Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature

The Surgical Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts: A Narrative Review

Pancreatic pseudocysts, commonly arising as a complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis, present a significant clinical challenge. This narrative review explores the surgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts, emphasizing advancements, techniques, and outcomes. We examine the indications for surgical intervention, including symptomatic pseudocysts, complications such as infection or hemorrhage, and pseudocysts resistant to conservative treatment. Various surgical approaches are discussed, including open surgery, laparoscopic techniques, and endoscopic interventions. The review highlights the evolution of surgical strategies, from traditional cystogastrostomy to minimally invasive methods, and assesses their efficacy and safety. Additionally, we address patient selection criteria, preoperative assessment, and postoperative care. By synthesizing current evidence and clinical experiences, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the best practices in the surgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts, offering valuable insights for clinicians in optimizing patient outcomes.

Pancreatic pseudocyst: The past, the present, and the future

A pancreatic pseudocyst is defined as an encapsulated fluid collection with a well-defined inflammatory wall with minimal or no necrosis. The diagnosis cannot be made prior to 4 wk after the onset of pancreatitis. The clinical presentation is often nonspecific, with abdominal pain being the most common symptom. If a diagnosis is suspected, contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging are performed to confirm the diagnosis and assess the characteristics of the pseudocyst. Endoscopic ultrasound with cyst fluid analysis can be performed in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Pseudocyst of the pancreas can lead to complications such as hemorrhage, infection, and rupture. The management of pancreatic pseudocysts depends on the presence of symptoms and the development of complications, such as biliary or gastric outlet obstruction. Management options include endoscopic or surgical drainage. The aim of this review was to summarize the current literature on pancreatic pseudocysts and discuss the evolution of the definitions, diagnosis, and management of this condition.

Spontaneous Rupture and Hemorrhage of WON: A Case Report

Background

Pancreatic pseudocysts are characterized by the leakage of pancreatic juice caused by various reasons, which leads to pancreatic juice accumulates around the pancreas, and stimulates the greater omentum and other tissues to form an area of fibrotic loculated effusion with an integrated capsule. Approximately, one-third of patients experienced recurrent pancreatic juice leakage, compression symptoms, infection, and bleeding, which requires surgical intervention, but spontaneous rupture cases are extremely rare.

Case presentation

We here present the case of 40-year-old male who presented with abdominal pain and vomiting for two days and 10 h, respectively. He had a history of chronic pancreatitis and pseudocysts. The symptoms of abdominal pain worsened in the second day. Laboratory tests showed a progressive decrease in hemoglobin. Then, emergency pancreatoduodenectomy was performed. Intraoperative exploration found a small blood clot in the abdominal cavity and a hematoma that had formed in the intestinal cavity and retroperitoneum.

Conclusion

This case showed that pseudocysts of the pancreas can rupture under certain circumstances, leading to intraperitoneal bleeding and hematoma formation, which can endanger the life of the patient. And surgical treatment can be the first choice for hemorrhagic pseudocysts.

Laparoscopic Intervention to Pancreatic Pseudocyst Confers Short-Term Benefits: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Surgical interventions for pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) are traditionally managed by an open surgical approach. With the development of minimally invasive surgical techniques, a laparoscopic surgical approach for PPs has been conducted increasingly with comparable outcomes. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical intervention for PPs between the laparoscopic approach and the open approach.

Methods

Databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched to identify studies that compared the safety and efficacy of surgical intervention for PPs between the laparoscopic approach and the open approach (until Aug 1st 2020).

Results

A total of 6 studies were eligible in qualitative synthesis. The laparoscopic approach was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (MD = -69.97; 95% CI: -95.14 to -44.70, P < 0.00001; P=0.86 for heterogeneity) and shorter operating time (MD = -33.12; 95% CI: -62.24 to -4.00, P=0.03; P < 0.00001 for heterogeneity). There was no significant difference found between the two approaches regarding the success rate and the recurrence rate. The postoperative complications and mortality rates were comparable between the two approaches.

Conclusions

The laparoscopic approach for the surgical intervention of PPs is safe and efficacious with shorter-term benefits.

Laparoscopic loop cystojejunostomy: An alternative to Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst

Surgical internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst can be done into the stomach, duodenum or jejunum depending on the anatomic relation of pseudocyst with hollow viscera. For cystojejunostomy, a Roux-en-Y loop is preferred over loop cystojejunostomy as former is thought to avoid the reflux of jejunal contents into the cyst cavity. This study presents our experience with laparoscopic loop cystojejunostomy showing loop cystojejunostomy for the pseudocyst of the pancreas can be safely performed laparoscopically with simpler technique with no complications including reflux.

Comparison of percutaneous vs endoscopic drainage in the management of pancreatic fluid collections: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Currently, endoscopic drainage (ED) and percutaneous drainage (PD) are both widely used effective interventions in the management of patients with symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of ED to those of PD in the treatment of PFCs.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of PFC patients who underwent ED or PD was conducted between January 2009 and December 2017. In this study, the initial success rate, adverse events, intervention, requirement of surgical treatment, hospital mortality within 30 days, length of hospital stay, and expenses during hospitalization were monitored, and a follow-up investigation of treatment outcome was conducted. Long-term recovery, recurrence, and mortality were determined according to telephone follow up.

RESULTS

In total, 129 patients were included in the study; 62 patients underwent ED, and 67 patients underwent PD during the 8-year study period. Initial treatment success was considerably higher in patients whose PFCs were managed by ED than in patients whose PFCs were managed by PD (94.9% vs 65.0%, P = 0.003). The rate of procedural adverse events, reintervention, length of hospitalization, and expense were all higher in the PD group than in the ED group, but the long-term recovery rate and requirement of surgical intervention were not clearly different between patients who underwent the two treatment measures.

