Stress-related mucosal disease in the intensive care unit: an update on prophylaxis

Distant Organ Damage in Acute Brain Injury

Acute brain injuries pose a great threat to global health, having significant impact on mortality and disability. Patients with acute brain injury may develop distant organ failure, even if no systemic diseases or infection is present. The severity of non-neurologic organs' dysfunction depends on the extremity of the insult to the brain. In this comprehensive review we sought to describe the organ-related consequences of acute brain injuries. The clinician should always be aware of the interplay between central nervous system and non-neurological organs, that is constantly present. Cerebral injury is not only a brain disease, but also affects the body as whole, and thus requires holistic therapeutical approach.

Dolichos lablab L. extracts as pharmanutrient for stress-related mucosal disease in rat stomach

Gastric stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) presented from superficial gastritis to deep ulceration consequent to insufficient perfusion, ischemia, and oxidative stress. Though pharmacologic interventions to optimize tissue perfusion or to enhance defensive mechanism are essential, limited clinical outcome necessitates strong acid suppressors or natural agents. Under the hypothesis that Dolichos lablab L. (NKM 23-1) can enhance defense against SRMD, water immersion restraint stress (WIRS) were imposed to rats and additional groups pretreated with differing doses of NKM 23-1 were monitored. On gross and microscopic evaluation, they significantly rescued SRMD (p<0.01). The levels of inflammatory mediators such as IL-18, IL-1β, IL-8, iNOS, TNF-α, caspase-1, NOXs as well as MMPs accompanied with NF-κB p50 activation were all significantly increased in WIRS, but their levels were significantly decreased in Groups pretreated with NKM 23-1. WIRS significantly increased apoptosis, but significantly decreased with NKM 23-1 accompanied with significantly increased levels of cyclin D/E and HSP70/HSP27. Gastric mucin was significantly preserved in Groups pretreated with NKM 23-1, while depleted in WIRS, accompanied with increased expressions of Muc5A. Gastric levels of HO-1 and NQO1 were significantly increased in Group treated with NKM 23-1 with transcriptional activation of Nrf2. Conclusively, preemptive intake of NKM 23-1 significantly rescued SRMD.

Know Thy Ulcers!!!

How to cite this article: Govil D, Kumar GP. Know Thy Ulcers!!! Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(3):153-154.

Esomeprazole alleviates the damage to stress ulcer in rats through not only its antisecretory effect but its antioxidant effect by inactivating the p38 MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways

Background

Stress ulcer is a severe complication in critically ill patients and causes a high mortality. The proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole is widely applied in the treatment of stress ulcers because of its powerful acid suppression ability. However, the mechanism of stress ulcer and the precise gastroprotective effect of esomeprazole in stress ulcer remain unclear.

Purpose

In the present study, the rats with water-immersed and restraint (WIR)-induced stress ulcer were used to further elucidate the anti-ulcerogenic capacity of esomeprazole in stress ulcer in addition to its anti-acid secreting ability.

Methods and results

The rats were randomly divided into 5 groups: control group (NS), water-immersed and restraint group (WIR), high-dose application of esomeprazole plus stress ulcer-induced group (HE+WIR), low-dose application of esomeprazole plus stress ulcer-induced group (LE+WIR), and high-dose application of esomeprazole without stress ulcer-induced group (HE). Our study showed that the pretreatment of esomeprazole alleviated gastric tissue damage in both macroscopic and histopathological manifestations. Pretreatment of esomeprazole elevated the decline in PEG2 level affected by WIR; and it inhibited the secretion of gastric acid, gastrin and pepsin. Moreover, esomeprazole exerted its antioxidant effects by reducing malondialdehyde levels, enhancing the expressions of antioxidant factors like glutathione and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reducing the compensatory transcriptional elevation of SOD1 gene. Esomeprazole also reduced the levels of MPO (myeloperoxidase), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-1β according to its anti-inflammatory effects. We further explored the possible mechanism of esomeprazole pretreatment on stress ulcer and demonstrated that esomeprazole attenuated the high phosphorylation levels of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) p65 and p38 MAPK, and decreased the NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation induced by WIR related stress ulcer.

