Over The Counter Cosmetic Colored Contact Lenses: Déjà Vu (Disaster!) All Over Again!

Review of complications associated with contact lenses from unregulated sources of supply

OBJECTIVE

To review existing studies and case reports regarding complications associated with contact lenses (CLs) from unregulated sources of supply and to identify any relevant trends.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to locate publications concerning complications associated with CLs obtained from unregulated sources of supply.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles were identified that represent 70 individual cases. All 8 of the pre-2006 case reports originated from the United States and the United Kingdom, whereas from 2006 onwards, only 2 of the 15 reports came from these locations. Over-the-counter supply accounted for 73% (51/70) of cases, whereas 17% (12/70) were borrowed or shared lenses and 6% (4/70) lenses were obtained through the Internet. Nearly, three quarters of patients (30/42, 71%) waited longer than 48 hours after the onset of symptoms before seeking medical attention; 10 patients waited longer than a week, and 5 longer than a month. Microbial keratitis (MK) was reported in 43 (61%) patients, with permanent damage occurring in 72% (31/43) of patients followed to conclusion. Known risk factors associated for MK were present in all cases irrespective of whether the patients developed MK.

CONCLUSIONS

There are various reasons to presume that the unregulated supply of CLs might result in the use of inappropriate lenses, increase the risk of poorer lens hygiene, and militate against the prompt treatment of any consequent complications. There is some indication that the introduction of regulations to control the supply of plano CLs has alleviated the level of complications.

[Severe bacterial keratitis referred to ophthalmology emergency departments: a retrospective study of 268 cases]

PURPOSE

To investigate epidemiological, microbiological and clinical aspects of severe bacterial keratitis, in order to update current understanding of risk factors (RF) and prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a monocentric retrospective study from January 2005 to January 2011, identifying and collecting data from inpatients admitted for severe documented bacterial keratitis.

RESULTS

We found 268 unilateral corneal ulcers. At least one local or systemic risk factor was identified in 255/268 patients (95%). The leading risk factor was contact lens wear (129/268), followed by underlying corneal disease (50/268) and prior corneal surgery (47/268). Initial and final visual acuities were 0.06 and 0.2 (1.20 and 0.72 LogMAR) respectively. Contact lens wear was associated with better prognosis and shorter hospitalization (P<0.05). Corneal healing was obtained in 255/268 patients (95%), with adjuvant surgery for 33 patients. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Gram+ cocci, more commonly associated with degenerative keratopathy or prior corneal surgery, and Gram- bacilli, more commonly associated with contact lenses (P<0.05). Both demonstrated a similar prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Specific risk factors should be investigated in cases of severe bacterial keratitis. Contact lens wear is the most frequent risk factor, but with a better prognosis than underlying corneal disease, prior corneal surgery or systemic risk factors. The specific bacterial pathogen no longer appears to dramatically influence the outcome of severe corneal ulcers.

Colored cosmetic contact lenses: an unsafe trend in the younger generation

PURPOSE

To identify the microbiological profile and evaluate the clinical course and outcomes in patients who developed severe infectious keratitis after colored cosmetic contact lens wear.

METHODS

This case series includes 13 patients who developed severe infectious keratitis after colored cosmetic contact lens wear. A detailed history regarding contact lens availability and storage and handling techniques was taken. All patients underwent standard diagnostic microbiological evaluation followed by culture-guided topical antimicrobial therapy.

RESULTS

Of 13 patients, 8 were male and 5 were female, with mean age at presentation of 19 ± 3.8 years. All patients were emmetropic, and lenses were worn solely for cosmetic purposes. Seven lenses were dispensed without prescription or fitting from an unlicensed optical shop, 5 patients had shared lenses with friends/relatives, and 1 patient obtained the lens from the garbage. None of the patients followed the recommended contact lens handling and storage techniques. The causative microorganisms included Pseudomonas aeruginosa (54%), Staphylococcus aureus (25%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (17%), with 1 case of viral keratitis. In 62% of cases, ulcer size was ≥5 × 5 mm and posttreatment corrected visual acuity was 6/24 or less. All patients responded well to topical antimicrobials, and none required surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Over-the-counter use of decorative lenses as a cosmetic aid is rapidly increasing. Easy and unmonitored availability of these cosmetic lenses is followed by severe sight-threatening complications in young emmetropic individuals.

Microbial keratitis as a foreseeable complication of cosmetic contact lenses: a prospective study

PURPOSE

A recent study shows that the relative risk of contact lenses (CL)-related microbial keratitis (MK) is highly increased with cosmetic contact lenses (CosCL). The aim of our study is to illustrate the implications of the CosCL on the occurence of MK and to describe the subpopulation of CosCL wearers.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study was conducted in 12 French University Hospitals on all lenses wearers presenting with MK between July 2007 and July 2009, including CosCL wearers. Patients had a complete ophthalmological examination and were interviewed by a 50 items anonymous 'questionnaire' to determine subject demographics and lenses wear history. The CosCL-related MK subpopulation (case) was described and finally compared to (noncosmetic) CL-related MK (control).

