Effect of increased dialysate volume on peritoneal surface area among peritoneal dialysis patients

Current clinical practice in adapted automated peritoneal dialysis (aAPD)-A prospective, non-interventional study

Adapted automated peritoneal dialysis (aAPD), comprising a sequence of dwells with different durations and fill volumes, has been shown to enhance both ultrafiltration and solute clearance compared to standard peritoneal dialysis with constant time and volume dwells. The aim of this non-interventional study was to describe the different prescription patterns used in aAPD in clinical practice and to observe outcomes characterizing volume status, dialysis efficiency, and residual renal function over 1 year. Prevalent and incident, adult aAPD patients were recruited during routine clinic visits, and aAPD prescription, volume status, residual renal function and laboratory data were documented at baseline and every quarter thereafter for 1 year. Treatments were prescribed according to the nephrologist's medical judgement in accordance with each center's clinical routine. Of 180 recruited patients, 160 were analyzed. 27 different aAPD prescription patterns were identified. 79 patients (49.4%) received 2 small, short dwells followed by 3 long, large dwells. During follow-up, volume status changed only marginally, with visit mean values ranging between 1.59 (95% confidence interval: 1.19; 1.99) and 1.97 (1.33; 2.61) L. Urine output and creatinine clearance decreased significantly, accompanied by reductions in ultrafiltration and Kt/V. 25 patients (15.6%) received a renal transplant and 15 (9.4%) were changed to hemodialysis. Options for individualization offered by aAPD are actually used in practice for optimized treatment. Changes observed in renal function and dialysis efficiency measures reflect the natural course of chronic kidney disease. No safety events were observed during the study period.

Traduction des Recommandations de l'ISPD pour l'évaluation du dysfonctionnement de la membrane péritonéale chez l'adulte

Informations concernant cette traductionDans le cadre d’un accord de partenariat entre l’ISPD et le RDPLF, le RDPLF est le traducteur français officiel des recommandations de l’ISPD. La traduction ne donne lieu à aucune compensation financière de la part de chaque société et le RDPLF s’est engagé à traduire fidèlement le texte original sous la responsabilité de deux néphrologues connus pour leur expertise dans le domaine. Avant publication le texte a été soumis à l’accord de l’ISPD. La traduction est disponible sur le site de l’ISPD et dans le Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile.Le texte est, comme l’original, libremement téléchargeable sous licence copyright CC By 4.0https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Cette traduction est destinée à aider les professionnels de la communauté francophone à prendre connaissance des recommandations de l’ISPD dans leur langue maternelle. Toute référence dans un article doit se faire au texte original en accès libre :Peritoneal Dialysis International https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860820982218 Dans les articles rédigés pour des revues françaises, conserver la référence à la version originale anglaise ci dessus, mais ajouter «version française  https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v4i3.62673"»TraducteursDr Christian Verger, néphrologue, président du RDPLFRDPLF, 30 rue Sere Depoin, 95300 Pontoise – FranceProfesseur Max Dratwa, néphrologueHôpital Universitaire Brugmann – Bruxelles – Belgique

ISPD recommendations for the evaluation of peritoneal membrane dysfunction in adults: Classification, measurement, interpretation and rationale for intervention