Conclusion

Our study provides some evidence that the esomeprazole pretreatment exerts gastroprotective effects in WIR-induced stress ulcer through not only its antisecretory effect but also its antioxidant effect by inactivating the p38 MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways.

Economic impact of pharmacist interventions on correction of stress-related mucosal damage prophylaxis practice

Introduction

Stress-related mucosal damage (SRMD) is described as the damage of gastric mucosa due to physiological stress that is a very common complication in critically ill patients. SRMD prophylactic medications are widely prescribed all over the world, while numerous studies have revealed that a large percentage of patients admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) services do not need to receive these medications. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and type of medication errors and the economic impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP).

Methods

This prospective interventional study was conducted on adult patients admitted to internal, surgical, and critical care units at two large academic medical centers over 6 months. Risk factors of stress ulcer were recorded daily during hospital stay, and appropriateness of SUP administration was assessed according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) criteria. An intervention was performed by a clinical pharmacist in the case of contradictions. The rate of inappropriate SUP and the economic impact of a pharmacist intervention were recorded.

Results

In this study, 178 out of 219 (81.2%) patients received prophylactic treatments. Averagely, prophylactic therapy was compatible with standard treatment guidelines in 67.1% of cases. The implementation of ASHP guideline by a clinical pharmacist resulted in a cost saving of >18,000 USD monthly in this study, which would result in an estimated cost saving of >216,000 USD annually.

Conclusion

Although treatment guidelines are available for the prophylaxis of SRMD, failure to observe these guidelines could increase the cost of treatment and adverse effects. The clinical pharmacists' intervention in order to implement standard protocols has a significant impact on the reduction of unintended mistakes in prescribing prophylaxis, as well as significant cost savings.

Appropriateness of Acid-suppressing Agents for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-intensive Care Unit Setting in Saudi Arabia

Objective

To investigate the appropriateness of acid-suppressive therapy (AST) for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in noncritically ill hospitalized patients.

Materials and Methods

A prospective, observational study with 384 subjects was conducted between October and December 2017 in the emergency and internal medicine departments. The Herzig clinical risk scoring system and the guidelines of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines were used to assess risk factors and determine risk scores for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.

Results

The mean age of subjects was 51.9 ± 19.4 years, and 220 (57.3%) of them were males. Among the absolute risk factors, coagulopathy was observed in 2 (0.5%) patients, mechanical ventilation in 15 (3.9%), and a history of GI bleeding in 1 (0.3%). Of 384 patients with SUP, 370 (96.4%) had a clinical risk score ≤ 9 and 14 (3.6%) had a risk score between 10 and 12 for nosocomial GI bleeding. A statistically significant relationship was found between the risk factor indication and demographics.

Conclusion

SUP is frequently administered to noncritically ill hospitalized patients lacking risk factors for GI bleeding. Proton pump inhibitors are the overwhelming first choice of AST among prescribers. Practitioners should follow international guidelines when prescribing ASTs outside the critical-care setting.

Comparative Effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine Type 2 Receptor Blockers for Preventing Clinically Important Gastrointestinal Bleeding During Intensive Care: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2 receptor blockers (H2Bs) are used for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Although the PPIs have greater potency for acid suppression, their relative effectiveness for preventing clinically important GI bleeding (CIGIB) has not been established. The goal of this study was to determine whether prophylactic PPIs were associated with lower risk of CIGIB than H2Bs among critically ill adults.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adults with critical illness from January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2012, who had at least one stress ulcer risk factor and received a PPI or H2B for ≥ 3 days. Cox proportional hazards regression propensity score matching and instrumental variable analyses were used to control for selection bias and confounding by unmeasured factors. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score version IV score was used to adjust for differences of acuity. The main outcome and exposure was CIGIB.

