Implant migration after early weightbearing in cementless hip replacement

Areal bone mineral density is not associated with femoral stem subsidence in patients younger than 70 years undergoing total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Femoral stem subsidence is a known complication after uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of osteoporosis and to investigate the relationship between areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and subsidence in a cohort of patients younger than 70 years.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients (age 60 ± 6 years; 52 female, 48 male) undergoing uncemented THA using a collarless press fit femoral stem were retrospectively reviewed. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed preoperatively at the proximal femur and lumbar spine, and if not feasible at these sites, at the distal radius. DXA results were compared to a cohort of 100 patients ≥ 70 years scheduled for cemented THA. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), canal flare index (CFI), and canal fill ratio (CFR) were assessed. Analysis of stem subsidence and migration was performed on standardized, calibrated radiographs obtained postoperatively and at follow-up.

RESULTS

The frequency of osteoporosis was considerably lower in the study cohort compared to patients ≥ 70 years (7% vs. 19%, p = 0.02). Illustrated by the high CFR (mean 96 ± 4%) in the mid-stem region, a sufficient press fit was achieved. After a mean follow-up of 7.4 months, the mean stem subsidence was 0.9 ± 0.9 mm. Only two patients had subsidence greater than 3 mm, one of whom was morbidly obese and the other diagnosed with severe osteoporosis. There were no correlations between any of the parameters (CFI, CFR, age, sex, BMI) and femoral stem subsidence. In addition, aBMD T-scores showed no correlations with subsidence.

CONCLUSION

aBMD by DXA does not appear to be associated with stem subsidence in patients younger than 70 years and with adequate press fit.

Early unrestricted vs. partial weight bearing after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The choice of postoperative weight bearing protocol after uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of immediate unrestricted weight bearing (UWB) compared with partial weight bearing (PWB) in patients undergoing uncemented THA.

Methods

Relevant articles were retrieved from electronic databases. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included but analyzed separately. All functional and clinical outcomes with at least 2 independent study outcomes were meta-analyzed.

Results

A total of 17 studies were investigated. No adverse effect was found regarding micromotion of the femoral stem with immediate UWB following uncemented THA. There was also no correlation between immediate UWB and failure of ingrowth fixation and higher risks of femoral stem subsidence and surgical revision in RCTs. Harris hip score was better in patients with immediate UWB than those with PWB at 1 year post surgery, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Immediate UWB did not have extra harm compared with PWB in patients undergoing uncemented THA. UWB was not superior to PWB. Considering the improvement of Harris score and the compliance of patients, UWB can be encouraged in THA rehabilitation.

Subsidence of a Single-Taper Femoral Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Characterization, Associated Factors, and Sequelae

BACKGROUND

We characterized subsidence of an uncemented single-taper femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), determined factors associated with subsidence, and evaluated the impact of subsidence on outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 502 primary THAs performed using a single-taper stem in Dorr type A and B femora between 2014 and 2018. Subsidence was measured based on distance from the greater trochanter to stem shoulder on calibrated X-rays. Demographics, case-specific data, and outcomes were collected. Changes in subsidence and variables associated with subsidence were determined.

RESULTS

Stem subsidence was 1.5 ± 2.3 mm, 1.6 ± 2.0 mm, 2.0 ± 2.6 mm, 2.3 ± 2.3 mm, 2.6 ± 2.5 mm, and 2.7 ± 3.0 mm at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and ≥3 years from THA, respectively. Subsidence across all patients at final mean follow-up of 24 months (range, 1 to 101 months) was 2.2 ± 2.6 mm. Pairwise comparison demonstrated that subsidence occurred predominantly within the first 6 months. Significant subsidence (≥5 mm) occurred in 17.3% and was associated with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 (P=0.04). Dorr type, age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were not associated with subsidence. There were two patients (0.4%) who underwent a revision that could be attributed to subsidence. There was no association between subsidence and pain, limp, need for ambulatory aid, or analgesic use.

CONCLUSION

In primary THAs performed using a single-taper prosthesis, average subsidence was 2.2 mm and significant subsidence occurred in 17.3%. Patient BMI was associated with subsidence. Revision surgery related to subsidence was infrequent (0.4%).

