Utility of Tracheobronchial Stents in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Central Airway Obstruction: Report of Three Patients and Literature Review

The utility of interventional pulmonary procedures in liberating patients with malignancy-associated central airway obstruction from mechanical ventilation

PURPOSE

Utilization of intensive care services by patients with malignancy has risen during the past several decades. Newer cancer therapies have improved overall survival and outcomes. Patients with respiratory failure from central airway obstruction related to tumor growth were previously viewed as inappropriate candidates for ventilator support. However, an increasing number of reports suggest that interventional pulmonary (IP) procedures may benefit such patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature for case reports or case series from the past 20 years regarding the use of IP procedures for the treatment of respiratory failure from malignancy-associated central airway obstruction.

RESULTS

As a whole, IP procedures were greater than 60 % successful in liberating patients from mechanical ventilation. Moreover, IP procedures served to palliate respiratory symptoms, prolong overall survival, allow for additional cancer treatments, and reduce hospitalization costs. Nevertheless, it remains unclear who may benefit the most from these procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Although data are limited, IP procedures are generally safe and should be considered for appropriate patients with respiratory failure from malignancy-associated central airway obstruction as a potential means of liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Stenting allows weaning and extubation in ventilator- or tracheostomy dependency secondary to benign airway disease

Central airway obstruction can cause severe respiratory insufficiency leading to mechanical ventilation (MV) or artificial airway (AA) dependency. Interventional bronchoscopic procedures have been reported to be of help in weaning patients with malignant airway stenoses from mechanical ventilation, whereas their use in benign disease is only anecdotal. The objectives of this study are to evaluate early, intermediate and long-term outcome of interventional bronchoscopy and stent placement in the treatment of MV/AA dependency due to benign airway obstruction. In a retrospective cohort analysis for the period 1999-2004, we evaluated 15 consecutive ICU patients with documented benign central airway obstruction, who were referred for bronchoscopic management of their condition after multiple failed attempts at weaning from MV or decannulation of the AA. Indications for bronchoscopic treatment were surgery refusal, medical or surgical inoperability, or absence of alternative treatment options. Malacia, post-intubation stenosis and goiter were the main causes of airway obstruction and MV/AA dependency. All patients were treated by means of rigid bronchoscopy, dilatation procedures and stent insertion. All but one patient (93.3%) were successfully and permanently extubated/decanulated immediately after the bronchoscopy. Minor complications occurred in 6 patients (40%) leading to a second intervention. All complications could be managed endoscopically and long-term follow up was uneventful. Interventional bronchoscopy with stent insertion can allow successful withdrawal from MV/AA and can offer longstanding airway patency in selected ventilator- or tracheostomy-dependant individuals with benign airway stenoses,when surgery in not feasable or contra-indicated.

Perioperative management for placement of tracheobronchial stents

Tracheobronchial stenting was performed under general anesthesia, with (six patients) or without (two patients) muscle relaxant, in eight patients suffering from carcinoma. All patients had presented preoperatively with dyspnea, exhibiting Hugh-Jones grade 4 or 5. Three patients had been mechanically ventilated before the procedure. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia with flexible bronchoscopic guidance. Stent placement was performed either through an orotracheal tube (four patients) or through a transtracheal tube (two patients) in those who had no upper tracheal stenosis, while it was performed through a laryngeal mask airway in two patients with upper tracheal stenosis. During the procedure, arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation (Sp(O(2)) decreased in all patients, despite fraction of inspired oxygen (FI(O(2)) being maintained at 1.0. Except for two patients, one of whom developed superior vena cava syndrome and one, tension pneumothorax after stent placement, there were no complications resulting from stent placement. Six patients were weaned from mechanical ventilation (0-24 days after the procedure). Two of the three patients who had been on mechanical ventilation preoperatively could not be weaned. Stent insertion is an effective treatment for tracheobronchial stenosis, but its indications in patients with malignancy who have been mechanically ventilated prior to stenting should further be evaluated.

Self-expandable metallic airway stents and flexible bronchoscopy: long-term outcomes analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

s: To report and analyze our 6-year experience with implanting 112 self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) using flexible bronchoscopy (FB).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study, tertiary-care hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The studied population consisted of 82 patients (mean age, 59.1 years; range, 37 to 83 years), who received SEMSs from 1995 to 2001 using Wallstent (Boston Scientific; Galway, Ireland) or Ultraflex (Boston Scientific) stents.

RESULTS

The indications for stent placement were airway obstruction caused by neoplasia (lung carcinoma [CA], n = 50), airway complications of lung transplantation (LTx) [n = 11], and miscellaneous benign conditions (BCs) [n = 21]. The most frequent clinical presentations for the airway obstruction were moderate-to-severe dyspnea (80%) and coughing (45%). The median follow-up duration for the CA group was 42.0 days (range, 1 to 672 days), 329.0 days (range, 35 to 1,540 days) for patients receiving LTx, and 336.0 days (range, 7 to 2,184 days) for the patients with miscellaneous BCs. The observed complications included infection (15.9%), obstructive granulomas (14.6%), and migration (4.7%). The incidence of granulomas was significantly lower in the patients with CA (4.0%) vs LTx and BC groups (17.3% and 33.3% respectively; p = 0.002). All other assessed variables showed no difference between the three analyzed groups. No cases of mucus plugging or fatal hemoptysis were observed. Forty-four patients (53.7%) had no complications related to the SEMS. The incidence of complications was not related to the type of stent (Wallstent or Ultraflex) or SEMS version (covered or uncovered). Fourteen of the 16 patients (87.5%) who were receiving mechanical ventilation could be weaned after the procedure. There were no deaths related to SEMS placement.

CONCLUSIONS

An SEMS is a safe and effective modality for malignant as well as selected benign airway obstruction. An SEMS is an acceptable therapeutic alternative in patients with central airway obstruction who are not considered good surgical candidates and are receiving mechanical ventilation. Careful patient selection is of outmost importance for a good outcome after airway stenting. Insertion using FB adds to the ease of the procedure.