-1 group O infection

The correct diagnosis and monitoring of HIV-1 group O (HIV-O) infection are essential for appropriate patient management, for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission, and for the detection of dual HIV-M/HIV-O infections. HIV-O RNA quantification is currently possible with two commercial kits (from Abbott and Roche), which quantify HIV-M and HIV-O strains indifferently; therefore, they cannot be used for the specific identification of HIV-O infection. We designed a new real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR assay) (INT-O), which we compared with our previous version, LTR-O, and with the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 kit. Specificity was assessed with 27 HIV-1 group M strains and the prototype strain of group P. Clinical performances were analyzed by using 198 stored plasma samples, representative of HIV-O genetic diversity. Analytical sensitivity, repeatability, and reproducibility were also determined. The detection limit of the INT-O assay was 40 copies/ml, and its specificity was 100%. The repeatability and reproducibility were excellent. Analysis of clinical samples showed a good correlation between the INT-O and LTR-O assays (r = 0.8240), with an improvement of analytical sensitivity. A good correlation was also obtained between the INT-O and Abbott assays (r = 0.8599) but with significantly higher values (0.19 logs) for the INT-O method, due to marked underquantifications for some patients. These results showed that HIV-O genetic diversity still has an impact on RNA quantification. The new assay, INT-O, allows both the specific diagnosis of HIV-O infection and the quantification of diverse HIV-O strains. Its detection limit is equivalent to that of commercial kits. This assay is cheap and suitable for use in areas in which strains of HIV-1 groups M and O cocirculate.

Impact of HIV-1 group O genetic diversity on genotypic resistance interpretation by algorithms designed for HIV-1 group M

BACKGROUND

HIV-1 group O (HIV-O) is characterized by a high genetic divergence from HIV-1 group M viruses. Little is known about the therapeutic impact of this diversity. The aim of this study was to assess in a large series of samples (1) the genotypic impact of natural polymorphism of the HIV-O reverse transcriptase and protease genes; and (2) the predictive value of resistance interpretation algorithms developed for HIV-1 group M when used for highly mutated HIV-O viruses.

METHODS

Sixty-eight antiretroviral-naive and 9 highly antiretroviral-experienced HIV-O-infected patients were included. The viruses were sequenced and resistance-associated mutations were identified using 3 different algorithms (Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales, Rega, Stanford).

RESULTS

All HIV-O samples naturally exhibited the A98G and V179E resistance mutations in the reverse transcriptase region; 54% of samples presented the Y181C mutation, conferring resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Twelve minor resistance mutations, present in more than 75% of the protease sequences, led to the different algorithms giving discrepant results for nelfinavir and saquinavir susceptibility. A marked virological response was observed in 8 of the 9 antiretroviral-experienced patients, despite the prediction of limited activity of the combination for 5 to 8 patients according to the algorithm used.

CONCLUSIONS

The high level of natural polymorphism in HIV-O genes, and the important discrepancies between genotypic resistance interpretation and the virological response, emphasize the need for resistance algorithm rules better adapted to HIV-O.

[Specific diagnosis and follow-up of HIV-1 group O infection: RES-O data]

INTRODUCTION

HIV-1 group O (HIV-O), mainly found in Cameroon, has a very high genetic diversity with consequences on the diagnosis and treatment of patients, requiring the development of specific tools.

OBJECTIVE

We present the currently available tools for the specific detection of HIV-O and its therapeutic monitoring, and the first RES-O data, a French network for the identification and monitoring of patients infected by HIV-O.

METHOD

The diagnosis of infection was confirmed by group-specific envelope serotyping. The viral load was assessed by a specific technique, LTR-O, developed in the laboratory and compared to the nonspecific kit RealTime HIV-1 (Abbott). The sequencing of antiretroviral target regions (Protease, Reverse Transcriptase (RT), Integrase and Gp41), was performed by specific primers. The analysis of resistance mutations was performed with the ANRS algorithm used for HIV-M.

RESULTS

HIV-O infection was confirmed for 117 patients. Measuring viral load showed the two techniques were equivalent, but with a tendency to under-quantification for the Abbott technique greater than 1 log for 5% of samples. 70 to 100% of the studied strains had at least 10 mutations in the Protease, four 4 in the RT, and one in Gp41, resulting in a natural genotypic resistance to some anti-retroviral molecules.

DISCUSSION

The diagnosis and monitoring of HIV-O infection is now possible. However, the impact of this variant's natural polymorphism on response to treatment remains undocumented.

Baseline genotypic and phenotypic susceptibilities of HIV-1 group O to enfuvirtide

We assessed the natural genotypic and phenotypic susceptibilities to enfuvirtide of 171 HIV group O (HIV-O) samples and 29 strains, respectively. The N42D resistance-associated mutation in the gp41 region was detected in 98% of cases. The phenotypic assay showed a wide range of baseline susceptibilities, with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)s) from 4 to 5,000 nM, a range similar to that reported for HIV-1 group M. Thus, despite the natural genotypic resistance conferred by the N42D signature mutation, HIV-O variants appear to be phenotypically susceptible. Enfuvirtide could therefore potentially be used in antiretroviral treatments for HIV-O-infected patients.

