Textbook Recommendations for Preventing and Treating Perineal Injury at Vaginal Delivery

[Functional proctology at the University of Pécs]

INTRODUCTION

Functional proctological investigations have been introduced at Pécs University of Sciences 15 years ago. The Pelvic Floor Multidisciplinary Team has been re-launched after many years of pause in 2010. Experience of the team in the treatment of faecal incontinence and obstructed defecation syndrome is discussed.

PATIENTS

In the past 3 years 9 patients underwent sphincter reconstruction for faecal incontinence. The Pelvic Floor Team in the past 1.5 year consulted 31 patients with constipation, who were considered by the referee for surgical intervention. Following investigations 10 patients underwent surgery, the rest of them were treated conservatively. Seven patients underwent perineal reconstruction with mesh, three patients had ventral rectopexy with additional levatoro-pexy.

RESULTS

78% of patients operated on for faecal incontinence reported full continence, 88% improvement. We invented a new symptom score with a maximum of 20 points to evaluate results of treatment of patients with Obstructed Defecation Syndrome. Patients who underwent perineal repair were interviewed pre and postoperatively. They scored 14 ± 2.83 and 5.4 ± 4.62 points, respectively (p = 0.0075).

CONCLUSION

Functional proctological patients require a specialist approach from history taking through investigation to treatment. Majority of patients benefit from conservative treatment. Adequate patient selection is essential for successful surgical treatment. Symptom scores applied pre and postoperatively facilitate proper patient selection for various surgical methods.

Ultrasonographic anatomy of perineal structures during pregnancy and immediately following obstetric injury

OBJECTIVES

To assess perineal anatomy using ultrasound before and immediately after delivery.

METHODS

Structures in the perineum were studied by real-time two-dimensional transvaginal and endoanal ultrasound imaging using a combined linear and semicircular (up to 200 degrees sector) probe. We examined 45 nulliparous pregnant women and 44 primiparae immediately after delivery (40 with anal sphincter tears and four without sphincter injury). In each case a single longitudinal image was later assessed by two observers in order to evaluate interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

In pregnancy, the perineal membrane, puboperineal muscles, conjoined longitudinal muscle and central point were identified on real-time examination in 91%, 98%, 100% and 100% of cases, respectively. At offline evaluation of the longitudinal images obtained for each of the pregnant women, the percentage of cases in which each structure was identified by both observers ranged from 64% to 100%. In the women who were examined postpartum, all structures were identified by both observers in all four of the women without sphincter injury. In the women with sphincter tears, the perineal membrane, puboperineal muscles, conjoined longitudinal muscle and central point were found by ultrasound to be intact in 10%, 10%, 55% and 18%, respectively. The agreement between two observers regarding identification of intact structures in a single longitudinal image was good for perineal membrane (kappa index, 0.66), fair for puboperineal muscles (kappa index, 0.40), and poor for conjoined longitudinal muscle and central point (kappa index, 0.08 and 0.17, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonography might be helpful in the evaluation of perineal anatomy and extent of perineal tears. However, the relatively poor agreement between the two observers evaluating single linear transvaginal images implies that both transverse and longitudinal projections are necessary to obtain relevant information. Further studies are needed regarding the importance of specific sonographically identified structures and their role in pelvic floor dysfunction after delivery.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Obstetric sphincter damage is the most common cause of fecal incontinence in women. This review aimed to survey the literature, and reach a consensus, on its incidence, risk factors, and management.

METHOD

This systematic review identified relevant studies from the following sources: Medline, Cochrane database, cross referencing from identified articles, conference abstracts and proceedings, and guidelines published by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (United Kingdom), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (United Kingdom), and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

RESULTS

A total of 451 articles and abstracts were reviewed. There was a wide variation in the reported incidence of anal sphincter muscle injury from childbirth, with the true incidence likely to be approximately 11% of postpartum women. Risk factors for injury included instrumental delivery, prolonged second stage of labor, birth weight greater than 4 kg, fetal occipitoposterior presentation, and episiotomy. First vaginal delivery, induction of labor, epidural anesthesia, early pushing, and active restraint of the fetal head during delivery may be associated with an increased risk of sphincter trauma. The majority of sphincter tears can be identified clinically by a suitably trained clinician. In those with recognized tears at the time of delivery repair should be performed using long-term absorbable sutures. Patients presenting later with fecal incontinence may be managed successfully using antidiarrheal drugs and biofeedback. In those who fail conservative treatment, and who have a substantial sphincter disruption, elective repair may be attempted. The results of primary and elective repair may deteriorate with time. Sacral nerve stimulation may be an appropriate alternative treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstetric anal sphincter damage, and related fecal incontinence, are common. Risk factors for such trauma are well recognized, and should allow for reduction of injury by proactive management. Improved classification, recognition, and follow-up of at-risk patients should facilitate improved outcome. Further studies are required to determine optimal long-term management.

Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the risk factors for anal sphincter tears during vaginal delivery and their association with fecal incontinence symptoms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence links sphincter tears with fecal incontinence, which has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms cohort study reported that the incidence and severity of fecal incontinence was increased in primiparous women experiencing a sphincter tear. Risk factors for tear included forceps, occiput posterior, vacuum delivery, prolonged second stage of labor and epidural. Using cesarean delivery to prevent fecal incontinence has not been justified, but the confluence of these risk factors in the context of labor management may be important in deciding on earlier intervention with cesarean delivery. Internal anal sphincter defects impact fecal incontinence, highlighting the identification and repair of the internal anal sphincter for future research and clinical applications. Routine episiotomy (or instrumentation) is not warranted, and there is no clear advantage to mediolateral episiotomy or overlapping sphincter repair. Postpartum ultrasound of the sphincter complex may have an emerging role.

SUMMARY

The modifiable risk factors of routine episotomy and instrumented delivery are associated with sphincter tear; definitive recommendations for labor management remain unclear in preventing fecal incontinence.