CONCLUSION

ED of symptomatic PFCs was associated with higher rates of initial treatment success, lower rates of reintervention and adverse events, and a shorter hospital stay than PD of symptomatic PFCs.

Outcomes following laparoscopic internal drainage of walled off necrosis of pancreas: experience of 134 cases from a tertiary care centre

INTRODUCTION

Internal drainage of walled of necrosis of pancreas has been considered as the standard of care. For symptomatic walled off necrosis (WON) of pancreas with the advent of laparoscopy and refinement of techniques and instrumentation, laparoscopic internal drainage is becoming the standard surgical drainage procedure for these patients. However, there is a dearth of literature regarding outcomes following laparoscopic drainage. Most of the studies have small number of patients with limited follow-up. We in this study describe our experience of laparoscopic internal drainage of walled off necrosis over the last 13 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients with WON undergoing laparoscopic internal drainage between January 2005 and December 2018 were included. Primary outcome measure was successful drainage. Secondary outcome measures included morbidity, hospital stay, re-intervention rate and mortality. Patients were followed up post-operatively at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months and then annually thereafter. Ultrasonography was done periodically for the assessment of cyst resolution.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2018, 154 surgical drainage procedures were performed for symptomatic pseudocyst/walled off necrosis. Out of these, 134 underwent laparoscopic drainage; 129 patients (96.3%) underwent laparoscopic cystogastrostomy and 5 (3.7%) underwent laparoscopic cystojejunostomy. Majority of the patients were male (male:female = 6:1) with a mean age of 36 ± 12.9 years (range 15-58 years). The mean operative time was 94 min (range 64-144 min). There were three conversions because of intra-operative bleeding. The overall post-operative morbidity was 8.9%. The average hospital stay was 4.4 days (2-19 days). The mean duration of follow-up was 5.5 years (range 6 months-13 years). Complete cyst resolution was achieved in 95.5% (n = 128) patients. There has been no mortality till date.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, laparoscopic internal drainage is a very effective technique for drainage of WON with an excellent success rate.

Review of management options for pancreatic pseudocysts

Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) present a challenging problem for physicians dealing with pancreatic disorders. Their management demands the co-operation of surgeons, radiologists and gastroenterologists. Historically, they have been treated either conservatively or surgically, with acceptable rates of complications and recurrence. However, recent advances in radiology and endoscopy, have leaded physicians to implement percutaneous and endoscopic drainage (ED) into their treatment algorithms. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery, with its advantages, has become an attractive alternative choice when surgical drainage (SD) is required. The aim of this review is to summarize the main diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the management of pseudocysts and to present the main studies that compare the three different types of pseudocyst drainage.

Pancreatic Pseudocyst Dilemma: Cumulative Multicenter Experience in Management Using Endoscopy, Laparoscopy, and Open Surgery

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) is the commonest cystic lesion of the pancreas. Internal drainage of PPs can be accomplished by traditional open or recently by minimally invasive laparoscopic or endoscopic approaches. We aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes after endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open drainage.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients with PP underwent endoscopic (n = 35), laparoscopic (n = 4), and open surgical drainage (n = 32). The primary outcome was the success rate. The secondary outcomes were the estimated blood loss, operative time, opioid requirement, morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, and recurrence rate.

RESULTS

The primary success rate was significantly higher for laparoscopic and open groups than for the endoscopic group, but the overall success rate was equivalent across the groups. There were no significant differences in the morbidity, mortality, requirement of blood transfusion, reinterventions, and recurrence rate between the groups. Endoscopic drainage revealed significantly lower blood loss, operative time, opioid requirement, and hospital stay in comparison to open and laparoscopic drainage.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive therapeutic techniques, whether endoscopic or laparoscopic for treatment of PP could be considered valuable, competitive, and promising alternatives for open surgery. Moreover, it is less invasive with less hospitalization and rapid return to work.

Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts

This article aims to elucidate the classification of and optimal treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts. Various approaches, including endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, and open surgery, have been employed for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. However, no scientific classification of pancreatic pseudocysts has been devised, which could assist in the selection of optimal therapy. We evaluated the treatment modalities used in 893 patients diagnosed with pancreatic pseudocysts according to the revision of the Atlanta classification in our department between 2001 and 2010. All the pancreatic pseudocysts have course of disease >4 weeks and have mature cysts wall detected by computed tomography or transabdominal ultrasonography. Endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, or open surgery was selected on the basis of the pseudocyst characteristics. Clinical data and patient outcomes were reviewed. Among the 893 patients, 13 (1.5%) had percutaneous drainage. Eighty-three (9%) had type I pancreatic pseudocysts and were treated with observation. Ten patients (1%) had type II pseudocysts and underwent the Whipple procedure or resection of the pancreatic body and tail. Forty-six patients (5.2%) had type III pseudocysts: 44 (4.9%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 2 (0.2%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Five hundred six patients (56.7%) had type IV pseudocysts: 297 (33.3%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 209 (23.4%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Finally, 235 patients (26.3%) had type V pseudocysts: 36 (4%) underwent distal pancreatectomy or splenectomy and 199 (22.3%) underwent endoscopic drainage. A new classification system was devised, based on the size, anatomical location, and clinical manifestations of the pancreatic pseudocyst along with the relationship between the pseudocyst and the pancreatic duct. Different therapeutic strategies could be considered based on this classification. When clinically feasible, endoscopic drainage should be considered the optimal management strategy for pancreatic pseudocysts.

