Critical care issues in liver transplantation

Hemodynamic Changes Are Predictive of Coagulopathic Hemorrhage After Living Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to evaluate the predictors of coagulopathic hemorrhage after living-donor liver transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 161 patients who had undergone living-donor liver transplant from July 2005 to April 2014 at a single medical institution. Of these patients, 32 developed hemorrhage after transplant. Patients were separated into those with coagulopathy-related hemorrhage (n=15) or noncoagulopathy-related hemorrhage (n=17) based on the results of computed tomography images. Predictors of hemorrhage after living-donor liver transplant evaluated in this study included preoperative, perioperative, and posttransplant factors and hemodynamic status.

RESULTS

Patients who developed coagulopathy-related hemorrhage had significantly lower pretransplant platelet counts (P = .040), a longer cold-ischemia time (P = .045), more blood loss (P = .040), and earlier onset of hemorrhage (P = .048) than patients who had noncoagulopathy-related hemorrhage after transplant. Results of the generalized estimating equation analysis showed that heart rate and central venous pressure differed significantly between the 2 groups of patients. Heart rates increased significantly during hemorrhage (P < .010). Central venous pressure was higher in the coagulopathic group (P = .005) than in the noncoagulopathic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower pretransplant platelet counts, longer cold ischemia time, more blood loss, earlier onset of hemorrhage, and higher central venous pressure level are indicators of coagulopathic hemorrhage after living-donor liver transplant.

Effect of preoperative iron deficiency in liver transplant recipients on length of intensive care unit stay

Liver transplant (LT) recipients often display iron deficiency preoperatively, which significantly increases the quantity of blood that needs to be transfused intraoperatively, A risk factor for a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether there was a clinically significant association between iron deficiency and the length of ICU stay, among 153 patients scheduled for OLT from September 2011 to June 2012. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their baseline iron status: iron- deficient (ID) and non-ID (normal iron profile) cohorts. Iron deficiency was assessed on the basis of several parameters; transferrin saturation as well as serum iron, ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor, and C-reactive protein levels. We retrospectively analyzed the data regarding demographic and clinical features, preoperative laboratory values, intraoperative transfusions, and length of ICU stay. Patient demographic features and preoperative values were similar between the groups. Preoperative iron deficiency, which was diagnosed in 72 patients (58.6%), was associated with a greater intraoperative use of fresh frozen plasma and red blood cell transfusions (P = .0001). The median length of ICU stay after LT was longer among the ID versus the non-ID group (5 and 3 days per patient, respectively; P = .0001). Therefore, we have suggested that preoperative iron deficiency may be a prognostic factor for the length of ICU stay after LT.

APACHE III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III prognostic system has not been previously validated in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We hypothesized that APACHE III would perform satisfactorily in patients after OLT

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients admitted to the ICU after OLT between July 1996 and May 2008 were identified. Data were abstracted from the institutional APACHE III and liver transplantation databases and individual patient medical records. Standardized mortality ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated by dividing the observed mortality rates by the rates predicted by APACHE III. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic were used to assess, respectively, discrimination and calibration of APACHE III.

Results

APACHE III data were available for 918 admissions after OLT. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) APACHE III (APIII) and Acute Physiology (APS) scores on the day of transplant were 60.5 (25.8) and 50.8 (23.6), respectively. Mean (SD) predicted ICU and hospital mortality rates were 7.3% (15.4) and 10.6% (18.9), respectively. The observed ICU and hospital mortality rates were 1.1% and 3.4%, respectively. The standardized ICU and hospital mortality ratios with their 95% C.I. were 0.15 (0.07 to 0.27) and 0.32 (0.22 to 0.45), respectively.

There were statistically significant differences in APS, APIII, predicted ICU and predicted hospital mortality between survivors and non-survivors. In predicting mortality, the AUC of APACHE III prediction of hospital death was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.68). The Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic was 5.288 with a p value of 0.871 (10 degrees of freedom).

Conclusion

APACHE III discriminates poorly between survivors and non-survivors of patients admitted to the ICU after OLT. Though APACHE III has been shown to be valid in heterogenous populations and in certain groups of patients with specific diagnoses, it should be used with caution – if used at all – in recipients of liver transplantation.

Ultrasonic cardiac output monitor provides accurate measurement of cardiac output in recipients after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM; USCOM Pty. Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia) has been accepted as a noninvasive device for measuring cardiac function in various clinical conditions. The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of this device with that of the thermodilution technique in recipients in the early postoperative period after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Fifteen mechanically ventilated patients were studied on the first postoperative day after liver transplantation. We compared the left-sided and right-sided cardiac output (CO) determined by USCOM with that obtained from the thermodilution technique with a pulmonary artery catheter every 8 hours in the intensive care unit. Each patient received a total of four paired measurements. Bland-Altman analysis was used for bias and precision testing. The CO measured by USCOM and the thermodilution method were considered interchangeable if the limits of agreement lay within +/- 1 L per minute or 20% of the mean CO.

RESULTS

Forty-eight paired left-sided CO measurements were obtained from 12 patients. Three patients were excluded due to unacceptable signals. Comparison of these two techniques revealed a bias of 0.13 L per minute and limits of agreement at -0.65 L and 0.92 L per minute. Fifty-six paired right-sided CO measurements were obtained from 14 patients with one patient excluded due to an unobtainable optimal signal. A bias of 0.11 L per minute with limits of agreement at -0.51 L and 0.72 L per minute were found for these two techniques.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate the accuracy of USCOM in the post-liver transplant setting. This device is accurate in measuring CO in liver transplant recipients postoperatively. Possible risks of arrhythmia, infection and pulmonary artery rupture can be avoided because of its noninvasive nature. USCOM should be considered as an alternative in hemodynamic monitoring after liver transplantation.