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-six patients were included for contact lenses-related MK. Thirty-two of them (12.5%) were seen for MK after wearing CosCL. Compared with CL, CosCL wearers are younger (21 versus 27 years of age) and recent wearers (3 versus 9 years). CosCL were rarely dispensed by eye care professionals increasing the risk of MK (OR, 12.3). Education about lens care and handling was deficient for most of CosCL wearers (OR, 26.5). Sixty per cent of CosCL cases versus 13% of CL-related MK had a final visual acuity less than 20/200.

CONCLUSION

Patients who acquire CosCL are less likely to be instructed on appropriate lenses use and basic hygiene rules. Consequently, CosCL wearers are experiencing acute vision-threatening infections.

[Study and prevention of contact lens-related microbial keratitis with a standardized questionnaire]

INTRODUCTION

microbial keratitis is a significant health concern for the one million wearers of contact lenses and their ophthalmologists, with some potentially modifiable risk factors. The number of risk factors for contact lens-related microbial keratitis has been described, but many of them still remain assumed or unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

a multicenter prospective case-control study was conducted in 12 French university hospitals (Besançon, Bordeaux, Dijon, Fort-de-France, Grenoble, Limoges, Lyon, Nancy, Nantes, Paris, Marseille and Strasbourg) beginning in July 2007 on contact lens wearers presenting with microbial keratitis and on healthy contact lens wearers. Patients and healthy wearers were interviewed using a 51-item anonymous standardized questionnaire to determine subject demographics and contact lens wear history.

RESULTS

two hundred and fifty-six patients with microbial keratitis were included. One hundred and thirteen healthy contact lenses wearers were surveyed. Cosmetic contact lens wear highly increased the relative risk (RR) of microbial keratitis (RR, 16.5). Time since the last visit to an ophthalmologist longer than 1 year (RR, 3.4) or prescription by someone other than an ophthalmologist (RR, 7.6) also increased the risk of microbial keratitis. Education on lens care and handling was deficient (hand washing: RR, 2.2; rub and rinse: RR, 2.7).

DISCUSSION

a standardized questionnaire is a powerful tool to determine risk factors for contact lens-related microbial keratitis, but also to analyze individual mistakes in contact lenses use and care.

Kératite infectieuse bilatérale chez une patiente porteuse de lentilles souples cosmétiques

We report a case of an immunocompetent 20-year-old woman, wearing planocosmetic contact lenses to change the color of her eyes, with no contact lens hygiene regimen. She developed a bilateral infectious keratitis. Acanthamoeba and Fusarium solani were isolated in both eyes. Bilateral penetrating keratoplasty was needed because of bilateral corneal perforation. Three months later, bilateral simultaneous phacoemulsification was performed because of a dense cataract and a severe decrease in her vision. Six months after surgery, her best corrected visual acuity was 0.7 in the right eye, and 0.6 in the left eye. Cosmetic contact lenses expose the wearers to the same potential ocular complications as other contact lenses. Wearers must be informed of such complications, which may be sight-threatening. Based on this case, we strongly recommend that all cosmetic contact lens wearers be examined and followed as if they were standard contact lens wearers.

Ocular Effects of Cosmetic Products and Procedures

Cosmetic products and procedures can produce adverse effects on the ocular surface, ranging from mild discomfort to vision-threatening conditions. Complications of skin and eye products can be related to allergy or toxicity, often attributable to perfumes. Complications of blepharoplasty may be associated with overcorrection, scarring, or uneven contour of the lid margins, conditions that can cause significant ocular surface disease until they are corrected. Ocular surface effects of botulinum toxin injection include dry eye syndromes and also epiphora. More serious complications occur (rarely) and are dose- and location-related. Adverse effects of micropigmentation procedures involve pathological processes or, simply, poor cosmetic results. In certain youth cultures, special-effect contact lenses and even decorative conjunctival implants have gained popularity, presenting a wide variety of dangers, often attributable to poor education about care and hygiene.

Over-the-Counter Decorative Contact Lenses: Cosmetic or Medical Devices? A Case Series

PURPOSE

To illustrate the implications of the unauthorized sale and unmonitored wearing of decorative cosmetic contact lenses resulting in ocular complications and to determine the prevalence of the use of cosmetic contact lenses obtained from unlicensed providers by adolescents.

METHODS

Observational case report, structured interview, and survey in a retrospective, observational, clinical practice setting. Reported sources of contact lenses were categorized as provider and nonprovider, and associations within the data were reviewed by using a Pearson correlation and chi-square test.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (eight female and four male) were seen urgently for acute eye pain and redness after wearing plano decorative contact lenses. None of the patients had previously worn a contact lens. None of the lenses were dispensed by eye care professionals. Four patients developed blinding infections requiring hospital admission. Causative organisms included staphylococci, Pseudomonas, and acanthamoeba. One patient required a penetrating keratoplasty. One hundred fifty-nine patients were surveyed. Thirty-seven (23%) used decorative contact lenses. Lenses were obtained from an unlicensed provider 51% of the time. Education about lens care and handling was significantly associated with acquiring lenses from licensed providers (R = 0.74, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Colored noncorrective contact lenses are being dispensed without a prescription or fitting from unlicensed vendors. Patients who acquire lenses from unauthorized providers are significantly less likely to be instructed on appropriate lens use and care. Consequently, uninformed lens wearers are experiencing acute vision-threatening infections and inflammation.