Comparison of two tapered fluted modular titanium (TFMT) stems used in revision hip arthroplasty from a single center

Background

TFMT stems are modular porous coated stems widely used in revision hip arthroplasty. Although TFMT stems are popular due to its proven advantage in the setting of severe bone deficiency, subsidence is a concern in these stem designs. We used two TFMT stems between 2013 and 2019, ARCOS(Zimmer Biomet) and Reclaim(Depuy Synthes). We reviewed our results and compared these stems.

Aim

The primary aim was a) look for early to mid-term stem survival b) radiological outcome measuring subsidence, secondary aim was to measure proximal femoral bone stock changes.

Materials and methods

Data was collected retrospectively. There were 51 patients in Arcos and 57 patients in Reclaim cohort. Both cohorts were comparable with respect to gender, side, BMI, paprosky defect, indications for surgery, ETO and stem length. The mean age group was 78.03 in Arcos and 73.75 in Reclaim.

Results

At a mean follow up of 5 years both cohorts showed excellent stem survival, 96.4% in Reclaim cohort as compared to 100% in Arcos. Subsidence was observed in both but none required a revision due to subsidence. There was a significant difference (p = 0.017) between the cohorts with mean of 2.3 mm(0-12 mm) in Arcos as compared to 4.5 mm(0-25 mm) in Reclaim. Both cohorts showed excellent restoration of proximal femoral bone stock.

Conclusion

Our data shows promising results using TFMT stems at 5 year follow up with more than 95% stem survival, minimal subsidence and good restoration of proximal femoral bone stock. The difference in subsidence between these stems may be attributed to stem geometry and difference in taper.

Early failure of an uncemented femoral stem, as compared to two other stems with similar design, following primary total hip arthroplasty performed with direct anterior approach

INTRODUCTION

An increased risk of early femoral component loosening has been reported using the direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with other common surgical approaches. However, long-term data are scarce. The purpose of this study is: (1) to determine the incidence of early femoral loosening in a high volume, single surgeon's practice utilising the DAA approach; and (2) to examine the effect of stem design and type of coating on aseptic loosening in the early and mid-term postoperative period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1650 consecutive patients (1800 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the DAA between August 2011 and December 2017 was conducted at our institution. 3 types of uncemented femoral stems (Quadra-S, Avenir, TwinSys), with similar design, but different coating, were implanted. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at 4 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 46.4 months, the total incidence of revision for aseptic loosening was 0.44% (n = 8). All loose stems were Quadra-S, failing to achieve osseointegration, for an overall incidence of 0.96% (p = 0.002). None of the other stems were loose. Radiolucent lines around the proximal stem portion were visible in 75 Quadra-S stems (4.1%) on radiographs taken at 1 year postoperatively and continued to deteriorate at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this specific cohort of patients, the increased rate of femoral stem aseptic loosening was implant-related and was attributed only to a specific type of femoral stem (Quadra-S). No relation to other factors was proven suggesting that the surface characteristics of this femoral stem and the lack of bioactive coating are responsible for the observed early femoral failures. These findings should be confirmed by additional registry work and larger population sample sizes are needed to evaluate the prosthesis performance after implantation through the DAA.

Factors Affecting Periprosthetic Bone Loss after Hip Arthroplasty

Periprosthetic bone loss may lead to major complications in hip arthroplasty, including aseptic loosening, implant migration, and even periprosthetic fracture. Such a complication leads to revision surgeries, which are expensive, technically demanding, and result in a low satisfaction rate. Therefore, a study was conducted of the factors affecting the periprosthetic bone loss around the stem that caused these complications. Factors influencing periprosthetic bone loss include demographic factors such as age, sex, obesity, smoking, and comorbidity including diabetes and osteoporosis. The implant design and fixation method are also factors that are determined before surgery. In addition, there are surgical factors, such as surgical approach and surgical technique, and we wish to investigate the factors affecting periprosthetic bone loss around the stem by comparing the effects of postoperative rehabilitation protocols and osteoporosis drugs.

