Clinical Evaluation of Wound Healing in Split-Skin Graft Donor Sites Using Microscopic Quantification of Reepithelialization

In vitro evaluation of a synthetic (Biobrane®) and a biopolymer (Epicite) wound dressing with primary human juvenile and adult fibroblasts after different colonization strategies

BACKGROUND

The three-dimensional [3D] wound dressings Biobrane® and Epicite are used in the wound management. Fibroblasts are important for successful deep wound healing. The direct effect of Biobrane® and Epicite on human fibroblasts, particularly of juvenile individuals, remains unclear. Therefore, this study compared the survival and growth characteristics of juvenile and adult dermal fibroblasts on Biobrane® and Epicite using different culture models.

METHOD

Murine (L929), primary juvenile and adult human fibroblasts were seeded on both materials using two dimensional (2D, slide culture) or 3D culture at the medium-air interface and dynamical rotatory culture. Cell adherence, viability, morphology, actin cytoskeleton architecture and DNA content were monitored. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses could be only performed from Biobrane®. Permeability of both materials were tested.

RESULTS

The majority of all tested fibroblasts species survived on both dressings with no significant differences between 1 and 14 days. Juvenile and adult fibroblasts exerted typical fibroblast morphology with spindle-shaped cell bodies on the materials. SEM visualized morphological differences between murine and human fibroblasts on Biobrane®. Juvenile and adult fibroblasts colonized Biobrane® in rotatory culture after 7 days the most. The Biobrane® rotatory culture of L929 and juvenile fibroblasts showed after 7 days the significantly highest DNA amount. No major gender differences could be observed. Biobrane® had a higher permeability than Epicite.

CONCLUSION

Both wound dressing can be colonized by fibroblasts suggesting their high cytocompatibility. Fibroblast survival and morphology on Biobrane® and Epicite depended on the culture system and the fibroblast source.

Use of injectable acellular dermal matrix combined with negative pressure wound therapy in open diabetic foot amputation

Objective:

Skin grafts after negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) usage have both been useful for treating diabetic foot amputation. We hypothesised that injectable ADM combined with NPWT would be more useful than NPWT only for healing after amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of injectable ADM combined with NPWT in patients with DFU who have undergone amputation.

Method:

This retrospective study reviewed patients with infected DFUs who were administered NPWT. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 included patients who were treated with NPWT only, while Group 2 included patients who were treated with injectable ADM combined with NPWT. Clinical results including the number of NPWT dressing changes, wound healing duration, and full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) incident rate between the two groups were compared.

Results:

A total of 41 patients took part in the study (Group 1=20, Group 2=21). The mean number of NPWT dressing changes was significantly lower in Group 2 (8.71±3.77) than in Group 1 (13.90±5.62) (p=0.001). Mean wound healing period was shorter in Group 2 (3.17±1.36 weeks) than in Group 1 (5.47±1.68 weeks) (p=0.001). Finally, the rate of patients who underwent FTSG for complete wound closure was 85% in Group 1, whereas it was only 14.3% in Group 2.

Conclusion:

In this study, the use of injectable ADM combined with NPWT in patients with DFU who underwent amputation favoured complete wound healing, without the need to resort to the use of skin grafts.

Closure of the radial forearm free flap donor site with split-thickness skin graft or amniotic membrane: A prospective randomized clinical study

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, aesthetic, and functional outcomes between amniotic membrane (test group) and split-thickness skin grafts (control group) used for radial forearm free flap defect closure. The primary outcome measurement for both groups was assessment of the defect closure healing process. In addition, aesthetic (Vancouver Scar Scale) and functional outcomes (skin sensitivity, hand/wrist functionality, grip strength) were evaluated. Fifty eligible patients with radial forearm free flap donor site defects were randomly assigned to two groups receiving either amniotic membrane (test group; n = 25) or split-thickness skin graft (control group; n = 25) for defect covering. Forty-seven of the 50 patients (n = 47) were able to be followed up for 6 months and showed a significantly longer healing process (p < 0.001) with amniotic membrane (64.5 ± 38.4 days; n = 24) than with split-thickness skin grafts (29.2 ± 8.9 days; n = 23); however, there were no differences in the prevalence of healing defects/dehiscence and/or wound infections. Forty-two of the 47 patients (21 in each group) were able to be continually followed up for 12 months, and showed no differences in terms of clinical outcome as well as the subjective and objective aesthetic and functional results evaluated. With regard to the clinical, aesthetic, and functional outcomes evaluated for radial forearm free flap defects, coverage with amniotic membrane offers an excellent alternative treatment approach, avoiding secondary induced donor site morbidity.