Lay summary

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) uses the peritoneal membrane for dialysis. The peritoneal membrane is a thin layer of tissue that lines the abdomen. The lining is used as a filter to help remove extra fluid and poisonous waste from the blood. Everybody is unique. What is normal for one person’s membrane may be very different from another person’s. The kidney care team wants to provide each person with the best dialysis prescription for them and to do this they must evaluate the person’s peritoneal lining. Sometimes dialysis treatment itself can cause the membrane to change after some years. This means more assessments (evaluations) will be needed to determine whether the person’s peritoneal membrane has changed. Changes in the membrane may require changes to the dialysis prescription. This is needed to achieve the best dialysis outcomes. A key tool for these assessments is the peritoneal equilibration test (PET). It is a simple, standardized and reproducible tool. This tool is used to measure the peritoneal function soon after the start of dialysis. The goal is to understand how well the peritoneal membrane works at the start of dialysis. Later on in treatment, the PET helps to monitor changes in peritoneal function. If there are changes between assessments causing problems, the PET data may explain the cause of the dysfunction. This may be used to change the dialysis prescription to achieve the best outcomes. The most common problem with the peritoneal membrane occurs when fluid is not removed as well as it should be. This happens when toxins (poisons) in the blood cross the membrane more quickly than they should. This is referred to as a fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR). Since more efficient fluid removal is associated with better outcomes, developing a personal PD prescription based on the person’s PSTR is critically important. A less common problem happens when the membrane fails to work properly (also called membrane dysfunction) because the peritoneal membrane is less efficient, either at the start of treatment or developing after some years. If membrane dysfunction gets worse over time, then this is associated with progressive damage, scarring and thickening of the membrane. This problem can be identified through another change of the PET. It is called reduced ‘sodium dip’. Membrane dysfunction of this type is more difficult to treat and has many implications for the individual. If the damage is major, the person may need to stop PD. They would need to begin haemodialysis treatment (also spelled hemodialysis). This is a very important and emotional decision for individuals with kidney failure. Any decision that involves stopping PD therapy or transitioning to haemodialysis therapy should be made jointly between the clinical team, the person on dialysis and a caregiver, if requested. Although evidence is lacking about how often tests should be performed to determine peritoneal function, it seems reasonable to repeat them whenever there is difficulty in removing the amount of fluid necessary for maintaining the health and well-being of the individual. Whether routine evaluation of membrane function is associated with better outcomes has not been studied. Further research is needed to answer this important question as national policies in many parts of the world and the COVID-19 has placed a greater emphasis and new incentives encouraging the greater adoption of home dialysis therapies, especially PD. For Chinese and Spanish Translation of the Lay Summary, see Online Supplement Appendix 1.

Key recommendations

Guideline 1:

A pathophysiological taxonomy: A pathophysiological classification of membrane dysfunction, which provides mechanistic links to functional characteristics, should be used when prescribing individualized dialysis or when planning modality transfer (e.g. to automated peritoneal dialysis (PD) or haemodialysis) in the context of shared and informed decision-making with the person on PD, taking individual circumstances and treatment goals into account. (practice point)

Guideline 2a:

Identification of fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR): It is recommended that the PSTR is determined from a 4-h peritoneal equilibration test (PET), using either 2.5%/2.27% or 4.25%/3.86% dextrose/glucose concentration and creatinine as the index solute. (practice point) This should be done early in the course dialysis treatment (between 6 weeks and 12 weeks) (GRADE 1A) and subsequently when clinically indicated. (practice point)

Guideline 2b:

Clinical implications and mitigation of fast solute transfer: A faster PSTR is associated with lower survival on PD. (GRADE 1A) This risk is in part due to the lower ultrafiltration (UF) and increased net fluid reabsorption that occurs when the PSTR is above the average value. The resulting lower net UF can be avoided by shortening glucose-based exchanges, using a polyglucose solution (icodextrin), and/or prescribing higher glucose concentrations. (GRADE 1A) Compared to glucose, use of icodextrin can translate into improved fluid status and fewer episodes of fluid overload. (GRADE 1A) Use of automated PD and icodextrin may mitigate the mortality risk associated with fast PSTR. (practice point)

Guideline 3:

Recognizing low UF capacity: This is easy to measure and a valuable screening test. Insufficient UF should be suspected when either (a) the net UF from a 4-h PET is <400 ml (3.86% glucose/4.25% dextrose) or <100 ml (2.27% glucose /2.5% dextrose), (GRADE 1B) and/or (b) the daily UF is insufficient to maintain adequate fluid status. (practice point) Besides membrane dysfunction, low UF capacity can also result from mechanical problems, leaks or increased fluid absorption across the peritoneal membrane not explained by fast PSTR.

Guideline 4a:

Diagnosing intrinsic membrane dysfunction (manifesting as low osmotic conductance to glucose) as a cause of UF insufficiency: When insufficient UF is suspected, the 4-h PET should be supplemented by measurement of the sodium dip at 1 h using a 3.86% glucose/4.25% dextrose exchange for diagnostic purposes. A sodium dip ≤5 mmol/L and/or a sodium sieving ratio ≤0.03 at 1 h indicates UF insufficiency. (GRADE 2B)

Guideline 4b:

Clinical implications of intrinsic membrane dysfunction (de novo or acquired): in the absence of residual kidney function, this is likely to necessitate the use of hypertonic glucose exchanges and possible transfer to haemodialysis. Acquired membrane injury, especially in the context of prolonged time on treatment, should prompt discussions about the risk of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. (practice point)

Guideline 5:

