Evidence-based Practice Needs Evidence-based Implementation:

Physical Therapy Management of Congenital Muscular Torticollis: A 2018 Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline From the APTA Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy

BACKGROUND

Congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) is a postural deformity evident shortly after birth, typically characterized by lateral flexion/side bending of the head to one side and cervical rotation/head turning to the opposite side due to unilateral shortening of the sternocleidomastoid muscle; it may be accompanied by other neurological or musculoskeletal conditions. Infants with CMT should be referred to physical therapists to treat these postural asymmetries as soon as they are identified.

PURPOSE

This update of the 2013 CMT clinical practice guideline (CPG) informs clinicians and families as to whom to monitor, treat, and/or refer and when and what to treat. It links 17 action statements with explicit levels of critically appraised evidence and expert opinion with recommendations on implementation of the CMT CPG into practice.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

The CPG addresses the following: education for prevention; referral; screening; examination and evaluation; prognosis; first-choice and supplemental interventions; consultation; discontinuation from direct intervention; reassessment and discharge; implementation and compliance audits; and research recommendations. Flow sheets for referral paths and classification of CMT severity have been updated.

Physical therapy management of congenital muscular torticollis: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline: from the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association

BACKGROUND

Congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) is an idiopathic postural deformity evident shortly after birth, typically characterized by lateral flexion of the head to one side and cervical rotation to the opposite side due to unilateral shortening of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. CMT may be accompanied by other neurological or musculoskeletal conditions.

KEY POINTS

Infants with CMT are frequently referred to physical therapists (PTs) to treat their asymmetries. This evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) provides guidance on which infants should be monitored, treated, and/or referred, and when and what PTs should treat. Based upon critical appraisal of literature and expert opinion, 16 action statements for screening, examination, intervention, and follow-up are linked with explicit levels of evidence. The CPG addresses referral, screening, examination and evaluation, prognosis, first-choice and supplemental interventions, consultation, discharge, follow-up, suggestions for implementation and compliance audits, flow sheets for referral paths and classification of CMT severity, and research recommendations.

An Evidence-Based Approach to Case Management Model Selection for an Acute Care Facility

PURPOSE OF STUDY

This research seeks to determine whether there is adequate evidence-based justification for selection of one acute care case management model over another.

PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING(S)

Acute Inpatient Hospital.

METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE

This article presents a systematic review of published case management literature, resulting in classification specific to terms of level of evidence.

CONCLUSION

This review examines the best available evidence in an effort to select an acute care case management model. Although no single case management model can be identified as preferred, it is clear that adequate evidence-based literature exists to acknowledge key factors driving the acute care model and to form a foundation for the efficacy of hospital case management practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

Although no single case management model can be identified as preferred, this systematic review demonstrates that adequate evidence-based literature exists to acknowledge key factors driving the acute care model and forming a foundation for the efficacy of hospital case management practice. Distinctive aspects of case management frameworks can be used to guide the development of an acute care case management model. The study illustrates: * The effectiveness of case management when there is direct patient contact by the case manager regardless of disease condition: not only does the quality of care increase but also length of stay (LOS) decreases, care is defragmented, and both patient and physician satisfaction can increase. * The preferred case management models result in measurable outcomes that can directly relate to, and demonstrate alignment with, organizational strategy. * Acute care management programs reduce cost and LOS, and improve outcomes. * An integrated case management program that includes social workers, as well as nursing, is the most effective acute care management model. * The successful case management model will recognize physicians, as well as patients, as valued customers with whom partnership can positively affect financial outcomes in terms of reduction in LOS, improvement in quality, and delivery of care.

An interdisciplinary, evidence-based process of clinical pathway implementation increases pathway usage

Clinical pathways have been implemented in many healthcare settings as a link between evidence and practice. Most published research concludes that when clinical pathways are implemented and used by health professionals, there is a positive impact on health outcomes. However, some research also suggests that utilization of clinical pathways by health professionals is low and that implementation strategies for linking evidence with clinical practice often prove to be weak or ineffective. This paper describes a before and after study to determine whether an interdisciplinary, genuinely collaborative, and evidence-based process of clinical pathway implementation resulted in increased documented use of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) clinical pathway by health professionals in a regional Australian hospital. Underpinning the design and implementation process was the belief that true team involvement would lead to ownership, acceptance, and, ultimately, to increased usage of the pathway. Documented clinical pathway usage was measured in two ways: (1) the presence of the AMI clinical pathway in the medical records of patients diagnosed with an AMI and (2) the proportion of the AMI clinical pathway completed when it was present in the medical record. A total of 195 medical records of those diagnosed with an AMI were audited before (n = 124) and after (n = 71) the implementation process. The interdisciplinary, truly collaborative, and evidence-based implementation process resulted in a statistically significant increase in documented usage of the AMI pathway (22.6% vs. 57.7%; p <.000). Results indicate that involvement of key users in the design and implementation of a clinical pathway significantly increases staff utilization of the document.