Nonoperative or Delayed Surgical Treatment of Combined Cruciate Ligaments and Medial Side Knee Injuries:

High return to play rate following treatment of multiple-ligament knee injuries in 136 elite athletes

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to assess return to play rate and timing of elite athletes treated for multi-ligament knee injuries with modern surgical techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all professional or national/international level athletes treated for a multi-ligament knee injury by the senior author in the period from February 2001 to October 2019, with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The study cohort consisted of 136 elite athletes who underwent surgery of two or more knee ligaments. Outcomes measures were return to play (RTP), defined as return to elite level sport, return to play time, and further surgical procedures.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty (88.2%) athletes returned to elite level sport at an average of 12.8 months from operation. In unicruciate injuries, ACL and PCL-based injuries had similar return to play rates (89.1% vs. 87.5% respectfully, n.s.) although mean RTP time was longer in those with PCL-based injuries (15.2 vs. 11.9 months, p < 0.01). Bicruciate injuries had longer RTP times compared to unicruciate injuries (mean RTP 16.0vs. 12.4 months, p < 0.05) but were able to return at a similar rate (83.3% vs. 88.9%, n.s.). Medial and lateral sided injuries had similar RTP rates (89.3% vs. 87.9%, n.s.) though lateral sided injuries took longer before returning to play (13.4 vs. 11.6 months, p < 0.05). Further surgery was required in 54 (39.9%) patients including 25 (18.4%) manipulations under anaesthesia. Four (2.9%) of the athletes underwent revision ligament surgery.

CONCLUSION

Modern surgical techniques used in the treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries can lead to high return to play rates in elite athletes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Early or delayed reconstruction in multi-ligament knee injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether early or delayed surgical intervention in patients with multi-ligament injuries results in better outcomes, is of current and controversial debate.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing early versus late surgical treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies in the English and German literature. Eligibility criteria included studies comparing early or delayed surgical interventions for multi-ligament knee injuries, with a minimum follow-up of two years, reporting the primary clinical outcome using a validated functional scoring system and range of motion. Exclusion criteria were patients treated with multi-trauma, head injury, non-union, lower extremity fractures, or a documented history of previous knee injuries. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot, and the risk of bias was established using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ² and I₂ statistic.

RESULTS

Eight studies (n=260 patients) were included in the analysis. 149 patients were treated early with a mean of 10.6days; 111 patients were treated late with a mean of 294days. The pooled estimate for clinical outcome demonstrated that early surgery resulted in significantly higher Lysholm scores (SMD 0.669, 95% CI: 0.379 to 0.959, p=0.0001, I₂=0%). Thirty-one per cent of all patients with early surgery had a normal or near normal knee, whereas only 15% of patients with late reconstruction reported the knee to be normal or near normal. The pooled estimates for total ROM did not demonstrate a significant difference between the groups (SMD 0.113, 95% CI: -0.271 to 0.498, p=0.564, I₂=35.57%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that early surgical intervention in multi-ligament injuries of the knee produces a significantly superior clinical outcome, compared to late reconstruction. Although an overall trend of improved total range of knee motion was also demonstrated, this was very small and unlikely to be clinically relevant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4; Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Practice Guidelines for the Management of Multiligamentous Injuries of the Knee

BACKGROUND

Multiligamentous injuries of knee remain a gray area as far as guidelines for management are concerned due to absence of large-scale, prospective controlled trials. This article reviews the recent evidence-based literature and trends in treatment of multiligamentous injuries and establishes the needful protocol, keeping in view the current concepts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two reviewers individually assessed the available data indexed on PubMed and Medline and compiled data on incidence, surgical versus nonsurgical treatment, timing of surgery, and repair versus reconstruction of multiligamentous injury.

RESULTS

Evolving trends do not clearly describe treatment, but most studies have shown increasing inclination toward an early, staged/single surgical procedure for multiligamentous injuries involving cruciate and collateral ligaments. Medial complex injuries have shown better results with conservative treatment with surgical reconstruction of concomitant injuries.

CONCLUSION

Multiligamentous injury still remains a gray area due to unavailability of a formal guideline to treatment in the absence of large-scale, blinded prospective controlled trials. Any in multiligamentous injuries any intervention needs to be individualized by the presence of any life- or limb-threatening complication. The risks and guarded prognosis with both surgical and non-surgical modalities of treatment should be explained to patient and relations.