Bicortical Contact Predicts Subsidence of Modular Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We describe the intraoperative parameters that affect stem subsidence rates in tapered modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). We also determine the effect of the stem bicortical contact on subsidence rates and whether there is a minimum threshold bicortical contact that must be achieved to avoid the complication of subsidence.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 109 hips in 105 patients (53 males and 52 females) at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. All revisions were carried out for Paprosky type 3A and 3B femoral deficits. Clinical outcomes included the indication for revision, aseptic re-revision surgery, specifications of the stem inserted, and specifications of the femoral head and acetabular components implanted. Radiographic outcome measures included subsidence (mm) and bicortical contact (mm).

RESULTS

Using multivariate regression analysis, 3 parameters were associated with an increased rate of stem subsidence. A reduced bicortical contact distance (P < .001) and a stem length of ≤155 mm (P < .001) were both associated with higher subsidence rates. We also demonstrated a novel threshold of 20-mm bicortical contact which must be achieved to significantly reduce subsidence rates in these modular femoral stems for revision THA.

CONCLUSION

Subsidence rates of modular tapered femoral stems for revision THA can be significantly reduced by increasing the initial bicortical contact of the stem within the diaphysis and the overall length of the femoral stem >155 mm. We describe a minimum threshold bicortical contact distance of 20 mm that should ideally be exceeded to significantly reduce the risk of stem subsidence within the femoral canal.

[Rehabilitation after hip and knee endoprosthetic treatment in the elderly]

Due to current demographic developments with a continuous increase in average life expectancy and improved medical treatment, the number of elderly patients with joint replacement of the lower extremities also has increased in recent years. Most of these patients have not only one but several chronic diseases requiring treatment and medication. Drug-drug interaction and functional restrictions of the elderly additionally reduce the postoperative psychophysical capacity; therefore, special knowledge in rehabilitative treatment and pain management is necessary. Physiotherapy and exercise should include training of mobility, endurance, strength, coordination and training in activities of daily living. The individual constitution and pain during exercise must always be taken into consideration. Rehabilitative outcome is dependent on a functioning cooperation of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team and requires an organized, holistic treatment approach in interconnected structures, which aims at rapid postoperative mobilization.

The Importance of Bone Mineral Density in Hip Arthroplasty: Results of a Survey Asking Orthopaedic Surgeons about Their Opinions and Attitudes Concerning Osteoporosis and Hip Arthroplasty

Objective. In patients scheduled to undergo total joint arthroplasty of the hip, the bone quality around the joint affects the safety of prosthetic implantation. Bone strength is clinically assessed by measuring bone mineral density (BMD); therefore we asked if BMD is important to orthopaedic surgeons performing hip arthroplasty. Methods. In a 14-question survey, we asked about treatment patterns with respect to BMD, osteoporosis work-up, and treatment for patients with low BMD scheduled to undergo hip arthroplasty. Results. 72% of all asked orthopaedics reported to use cementless implants as a standard in hip arthroplasty. Over 60% reported that low BMD is a reason to reconsider operation strategies, but only 4% performed BMD measurement preoperatively. 26% would change their treatment strategy in case of a BMD (T-Score) between −1.5 and −2 and 40% in case of a T-score between −2 and −2.5, and 29% would change their intraoperative strategy if a T-score smaller than −2.5 was measured. Conclusion. The majority of orthopaedic surgeons who responded to the survey reported that they do not perform routine measurement of BMD before arthroplasty. However, most surgeons commented that low bone mineral density will influence their surgical plan and the implant design.