Additional membrane function tests: measures of peritoneal protein loss, intraperitoneal pressure and more complex tests that estimate osmotic conductance and ‘lymphatic’ reabsorption are not recommended for routine clinical practice but remain valuable research methods. (practice point)

Guideline 6:

Socioeconomic considerations: When resource constraints prevent the use of routine tests, consideration of membrane function should still be part of the clinical management and may be inferred from the daily UF in response to the prescription. (practice point)

Alterations of peritoneal transport characteristics in dialysis patients with ultrafiltration failure: tissue and capillary components

BACKGROUND

Ultrafiltration failure (UFF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is due to altered peritoneal transport properties leading to reduced capacity to remove excess water. Here, with the aim to establish the role of local alterations of the two major transport barriers, peritoneal tissue and capillary wall, we investigate changes in overall peritoneal transport characteristics in UFF patients in relation to corresponding local alterations of peritoneal tissue and capillary wall transport properties.

METHODS

Six-hour dwell studies using 3.86% glucose solutions and radioisotopically labelled serum albumin added to dialysate as a volume marker were analysed in 31 continuous ambulatory PD patients, 20 with normal ultrafiltration (NUF) and 11 with UFF. For each patient, the physiologically based parameters were evaluated for both transport barriers using the spatially distributed approach based on the individual intraperitoneal profiles of volume and concentrations of glucose, sodium, urea and creatinine.

RESULTS

UFF patients as compared with NUF patients had increased solute diffusivity in both barriers, peritoneal tissue and capillary wall, decreased tissue hydraulic conductivity and increased local lymphatic absorption and functional decrease in the fraction of the ultra-small pores. This resulted in altered distribution of fluid and solutes in the peritoneal tissue, and decreased penetration depths of fluid and solutes into the tissue in UFF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Mathematical modelling using a spatially distributed approach for the description of clinical data suggests that alterations both in the capillary wall and in the tissue barrier contribute to UFF through their effect on transport and distribution of solutes and fluid within the tissue.

Evaluation of Intraperitoneal Pressure and the Effect of Different Osmotic Agents on Intraperitoneal Pressure in Children

Objectives

To establish intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) in a relatively large pediatric study group and to study the effects of a 3.86% glucose solution and a 7.5% icodextrin solution on IPP during a 4-hour dwell.

Design

IPP was measured with the patient in a supine position. The intraperitoneal volume (IPV) was 1200 mL/m2 with a 1.36% glucose solution. The influence of dialysis solutions was obtained by performing two 4-hour peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) with 3.86% glucose and 7.5% icodextrin as test solution, using an IPV of 1200 mL/m2 and dextran 70 as volume marker. IPP was measured at two consecutive time points ( t = 0 and t = 240 minutes). Transcapillary ultrafiltration, net ultrafiltration, and marker clearance were calculated.

Patients

IPP was established in 30 patients with median age of 4.5 years (range 1.0 – 14.9 years). Influence of dialysis solutions on IPP was studied in 9 children with median age of 4.2 years (range 1.7 – 10.9 years) and median treatment period of 12 months (range 5.6 – 122.3 months).

Results

Mean IPP was 12.0 ± 6.5 cm H2O. Significant relations were found between the change in IPP and transcapillary ultrafiltration and body surface area during the PET with 3.86% glucose. No relations were seen during the PET with icodextrin.

Conclusions

IPP was established in a large pediatric study group and was similar to previously published values of IPP in a small number of patients. Differences in fluid kinetics have different effects on the change in IPP during a 4-hour dwell period.

The Influence of Peritoneal Surface Area on Dialysis Adequacy

In children, the prescription of peritoneal dialysis is based mainly on the choice of the peritoneal dialysis fluid, the intraperitoneal fill volume (mL/m2 body surface area (BSA)], and the contact time. The working mode of the peritoneal membrane as a dialysis membrane is more related to a dynamic complex structure than to a static hemodialyzer. Thus, the peritoneal surface area impacts on dialysis adequacy. In fact, the peritoneal surface area may be viewed as composed of three exchange entities: the anatomic area, the contact area, and the vascular area.