RESULTS

Among 70,093 patients at risk, 49,576 (70.7%) received prophylaxis for at least 3 days, and 424 patients (0.6%) met the definition for experiencing CIGIB. The hazard for CIGIB was two times greater for PPI users compared with H2B users (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.19-2.78]; hazard ratio, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.61-3.5]). Sensitivity analyses failed to detect any plausible scenario in which PPIs were superior to H2Bs for the prevention of CIGIB.

CONCLUSIONS

H2Bs were robustly and consistently associated with significantly lower CIGIB risk compared with PPIs in this population.

The Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Intensive Care Units

The bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract represent a significant medical but also socio-economic problem. A special group of patients et increased risk consists of critically ill patients in intensive care units. Particularly significant cause of bleeding in intensive care unit patients is bleeding resulting from the stress ulcers caused by damage of the mucosa of the stomach and duodenum.

The purpose of this review is to present current experience in prevention of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding using proton pump inhibitors in intensive care units.

Combination of endoscopic hemostatic methods and proton pump inhibitors represents golden standard in most cases.

Despite some adverse effects treatment with proton pump blockers is essential when upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding appears in critically ill patients in intensive care units. Proton pump inhibitors are more effective in acid suppression, as well as in the prevention of recurrent bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis than histamine 2 receptor blockers. The efficacy of proton pump blockers is higher in the case of a continuous intravenous infusion than in the intermittent mode of administration of the drug. The need for highly elaborate strategy for the prophylaxis of bleeding from the upper parts of gastrointestinal tract in intensive care units is essential, because when it occurs in intensive care units, mortality is high, and therapeutic options become narrow.

Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection with the Use of a Proton Pump Inhibitor for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients

Background/Aims

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are commonly prescribed for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in critically ill patients. Several studies have suggested that the use of PPIs is a potential risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We compared the incidences of CDI in the PPI group and H2RA group for SUP in critically ill patients.

Methods

From August 2005 to July 2012, the incidences of CDI were retrospectively analyzed in patients who were admitted directly to intensive care units and stayed for more than 3 days. SUP-related CDI was defined as a CDI diagnosed during the SUP period. Patient clinical data were analyzed to identify potential risk factors for SUP-related CDI.

Results

Of the 1,005 patients enrolled (444 patients received PPI and 561 received H2RA), 38 (3.8%) were diagnosed with SUP-related CDI. The incidence of SUP-related CDI was considerably higher in patients who received PPI than in those who received H2RA (6.7% vs 1.8%). PPI use for SUP (odds ratio [OR], 3.3; confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 7.1; p=0.003) and diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.3; CI, 1.2 to 4.7; p=0.019) were independent risk factors for SUP-related CDI.

Conclusions

PPI therapy is associated with a higher risk of SUP-related CDI than H2RA therapy in critically ill patients.

Comparison of three acute stress models for simulating the pathophysiology of stress-related mucosal disease

Stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) is highly prevalent in intensive care patients leading to increasing treatment cost and mortality. SRMD is a disease elusive of ideal treatment. Evaluation of drugs is very pertinent for the efficient and safe treatment of SRMD. It relies mainly on in vivo screening models. There are various stress models, and till date, none of them is validated for simulating the SRMD pathophysiology. The present study aims to choose the best model, which reproduce pathophysiology of SRMD, among previously established stress models. This study evaluates ulcer index, hexosamine content, microvascular permeability, and gastric content in three acute stress models (cold-restraint, restraint, and water immersion restraint). Macroscopic pictures of the ulcerogenic stomach explain that in contrast to other models, cold-restraint stress (CRS) exposure produced marked ulcers on the fundic area of the stomach. Results of the present study depicted that each stress model significantly increased ulcer index, microvascular permeability and decreased hexosamine level, however, the maximum in the case of CRS-exposed rats. Total acidity and pH of the gastric content remains unchanged in all the stress models. On the contrary, the gastric volume significantly decreased only in case of CRS, while unchanged in other stress models. The overall results revealed that the CRS resembles the pathophysiology of SRMD closely. It is the best and feasible model among all the models to evaluate drugs for the treatment of SRMD.

Risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult neurocritical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction

Neurocritical care patients are at high risk for stress-related upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in this patient group.

Methods

A systematic search of major electronic literature databases was conducted. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which researchers compared the effects of SUP (with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists) with placebo or no prophylaxis in neurocritical care patients. The primary outcome was UGI bleeding, and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and nosocomial pneumonia. Study heterogeneity was sought and quantified. The results were reported as risk ratios/relative risks (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

We included 8 RCTs comprising an aggregate of 829 neurocritical care patients. Among these trials, one study conducted in a non–intensive care unit setting that did not meet our inclusion criteria was ultimately included based on further evaluation. All studies were judged as having a high or unclear risk of bias. SUP was more effective than placebo or no prophylaxis at reducing UGI bleeding (random effects: RR 0.31; 95 % CI 0.20–0.47; P < 0.00001; I² = 45 %) and all-cause mortality (fixed effects: RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.50–0.98; P = 0.04; I² = 0 %). There was no difference between SUP and placebo or no prophylaxis regarding nosocomial pneumonia (random effects: RR 1.14; 95 % CI 0.67–1.94; P = 0.62; I² = 42 %). The slight asymmetry of the funnel plots raised the concern of small trial bias, and apparent heterogeneity existed in participants, interventions, control treatments, and outcome measures.

Conclusions

In neurocritical care patients, SUP seems to be more effective than placebo or no prophylaxis in preventing UGI bleeding and reducing all-cause mortality while not increasing the risk of nosocomial pneumonia. The robustness of this conclusion is limited by a lack of trials with a low risk of bias, sparse data, heterogeneity among trials, and a concern regarding small trial bias.

Trial registration

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier: CRD42015015802. Date of registration: 6 Jan 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1107-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prevalence and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients

PURPOSE

To describe the prevalence of, risk factors for, and prognostic importance of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients.

METHODS

We included adults without GI bleeding who were acutely admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during a 7-day period. The primary outcome was clinically important GI bleeding in ICU, and the analyses included estimations of baseline risk factors and potential associations with 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,034 patients in 97 ICUs in 11 countries were included. Clinically important GI bleeding occurred in 2.6 % (95 % confidence interval 1.6-3.6 %) of patients. The following variables at ICU admission were independently associated with clinically important GI bleeding: three or more co-existing diseases (odds ratio 8.9, 2.7-28.8), co-existing liver disease (7.6, 3.3-17.6), use of renal replacement therapy (6.9, 2.7-17.5), co-existing coagulopathy (5.2, 2.3-11.8), acute coagulopathy (4.2, 1.7-10.2), use of acid suppressants (3.6, 1.3-10.2) and higher organ failure score (1.4, 1.2-1.5). In ICU, 73 % (71-76 %) of patients received acid suppressants; most received proton pump inhibitors. In patients with clinically important GI bleeding, crude and adjusted odds for mortality were 3.7 (1.7-8.0) and 1.7 (0.7-4.3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In ICU patients clinically important GI bleeding is rare, and acid suppressants are frequently used. Co-existing diseases, liver failure, coagulopathy and organ failures are the main risk factors for GI bleeding. Clinically important GI bleeding was not associated with increased adjusted 90-day mortality, which largely can be explained by severity of comorbidity, other organ failures and age.

