Internal Fixation of the Humerus with Locking Compression Plates:

Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures With Intramedullary Interlocking Nail Versus Locking Compression Plate

Surgical fixation of humeral shaft fractures generally involves plating or nailing. It is unclear whether one method is more effective than the other. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the intramedullary nail and locking compression plate for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. A total of 60 patients with humeral shaft fractures were randomized to undergo surgery with an intramedullary interlocking nail (n=30) or locking compression plate (n=30). The outcome was assessed in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, union time, union rate, functional outcome, and incidence of complications. Functional outcome was assessed using the Constant score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay in group A (intramedullary interlocking nail) were significantly lower than those in group B (locking compression plate). No statistically significant difference was found regarding the union rate, mean Constant score, and mean ASES score between the groups. The average union time was found to be significantly lower for the intramedullary interlocking nail compared with the locking compression plate. The incidence of complications such as radial nerve palsy was found to be higher with the locking compression plate compared with the intramedullary interlocking nail. The intramedullary interlocking nail can be considered a better surgical option for the management of humeral shaft fractures because it offers decreased intraoperative blood loss; shorter operative times, hospital stays, and union times; and a lower incidence of serious complications such as radial nerve palsy.

Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plateA retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures, particularly in osteoporotic patients, remain an unsolved problem as regards the durability of the osteosynthesis. The AO/ASIF group has developed a new technique which aims to preserve the biological integrity of the humeral head and secures the reduction using multiple locking screws with angular stability (Philos), thus allowing an early mobilization.

PATIENTS AND OUTCOME

We retrospectively reviewed the complications and functional outcome after a minimum follow-up of 1 year in 72 patients treated with this new method. 2 fractures failed to unite, and 3 patients developed an avascular necrosis of the humeral head. In addition, 2 implant failures were observed due to a technical error. According to the Constant score, the functional outcome was acceptable even in elderly patients.

INTERPRETATION

The Philos method appears to be safe and can be recommended for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in patients with poor bone quality.

The use of a new locking 90 degree blade plate in the treatment of atrophic proximal humerus nonunions

This level IV case series study prospectively evaluated patients with atrophic proximal humerus nonunions stabilised with a locking 90 degree blade plate. All patients were women with an average age of 69 years (range 56-78). Time from trauma to nonunion treatment averaged 23 months. Five patients had had previous surgical treatments. Two patients had a history of infection and one patient with active infection was reconstructed in two stages. Follow-up averaged 22 months (range 18-36); union was achieved in all seven cases after an average of 5.85 months. The DASH score at the last follow-up averaged 25 points and Constant score averaged 72.7 points. No patient required additional procedures. At the last follow-up all patients were free of infection, and there were no cases of avascular necrosis. The results with locked 90 degree blade plates in atrophic nonunions of the proximal humerus in adults were favourable in this series.