Endoscopic therapy in chronic pancreatitis: current perspectives

Endoscopic therapy in chronic pancreatitis (CP) aims to provide pain relief and to treat local complications, by using the decompression of the pancreatic duct and the drainage of pseudocysts and biliary strictures, respectively. This is the reason for using it as first-line therapy for painful uncomplicated CP. The clinical response has to be evaluated at 6-8 weeks, when surgery may be chosen. This article reviews the main possibilities of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) therapies. Endotherapy for pancreatic ductal stones uses ultrasound wave lithotripsy and sometimes additional stone extractions. The treatment of pancreatic duct strictures consists of a single large stenting for 1 year. If the stricture persists, simultaneous multiple stents are applied. In case of unsuccessful ERCP, the EUS-guided drainage of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) or a rendezvous technique can solve the ductal strictures. EUS-guided celiac plexus block has limited efficiency in CP. The drainage of symptomatic or complicated pancreatic pseudocysts can be performed transpapillarily or transgastrically/transduodenally, preferably by EUS guidance. When the biliary stricture is symptomatic or progressive, multiple plastic stents are indicated. In conclusion, as in many fields of symptomatic treatment, endoscopy remains the first choice, either by using ERCP or EUS-guided procedures, after consideration of a multidisciplinary team with endoscopists, surgeons, and radiologists. However, what is crucial is establishing the right timing for surgery.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Infected Pancreatic Pseudocysts

The standard endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) approach of cystogastrostomy involves the use of series of plastic pigtail stents that are placed through the wall of the cyst. The use of a single stent has also been described in the literature. Here we describe five cases of EUS-guided cystogastrostomy with irrigation of infected pancreatic pseudocysts using a single self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). To our knowledge this has not been described in the literature in the United States. This novice approach will have significant implications in the management of infected pseudocysts with a lower morbidity, mortality and overall cost compared to conventional management such as surgery or percutaneous drainage.

Laparoscopic versus open cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts: a case-matched comparative study

BACKGROUND

Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available.

Imaging of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Part 2: complications of acute pancreatitis

The Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis was introduced in 1992 and divides patients into mild and severe groups based on clinical and biochemical criteria. Recently, the terminology and classification scheme proposed at the initial Atlanta Symposium have been reviewed and a new consensus statement has been proposed by the Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Major changes include subdividing acute fluid collections into "acute peripancreatic fluid collection" and "acute post-necrotic pancreatic/peripancreatic fluid collection (acute necrotic collection)" based on the presence of necrotic debris. Delayed fluid collections have been similarly subdivided into "pseudocyst" and "walled of pancreatic necrosis". Appropriate use of the new terms describing the fluid collections is important for management decision-making in patients with acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this review article is to present an overview of complications of the acute pancreatitis with emphasis on their prognostic significance and impact on clinical management and to clarify confusing terminology for pancreatic fluid collections.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage is an effective and relatively safe treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections in a cohort of 108 symptomatic patients

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic drainage [i.e. conventional, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-assisted, or EUS-guided] is an accepted treatment modality for symptomatic peripancreatic fluid collections (PFC), but data on the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage performed in a large patient cohort are not widely available. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical success and complication rate of EUS-guided drainage of PFCs and to identify prognostic factors for complications and recurrence of PFCs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out of consecutive patients undergoing EUS-guided drainage of a symptomatic PFC in the period 2004-2011. Technical success was defined as the ability to enter and drain a PFC by the placement of one or more double-pigtail stents, whereas clinical success was defined as complete resolution of a PFC on follow-up computed tomography.

RESULTS

In total, 108 patients [56% men, mean age 55 (SD 14) years], underwent EUS-guided drainage of a symptomatic PFC. The procedure was technically successful in 105/108 (97%) patients and a median of 2 (range 1-3) pigtail stents were placed. Clinical success was observed in 87/104 (84%) patients after a median follow-up of 53 (interquartile range 21-130) weeks, whereas PFC recurrence was noted in 15/83 (18%) patients. Complications occurred in 21/105 (20%) patients and procedure-related mortality was not observed. Prognostic factors for complications and recurrence of PFCs could not be identified.

CONCLUSION

EUS-guided drainage of PFCs is effective in the majority of patients. Although the complication rate of the procedure is not negligible (20%), they could be managed in almost all patients by conservative and/or endoscopic means and did not result in mortality.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pseudocyst drainage as a one-step procedure using a novel multiple-wire insertion technique (with video)

BACKGROUND

The EUS 2008 working group considered the development of equipment and methods to minimize the need for exchanging accessories and to facilitate insertion of multiple transmural stents during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pseudocyst drainage as an important advance for therapeutic EUS. The authors aimed to describe their experience with EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage using a novel multiple-wire insertion technique facilitated by the double-lumen biliary cytology brush catheter.

METHODS

The study enrolled 10 symptomatic patients undergoing EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage. The EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage was performed as a one-step procedure using graded catheter and balloon dilation of the cystgastrostomy tract and a novel multiple-wire insertion technique facilitated by a modified double-lumen biliary cytology brush catheter. The main outcome measured was technical success.

RESULTS

In this study, 10 patients with 11 pseudocysts underwent a EUS-guided pseudocyst using the novel multiple-wire insertion technique. Technical success, defined as successful achievement of access and drainage of pseudocysts, was achieved in all cases (100 %) with no procedural complications. Clinical success was achieved in all cases with complete resolution of pseudocysts.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel method of using a modified double-lumen biliary cytology brush catheter allows for a simple and safe one-step EUS-guided drainage of pseudocysts.

Endoscopic transmural drainage of pseudocysts associated with pancreatic resections or pancreatitis: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopy has been regarded as an effective modality for draining pancreatic collections, pseudocysts, and abscesses. This study analyzes our experience with endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and compares the outcomes in patients with postsurgical and pancreatitis-associated ones.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst from January 1999 through June 2008 were included in this retrospective analysis. The specific indication for attempting the procedure was the presence of direct contact between the pseudocyst and the gastric wall. All the drainages were carried out via a transgastric approach, and one or two straight plastic stents (10 or 11.5 French) were positioned. A comparative analysis of short- and long-term results was made between patients with postoperative pseudocysts (group A) and patients with pancreatitis-associated pseudocysts (group B).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 25 in group A and 30 in group B. Overall, a single stent was inserted in 84.0% of patients, while two stents were needed in the remaining 16.0%. The technical success rate was 78.2%, whereas procedure-related complications were 16.4%. Complications included pseudocyst superinfection and major bleeding and were managed mainly by surgery. Mortality rate was 1.8% (1 patient). There were no significant differences in the technical success rate and procedure-related complications between the two groups (p=0.532 and 0.159, respectively) Recurrences were 13.9% and significantly more common in group B (p=0.021). In such cases, a second endoscopic drainage was successfully performed.