First, in infants, the anatomic area appears to be twofold larger than in adults when expressed per kilogram body weight. On the other hand, the anatomic area becomes independent of age when expressed per square meter BSA. Therefore, scaling of the intraperitoneal fill volume by BSA (m2) is necessary to prevent a too low ratio of fill volume to exchange area, which would result in a functional “hyperpermeable” peritoneal exchange. Second, the contact area, also called the wetted membrane, is only a portion of the anatomic area, representing 30% to 60% of this area in humans, as measured by computed tomography. Both posture and fill volume may affect the extent of recruitment of contact area. Finally, the vascular area is influenced by the availability of both the anatomic area and the recruited contact area. This surface is governed essentially by both peritoneal vascular perfusion, represented by the mesenteric vascular flow and, hence, by the number of perfused capillaries available for exchange. This vascular area is dynamically affected by different factors, such as composition of the peritoneal fluid, the fill volume, and the production of inflammatory agents.

Peritoneal dialysis fluids that will be developed in the future for children should allow an optimization of the fill volume owing to a better tolerance in terms of lower achieved intraperitoneal pressure for a given fill volume. Moreover, future peritoneal dialysis fluids should protect the peritoneal membrane from hyperperfusion (lower glucose degradation products).

In Vivo Peritoneal Surface Area Measurement in Rats by Micro-Computed Tomography (μCT)

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) uses the dynamic dialysis properties of the peritoneal membrane. The fraction of the anatomic peritoneal surface area (PSA) recruited is of importance for maximizing exchanges and is potentially impacted by parameters such as fill volume.

We describe an in vivo assessment of the contact surface area by micro-computed tomography (μCT) using an iodinated contrast medium added to the PD fluid, a contrast agent presumed without surfactant property. In the isotropic volume (reconstructed voxel size 186 μm x 186 μm x 186 μm), the iodinated PD fluid is automatically selected, thanks to its contrast difference with soft tissues, and its surface area is computed. The method was first tested on phantoms showing the ability to select the PD fluid volume and to measure its surface area. In vivo experiments in rat consisted of μCT acquisition of rat abdomen directly after intraperitoneal administration (10 mL/100 g rat body weight) of a dialysis fluid containing 10% by volume iodinated contrast agent. Fluorescein isothiocyanate albumin was used as dilution marker.

We found a strong linear relationship ( R2= 0.98) between recruited PSA (cm2) and rat weight (g) in the range of 235 to 435 g: recruited PSA = (1.61 weight + 40.5) cm2. Applying μCT with a fill volume of 10 mL/100 g rat body weight, the in vivo measured PSA was in the order of magnitude of the ex vivo anatomic PSA as determined by Kuzlan's formula, considered in most instances as the maximal surface area that can be recruited by PD fluid.

This new methodology was the first to give an in vivo high-resolution isotropic three-dimensional (3-D) determination of the PSA in contact with dialysate. Its sensitivity allows us to take into account the recruitment of fine 3-D structures of the PSA membrane that were not accessible to previous 2-D-based imaging methodologies. Its in vivo application also integrates the physiological natural tensile stress of tissues.

Fluid Tonicity Affects Peritoneal Characteristics Derived by 3-PORE Model

Background

It is typically assumed that within short time-frames, patient-specific peritoneal membrane characteristics are constant and do not depend on the initial fluid tonicity and dwell duration. The aim of this study was to check whether this assumption holds when membrane properties are estimated using the 3-pore model (3PM).

Methods

Thirty-two stable peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients underwent 3 8-hour peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) with different glucose-based solutions (1.36%, 2.27%, and 3.86%). Temporary drainage was performed at 1 and 4 hours. Glucose, urea, creatinine, sodium, and phosphate concentrations were measured in dialysate and blood samples. Three-pore model parameters were estimated for each patient and each 8-hour PET separately. In addition, model parameters were estimated using data truncated to the initial 4 hours of peritoneal dwell.

Results

In all cases, model-estimated parameter values were within previously reported ranges. The peritoneal absorption (PA) and diffusive permeability for all solutes except sodium increased with fluid tonicity, with about 18% increase when switching from glucose 2.27% to 3.86%. Glucose peritoneal reflection coefficient and osmotic conductance (OsmCond), and fraction of hydraulic conductance for ultrasmall pores decreased with fluid tonicity (over 40% when switching from glucose 1.36%). Model fitting to the truncated 4-hour data resulted in little change in the parameters, except for PA, peritoneal hydraulic conductance, and OsmCond, for which higher values for the 4-hour dwell were found.

Conclusion

Initial fluid tonicity has a substantial impact on the 3PM-estimated characteristics of the peritoneal membrane, whereas the impact of dwell duration was relatively small and possibly influenced by the change in the patient's activity.