Acid peptic diseases: pharmacological approach to treatment

Acid peptic disorders are the result of distinctive, but overlapping pathogenic mechanisms leading to either excessive acid secretion or diminished mucosal defense. They are common entities present in daily clinical practice that, owing to their chronicity, represent a significant cost to healthcare. Key elements in the success of controlling these entities have been the development of potent and safe drugs based on physiological targets. The histamine-2 receptor antagonists revolutionized the treatment of acid peptic disorders owing to their safety and efficacy profile. The proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent a further therapeutic advance due to more potent inhibition of acid secretion. Ample data from clinical trials and observational experience have confirmed the utility of these agents in the treatment of acid peptic diseases, with differential efficacy and safety characteristics between and within drug classes. Paradigms in their speed and duration of action have underscored the need for new chemical entities that, from a single dose, would provide reliable duration of acid control, particularly at night. Moreover, PPIs reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk of ulcers in patients taking NSAIDs, reflecting untargeted physiopathologic pathways and a breach in the ability to sustain an intragastric pH of more than 4. This review provides an assessment of the current understanding of the physiology of acid production, a discussion of medications targeting gastric acid production and a review of efficacy in specific acid peptic diseases, as well as current challenges and future directions in the treatment of acid-mediated diseases.

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit: is it indicated? A topical systematic review

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is regarded as standard of care in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, recent randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have questioned the rationale and level of evidence for this recommendation. The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate if SUP in the critically ill patients is indicated.

DATA SOURCES

 MEDLINE including MeSH, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library.

PARTICIPANTS

patients in the ICU.

INTERVENTIONS

pharmacological and non-pharmacological SUP.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Risk of bias was assessed according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, and risk of random errors in cumulative meta-analyses was assessed with trial sequential analysis. A total of 57 studies were included in the review. The literature on SUP in the ICU includes limited trial data and methodological weak studies. The reported incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding varies considerably. Data on the incidence and severity of GI bleeding in general ICUs in the developed world as of today are lacking. The best intervention for SUP is yet to be settled by balancing efficacy and harm. In essence, it is unresolved if intensive care patients benefit overall from SUP. The following clinically research questions are unanswered: (1) What is the incidence of GI bleeding, and which interventions are used for SUP in general ICUs today?; (2) Which criteria are used to prescribe SUP?; (3) What is the best SUP intervention?; (4) Do intensive care patients benefit from SUP with proton pump inhibitors as compared with other SUP interventions? Systematic reviews of possible interventions and well-powered observational studies and RCTs are needed.

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-critically ill patients: a prospective evaluation of current practice in a general surgery department

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

There is little evidence regarding the benefit of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) outside a critical care setting. Overprescription of SUP is not devoid of risks. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for SUP in a general surgery department.

METHOD

Data collection was performed prospectively during an 8-week period on patients hospitalized in a general surgery department (58 beds) by pharmacists. Patients with a PPI prescription for the treatment of ulcers, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, oesophagitis or epigastric pain were excluded. Patients admitted twice during the study period were not reincluded. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines on SUP were used to assess the appropriateness of de novo PPI prescriptions.

RESULTS

Among 255 patients in the study, 138 (54%) received a prophylaxis with PPI, of which 86 (62%) were de novo PPI prescriptions. A total of 129 patients (94%) received esomeprazole (according to the hospital drug policy). The most frequent dosage was at 40 mg once daily. Use of PPI for SUP was evaluated in 67 patients. A total of 53 patients (79%) had no risk factors for SUP. Twelve and two patients had one or two risk factors, respectively. At discharge, PPI prophylaxis was continued in 33% of patients with a de novo PPI prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the overuse of PPIs in non-intensive care unit patients and the inappropriate continuation of PPI prescriptions at discharge. Treatment recommendations for SUP are needed to restrict PPI use for justified indications.

Variables associated with stress ulcer prophylaxis misuse: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in hospitals. Although its indications are better delineated for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, its use in non-ICU settings is somewhat arbitrary and based on judgment.

