How to Withdraw Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Effectiveness of an Algorithmic Approach to Ventilator Withdrawal at the End of Life: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

Background: The transition to spontaneous breathing puts patients who are undergoing ventilator withdrawal at high risk for developing respiratory distress. A patient-centered algorithmic approach could standardize this process and meet unique patient needs because a single approach (weaning vs. one-step extubation) does not capture the needs of a heterogenous population undergoing this palliative procedure. Objectives: (1) Demonstrate that the algorithmic approach can be effective to ensure greater patient respiratory comfort compared to usual care; (2) determine differences in opioid or benzodiazepine use; (3) predict factors associated with duration of survival. Design/Settings/Measures: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized design at five sites was used. Sites crossed over to the algorithm in random order after usual care data were obtained. Patient comfort was measured with the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale© (RDOS) at baseline, at ventilator off, and every 15-minutes for an hour. Parenteral morphine and lorazepam equivalents from the onset of the process until patient death were calculated. Results: Usual care data n = 120, algorithm data n = 48. Gender and race were evenly distributed. All patients in the usual care arm underwent a one-step ventilator cessation; 58% of patients in the algorithm arm were weaned over an average of 18 ± 27 minutes as prescribed in the algorithm. Patients had significantly less respiratory distress in the intervention arm (F = 10.41, p = 0.0013, effective size [es] = 0.49). More opioids (t = -2.30, p = 0.023) and benzodiazepines (t = -2.08, p = 0.040) were given in the control arm. Conclusions: The algorithm was effective in ensuring patient respiratory comfort. Surprisingly, more medication was given in the usual care arm; however, less may be needed when distress is objectively measured (RDOS), and treatment is initiated as soon as distress develops as in the algorithm. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT03121391.

Clinical characteristics and course of dying in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis withdrawing from long-term ventilation

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or tracheotomy with invasive ventilation (TIV) are treatment options in ALS. However, a proportion of patients receiving long-term ventilation decide to have it withdrawn. The objective of this study was to analyse the clinical characteristics and palliative approaches in ALS patients withdrawing from long-term ventilation (WLTV). In a cohort study, two different palliative concepts in WLTV were studied: (1) augmented symptom control (ASC; sedation not intended) in patients with ventilator-free tolerance; (2) continuous deep sedation (CDS; sedation intended) in patients without ventilator-free tolerance. Results showed that WLTV was realised in 49 ALS patients (NIV = 13; TIV = 36). Mean daily ventilation was 23.4 h. The ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) was low (5.6 of 48). Forty-one per cent of patients (n = 20) presented with ophthalmoplegia. ASC was performed in 20 patients, CDS in 29 patients. The mean time to death following disconnection was 32 (0.3-164) h during ASC and 0.3 (0.2-0.6) h in CDS. In conclusion, a low ALSFRS-R, high incidence of ophthalmoplegia and extended ventilator dependency were found before WLTV. The presence or absence of ventilator-free tolerance determined the approach to the management of symptoms, the setting for immediate end-of-life care and the course of dying in WLTV.

Discontinuance of life sustaining treatment utilizing ketamine for symptom management

We present the case of an otherwise healthy 21-year-old female who developed severe respiratory failure following a minor procedure requiring ECMO and bi-level ventilation. During her protracted ICU course, she had significant difficulties with agitation and was titrated to the following regimen: hydromorphone 30 mg/hour, fentanyl 200 mcg/hour, dexmedetomidine 1.5 mcg/kg/hour, propofol at 70 mcg/kg/min, and midazolam at 20 mg/hour. We were consulted to assist in withdrawal of life prolonging measures at the family's request and given high doses of commonly used opioid and sedative medications successfully utilized methadone and ketamine for symptom control. This case study would indicate that in selected patients on high dose opioid and sedative medications prior to withdrawal of life prolonging measures ketamine may be considered for symptom management.

Providing a "good death" for oncology patients during the final hours of life in the intensive care unit

Cancer is a leading cause of death in the United States. Aggressiveness of cancer care continues to rise in parallel with scientific discoveries in the treatment of a variety of malignancies. As a result, patients with cancer often require care in intensive care units (ICUs). Although growth in hospice and palliative care programs has occurred nationwide, access to these programs varies by geographic region and hospital type. Thus, critical care nurses may be caring for patients with cancer during the final hours of life in the ICU without the support of palliative care experts. This article provides an overview of the meaning of the final hours of life for cancer patients and uses principles of a "good death" and the tenets of hospice care to organize recommendations for critical care nurses for providing high quality end-of-life care to patients with cancer in the ICU.

A Respiratory Distress Observation Scale for patients unable to self-report dyspnea

BACKGROUND

Standard measures of dyspnea rely on self-report. Cognitive impairment and nearness to death may interfere with symptom distress reporting leading to underrecognition and overtreatment or undertreatment. Previous psychometric testing of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale (RDOS) demonstrated internal consistency and convergent validity with dyspnea self-report and discriminant validity with pain and no dyspnea. Additional testing was needed with patients unable to self-report. The aim of this study was to establish further the reliability and construct validity of a revised RDOS.

METHODS

An observational design was used with 89 consecutive patients referred for inpatient palliative care consultation and at risk for dyspnea who had one or more of lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, or pneumonia. Patients were observed and the RDOS scored once each day for up to three days after the initial consultation. Other measures included: dyspnea self-report, neurologic diagnoses, opioid or benzodiazepine use, peripheral oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide level, consciousness, cognitive state, nearness to death, and patient demographics.

RESULTS

Perfect interrater reliability across data collectors was achieved. No differences in RDOS scoring were found by patient demographics. RDOS was associated with use of oxygen (p < 0.01), oxygen saturation (p < 0.01) and nearness to death (p < 0.01). A significant decrease in RDOS was found over time corresponding with treatment (p < 0.01). The reliability of this 8-item scale using Cronbach alpha is 0.64.

CONCLUSIONS

Declining consciousness and/or cognition are expected when patients are near death. The RDOS performed well when tested with terminally ill patients who were at risk for respiratory distress, most of whom could not self-report dyspnea. The tool is sensitive to detect changes over time and measure response to treatment. The RDOS is simple to use; scoring takes less than 5 minutes. The RDOS has clinical and research utility to measure and trend respiratory distress and response to treatment.

Duration of withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit and association with family satisfaction

RATIONALE

Most deaths in the intensive care unit (ICU) involve withholding or withdrawing multiple life-sustaining therapies, but little is known about how to proceed practically and how this process affects family satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the duration of life-support withdrawal and its association with overall family satisfaction with care in the ICU.

METHODS

We studied family members of 584 patients who died in an ICU at 1 of 14 hospitals after withdrawal of life support and for whom complete medical chart and family questionnaires were available.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data concerning six life-sustaining interventions administered during the last 5 days of life were collected. Families were asked to rate their satisfaction with care using the Family Satisfaction in the ICU questionnaire. For nearly half of the patients (271/584), withdrawal of all life-sustaining interventions took more than 1 day. Patients with a prolonged (>1 d) life-support withdrawal were younger, stayed longer in the ICU, had more life-sustaining interventions, had less often a diagnosis of cancer, and had more decision makers involved. Among patients with longer ICU stays, a longer duration in life-support withdrawal was associated with an increase in family satisfaction with care (P = 0.037). Extubation before death was associated with higher family satisfaction with care (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal of life support is a complex process that depends on patient and family characteristics. Stuttering withdrawal is a frequent phenomenon that seems to be associated with family satisfaction. Extubation before death should be encouraged if possible.