Progress in rectal cancer treatment

The dramatic improvement in local control of rectal cancer observed during the last decades is to be attributed to attention to surgical technique and to the introduction of neoadjuvant therapy regimens. Nevertheless, systemic relapse remains frequent and is currently insufficiently addressed. Intensification of neoadjuvant therapy by incorporating chemotherapy with or without targeted agents before the start of (chemo)radiation or during the waiting period to surgery may present an opportunity to improve overall survival. An increasing number of patients can nowadays undergo sphincter preserving surgery. In selected patients, local excision or even a "wait and see" approach may be feasible following active neoadjuvant therapy. Molecular and genetic biomarkers as well as innovative imaging techniques may in the future allow better selection of patients for this treatment option. Controversy persists concerning the selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy after neoadjuvant regimens. The currently available evidence suggests that in complete pathological responders long-term outcome is excellent and adjuvant therapy may be omitted. The results of ongoing trials will help to establish the ideal tailored approach in resectable rectal cancer.

Computer simulations of osmotic ultrafiltration and small-solute transport in peritoneal dialysis: a spatially distributed approach

The aim of this study was to simulate clinically observed intraperitoneal kinetics of dialysis fluid volume and solute concentrations during peritoneal dialysis. We were also interested in analyzing relationships between processes in the peritoneal cavity and processes occurring in the peritoneal tissue and microcirculation. A spatially distributed model was formulated for the combined description of volume and solute mass balances in the peritoneal cavity and flows across the interstitium and the capillary wall. Tissue local parameters were assumed dependent on the interstitial hydration and vasodilatation induced by glucose. The model was fitted to the average volume and solute concentration profiles from dwell studies in 40 clinically stable patients on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis using a 3.86% glucose dialysis solution. The model was able to describe the clinical data with high accuracy. An increase in the local interstitial pressure and tissue hydration within the distance of 2.5 mm from the peritoneal surface of the tissue was observed. The penetration of glucose into the tissue and removal of urea, creatinine, and sodium from the tissue were restricted to a layer located within 2 mm from the peritoneal surface. The initial decline of sodium concentration (sodium dip) was observed not only in intraperitoneal fluid but also in the tissue. The distributed model can provide a precise description of the relationship between changes in the peritoneal tissue and intraperitoneal dialysate volume and solute concentration kinetics. Computer simulations suggest that only a thin layer of the tissue within 2-3 mm from the peritoneal surface participates in the exchange of fluid and small solutes between the intraperitoneal dialysate and blood.

Peritoneal dialysis tailored to pediatric needs

Consideration of specific pediatric aspects is essential to achieve adequate peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment in children. These are first of all the rapid growth, in particular during infancy and puberty, which must be accompanied by a positive calcium balance, and the age dependent changes in body composition. The high total body water content and the high ultrafiltration rates required in anuric infants for adequate nutrition predispose to overshooting convective sodium losses and severe hypotension. Tissue fragility and rapid increases in intraabdominal fat mass predispose to hernia and dialysate leaks. Peritoneal equilibration tests should repeatedly been performed to optimize individual dwell time. Intraperitoneal pressure measurements give an objective measure of intraperitoneal filling, which allow for an optimized dwell volume, that is, increased dialysis efficiency without increasing the risk of hernias, leaks, and retrofiltration. We present the concept of adapted PD, that is, the combination of short dwells with low fill volume to promote ultrafiltration and long dwells with a high fill volume to improve purification within one PD session. The use of PD solutions with low glucose degradation product content is recommended in children, but unfortunately still not feasible in many countries.

The beneficial influence on the effectiveness of automated peritoneal dialysis of varying the dwell time (short/long) and fill volume (small/large): a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

It is well known that the efficiency of peritoneal dialysis (PD) varies with the duration of the dwell and with the prescribed fill volume. Automated PD (APD) is classically given as a series of recurrent exchanges, each having the same dwell time and fill volume-that is, conventional APD (APD-C). We propose a new way of giving PD, using a modified version of APD-C. This method first uses a short dwell time with a small fill volume to promote ultrafiltration (UF) and subsequently uses a longer dwell time and a larger fill volume to promote removal of uremic toxins from the blood. We use the term "adapted APD" (APD-A) to describe this modified form of PD.