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to assess the extent of SUP overuse in our hospital. We also carefully collected and analyzed several variables to detect associations governing this flawed behavior and its financial burden on the hospital's budget.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed charts of patients admitted to the medical floor of a tertiary referral university hospital over a 1 year period. All adult patients admitted to the medical ward who received at least one dose of SUP were included and reviewed for a multitude of variables in addition to the appropriateness of acid suppression therapy (AST).

RESULTS

We included 320 charts and found that 92% of patients admitted during that period were not eligible for SUP. The total inappropriateness of SUP was noted to be 58% (p = 0.015). Increasing age and male gender were found to be significant variables in AST misuse (p = 0.045 and p = 0.010), much like duration of hospital stay (p = 0.008). Comorbidities was also found to be a defining variable for AST overuse (odds ratio [OR] = 3.27). Patients with two or more minor risk factors were also subjected more to SUP inappropriately (OR = 3.53), in addition to patients of certain specialties (Neurology, Infectious Diseases, etc.). Our calculated financial burden was more than $23,000 per year for the medical floor.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study confirmed the growing suspicion that SUP misuse is evident on the medical floors. We also delineated several factors and variables associated with and affecting SUP overuse.

Does bloody aspirate reflect the state of upper gastrointestinal mucosa in a critically ill newborn?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Critically ill newborns have many risk factors to develop stress related mucosal lesions (SRML). We used upper endoscopy to evaluate the presence of SRML in these neonates, to know the specificity and sensitivity of the bloody gastric aspirate to detect SRML and to identify the risk factors associated with the presence of SRML and bloody gastric aspirate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study done on 100 critically ill newborn after becoming clinically stable. SRML were diagnosed if there is hyperaemia, erosions or ulcers in the oesophagus, stomach, and/or the duodenum.

RESULTS

SRML were found in 77% of neonates in the NICU though frank bloody aspirate was detected in only 22% of neonates. The presence of bloody aspirate showed low sensitivity (24.68%) and high specificity (86.96%) for the presence of SRML. The presence of bloody gastric aspirate showed a double fold risk for the presence SRML (OR=2.184, CI=0.584-8.171). Factors associated with SRML included respiratory distress (p=0.000, risk=4.006), the use of nasogastric tube (p=0.017, OR=3.281) and the use of triple antibiotics (p=0.001, risk=1.432). Factors associated with the presence of bloody gastric aspirate included the use of nasogastric tube (OR=1.629, p=0.000) and the presence of haemostatic disorders (OR=3.143, p=0.039). It was also associated with lower haemoglobin levels (p=0.000).

CONCLUSION

SRML represents an under-diagnosed problem in NICUs. Absence of bloody gastric aspirate does not exclude the presence of SRML.

Gastrointestinal prophylaxis in neurocritical care

The aim of this study is to review and summarize the relevant literature regarding pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic methods of prophylaxis against gastrointestinal (GI) stress ulceration, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Stress ulcers are a known complication of a variety of critical illnesses. The literature regarding epidemiology and management of stress ulcers and complications thereof, is vast and mostly encompasses patients in medical and surgical intensive care units. This article aims to extrapolate meaningful data for use with a population of critically ill neurologic and neurosurgical patients in the neurological intensive care unit setting. Studies were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials and NLM PubMed for English articles dealing with an adult population. We also scanned bibliographies of relevant studies. The results show that H(2)A, sucralfate, and PPI all reduce the incidence of UGIB in neurocritically ill patients, but H(2)A blockers may cause encephalopathy and interact with anticonvulsant drugs, and have been associated with higher rates of nosocomial pneumonias, but causation remains unproven and controversial. For these reasons, we advocate against routine use of H(2)A for GI prophylaxis in neurocritical patients. There is a paucity of high-level evidence studies that apply to the neurocritical care population. From this study, it is concluded that stress ulcer prophylaxis among critically ill neurologic and neurosurgical patients is important in preventing ulcer-related GI hemorrhage that contributes to both morbidity and mortality. Further, prospective trials are needed to elucidate which methods of prophylaxis are most appropriate and efficacious for specific illnesses in this population.

