Monitoring of head injured patients

Advances in neuro-monitoring

Neuromonitoring aims to detect harmful physiologic events, early enough to guide the treatment instituted. Evidences encourage us to implement multimodal monitoring, as no single monitor is capable of providing a complete picture of dynamic cerebral state. This review highlights the role of intracranial pressure monitoring, cerebral oxygenation (jugular venous oximetry, brain tissue oxygenation, near infrared oximetry, cerebral microdialysis) and cerebral blood flow monitoring (direct and indirect methods) in the management of neurologically injured patients. In this context, the recent developments of these monitors along with the relevant clinical implications have been discussed. Nevertheless, the diverse range of data obtained from these monitors needs to be integrated and simplified for the clinician. Hence, the future research should focus on identification of a most useful monitor for integration into multimodal system.

A multi-parameters fusion model for non-invasive detection of intracranial pressure

On the basis of discussing the limitation of a single intracranial pressure non-invasive detection method in clinical application, the feasibility of the measurement and analysis model is investigated based on multi-parameters organic integration facing to intracranial pressure non-invasive measurement. Then the sensitivity analysis for the relation between the detected parameters and the change of intracranial pressure will be done. Finally, a synthesized non-invasive evaluation frame for intracranial pressure measurement with disease-adaptive model choice will be realized. By this way, a new idea is provided for the realization of the non-invasive measurement of intracranial pressure and its clinical application, which will be of significance for improving the clinical feasibility and monitoring accuracy of intracranial pressure non-invasive measuring methods.

Neuromonitoring for Traumatic Brain Injury in Neurosurgical Intensive Care

The primary aim of neuromonitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury is early detection of secondary brain insults so that timely interventions can be instituted to prevent or treat secondary brain injury. Intracranial pressure monitoring has been a stalwart in neuromonitoring and is still very much the main parameter to guide therapy in brain injured patients in many centres. Cerebral oxygenation is also established as an important parameter for monitoring: global cerebral oxygenation is reliably measured using jugular venous oxygen saturation while brain tissue oxygen tension measurement allows focal brain oxygenation to be monitored. Near-infrared spectroscopy allows a non-invasive option for monitoring of regional cerebral oxygenation. Cerebral microdialysis makes focal measurements of markers of cellular metabolism and cellular injury and death possible, and it is in transition from being a research tool to being an important clinical tool in neuromonitoring. Multimodal monitoring allows different parameters of brain physiology and function to be monitored and can improve identification and prediction of secondary cerebral insults. Multimodal monitoring can potentially improve outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury by promoting customised treatment strategies for individual patients in place of the commonplace practice of strict adherence to achieving the same standard physiological targets for every patient.

Methods of monitoring brain oxygenation

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic brain ischemia or hypoxia is a major potential cause of secondary injury that may lead to poor outcome. Avoidance, or amelioration, of this secondary injury depends on early diagnosis and intervention before permanent injury occurs. However, tools to monitor brain oxygenation continuously in the neuro-intensive care unit have been lacking.

DISCUSSION

In recent times, methods of monitoring aspects of brain oxygenation continuously by the bedside have been evaluated in several experimental and clinical series and are potentially changing the way we manage head-injured patients. These monitors have the potential to alert the clinician to possible secondary injury and enable intervention, help interpret pathophysiological changes (e.g., hyperemia causing raised intracranial pressure), monitor interventions (e.g., hyperventilation for increased intracranial pressure), and prognosticate. This review focuses on jugular venous saturation, brain tissue oxygen tension, and near-infrared spectroscopy as practical methods that may have an important role in managing patients with brain injury, with a particular focus on the available evidence in children. However, to use these monitors effectively and to understand the studies in which these monitors are employed, it is important for the clinician to appreciate the technical characteristics of each monitor, as well as respective strengths and limitations of each. It is equally important that the clinician understands relevant aspects of brain oxygen physiology and head trauma pathophysiology to enable correct interpretation of the monitored data and therefore to direct an appropriate therapeutic response that is likely to benefit, not harm, the patient.

Monitoring intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important cause of secondary brain injury, and ICP monitoring has become an established component of brain monitoring after traumatic brain injury. ICP cannot be reliably estimated from any specific clinical feature or computed tomography finding and must actually be measured. Different methods of monitoring ICP have been described but intraventricular catheters and microtransducer systems are most widely used in clinical practice. ICP is a complex variable that links ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure and provides additional information from identification and analysis of pathologic ICP wave forms. ICP monitoring can also be augmented by measurement of indices describing cerebrovascular pressure reactivity and pressure-volume compensatory reserve. There is considerable variability in the use of ICP monitoring and treatment modalities among head injury centers. However, there is a large body of clinical evidence supporting the use of ICP monitoring to detect intracranial mass lesions early, guide therapeutic interventions, and assess prognosis, and it is recommended by consensus guidelines for head injury management. There remains a need for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to identify the value of ICP monitoring and management after head injury.