Rare Presentation of Postsurgical Pyoderma Gangrenosum Presenting as Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection

Perioperative management and clinical outcomes of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum

Peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum is an uncommon subtype of pyoderma gangrenosum mainly affecting stoma sites of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. While surgical treatments are often used to assist healing, little is known about the relationship between surgical interventions and the rate of recurrence of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum. The aim of this study was to identify patient and clinical factors associated with peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum recurrence following surgical intervention. A multi-institutional retrospective case series and literature review was conducted to evaluate patient characteristics and perioperative treatment. Patients of any age with peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum undergoing surgical operations related to their pyoderma gangrenosum or due to another comorbidity were included. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographic information. Associations were evaluated using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Thirty-seven cases were included, 78.3% of which had a history of inflammatory bowel disease. Overall, 13 (35.1%) cases experienced recurrence at 30 days. There was no significant association identified between patient demographics, stoma location, surgical intervention, or perioperative treatment with rate of recurrence at 30 days post-operation. While no clinical risk factors or treatments were associated with recurrence, our work underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to this disease to address gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and surgical components of treatment.

Wound Debridement in Pyoderma Gangrenosum

BACKGROUND

Wound debridement improves healing in a variety of acute and chronic ulcers. However, there is concern that debridement may trigger pathergy and worsen pyoderma gangrenosum (PG).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether published evidence supports conservative wound debridement for PG.

DATA SOURCES

The authors reviewed the literature published in MEDLINE through January 2023 using the search germs "pyoderma gangrenosum" and "debridement."

STUDY SELECTION

Articles reporting sharp surgical debridement or maggot debridement for PG were included in the review. The authors also searched the reference sections of the reviewed articles for additional reports on debridement for PG.

DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical data regarding patient status, procedures performed, and patient outcomes were extracted from the selected articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There are multiple reports of uncontrolled, active-phase PG wounds worsening after aggressive excisional debridement of viable inflamed tissues. In contrast, there is no evidence indicating that conservative debridement of nonviable necrotic tissue worsens PG wounds, regardless of the disease activity. There are multiple reports of successful debridement and surgical grafting for PG in remission.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence in favor of or against using conservative debridement of nonviable necrotic tissue for a PG wound. Therefore, it should not be considered contraindicated, even in the active phase of the disease.

Practical aspects of the diagnosis and management of pyoderma gangrenosum

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare autoinflammatory ulcerative neutrophilic skin disease. Its clinical presentation is a rapidly progressing painful skin ulcer with ill-defined borders and surrounding erythema. The pathogenesis of PG is complex and not fully understood. Clinically, patients with PG often have various systemic diseases, the most common being inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and arthritis. Due to the lack of specific biological markers, diagnosing PG remains difficult, which easily resulting in misdiagnosis. Some validated diagnostic criteria have been applied in clinical practice that facilitate its diagnosis. The treatment of PG currently consists mainly of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory agents, especially biological agents, which have bright prospects for PG therapy. After the systemic inflammatory response is controlled, the problem of wounds becomes the main contradiction in PG treatment. Surgery is not controversial for PG, increasing evidence shows that with adequate systemic treatment, the benefits of reconstructive surgery for patients are increasing.

Stomal and peristomal complications management: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Correctly identifying and managing stomal and peristomal complications are key to assisting individuals with an ostomy when they are facing challenges with self-care. Providers that are knowledgeable and experienced with stomal and peristomal care are vital when complications arise. Providing care that is consistent with findings in current high evidence-based literature supports the goal of providing optimal patient outcomes in a timely manner. The objective of this study was to explore stomal and peristomal that presented in an outpatient ostomy clinic and compare these interventions with information found in the literature.

METHOD

This retrospective study used a sample population of convenience that included adult patients aged ≥18 years who presented for stomal or peristomal complications in an outpatient ostomy clinic in northwest Ohio, US. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the presenting stomal or peristomal complication(s) of each patient and treatment was provided or prescribed. The interventions were then compared with information found in the literature. Length of treatment and reasons for referral to the surgeon that created the stoma were also reviewed.

RESULTS

This study showed that interventions for adult individuals with a stomal or peristomal complications that presented to the clinic were consistent with that found in the literature. This study also sought to deliver information to healthcare providers that may not be directly involved in ostomy care, helping to increase their understanding of problems that patients with an ostomy may experience.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that interventions completed in this setting where the research took place was consistent with information found in literature.