CONCLUSION

Transmural endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts is feasible and has a technical success rate of 78.2%, without differences related to the pseudocyst etiology. Recurrences, on the other hand, are more common in patients with pancreatitis. Given the severe complications that may occur after the procedure, we recommend that endoscopic drainage be performed in a tertiary-care center with specific expertise in pancreatic surgery.

Percutaneous treatment for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts: Long-term results in a single center

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to present and evaluate the long-term results of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts (PPC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 128 patients with 140 PPC treated by PCD from 01/01/1989 to 12/31/2008. All procedures were performed under ultrasound control. Surgical treatment was planned only in patients with failed PCD. The patients were followed up monthly with sonography for 12 months. The primary outcome was conversion rate to surgery. Secondary outcomes were disappearance of PPC, requirement for additional treatment, length of hospital stay, and catheter dwell time.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 42 of the 140 cysts (30%) recurred. 19/42 cysts were small and they were followed up without intervention and 23/42 cysts required further intervention. These patients were offered a second attempt but 5 patients declined it and they chose to undergo surgery. The remaining 18 patients underwent second PCD and 10 of them developed recurrence. All of them underwent third PCD and 6 of the 10 patients developed recurrences. Four and 2 of them necessitated surgery and follow-up, respectively. In total, 9 of the 128 patients (7%) underwent surgery during the study period. Medians (interquartile ranges) of hospital stay and catheter dwell time were 19 (14-23) and 23 (15-43) days, respectively. There were no complications related to the procedure.

CONCLUSION

PCD is a safe and effective management for PPC, with low recurrence rates and complication rate and it can eliminate the need for surgery in majority of patients with PPC.

Hand-sewn cystogastrostomy using the novel single-incision laparoscopy with flexible-tip laparoscope

Laparoscopy performed through a single incision has been increasingly reported as a novel technique implemented in a wide variety of surgical procedures. We report what we believe to be the first case of cystogastrostomy for treatment of a pancreatic pseudocyst using this technique. Patient developed pancreatic pseudocyst after severe biliary pancreatitis. The cyst was noted to increase in size on follow-up computed tomography scans. In addition, patient developed symptoms requiring intervention.

Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis: Where are we now?

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is well suited for assessment of the pancreas due to its high resolution and the proximity of the transducer to the pancreas, avoiding air in the gut. Evaluation of chronic pancreatitis (CP) was an early target for EUS, initially just for diagnosis but later for therapeutic purposes. The diagnosis of CP is still accomplished using the standard scoring based on nine criteria, all considered to be of equal value. For diagnosis of any CP, at least three or four criteria must be fulfilled, but for diagnosis of severe CP at least six criteria are necessary. The Rosemont classification, more restrictive, aims to standardize the criteria and assigns different values to different features, but requires further validation. EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is less advisable for diagnosis of diffuse CP due to its potential side effects. Elastography and contrast-enhanced EUS are orientation in differentiating a focal pancreatic mass in a parenchyma with features of CP, but they cannot replace EUS-FNA. The usefulness of EUS-guided celiac block for painful CP is still being debated with regard to the best technique and the indications. EUS-guided drainage of pseudocysts is preferred in non-bulging pseudocysts or in the presence of portal hypertension. EUS-guided drainage of the main pancreatic duct should be reserved for cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed owing to difficult cannulation of the papilla or difficult endotherapy. It should be performed only by highly skilled endoscopists, due to the high rate of complications.

Open cystogastrostomy, retroperitoneal drainage, and G-J enteral tube for complex pancreatitis-associated pseudocyst: 19 patients with no recurrence

INTRODUCTION

Various techniques have been described to achieve definitive resolution of complex acute pancreatitis associated pseudocysts (PACs). Many of these strategies, inclusive of open, minimally invasive, and radiological procedures, are hampered by high recurrence or failed resolution, particularly for PAC near the pancreatic head. The present series describes a multimodal strategy combining a minilaparotomy for anterior gastrostomy for the creation of a stapled posterior cystogastrostomy, placement of an 8F secured silastic tube for intentional formation of a cystogastric fistula tract in combination with gastric drainage, and postduodenal enteral alimentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database, patients with complex PAC undergoing the above procedures were identified. PAC location, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and time to start enteral feeding were identified. PAC were assessed by computed tomography (CT) scan prior to operation, 1 month after drainage, and patients with PAC resolution were started on oral diet, with the fistula silastic tube kept in place for an additional month.

RESULTS

Over the interval 2003 to 2008, 19 patients were managed with the stated strategy. PACs were located at the pancreatic body/tail in 12 patients, and 7 patients had PAC at the level of the pancreatic head/neck area. In this cohort, prior to surgical drainage, 17/19 patients had undergone failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with decompressive stent placement and 13/19 had a failed percutaneous PAC drainage. There was no perioperative mortality after open surgical drainage. All patients started on jejunal tube feeding 24 h after surgical procedure. Median postoperative LOS was 7 days (4-13). At 1 month, 16/19 (84%) of patients showed complete resolution of the PAC on CT scan and were started on oral diet; 3/19 required additional month for complete resolution. After a mean follow-up of 31 months, there was no PAC recurrences in any of these patients demonstrated on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The described strategy is safe, efficient, and allows early restoration of enteral feeding with early hospital discharge. High resolution rates and absence of PAC recurrences in this series supports this approach for complex PAC.