New Approach and Stem Increased Femoral Revision Rate in Total Hip Arthroplasty

This study compared the femoral stem revision and loosening rates in primary total hip arthroplasty between 2 different approaches and stem designs. Recent reports comparing the direct anterior approach with either the posterior or lateral approach showed that patients undergoing the direct anterior approach have less pain and an accelerated functional recovery in the early postoperative period. After converting to an anterior approach, the authors observed an increased rate of femoral stem revision. From 2003 to 2009, a posterior or lateral approach was used to insert 514 stems of 2 designs. These cases included the use of an extensively coated cobalt-chrome stem (n=232) or a straight, dual-tapered, proximally porous-coated titanium stem (n=282). In the following years, from 2009 to 2012, 594 short, proximally coated, titanium tapered-wedge stems were inserted through a direct anterior approach. The revision rates of femoral stems inserted through a posterior approach or a lateral approach were compared with those inserted via a direct anterior approach. No stem revisions occurred in the posterior approach group or the lateral approach group, and 5 stems were revised in the anterior approach group for periprosthetic fracture or aseptic loosening (0.8%). Significantly more stem revisions occurred after the use of the new stem design and a direct anterior approach (P=.04).

Early Migration Predicts Aseptic Loosening of Cementless Femoral Stems: A Long-term Study

BACKGROUND

Excessive early migration of cemented stems and cups after THA has been associated with poor long-term survival and allows predictable evaluation of implant performance. However, there are few data regarding the relationship between early migration and aseptic loosening of cementless femoral components, and whether early migration might predict late failure has not been evaluated, to our knowledge. Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) is a validated technique to accurately measure axial femoral stem migration without the need for tantalum markers, can be performed retrospectively, and may be a suitable tool to identify poor performing implants before their widespread use.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) Is axial migration within the first 24 months as assessed by EBRA-FCA greater among cementless stems that develop aseptic loosening than those that remain well fixed through the second decade; (2) what is the diagnostic performance of implant migration at 24 months postoperatively to predict later aseptic loosening of these components; and (3) how does long-term stem survivorship compare between groups with high and low early migration?

METHODS

We evaluated early axial stem migration in 158 cementless THAs using EBRA-FCA. The EBRA-FCA measurements were performed during the first week postoperatively (baseline measurement) and at regular followups of 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. The mean duration of followup was 21 years (range, 18-24 years). The stems studied represented 45% (158 of 354) of the cementless THAs performed during that time, and cementless THAs represented 34% (354 of 1038) of the THA practice during that period. No patient enrolled in this study was lost to followup. Multivariate survivorship analysis using Cox's regression model was performed with an endpoint of aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Loosening was defined according to the criteria described by Engh et al. and assessed by two independent observers. Patients with a diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection were excluded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic performance of axial stem migration 1, 2, 3, and 4 years postoperatively as a predictor of aseptic loosening. Survivorship of hips with high (≥ 2.7 mm) and low (< 2.7 mm) migration was compared using a competing-events analysis.

RESULTS

Femoral components that had aseptic loosening develop showed greater mean distal migration at 24 months postoperatively than did components that remained well fixed throughout the surveillance period (4.2 mm ± 3.1 mm vs 0.8 mm ± 0.9 mm; mean difference, 3.4 mm, 95% CI, 2.5-4.4; p ≤ 0.001). Distal migration at 24 months postoperatively was a strong risk factor for aseptic loosening (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.51-2.57; p < 0.001). The associated overall diagnostic performance of 2-year distal migration for predicting aseptic loosening was good (area under the ROC curve, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00; p < 0.001). Sensitivity of early migration measurement was high for the prediction of aseptic loosening during the first decade after surgery but decreased markedly thereafter. Stems with large amounts of early migration (≥ 2.7 mm) had lower 18-year survivorship than did stems with little early migration (29% [95% CI, 0%-62%] versus 95% [95% CI, 90%-100%] p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early migration, as measured by EBRA-FCA at 2 years postoperatively, has good diagnostic capabilities for detection of uncemented femoral components at risk for aseptic loosening during the first and early second decades after surgery. However, there was no relationship between early migration patterns and aseptic loosening during the late second and third decades. EBRA-FCA can be used as a research tool to evaluate new cementless stems or in clinical practice to evaluate migration patterns in patients with painful femoral components.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Risk Factors for Subsidence of a Modular Tapered Femoral Stem Used for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, and the clinical and radiographic risk factors for significant subsidence of a cementless, modular tapered revision femoral stem. Femoral stem subsidence of at least 10 mm or subsidence requiring revision was considered significant subsidence. Ninety-seven patients (99 hips) were included with minimum radiographic follow-up of one year (mean 34 months; range, 12-91 months). The mean stem subsidence was 4.5 mm (range, 0-44 mm). Fourteen out of 99 (14.1%) stems had significant subsidence and 6 (6.1%) stems required revision due to subsidence. Patient weight greater than 80 kg (P=0.04) and femoral stem press-fit distance of less than 2 cm (P<0.01) were both independent risk factors for significant stem subsidence.