Stem cells derived from burned skin - The future of burn care

BACKGROUND

Thermal injuries affect millions of adults and children worldwide and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The key determinant for the survival of burns is rapid wound healing. Large wounds exceed intrinsic wound-healing capacities, and the currently available coverage materials are insufficient due to lack of cellularity, availability or immunological rejection.

METHODS

Using the surgically debrided tissue, we isolated viable cells from burned skin. The isolated cells cultured in tissue culture dishes and characterized.

FINDINGS

We report here that debrided burned skin, which is routinely excised from patients and otherwise considered medical waste and unconsciously discarded, contains viable, undamaged cells which show characteristics of mesenchymal skin stem cells. Those cells can be extracted, characterized, expanded, and incorporated into created epidermal-dermal substitutes to promote wound healing in immune-compromised mice and Yorkshire pigs without adverse side effects.

INTERPRETATION

These findings are of paramount importance and provide an ideal cell source for autologous skin regeneration. Furthermore, this study highlights that skin contains progenitor cells resistant to thermal stress. FUND: Canadian Institutes of Health Research # 123336. CFI Leader's Opportunity Fund: Project # 25407 National Institutes of Health 2R01GM087285-05A1. EMHSeed: Fund: 500463, A generous donation from Toronto Hydro. Integra© Life Science Company provided the meshed bilayer Integra© for porcine experiments.

Split-thickness skin grafting: early outcomes of a clinical trial using different graft thickness

OBJECTIVE

In clinical practice, split-thickness skin graft (STSG) transplantation remains the gold standard for covering large skin defects. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal thickness of skin grafts. The purpose of our study was to compare the early healing processes of recipient and donor wounds after STSG transplantation using grafts of different thickness.

METHOD

This prospective, randomised clinical trial included 84 patients that underwent STSG transplantation surgery for post-burn, post-traumatic or postoperative skin defects. Patients were randomised to receive a skin graft of either 0.2mm, 0.3mm or 0.4mm thickness. After skin transplantation, the wound healing parameters of both the recipient and donor wounds were evaluated after three days, one week, two weeks and one month.

RESULTS

The greatest mean epithelialisation scores and highest rate of complete wound epithelialisation were identified in the recipient and donor wounds of the 0.2mm transplant group, at all time points. When the recipient wound pain scores were evaluated, the greatest visual analogue scale (VAS) values were found in the 0.2mm transplant group. The opposite result was found for the donor wound, where the highest VAS scores were identified in the 0.4mm transplant group. There were no significant differences, at any follow-up period, when wound secretion, erythema, swelling, localised warmth and fluctuation were compared.

CONCLUSION

The early healing of recipient wounds after STSG transplantation with grafts of various thickness differed considerably, especially regarding wound epithelialisation and pain.

A new low-cost negative-pressure wound therapy versus a commercially available therapy device widely used to treat complex traumatic injuries: a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial

OBJECTIVES

Negative-pressure wound therapy has been widely adopted to reduce the complexity of treating a broad range of acute and chronic wounds. However, its cost is high. The objective of this study was to evaluate the following two different methods of negative-pressure wound therapy in terms of healing time: a low-cost method of negative-pressure wound therapy (a pressure stabilizer device connected to a hospital wall-vacuum system with a gauze-sealed dressing, USP) and the standard of care (vacuum-assisted closure, VAC).

METHODS

This is a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, unblinded trial. Patients admitted with complex injuries to a trauma center in a public referral hospital who were indicated for orthopedic surgery were randomized to a USP or VAC group. The primary outcome was the time required to achieve a "ready for surgery condition", which was defined as a wound bed with healthy granulation tissue and without necrosis or purulent secretion. Wound bed area contraction, granulation tissue growth and the direct costs of the dressings were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Variation in area and granulation tissue growth were essentially the same between the systems, and healing time was equal between the groups (p=0.379). In both systems, serial debridement increased wound area (p=0.934), and granulation tissue was also increased (p=0.408). The mean treatment cost was US$ 15.15 in the USP group and US$ 872.59 in the VAC group.

CONCLUSIONS

For treating complex traumatic injuries, USP was non-inferior to and less expensive than VAC.