Pseudocyst management: endoscopic drainage and other emerging techniques

Pseudocyst formation is a well known complication of pancreatitis. Not all pancreatic pseudocysts require intervention. Selected patients who are asymptomatic can be subject to expectant management. Spontaneous resolution has been shown to occur in 40% to 50% of patients with no serious complications occurring during the observation period. Intervention is warranted if the patient is symptomatic, there is a progressive increase in size or if the pseudocyst is infected. Surgery was the only available treatment for pseudocysts for a long time. Of late other modalities like percutaneous, endoscopic, and laparoscopic drainage have come to be seen as viable alternatives.

Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a methodological approach

BACKGROUND

This paper describes our tailored and methodological approach to laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) based on an anatomical classification.

METHODS

We adopted the laparoscopic approach in "all comers" who had PPs requiring surgical drainage. The recipient organ for drainage (e.g., cystgastrostomy, cystjejunostomy, or cystduodenostomy) and method of access (e.g., transgastric, endogastric, exogastric or lesser sac, and infracolic) were decided based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative findings. The results shown represent median (range).

RESULTS

Between 2001 and 2009, 30 laparoscopic drainage procedures for PPs were performed in 28 consecutive patients. The surgical approach included transgastric (n = 17) or endogastric (n = 3) cystgastrostomy for large retrogastric PPs (n = 20), exogastric cystgastrostomy for small perigastric PPs (n = 4), cystduodenostomy (n = 1) under ultrasound guidance, cystjejunostomy for infracolic PPs (n = 4), and one external drainage. The operative time was 118 (25-300) min. There was one conversion to laparotomy (3.3%), low morbidity (3.3%), and no mortality. The postoperative hospital stay was 2 (1-7) days. At a follow-up of 15 (1-48) months, PPs recurred in two patients (7.1%) and were drained by laparoscopic cystgastrostomy.

CONCLUSION

CT findings and laparoscopic exploration demonstrate the anatomical characteristics of PPs and enable successful planning and execution of their laparoscopic drainage.

Gastric necrosis and perforation as a severe complication of pancreatic pseudocyst

Patients with acute pancreatitis may present with stress-related gastrointestinal mucosal lesions. But severe gastrointestinal complications such as gastric perforation are very rare. Here, we report a 40-year-old man who was admitted due to acute pancreatitis and pseudocyst formation. During hospitalization, panendoscopic examination found multiple scattered stress ulcers over the gastric antrum and a large ulcerative area with suspicious malignant features at the body and fundus. The patient received surgical intervention due to worsening of his clinical condition. Postoperative findings showed a perforation of the gastric wall at the region in contact with the pseudocyst, and microscopic examination found diffuse ischemia and necrosis with intravascular thrombus and emboli in gastric vessels. We suggest keeping in mind that pancreatic pseudocyst may cause serious gastrointestinal complications including massive necrosis and perforation of the gastric wall.

Role of endosonography in drainage of fluid collections and other NOTES procedures

Endosonography (EUS) has become the accepted procedure for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in the past decade. EUS was shown to be safe and effective and it has been the first-line therapy for uncomplicated pseudocysts. Where walled-off pancreatic necrosis was originally thought to be a contraindication for endoscopic treatment, multiple case series have now shown that these fluid collections also can be treated endoscopically with low morbidity and mortality. Analogous to the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections, others, such as abscesses in the lower and upper abdomen, have also been treated successfully, although there is limited literature in this regard, EUS appears to be a useful technique in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures as well.

Pancreatic pseudocysts: observation, endoscopic drainage, or resection?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic pseudocysts are a common complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis. They are diagnosed with imaging studies and can be treated successfully with a variety of methods: endoscopic transpapillary or transmural drainage, percutaneous catheter drainage, laparoscopic surgery, or open pseudocystoenterostomy.

METHODS

Relevant publications that appeared from 1975 to 2008 were retrieved from the MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE databases for this review.

RESULTS

Endoscopic pseudocyst drainage has a high success rate (79.2%) and a low complication rate (12.9%). Percutaneous drainage is mainly used for the emergency treatment of infected pancreatic pseudocysts. Open internal drainage and pseudocyst resection are surgical techniques with high success rates (>92%), but also higher morbidity (16%) and mortality (2.5%) than endoscopic treatment (mortality 0.7%). Laparoscopic pseudocystoenterostomy, a recently introduced procedure, is probably similar to the endoscopic techniques with regard to morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

An interdisciplinary approach is best suited for the safe and effective stage-specific treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. The different interventional techniques that are currently available have yet to be compared directly in randomized trials.

Endoscopic drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy in the management of symptomatic pancreatic collections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of endoscopic drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy in the management of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collection.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with symptomatic pancreatic fluid collection referred for endoscopic drainage were captured prospectively and analyzed. Pancreatic duct disruption was treated with stenting. Endosonography-guided transmural drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy were performed when indicated.

RESULTS

Fifteen consecutive patients (mean age 53.7 years; range 23-82 years) underwent endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections (pseudocysts: six; abscesses: six; infected walled-off necrosis: three). Pancreatic duct fistulas were present in 13 patients. The drainage techniques used were: (i) transpapillary drainage; five; (ii) transmural drainage; two (these two patients had no pancreatic duct fistulas); and (iii) combined transpapillary and transmural drainage; eight. An additional transgastric endoscopic necrosectomy was performed in five patients. The endoscopic treatment was successful in all cases. The only complication was asymptomatic pneumo-peritoneum that occurred in one patient. Combined transpapillary and transmural drainage led to the faster resolution of the fluid collection compared to transpapillary drainage (75.6 vs 147 days, P = 0.03). No recurrence occurred over a mean follow up of 486 days.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy are safe and effective techniques for the treatment of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collection.