A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis

This was a randomised controlled trial studying the safety of a new short metaphyseal fixation (SMF) stem. We hypothesised that it would have similar early clinical results and micromovement to those of a standard-length tapered Synergy metaphyseal fixation stem. Using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) we compared the two stems in 43 patients. A short metaphyseal fixation stem was used in 22 patients and a Synergy stem in 21 patients. No difference was found in the clinical outcomes pre- or post-operatively between groups. RSA showed no significant differences two years post-operatively in mean micromovement between the two stems (except for varus/valgus tilt at p = 0.05) (subsidence 0.94 mm (sd 1.71) vs 0.32 mm (sd 0.45), p = 0.66; rotation 0.96° (sd 1.49) vs 1.41° (sd 2.95), p = 0.88; and total migration 1.09 mm (sd 1.74) vs 0.73 mm (sd 0.72), p = 0.51). A few stems (four SMF and three Synergy) had initial migration > 1.0 mm but stabilised by three to six months, with the exception of one SMF stem which required revision three years post-operatively. For most stems, total micromovement was very low at two years (subsidence < 0.5 mm, rotation < 1.0°, total migration < 0.5 mm), which was consistent with osseous ingrowth. The small sample makes it difficult to confirm the universal applicability of or elucidate the potential contraindications to the use of this particular new design of stem.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:595–602.

Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a micro-arc oxidation coated stem in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures

Femoral stem fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic patients is an ongoing debate. We evaluated the outcome of 136 cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) coated stem. All patients survived the procedure and were discharged from the hospital. Thirty- and 90-day mortality rates were 0.7% and 2.2%, respectively. Ninety-eight hips were followed for a minimum of 2years (mean, 44months) postoperatively. Three stems were revised because of a periprosthetic fracture. Although cortical stress shielding around the stem was observed in 3 hips, there was no loosening or osteolysis. Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a MAO-coated stem is a useful and safe option to treat displaced femoral neck fractures.

Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants were published in 2005 to facilitate comparison of outcomes between various research groups. In this systematic review, we determined how well studies have adhered to these guidelines.

METHODS

We carried out a literature search to identify all articles published between January 2000 and December 2011 that used RSA in the evaluation of hip or knee prosthesis migration. 2 investigators independently evaluated each of the studies for adherence to the 13 individual guideline items. Since some of the 13 points included more than 1 criterion, studies were assessed on whether each point was fully met, partially met, or not met.

RESULTS

153 studies that met our inclusion criteria were identified. 61 of these were published before the guidelines were introduced (2000-2005) and 92 after the guidelines were introduced (2006-2011). The methodological quality of RSA studies clearly improved from 2000 to 2011. None of the studies fully met all 13 guidelines. Nearly half (43) of the studies published after the guidelines demonstrated a high methodological quality and adhered at least partially to 10 of the 13 guidelines, whereas less than one-fifth (11) of the studies published before the guidelines had the same methodological quality. Commonly unaddressed guideline items were related to imaging methodology, determination of precision from double examinations, and also mean error of rigid-body fitting and condition number cutoff levels.

INTERPRETATION

The guidelines have improved methodological reporting in RSA studies, but adherence to these guidelines is still relatively low. There is a need to update and clarify the guidelines for clinical hip and knee arthroplasty RSA studies.

