Is Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy a “Bridge to Reconstruction” for Poststernotomy Mediastinitis? A Systematic Review

An Outcomes Review of 330 Sternal Wound Reconstructions: Timing of Closure Does Make a Difference

BACKGROUND

Sternal wound infection and dehiscence following cardiac surgery remain difficult clinical problems with high morbidity. Older classification systems regarding timing to reconstruction do not take into account recent improvements in critical care, wound vacuum-assisted closure use, or next-generation antibiotic therapies, which may prolong time to reconstruction.

METHODS

Records of patients undergoing sternal wound reconstruction performed by the senior author (J.A.A.) from 1996 to 2018 at a high-volume cardiac surgery center were reviewed. Indications included sternal wound infection or dehiscence. All patients underwent single-stage removal of hardware, débridement, and flap closure. Patients were divided into two groups based on timing of wound closure after cardiac surgery: less than 30 days or greater than or equal to 30 days.

RESULTS

Of the 505 patients identified during the study period, 330 had sufficient data for analysis. Mean time to sternal wound surgery was 15.7 days in the early group compared to 64.4 days (p < 0.01) beyond 30 days. Postdébridement cultures were positive in 72 percent versus 62.5 percent of patients (p = 0.11), whereas rates of postoperative infection were significantly higher in the delayed group: 1.9 percent versus 9.5 percent (p < 0.01). Partial wound dehiscence rates were also higher after 30 days (1.9 percent versus 11.3 percent; p < 0.01), whereas total length of stay was decreased. Use of wound vacuum-assisted closure was significantly associated with reconstruction beyond 30 days (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although performing sternal wound reconstruction more than 30 days after initial cardiac surgery was associated with a shorter overall hospital length of stay and higher extubation rates in the operating room, these patients also had elevated postoperative infection and wound complication rates. The authors thus recommend not delaying definitive surgical reconstruction when possible.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of deep sternal wound infections - a critical appraisal

Introduction. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has widely become the first-line option in the treatment of deep sternal wound infections. After several positive reports in comparison with conventional treatment, very recent studies comparing NPWT with early reconstruction have favored the latter. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of NPWT in comparison with early flap reconstruction. Materials and methods. We concluded a retrospective analysis of 125 patients with deep sternal wound infection treated in a single institution between the years 2006 and 2018. NPWT became the first-line treatment in our hospital in 2011. The study group consisted of 55 patients treated primarily with NPWT with or without subsequent flap reconstruction. The control group consisted of 60 patients treated with flap reconstruction without prior NPWT. Ten patients with an immediate re-fixation and direct wound closure were excluded. Results. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning the type or urgency of the original open-heart surgery, age, gender, or co-morbidities. In the NPWT group there was significantly higher mortality (p = .002), longer stay in the intensive care unit (p = .028), and in the university hospital (p < .001) as well as higher number of operations (p < .001). However, there were somewhat more surgical complications in the control group as well as a higher number of distant flap reconstructions. Overall, five patients suffered from NPWT associated bleeding. Conclusion. Our results raise concerns about the wide use of NPWT as a first-line treatment of deep sternal wound infections. Further evaluative studies are warranted to confirm the results.