METHODS

We designed a multicenter prospective randomized crossover trial to assess the impact of APD-A in comparison with APD-C on the efficacy of dialysis. The parameters investigated were overnight UF; weekly peritoneal Kt/V(urea); weekly peritoneal creatinine clearance corrected to 1.73 m(2) body surface area (K(creat)); and phosphate (PDR) and sodium dialytic removal (SDR) in millimoles per session, corrected for glucose absorption, which provides an estimate of metabolic cost. Blood pressure was also regularly monitored. Initially, 25 patients were identified for inclusion in the study. There were 6 withdrawals in total: 2 at enrolment, 1 at day 75 (transplantation), 2 at day 30 (catheter dysfunction), and 1 for drainage alarms. All patients received the same duration of overnight APD, using the same total volume of dialysate, with the same 1.5% glucose, lactate-buffered dialysate (Balance: Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany).

RESULTS

Tolerance was good. Compared with APD-C, APD-A resulted in a significant enhancement of Kt/V(urea), K(creat), and PDR. The metabolic cost, in terms of glucose absorption, required to achieve dialytic capacity for urea, creatinine, and phosphate blood purification was significantly lower for APD-A than for APD-C, and UF increased during APD-A. With APD-A, each gram of glucose absorbed contributed to 18.25 ± 15.82 mL UF; in APD-C, each gram of glucose absorbed contributed to 15.79 ± 11.24 mL UF. However, that difference was not found to be significant (p=0.1218). The SDR was significantly higher with APD-A than with APD-C: 35.23 ± 52.00 mmol and 18.35 ± 48.68 mmol per session respectively (p<0.01). The mean blood pressure recorded at the end of each PD period (on day 45) was significantly lower when patients received APD-A than when they received APD-C.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides evidence that, compared with the uniform dwell times and fill volumes used throughout an APD-C dialysis session, the varying dwell times and fill volumes as described for an APD-A dialysis session result in improved dialysis efficiency in terms of UF, Kt/V(urea), K(creat), PDR, and SDR. Those results were achieved without incurring any extra financial costs and with a reduction in the metabolic cost (assessed using glucose absorption).

Peritoneal dialysis prescription in children: bedside principles for optimal practice

There is no unique optimal peritoneal dialysis prescription for all children, although the goals of ultrafiltration and blood purification are universal. In turn, a better understanding of the physiology of the peritoneal membrane, as a dynamic dialysis membrane with an exchange surface area recruitment capacity and unique permeability characteristics, results in the transition from an empirical prescription process based on clinical experience alone to the potential for a personalized prescription with individually adapted fill volumes and dwell times. In all cases, the prescribed exchange fill volume should be scaled for body surface area (ml/m(2)), and volume enhancement should be conducted based on clinical tolerance and intraperitoneal pressure measurements (IPP; cmH(2)O). The exchange dwell times should be determined individually and adapted to the needs of the patient, with particular attention to phosphate clearance and ultrafiltration capacity. The evolution of residual kidney function and the availability of new, more physiologic, peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) also influence the prescription process. An understanding of all of these principles is integral to the provision of clinically optimal PD.

Distributed modeling of osmotically driven fluid transport in peritoneal dialysis: theoretical and computational investigations

Based on a distributed model of peritoneal transport, in the present report, a mathematical theory is presented to explain how the osmotic agent in the peritoneal dialysis solution that penetrates tissue induces osmotically driven flux out of the tissue. The relationships between phenomenological transport parameters (hydraulic permeability and reflection coefficient) and the respective specific transport parameters for the tissue and the capillary wall are separately described. Closed formulas for steady-state flux across the peritoneal surface and for hydrostatic pressure at the opposite surface are obtained using an approximate description of the concentration profile of the osmotic agent within the tissue by exponential function. A case of experimental study with mannitol as the osmotic agent in the rat abdominal wall is shown to be well described by our theory and computer simulations and to validate the applied approximations. Furthermore, clinical dialysis with glucose as the osmotic agent is analyzed, and the effective transport rates and parameters are derived from the description of the tissue and capillary wall.

Transport of peritoneal membrane assessed before and after the start of peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) with high small solute peritoneal membrane transport have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The membrane transport is currently assessed by peritoneal equilibration test (PET), usually performed after the first month of PD because of the early increase of membrane transport after the start of PD. The aim of this study was the assessment of small solute peritoneal membrane transport before and after the start of PD.

METHODS

The small solute peritoneal membrane transport was evaluated in 34 patients before the start of PD. Twenty-two patients were treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 12 with automated peritoneal dialysis (APD).

