Measuring Interface Pressure and Temperature in the Operating Room

Comparison of interface pressures on three operating table support surfaces during surgery

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate the effect of support surface usage and positions on interface pressure during surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2019. The study included patients who had planned surgery in supine and prone positions. The sample size was 72 patients. Patients were assigned to three groups (gel support surface, viscoelastic support surface and standard operating table) according to the determined randomization table. During the surgery, the pressure in the patients' body was recorded. The statistics program IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 packaged software was used in the analyses of data.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the total body average interface pressure (mmHg) values between the supporting surfaces in the prone position. There was a statistically significant difference between the total body average interface pressure (mmHg) values between the support surfaces in the supine position, and the average interface pressure measured on the viscoelastic foam support surface was significantly lower than the gel support surface and the standard operating table.

CONCLUSION

In the study, the use of viscoelastic foam support surface was found to be more effective than the use of a standard operating table and gel support surface. Viscoelastic foam support surface is recommended for patients at risk for pressure injury in the operating room.

A comparison of air-cell and gel surgical table pads and an evaluation of the influence of pressure distribution and other factors on pressure injury prevention

Guidelines for pressure injury prevention consider the use of pressure-redistributing pads to prevent tissue deformation. However, limited research exists to assess the pressure distribution provided by the operating tables and the effectiveness of pressure-redistributing pads in preventing pressure injuries. In this study, we compared the pressure distribution properties of two surgical table pads and identified parameters influencing pressure injury outcomes after a lengthy surgical procedure. Twenty-seven patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation surgery participated in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to use either an air cell-based pad or a gel pad. Interface pressure was recorded during the surgery. We analyzed the effect of surgical table pad type, interface pressure distribution and pressure injury outcomes and analyzed what characteristics of the patients and the interface pressure are most influential for the development of pressure injuries. Comparing the interface pressure parameters between the air-cell group and the gel group, only the peak pressure index x time was significantly different (p < 0.05). We used univariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant predictors for the pressure injury outcome. The support surface was not significant. And, among patient characteristics, only age and BMI were significant (p ≤ 0.05). Among the interface pressure parameters, pressure density maxima, peak pressure index x time, and coefficient of variation were significant for pressure injury outcome (p ≤ 0.05). Peak pressure index, average pressure, and the surgery length were not statistically significant for pressure injury outcomes.

The effectiveness of curvilinear supine position on the incidence of pressure injuries and interface pressure among surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative pressure injury is still a major problem of perioperative nursing. Reducing the peak interface pressure is a valid clinical intervention for reducing the incidence of intraoperative pressure injuries. However, studies of repositioning and pressure-redistributing for surgical patients are still lacking. In this context we aimed to evaluate the effect of a curvilinear supine position on incidence of pressure injury with surgical patients in a hospital setting.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study, carried out from May to December 2016, included 104 surgical patients from a university hospital in China (experimental group, n = 52; control group, n = 52). Incidence of pressure injury, interface pressure, comfort and satisfaction scores from surgeons, anesthesiologists, OR nurses were recorded. Mann-Whitney U Chi-square test was used for difference of pressure injury's incidence and mixed linear model was used for interface pressure.

RESULTS

Overall the intervention group had significant fewer intraoperative pressure injuries than the control group (0 patients [0%] vs. 9 patients [17.65%], p = 0.002). Compared with control group, the experimental group had significantly lower interface pressures in the sacrum and heel regions (F = 23.81, p < 0.001; F = 60.71, p < 0.001). The subjects felt comfortable in two groups were 40(80%) vs. 3(5.88%) (experimental group vs. control group), respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Curvilinear supine position could significantly decrease the incidence of perioperative pressure injuries in surgical patients with surgery duration more than three hours. Considering these results, we recommend that curvilinear supine position use as effective interventions to inform perioperative care delivery, reducing perioperative pressure injuries. These findings may serve to guide the application of pressure redistribution in the surgical positioning of patients during prolonged surgery.

Pressure Ulcers: Factors Contributing to Their Development in the OR

The prevention of health care-associated pressure ulcers (HAPUs) is an important quality measure because HAPUs are considered a never event. The literature suggests that the prevalence rate of pressure ulcers is 8.5% or higher among patients who undergo surgical procedures that last longer than three hours. We performed a retrospective chart review to determine what factors contribute to the development of pressure ulcers in patients who undergo surgical procedures. The sample population included patients who acquired a pressure ulcer that was not present at admission and developed during their postoperative hospital stay. The project revealed consistent risk factors that may contribute to the development of pressure ulcers in patients who have undergone surgical procedures. These findings can drive the implementation of preventive measures to reduce the occurrence of HAPUs associated with surgical procedures.