Mitigating endoplasmic reticulum stress with revaprazan ameliorates stress-related mucosal disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The term "stress-related mucosal disease" (SRMD) represents conditions ranging from superficial mucosal damage to focal deep mucosal damage in the stomach, of which pathogenesis is deduced to be violent mucosal ischemia or excess oxidative stress, but not fully clarified yet. Under the hypothesis that mucosal cell apoptosis subsequent to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress might play a crucial role, we evaluated the efficacy and mechanism that novel acid pump antagonist (APA), revaprazan, alleviated water immersion restraint stress (WIRS) induced SRMD in rats.

METHODS

In order to define whether WIRS-induced SRMD is associated with ER stress, we checked the alteration in the expression of ER stress markers including GRP78, CHOP, XBP-1, BiP as well as apoptosis in WIRS-induced SRMD. The efficacy of revaprazan on either alleviating ER stress or attenuating SRMD was compared with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and gastroprotectant.

RESULTS

Ten hours of WIRS induced a severe degree of SRMD, in which ER stress markers including CHOP, XBP1, and BiP were significantly overexpressed in the gastric tissues. However, these markers of ER stress were significantly decreased in the group pretreated with revaprazan compared to PPI or gastroprotectant, accompanied with a significant reduction in apoptotic index. In addition to ER stress, revaprazan imposed anti-inflammatory benefit to limit SRMD based on significant levels of inflammatory cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Endoplasmic reticulum stress accompanied with drastic apoptosis was implicated in the development of SRMD, but revaprazan could rescue the stomach from SRMD through alleviating ER stress in epithelial cells much better than either PPI or gastroprotectant.

Stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines: Are they being implemented in Lebanese health care centers?

AIM

To evaluate the current practice of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in Lebanese Health care centers.

METHODS

A multi-center prospective chart review study was conducted over 8 mo. A questionnaire was distributed to pharmacy students who collected data on demographics, SUP medications, dose, route, duration and associated risk factors. The appropriateness of SUP use was determined as per American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines. Institutional review board approval was obtained from each hospital center.

RESULTS

A total of 1004 patients were included. 67% of the patients who received prophylaxis did not have an indication for SUP. The majority (71.6%) of the patients who were administered parenteral drugs can tolerate oral medications. Overall, the regimen of acid-suppressant drugs was suboptimal in 87.6% of the sample. This misuse was mainly observed in non-teaching hospitals.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the need, in Lebanese hospitals, to establish clinical practice guidelines for the use of SUP; mainly in non-critical care settings.

Gastric tube perforation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

We searched for cases of perforation of the gastric tube after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by reviewing the literature. Only 13 cases were found in the English literature, and serious complications were seen in all cases, especially in cases of posterior mediastinal reconstruction. However, in the Japanese literature serious complications were also frequently seen in retrosternal reconstruction. Gastric tubes are at a higher risk of developing an ulcer than the normal stomach, including an ulcer due to Helicobacter pylori infection, insufficient blood supply, gastric stasis, and bile juice regurgitation. H. pylori eradication and acid-suppressive medications are important preventive therapies for ordinary gastric ulcers, but for gastric tube ulcers the effects of such treatments are still controversial. We tried to determine the most appropriate treatment to avoid serious complications in the gastric tubes, but we could not confirm an optimal route because each had advantages and disadvantages. However, at least in cases with severe atrophic gastritis due to H. pylori infection or a history of frequent peptic ulcer treatment, the antesternal route is clearly the best. Many cases of gastric tube ulcers involve no pain, and vagotomy may be one of the reasons for this absence of pain. Therefore, periodic endoscopic examination may be necessary to rule out the presence of an ulcer.