Management of Chronic Combined ACL Medial Posteromedial Instability of the Knee

The medial collateral ligament is the most commonly injured ligament in the knee. High-grade medial collateral injuries are associated with injuries to the posteromedial structures of the knee. Chronic medial-sided instability is rare due to the intrinsic capacity of the medial ligamentous structures to heal. However, when combined with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, significant anterior, valgus, and rotatory laxity of the knee occurs. In this review, we discuss the important biomechanical, clinical, and surgical considerations in the management of chronic combined anterior cruciate ligament, medial, and posteromedial instability of the knee.

Decision making in the multiligament-injured knee: an evidence-based systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to address the treatment of multiligament knee injuries, specifically (1) surgical versus nonoperative treatment, (2) repair versus reconstruction of injured ligamentous structures, and (3) early versus late surgery of damaged ligaments.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed a search on PubMed from 1966 to August 2007 using the terms "knee dislocation," "multiple ligament-injured knee," and "multiligament knee reconstruction." Study inclusion criteria were (1) levels I to IV evidence, (2) "multiligament" defined as disruption of at least 2 of the 4 major knee ligaments, (3) measures of functional and clinical outcome, and (4) minimum of 12 months' follow-up, with a mean of at least 24 months.

RESULTS

Four studies compared surgical treatment with nonoperative treatment. There was a higher percentage of excellent/good International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (58% v 20%) in surgically treated patients, as well as higher rates for return to work (72% v 52%) and return to full sport (29% v 10%). Two studies compared repair with reconstruction of damaged structures, with similar mean Lysholm scores (88 v 87) and excellent/good IKDC scores (51% v 48%). However, repair of the posterolateral corner had a higher failure rate (37% v 9%). Similarly, repair of the cruciates yielded decreased stability and range of motion and a lower return to preinjury activity levels (0% v 33%). There were 5 studies comparing early surgery (<or=3 weeks) with late surgery. Early treatment resulted in higher mean Lysholm scores (90 v 82) and a higher percentage of excellent/good IKDC scores (47% v 31%), as well as higher sports activity scores (89 v 69) on the Knee Outcome Survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that early operative treatment of the multiligament-injured knee yields improved functional and clinical outcomes compared with nonoperative management or delayed surgery. Repair of the posterolateral corner may yield higher revision rates compared with reconstruction.

Knee dislocation with lateral side injury: results of an en masse surgical repair technique of the lateral side

BACKGROUND

Knee dislocations with lateral side injury are rare and disabling if not treated.

HYPOTHESIS

An en masse surgical technique to repair the lateral side will provide good stability, and the posterior cruciate ligament will heal when left in situ.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients underwent an en masse lateral side repair after knee dislocation injury; all but 1 patient had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Physical examination included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, isokinetic strength testing, KT-2000 arthrometer testing, radiography (including varus stress), and magnetic resonance imaging scan. Patients were evaluated subjectively with several surveys.

RESULTS

Mean objective evaluation occurred for 17 patients at 4.6 years postoperatively, and 21 subjective evaluations occurred for 21 patients at 5.6 years postoperatively. The objective overall grade was normal for 10 patients and nearly normal for 7 patients. Lateral laxity was graded as normal in 15 patients and 1+ in 2 patients. The posterior drawer was normal in all but 3 patients, who had 1+ posterior laxity. The postoperative varus stress radiography demonstrated a mean increase of 1.1 +/- 1.7 mm (range, -1.2-4.7) between knees. Magnetic resonance scans showed that the lateral side was thickened but intact in all patients. The posterior cruciate ligament was viewed as healed or intact in all patients but was sometimes seen as elongated or buckled. The mean subjective total scores were 91.3 points for the IKDC survey, 93.0 for the modified Noyes survey, and 8.0 for an activity score, but scores were higher for patients who underwent surgery within 4 weeks from the injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The en masse surgical technique to repair the lateral side combined with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after knee dislocation provides excellent long-term stability. The repaired lateral side and untreated posterior cruciate ligament heal with continuity. Patients can return to high levels of activity.