RESULTS

Four months after the start of PD, the small solute peritoneal membrane transport increased only in CAPD patients (D/P(Creat), the ratio between dialysate solute concentration at the end of the PET and creatinine plasma concentration, changed from 0.66 +/- 0.12 to 0.73 +/- 0.07 in CAPD patients and from 0.64 +/- 0.12 to 0.61 +/- 0.07 in APD patients), and after about 16 months of PD, the peritoneal membrane transport was higher in CAPD patients (D/P(Creat) = 0.74 +/- 0.06) than in APD patients (D/P(Creat) = 0.63 +/- 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing the PET before and after the start of PD could provide relevant information about the characteristics of small solute peritoneal membrane transport and could be useful to evaluate the influence of PD modality on the changes in peritoneal membrane transport.

Peritoneal membrane recruitment in rats: a micro-computerized tomography (muCT) study

The peritoneal contact surface area (PCSA), which represents the area parameter in the mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC), is a crucial marker in the evaluation of peritoneal dialysis effectiveness. However, the capacity to recruit a larger PCSA has only been rarely demonstrated in vivo and, in most cases, changes in MTAC are interpreted as permeability changes and not as surface area variations. Here, we report the use of micro-computerized tomography (muCT) for the measurement of PCSA changes to various fill volumes. Using this three-dimensional imaging method, PCSA was measured in vivo in 26 healthy Wistar rats receiving intraperitoneally increasing fill volumes of peritoneal dialysis solutions: 5 mL (group 1, n = 8), 10 mL (group 2, n = 8) and 15 mL (group 3, n = 10) per 100 g of body weight. A non-ionic iodinated contrast agent was added to the dialysis solution in order to distinguish the intraperitoneal dialysis solutions from soft tissues. The normalized PCSA/weight ratio (cm(2)/g) increased with fill volume: 1.12 +/- 0.10 cm(2)/g (range 0.98-1.25) in group 1; 1.74 +/- 0.08 cm(2)/g (range 1.64-1.87) in group 2; 2.13 +/- 0.09 cm(2)/g(range 1.90-2.30) in group 3. With this muCT method, PCSA recruited in vivo with a 10 mL/100 g fill volume was in the range 94-107%) of ex vivo total peritoneal surface area (evPSA), as calculated with the Kuzlan's formula. With a 15 mL/100 g fill volume, the in vivo-measured PCSA, the exchange surface area, surpassed the evPSA (range 113-139%).

Mitigating peritoneal membrane characteristics in modern peritoneal dialysis therapy

Membrane function at the start of peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment, measured as solute transport rate and ultrafiltration capacity, varies considerably between individuals. Although this can be correlated to clinical factors such as age and body habitus, this accounts for little of the variance seen. It is increasingly clear, however, that this variability in membrane function does impact on clinical outcomes. Specifically, high solute transport increases mortality risk, independent of other known factors such as age, comorbidity, and residual renal function. High solute transport causes earlier loss of the osmotic gradient when a low molecular weight osmolyte such as glucose is used. This will result in an earlier and lower peak in the ultrafiltration achieved combined with a higher fluid absorption rate once the osmotic gradient is lost. It is therefore quite plausible that the worse clinical outcomes associated with high transport reflect less good ultrafiltration, although other explanations must be considered, including higher peritoneal protein losses and a possible association with systemic inflammation. Strategies now exist to mitigate the effects of high transport on fluid removal. These include optimization of the short dwell lengths using automated PD (APD) combined with icodextrin which will result in sustained ultrafiltration and thus prevention of reabsorption in the long dwell. Survival analysis of APD patients, especially in cohorts in which icodextrin has been used, would suggest that high transport status is not a risk factor, although some of these data are only preliminary. In contrast, low ultrafiltration capacity of the membrane seems to be more important in these patients, especially if anuric. Here the best strategy would seem to be prevention as patients who develop low ultrafiltration capacity are not easily treated on PD. Avoiding excessive hypertonic glucose exposure and preserving residual renal function offers the best available approach.

