Is it Possible to Resterilize Disposable Laparoscopy Trocars in a Hospital Setting?

Structural damage and chemical contaminants on reprocessed arthroscopic shaver blades

BACKGROUND

In response to socioeconomic pressure to cut budgets in medicine, single-use surgical instruments are often reprocessed despite potential biological hazard.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quality and contaminants of reprocessed shaver blades.

HYPOTHESIS

Reprocessed shaver blades have mechanical damage and chemical contamination.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Seven blades and 3 abraders were reprocessed 1 time or 3 times and then were assessed. In the first part of the study, structural damage on the blades after 3 reprocessings was compared to that after 1 reprocessing using optical microscopy. In the second part, surface damage was observed using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy; elemental and chemical analyses of contaminants found by the microscopy were performed using scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, scanning Auger microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Optical microscopic examination revealed abrasion on the surface of the inner blade and cracks on the inner tube after 1 reprocessing. These changes were more evident after 3 reprocessings. Scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy of the inner cutter of the blade reprocessed once showed contaminants containing calcium, carbon, oxygen, and silicon, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy demonstrated biological protein consisting mainly of collagen, some type of salts, and polycarbonate used in plastic molding. Scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy of the inner cutter of the reprocessed abrader revealed contaminants containing carbon, calcium, phosphorous, and oxygen, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed H2O, hydroxyapatite, and hydroxyl proteins. Scanning Auger microscopy showed that the tin-nickel plating on the moving blade and abrader was missing in some locations.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate both mechanical damage and chemical contaminants containing collagen, hydroxyapatite, and salts on the reprocessed arthroscopic shaver blades.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons should keep in mind that mechanical damage and chemical contamination are found on reprocessed arthroscopic blades.

Assessment of reprocessed arthroscopic shaver blades

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of contaminants on, as well as the quality of, reprocessed shaver blades.

METHODS

We assessed 7 new shaver blades and 27 shaver blades that had been reprocessed with mechanical cleaning, functional testing, and sterilization with ethylene oxide. A spectrophotometer measured the amount of nucleic acid and protein. The blade quality was assessed by photographing the blades with magnification and determining the percentage of damage present on each blade. A subset of shaver blades were then used to cut meniscal tissue, and the cut surface was measured for smoothness by image processing and automated laser scanning cytometry. In evaluation of the meniscus, for the subset of shavers, an image processing value of 1 indicates a smooth, straight line, and values lower than 1 reflect deviations in the cut surface (the closer the value is to 1, the smoother the surface). Laser scanning cytometry values indicate the percentage of irregularities in the cut surface (the lower the value is, the smoother the surface).

RESULTS

Of the 27 reprocessed shaver blades, 13 (48%) had detectable levels of protein and 17 (63%) had detectable levels of nucleic acid. On the reprocessed shaver blades, protein levels ranged from 2.43 microg to 60 microg and nucleic acid levels ranged from 0.40 microg to 3.5 microg. No new shaver blade had contaminants. Twenty reprocessed shaver blades had been manufactured with teeth and could be evaluated for visible damage. Of these, 10 had 1% to 25% damage, 5 had 26% to 50% damage, 3 had 51% to 75% damage, and 2 had 76% to 100% damage. The new blades had no visible damage. Image processing revealed smoothness of the surface cut with new shaver blades, yielding values of 1 +/- 0.12, whereas the values for reprocessed shaver blades ranged from 0.62 +/- 0.02 to 1 +/- 0.07. Laser scanning cytometry values ranged from 3.3% to 7.1% for the new blades as compared with 5.8% to 20.0% for the reprocessed blades.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the reprocessed shaver blades, 48% had detectable levels of protein and 63% had detectable levels of nucleic acid. All of the reprocessed blades visually evaluated showed some level of damage or wear, whereas no new blade had such damage. In addition, menisci cut with reprocessed shavers showed rougher edges than did menisci cut with new shavers.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To make an informed decision regarding the use of reprocessed shaver blades, surgeons will want to know the level of contamination on, and the quality of, reprocessed shaver blades.