Laparoscopic intragastric stapled cystgastrostomy of pancreatic pseudocyst in a child

The current management for pancreatic pseudocysts in children is predicated on adult techniques and includes open, endoscopic, percutaneous, and laparoscopic drainage. In this paper, we report our technique using two intragastric cannulas for the creation of a laparoscopic stapled pancreatic cystgastrostomy.

Minimally invasive and standard surgical therapy for complications of pancreatitis and for benign tumors of the pancreas and duodenal papilla

The treatment of severe pancreatitis and its complications is rapidly evolving because of increasing clinical application of effective, minimally invasive techniques. With ongoing innovations in therapeutic endoscopy, image-guided percutaneous techniques, and minimally invasive surgery, the long-standing traditional management algorithms have recently changed. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the treatment of complicated inflammatory diseases of the pancreas and benign periampullary tumors. Surgeons, gastroenterologists, and therapeutic radiologists combine expertise as members of a team to offer their patients improved outcomes and faster recovery.

Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis

Pancreatic pseudocysts are a well-known complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis, with a higher incidence in the latter. Diagnosis is accomplished most often by computed tomographic scanning, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or by ultrasound, and a rapid progress in the improvement of diagnostic tools enables detection with high sensitivity and specificity. Different strategies contribute to the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts: endoscopic transpapillary or transmural drainage, percutaneous catheter drainage, or open surgery. The feasibility of endoscopic drainage is highly dependent on the anatomy and topography of the pseudocyst, but provides high success and low complication rates. Percutaneous drainage is used for infected pseudocysts. However, its usefulness in chronic pancreatitis-associated pseudocysts is questionable. Internal drainage and pseudocyst resection are frequently used as surgical approaches with a good overall outcome, but a somewhat higher morbidity and mortality compared with endoscopic intervention. We therefore conclude that pseudocyst treatment in chronic pancreatitis can be effectively achieved by both endoscopic and surgical means. This review entails publications referring to the classification of pancreatic pseudocysts, epidemiology, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic options for pancreatic pseudocysts. Only full articles were considered for the review. Based on a search in PubMed, the MeSH terms "pancreatic pseudocysts and classification," "diagnosis," and "endoscopic, percutaneous, and surgical treatment" were used either alone or in combination.

Pancreatic cyst associated with pancreas divisum treated by laparoscopy-assisted cystgastrostomy in the intragastric approach: a case report and a review of the literature

A 39-year-old Japanese man was admitted to our hospital after experiencing recurrent episodes of pancreatitis over the previous 2 years. On the first episode, he had been admitted to our hospital with elevated serum amylase levels and epigastralgia. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a diffuse, uncircumscribed area with heterogeneous density in the pancreas. No previous history of pancreatitis, gallstones, drinking, or abdominal injury was elicited. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) demonstrated that the Wirsung duct was unconnected to the Santorini's duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography through the papilla of Vater and accessory papilla revealed an enlarged ventral pancreatic duct, pancreas divisum, and a cystic lesion in the pancreatic body. On the second and third episodes, endoscopic drainage of the pancreatic pseudocysts through the accessory papilla and ultrasonography-guided transmural drainage were unsuccessful. A follow-up CT and MRCP demonstrated that the pancreatic cyst had enlarged to 9 x 8 cm in diameter. A laparoscopy-assisted cystgastrostomy was performed with an intragastric approach. An anastomosis was performed using an endoscopic linear stapler through the small cystotomy and gastrotomy openings on the posterior wall of the stomach. The postoperative clinical course was uneventful. Over 6 months later, the patient remains well and with a good quality of life. A laparoscopy-assisted cystgastrostomy, using an intragastric surgical technique, offers a safe, less-invasive procedure for cyst drainage by the pancreas divisum.

Toward an update of the atlanta classification on acute pancreatitis: review of new and abandoned terms

OBJECTIVES

The 1992 Atlanta classification is a clinically based classification system that defines the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this review was to assess whether the terms abandoned by the Atlanta classification are really discarded in the literature. The second objective was to review what new terms have appeared in the literature since the Atlanta symposium.

METHODS

We followed a Medline search strategy in review and guideline articles after the publication of the Atlanta classification. This search included the abandoned terms: "phlegmon," "infected pseudocyst," "hemorrhagic pancreatitis," and "persistent pancreatitis."

RESULTS

A total of 239 publications were reviewed, including 10 guideline articles and 42 reviews. The abandoned terms "hemorrhagic pancreatitis" and "persistent pancreatitis" are hardly encountered, in contrast, both "infected pseudocyst" and "phlegmon" are frequently used, and several authors question their abandonment. New terminology in acute pancreatitis consists of "organized pancreatic necrosis," "necroma," "extrapancreatic necrosis," and "central gland necrosis."

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that the Atlanta classification is still not universally accepted. Several abandoned terms are frequently used, and new terms have emerged that describe manifestations in acute pancreatitis that were not specifically addressed during the Atlanta symposium.

Transgastric pancreatography and EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Endoscopic transpapillary drainage of the retained pancreatic duct in symptomatic patients with chronic pancreatitis is considered an established treatment option. The aim of this study was to investigate, as an alternative, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transgastric pancreatography and drainage of the pancreatic duct, in terms of their feasibility and outcome.