Similitude of transperitoneal permeability in different rodent species

Transgenic mice facilitate mechanistic studies of altered peritoneal transport, but the majority of transport studies have been carried out in rats. We hypothesized that mouse transport parameters, normalized to the peritoneal contact area, would be similar to those of the rat. To address this, we affixed small (∼10-mm diameter) plastic chambers to the serosa of the abdominal wall of anesthetized CD1 and C57BL mice. The chamber constrained transfer across the area of the chamber base and facilitated mixing, volumetric, and concentration measurements vs. time for mannitol, serum albumin, and osmotic and hydrostatic pressure-driven convection. The mass transfer coefficient of mannitol (MTCM) and of serum albumin (MTCBSA), hydrostatic pressure-driven flux ( JP), and osmotic filtration ( Josm) were calculated from the time-dependent volume and concentration data. The units of all parameters (μl·min−1·cm−2) were compared with previously derived parameters from SD rats with a one-way ANOVA. Results indicated small but significant differences in MTCBSA(x102): CD1, 9.72 ± 1.97, n = 6; C57BL, 7.13 ± 1.52, n = 10; rat, 12.5 ± 1.6, n = 17 ( P = 0.03). ANOVAs of all other parameters were not significant and confirmed our hypothesis: MTCM(CD1, 3.20 ± 0.38, n = 7; C57BL, 2.34 ± 0.41, n = 6; rat, 2.72 ± 0.23 n = 19), JP(CD1, 0.77 ± 0.15, n = 10; C57BL, 0.33 ± 0.13, n = 15; rat, 0.51 ± 0.16, n = 9), or Josm(CD1, 0.92 ± 0.35, n = 6; C57BL, 0.49 ± 0.35, n = 6; rat 1.72 ± 0.35, n = 6). We conclude that elimination of the variable peritoneal transfer area normalizes calculated transport characteristics and facilitates comparison between species.

Correlating structure with solute and water transport in a chronic model of peritoneal inflammation

To study the process of chronic peritoneal inflammation from sterile solutions, we established an animal model to link structural changes with solute and water transport. Filtered solutions containing 4% N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) or 4% glucose (G) were injected intraperitoneally daily in 200- to 300-g rats and compared with controls (C). After 2 mo, each animal underwent transport studies using a chamber affixed to the parietal peritoneum to determine small-solute and protein mass transfer, osmotic filtration, and hydraulic flow. After euthanasia, parietal tissues were sampled for histological analysis, which demonstrated significant differences in peritoneal thickness (microm; C, 42.6 +/- 7.5; G, 80.4 +/- 22.3; NAG, 450 +/- 104; P < 0.05). Staining for VEGF correlated with CD-31 vessel counts (no./mm2: C, 53.1 +/- 16.1; G, 166 +/- 32; NAG, 183 +/- 32; P < 0.05). Tissue analysis showed treatment effects on tissue hyaluronan (micro/g: C, 962 +/- 73; G, 1,169 +/- 69; NAG, 1,428 +/- 69; P < 0.05) and collagen (microg/g: C, 56.9 +/- 12.0; G, 107 +/- 12; NAG, 97.6 +/- 11.4; P < 0.05) but not sulfated glycosaminoglycan. Transport experiments revealed no significant differences in mannitol transfer or osmotic flow. Changes were seen in hydrostatic pressure-driven flux (microl x min(-1) x cm(-2): C, 0.676 +/- 0.133; G, 0.317 +/- 0.124; NAG, 0.284 +/- 0.117; P < 0.05) and albumin transfer (microl x min(-1) x cm(-2): C, 0.331 +/- 0.028; G, 0.286 +/- 0.026; NAG, 0.229 +/- 0.025; P < 0.04). We conclude that alteration of the interstitial matrix correlates with diminished hydraulic conductivity and macromolecular transport.

The transport barrier in intraperitoneal therapy

The peritoneal cavity is important in clinical medicine because of its use as a portal of entry for drugs utilized in regional chemotherapy and as a means of dialysis for anephric patients. The barrier between the therapeutic solution in the cavity and the plasma does not correspond to the classic semipermeable membrane but instead is a complex structure of cells, extracellular matrix, and blood microvessels in the surrounding tissue. New research on the nature of the capillary barrier and on the orderly array of extracellular matrix molecules has provided insights into the physiological basis of osmosis and the alterations in transport that result from infusion of large volumes of fluid. The anatomic peritoneum is highly permeable to water, small solutes, and proteins and therefore is not a physical barrier. However, the cells of the mesothelium play an essential role in the immune response in the cavity and produce cytokines and chemokines in response to contact with noncompatible solutions. The process of inflammation, which depends on the interaction of mesothelial, interstitial, and endothelial cells, ultimately leads to angiogenesis and fibrosis and the functional alteration of the barrier. New animal models, such as the transgenic mouse, will accelerate the discovery of methods to preserve the functional peritoneal barrier.