Diagnosis and monitoring of HIV-1 group O-infected patients in Cameroun

OBJECTIVE

To define a routine algorithm for the specific diagnosis and complete follow-up of HIV-1 group O (HIV-O) infections in Cameroun.

METHODS

During 18 months, samples referred to Centre Pasteur du Cameroun for HIV testing or viral monitoring were screened for HIV-O infection with an in-house serotyping assay. HIV-O viral load was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction in the LTR gene and resistance genotyping was performed on pol and env sequences.

RESULTS

Of the 7030 samples tested, 78 HIV-O infections (1.1%) were identified, including 7 M and O dually seroreactive samples (9%). All treatment-naive patients and 59% of the patients receiving HAART had detectable viral loads. Analysis of pol sequences from 15 treatment-naive patients revealed a high number of polymorphisms in the protease region, with natural residues implicated in genotypic resistance to tipranavir and saquinavir for HIV-1 group M according to the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites virales algorithm. Six patients (40%) harbored the 181C mutation conferring natural resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Among antiretroviral-treated patients, major resistance mutations described for HIV-1 group M were found.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-O prevalence remains relatively low in Cameroun. The cocirculation of groups M and O in this country leads to replicative dual infections. HIV-O-infected patients in this region can now benefit from effective and specific tools for a complete monitoring of infection. However, further studies are needed to understand long-term response to antiretrovirals of these complex variants.

A new human immunodeficiency virus derived from gorillas

We have identified a new human immunodeficiency virus in a Cameroonian woman. It is closely related to gorilla simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVgor) and shows no evidence of recombination with other HIV-1 lineages. This new virus seems to be the prototype of a new HIV-1 lineage that is distinct from HIV-1 groups M, N and O. We propose to designate it HIV-1 group P.

Diagnosis of HIV-1 infection in children younger than 18 months in the United States

The objectives of this technical report are to describe methods of diagnosis of HIV-1 infection in children younger than 18 months in the United States and to review important issues that must be considered by clinicians who care for infants and young children born to HIV-1-infected women. Appropriate HIV-1 diagnostic testing for infants and children younger than 18 months differs from that for older children, adolescents, and adults because of passively transferred maternal HIV-1 antibodies, which may be detectable in the child's bloodstream until 18 months of age. Therefore, routine serologic testing of these infants and young children is generally only informative before the age of 18 months if the test result is negative. Virologic assays, including HIV-1 DNA or RNA assays, represent the gold standard for diagnostic testing of infants and children younger than 18 months. With such testing, the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection (as well as the presumptive exclusion of HIV-1 infection) can be established within the first several weeks of life among nonbreastfed infants. Important factors that must be considered when selecting HIV-1 diagnostic assays for pediatric patients and when choosing the timing of such assays include the age of the child, potential timing of infection of the child, whether the infection status of the child's mother is known or unknown, the antiretroviral exposure history of the mother and of the child, and characteristics of the virus. If the mother's HIV-1 serostatus is unknown, rapid HIV-1 antibody testing of the newborn infant to identify HIV-1 exposure is essential so that antiretroviral prophylaxis can be initiated within the first 12 hours of life if test results are positive. For HIV-1-exposed infants (identified by positive maternal test results or positive antibody results for the infant shortly after birth), it has been recommended that diagnostic testing with HIV-1 DNA or RNA assays be performed within the first 14 days of life, at 1 to 2 months of age, and at 3 to 6 months of age. If any of these test results are positive, repeat testing is recommended to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection. A diagnosis of HIV-1 infection can be made on the basis of 2 positive HIV-1 DNA or RNA assay results. In nonbreastfeeding children younger than 18 months with no positive HIV-1 virologic test results, presumptive exclusion of HIV-1 infection can be based on 2 negative virologic test results (1 obtained at > or = 2 weeks and 1 obtained at > or = 4 weeks of age); 1 negative virologic test result obtained at > or = 8 weeks of age; or 1 negative HIV-1 antibody test result obtained at > or = 6 months of age. Alternatively, presumptive exclusion of HIV-1 infection can be based on 1 positive HIV-1 virologic test with at least 2 subsequent negative virologic test results (at least 1 of which is performed at > or = 8 weeks of age) or negative HIV-1 antibody test results (at least 1 of which is performed at > or = 6 months of age). Definitive exclusion of HIV-1 infection is based on 2 negative virologic test results, 1 obtained at > or = 1 month of age and 1 obtained at > or = 4 months of age, or 2 negative HIV-1 antibody test results from separate specimens obtained at > or = 6 months of age. For both presumptive and definitive exclusion of infection, the child should have no other laboratory (eg, no positive virologic test results) or clinical (eg, no AIDS-defining conditions) evidence of HIV-1 infection. Many clinicians confirm the absence of HIV-1 infection with a negative HIV-1 antibody assay result at 12 to 18 months of age. For breastfeeding infants, a similar testing algorithm can be followed, with timing of testing starting from the date of complete cessation of breastfeeding instead of the date of birth.