Intravenous esomeprazole pharmacodynamics in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

A widely held belief contends that food-induced proton pump activation is important for optimal proton pump inhibitor-induced inhibition of gastric acid secretion. This study was undertaken to assess intragastric acid control with intravenous (IV) esomeprazole in critically ill patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This open-label, single-arm, exploratory trial was conducted at five university or regional hospital intensive care units in the US. Adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit who required mechanical ventilation and had at least one additional risk factor for stress-induced ulcer received twice-daily IV esomeprazole 40 mg for 48 hours and could continue for another 24 hours if no prepyloric enteral feedings were planned.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

D9612L00107; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00428701.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy variable was the linear-interpolated percentage of time intragastric pH was > or =4 during 24-48 hours. Secondary efficacy variables included the interpolated percentage of time intragastric pH was > or =4 during 0-24, 0-48, and 48-72 hours, the percentage of gastric aspirates collected with pH > or =4 during 0-24, 24-48, 0-48, and 48-72 hours, and time to stable pH > or =4. Safety was assessed based on adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled (one was excluded because of previous partial gastrectomy). Interpolated mean percentage time pH > or =4 was 88.8%, 80.7%, and 83.5% for 24-48, 0-24, and 0-48 hours, respectively. For 0-72 hours, > or =78% of gastric aspirates had pH > or =4. Median time to stable pH was 1 hour (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 2.00). Treatment was well tolerated, with no evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding. A total of 75 AEs occurred in 34 patients, none considered treatment related.

CONCLUSIONS

In this noncontrolled exploratory study, twice-daily IV esomeprazole 40 mg rapidly decreased intragastric acidity and effectively maintained pH >/=4 during 0-72 hours in fasting, critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients at high risk for stress ulcers.

Proton pump inhibitors: actions and reactions

Proton pump inhibitors are the second most commonly prescribed drug class in the United States. The increased utilization of PPIs parallels the rising incidence of reflux disease. Owing to their clinical efficacy and relative lack of tachyphylaxis, PPIs have largely displaced H-2 receptor antagonists in the treatment of acid peptic disorders. The elevation of intragastric pH and subsequent alterations of gastric physiology induced by PPIs may yield undesired effects within the upper GI tract. The ubiquity of the various types of H(+), K(+)-ATPase could also contribute to non-gastric effects. PPIs may influence physiology in other ways, such as inducing transepithelial leak.

Gastrointestinal symptoms in intensive care patients

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) problems are not uniformly assessed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and respective data in available literature are insufficient. We aimed to describe the prevalence, risk factors and importance of different GI symptoms.

METHODS

We prospectively studied all patients hospitalized to the General ICU of Tartu University Hospital in 2004-2007.

RESULTS

Of 1374 patients, 62 were excluded due to missing data. Seven hundred and seventy-five (59.1%) patients had at least one GI symptom at least during 1 day of their stay, while 475 (36.2%) suffered from more than one symptom. Absent or abnormal bowel sounds were documented in 542 patients (41.3%), vomiting/regurgitation in 501 (38.2%), high gastric aspirate volume in 298 (22.7%), diarrhoea in 184 (14.0%), bowel distension in 139 (10.6%) and GI bleeding in 97 (7.4%) patients during their ICU stay. Absent or abnormal bowel sounds and GI bleeding were associated with significantly higher mortality. The number of simultaneous GI symptoms was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. The ICU length of stay and mortality of patients who had two or more GI symptoms simultaneously were significantly higher than in patients with a maximum of one GI symptom.

CONCLUSION

GI symptoms occur frequently in ICU patients. Absence of bowel sounds and GI bleeding are associated with impaired outcome. Prevalence of GI symptoms at the first day in ICU predicts the mortality of the patients.

Late presentation of gastric tube ulcer perforation after oesophageal atresia repair

Ulcer formation in intrathoracic grafts after oesophageal replacement is considered an infrequent complication of the procedure. We present a rare case of a gastric tube ulcer with perforation, more than 30 years after gastric tube interposition for oesophageal atresia.