METHODS

All consecutive symptomatic patients with failure of the traditional approach to catheterize and drain the pancreatic duct, over a 3-year time period, were enrolled in this prospective, observational single-center study (case series). Feasibility was characterized by success rate, outcome by complication rate (frequency of bleeding or perforation), mortality, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Twelve patients underwent 14 interventions (sex ratio, M/F, 10:4; age range, 43-77 years) from November 2002 to October 2005. The main indication was retention of the pancreatic duct associated with pain, in particular: (i) papilla not reachable because of prior gastrointestinal surgery (n = 5); and (ii) not possible to introduce the catheter through the papilla in chronic pancreatitis or "pancreas divisum" (n = 7). Pancreatography was successful in all patients (normal finding with no therapeutic consequence, n = 1 [after pancreaticojejunostomy]), whereas drainage of the pancreatic duct was achieved in 9 patients (69%; attempts, n = 13). The transgastric route was used in 5 patients and the transpapillary route (rendezvous technique with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]) in 4. There was a complication rate of 42.9%, comprising postinterventional pain (n = 4; 28.6%); bleeding (n = 1); and perforation because of retriever problems (n = 1). The postinterventional pancreatitis rate was 0% and mortality was 0%. The follow-up investigation (range, 4 weeks - 3 years) revealed that 4 patients (28.6%) subsequently underwent surgical intervention, because of duodenal stenosis (n = 1; 7.1%), suspicious tumor growth (n = 1; 7.1%), and insufficient drainage of the pancreatic duct (n = 2; 14.3%). In 2 subjects (14.3%), endoscopic reinterventions became necessary, which were subsequently successful. There were the following technical problems: 1) Too dense stenosis (n = 3); 2) inadequate equipment (insufficient infeed of the endoscopic tool because of its bending), in each case.

CONCLUSIONS

Transgastric pancreatography and EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct are reasonable and feasible alternative options for diagnostic and therapeutic management for selected indications (chronic pancreatitis; anomaly of the congenital pancreatic or postoperative gastrointestinal anatomy), with an acceptable periinterventional risk, which broaden the therapeutic spectrum and may avoid surgery but need further evaluation and follow-up investigation.

Combined laparoscopic endoscopic procedures

The combination of laparoscopy and flexible endoscopy has expanded the minimally invasive approaches to both benign and malignant gastrointestinal disease. This article reviews the current applications of combined approaches to gastric, colonic, and pancreatic pathology.

Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery--experience from a tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

In the era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopy has a great role to play in the management of pseudocyst of pancreas. We present our surgical experience over the past 12 years (May 1994 to April 2006) in the management of pancreatic pseudocysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The total number of cases was 108, with 76 male and 32 female patients. Age ranged from 18 to 70 years. Duration of symptoms ranged from 45 days to 7 months. Fifty-nine patients presented with pain abdomen. Sixty-one patients had co-morbid illness. Ten patients had abdominal mass on clinical examination. Predisposing factors were gallstones in 58 cases, alcohol in 20 cases, trauma in eight cases and post-pancreatectomy in one case. In 21 cases there are no predisposing factors.

RESULTS

All the cases were successfully operated without any significant intraoperative complication. Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy was done in 90 cases (83.4%), laparoscopic cystojejunostomy in eight cases (7.4%), open cystogastrostomy in two cases (1.8%), and laparoscopic external drainage in eight cases (7.4%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done in 47 cases along with the drainage procedure. The mean operating time was 95 minutes. Mean blood loss was 69 ml. Mean hospital stay was 5.6 days. Percutaneous tube drain to assist decompression of the cyst was kept in all the laparoscopic cystojejunostomy (LCJ) group. Two patients were re-operated for bleeding and gastric outlet obstruction. We had no mortality in the postoperative period. With mean follow up of 54 months (range 3-145 months); only one patient who underwent laparoscopic cystogastrostomy (LCG) earlier in this series had recurrence due to inadequate stoma size. This patient later underwent OCG CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy has a significant role to play in the surgical management of pseudocysts with excellent outcome. It offers all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to the patients.

Minilaparoscopic transgastric cystgastrostomy

BACKGROUND

A technique combining upper endoscopy with percutaneous transgastric minilaparoscopic instrumentation for the formation of pancreatic cystgastrostomy is safe and effective for the internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

METHODS

At a tertiary-care academic medical center, 6 patients with pancreatic pseudocysts with a mean size of 19 cm (range, 16-23 cm) were selected for combined endoscopic and percutaneous transgastric minilaparoscopic (1.7-2 mm) pancreatic cystgastrostomy. All pseudocysts had been followed-up for a minimum of 5 weeks (range, 5-22 wk) and were noted to significantly displace the stomach anteriorly.

RESULTS

The mean surgical time was 98 minutes (range, 45-150 min). The mean amount of fluid removed from the pseudocysts was 2167 mL (range, 1600-2600 mL). All ports were removed from the stomach without the need to suture the gastric wall or skin except for 2 gastric serosal sites that were closed with a single intracorporeal stitch. The length of hospital stay averaged 2.2 days (range, 0-6 d). All patients were discharged in good condition, tolerating a regular diet. With a mean follow-up period of 13.4 months (range, 1-30 mo), all patients remain asymptomatic from their pancreatic pseudocysts.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique of combining upper endoscopy with percutaneous transgastric minilaparoscopic instruments to create a pancreatic cystgastrostomy can be used to apply well-established surgical principals for internal drainage and has the potential to be used for the management of other gastric pathology.

Differential treatment and early outcome in the interventional endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts in 27 patients

AIM: Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPC) as a complication of pancreatitis are approached only in the case of abdominal pain, infection, bleeding, and compression onto the gastrointestinal tract or biliary tree.

METHODS: From 02/01/2002 to 05/31/2004, all consecutive patients with symptomatic PPC who underwent an interventional endoscopic approach were evaluated in this pilot case-series study: Group (Gr.) I-Primary percutaneous (external), ultrasound-guided drainage. Gr. II-Primary EUS-guided cystogastrostomy. Gr. III-EUS-guided cystogastrostomy including intracystic necrosectomy.

RESULTS: (=“follow up”: n = 27): Gr. I (n = 9; 33.3%): No complaints (n = 3); change of an external into an internal drainage (n = 4); complications: (a) bleeding (n = 1) followed by 3 d at ICU, discharge after 40 d; (b) septic shock (n = 1) followed by ICU and several laparotomies for programmed lavage and necrosectomy, death after 74 d. Gr. II (n = 13; 48.1%): No complaints (n = 11); external drainage (n = 2); complications/problems out of the 13 cases: 2nd separate pseudocyst (n = 1) with external drainage (since no communication with primary internal drainage); infection of the residual cyst (n = 1) + following external drainage; spontaneous PPC perforation (n = 1) + following closure of the opening of the cystogastrostomy using clips and subsequently ICU for 2 d. Gr. III (n = 5; 18.5%): No complaints in all patients, in average two endoscopic procedures required (range, 2-6).

CONCLUSION: Interventional endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts is a reasonable alternative treatment option with low invasiveness compared to surgery and an acceptable outcome with regard to the complication rate (11.1%) and mortality (3.7%), as shown by these initial study results.

A comparison of anterior and posterior approaches for the surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst using laparoscopic cystogastrostomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst allows for definitive drainage with faster recovery. Although many groups have reported their experience with an anterior approach, only a few have done so with a posterior approach. This paper compares the approaches, analyzing their potential benefits and pitfalls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven females and one male underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy to treat pancreatic pseudocysts. The anterior approach was performed by opening the stomach anteriorly, localizing the pseudocyst ultrasonographically, draining the cyst with a needle and, via the same opening, using a stapler to form a cystgastrostomy. The posterior approach was performed by directly visualizing the posterior gastric wall and the pseudocyst, opening and draining the cyst with a needle, and using a stapler and running sutures for closure.

RESULTS

All patients had gallstone pancreatitis. Cystgastrostomy via the anterior approach was used in 4 patients and via the posterior approach in 4 patients. Dense adhesions required one attempted posterior cystgastrostomy to be converted to an anterior approach. The mean age of the anterior group was 38 years (range, 18-58 years) and hospital stay was 6 days (range, 4-8 days): for the posterior group, mean age was 42 years (range, 40-44 years) and length of stay was 3 days (range, 2-4 days).

CONCLUSION

Although both approaches had good results with no complications and short hospital stays, the posterior approach is safer, with a more precise cyst visualization and dissection that permits more tissue to be sent for histopathologic examination. Furthermore, the posterior approach?s larger anastomosis would seem to yield fewer occlusions, which are commonly seen with the anterior approach. The anterior approach is easier to learn, but it requires the opening of the anterior stomach and the use of ultrasound.

Pancreatic pseudocysts--when and how to treat?

Pancreatic pseudocysts are a well-known complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis, with a higher incidence in the latter. Currently several classification systems are in use that are based on the origin of the pseudocyst, their relation to pancreatic duct anatomy and a possible pseudocyst-duct communication. Diagnosis is accomplished most often by CT scanning, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) or by ultrasound, and rapid progress in the improvement of diagnostic tools has enabled detection with high sensitivity and specificity. There are different therapeutic strategies: endoscopic transpapillary or transmural drainage, percutaneous catheter drainage, or open surgery. The feasibility of endoscopic drainage is highly dependent on the anatomy and topography of the pseudocyst, but provides high success and low complication rates. Percutaneous drainage is used for infected pseudocysts. However, its usefulness in chronic pancreatitis-associated pseudocysts is questionable. Internal drainage and pseudocyst resection are frequently used as surgical approaches with a good overall outcome, but a somewhat higher morbidity and mortality compared with endoscopic intervention. We therefore conclude that pseudocyst treatment in chronic pancreatitis can be effectively achieved by both endoscopic and surgical means.

Endoscopic Transgastric Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocyst With the Use of Nd:YAG Laser

Pancreatic pseudocysts have been successfully managed with endoscopic drainage recently. This report describes a case of endoscopic transgastric drainage using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and an Nd:YAG laser. EUS was used to detect an optimal puncture site of the pseudocyst and to reduce the risk of bleeding and perforation. An Nd:YAG laser was used to minimize the risk of bleeding and to penetrate the thick wall of the pseudocyst. After transgastric cystgastrostomy was performed, an internal stent was placed between the pseudocyst and the stomach. There were no complications associated with endoscopic interventions. Complete resolution of the pseudocyst was observed. Endoscopic transgastric drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is a recommended approach for selected patients with pancreatic pseudocysts that are uncomplicated and are located adjacent to the stomach. Safe and effective drainage can be achieved without hemorrhage and perforation with the use of EUS, an Nd:YAG laser, and a stent. Furthermore, the Nd:YAG laser facilitated passage through a markedly indurated pseudocyst wall and it seemed to be an effective instrument, especially for pseudocysts with a thick wall.

Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts

According to the Atlanta classification an acute pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic juice enclosed by a wall of fibrous or granulation tissue, which arises as a consequence of acute pancreatitis or pancreatic trauma, whereas a chronic pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic juice enclosed by a wall of fibrous or granulation tissue, which arises as a consequence of chronic pancreatitis and lack an antecedent episode of acute pancreatitis. It is generally agreed that acute and chronic pseudocysts have a different natural history, though many reports do not differentiate between pseudocysts that complicate acute pancreatitis and those that complicate chronic disease. Observation--"conservative treatment"--of a patient with a pseudocyst is preponderantly based on the knowledge that spontaneous resolution can occur. It must, however, be admitted that there is substantial risk of complications or even death; first of all due to bleeding. There are no randomized studies for the management protocols for pancreatic pseudocysts. Therefore, today we have to rely on best clinical practice, but still certain advice may be given. First of all it is important to differentiate acute from chronic pseudocysts for management, but at the same time not miss cystic neoplasias. Conservative treatment should always be considered the first option (pseudocysts should not be treated just because they are there). However, if intervention is needed, a procedure that is well known should always be considered first. The results of percutaneous or endoscopic drainage are probably more dependent on the experience of the interventionist than the choice of procedure and if surgery is needed, an intern anastomosis can hold sutures not until several weeks (if possible 6 weeks).