No association between serum metal ions and implant fixation in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The mechanism of failure of metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been related to a high rate of metal wear debris, which is partly generated from the head-trunnion interface. However, it is not known whether implant fixation is affected by metal wear debris.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

49 cases of MoM THA in 41 patients (10 women) with a mean age of 52 (28-68) years were followed with stereoradiographs after surgery and at 1, 2, and 5 years to analyze implant migration by radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Patients also participated in a 5- to 7-year follow-up with measurement of serum metal ions, questionnaires (Oxford hip score (OHS) and Harris hip score (HHS)), and measurement of cup and stem positions and systemic bone mineral density.

RESULTS

At 1-2 years, mean total translation (TT) was 0.04 mm (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.14; p = 0.5) for the stems; at 2-5 years, mean TT was 0.13 mm (95% CI: -0.25 to -0.01; p = 0.03), but within the precision limit of the method. For the cups, there was no statistically significant TT or total rotation (TR) at 1-2 and 2-5 years. At 2-5 years, we found 4 cups and 5 stems with TT migrations exceeding the precision limit of the method. There was an association between cup migration and total OHS < 40 (4 patients, 4 hips; p = 0.04), but there were no statistically significant associations between cup or stem migration and T-scores < -1 (n = 10), cup and stem positions, or elevated serum metal ion levels (> 7µg/L (4 patients, 6 hips)).

INTERPRETATION

Most cups and stems were well-fixed at 1-5 years. However, at 2-5 years, 4 cups and 5 stems had TT migrations above the precision limits, but these patients had serum metal ion levels similar to those of patients without measurable migrations, and they were pain-free. Patients with serum metal ion levels > 7 µg/L had migrations similar to those in patients with serum metal ion levels < 7 µg/L. Metal wear debris does not appear to influence the fixation of hip components in large-head MoM articulations at medium-term follow-up.

Does osteoporosis increase early subsidence of cementless double-tapered femoral stem in hip arthroplasty?

Among 320 hip arthroplasties performed between January 2007 and March 2008, patients younger than 50 years old and patients older than 70 with a T-score at the proximal femur less than -2.5 made up the control and study group, respectively. There were 40 patients in each group. We measured stem subsidence, both digital and manual methods. Measurements were made from radiographs taken serially from 2 weeks to 1 year after surgery. The amount of mean subsidence for each group was not different, and all stems showed stable fixation in the final radiographs. Our study suggests that even in osteoporotic proximal femurs, press-fit fixation of double-tapered stems for hip arthroplasty can be safe and effective without excessive early subsidence.

Low BMD affects initial stability and delays stem osseointegration in cementless total hip arthroplasty in women: a 2-year RSA study of 39 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Immediate implant stability is a key factor for success in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Low bone mineral density (BMD) and age-related geometric changes of the proximal femur may jeopardize initial stability and osseointegration. We compared migration of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems in women with or without low systemic BMD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

61 female patients with hip osteoarthritis were treated with cementless THA with anatomically designed hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems and ceramic-ceramic bearing surfaces (ABG-II). Of the 39 eligible patients between the ages of 41 and 78 years, 12 had normal systemic BMD and 27 had osteopenia or osteoporosis. According to the Dorr classification, 21 had type A bone and 18 had type B. Translational and rotational migration of the stems was evaluated with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) up to 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with low systemic BMD showed higher subsidence of the femoral stem during the first 3 months after surgery than did those with normal BMD (difference = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.1-1.1; p = 0.03). Low systemic BMD (odds ratio (OR) = 0.1, CI: 0.006-1.0; p = 0.02), low local hip BMD (OR = 0.3, CI: 0.1-0.7; p = 0.005) and ageing (OR = 1.1, CI: 1.0-1.2; p = 0.02) were risk factors for delayed translational stability. Ageing and low canal flare index were risk factors for delayed rotational stabilization (OR = 3, CI: 1.1-9; p = 0.04 and OR = 1.1, CI: 1.0-1.2; p = 0.02, respectively). Harris hip score and WOMAC score were similar in patients with normal systemic BMD and low systemic BMD.

INTERPRETATION

Low BMD, changes in intraosseous dimensions of the proximal femur, and ageing adversely affected initial stability and delayed osseointegration of cementless stems in women.

Partial weightbearing is not necessary after cementless total hip arthroplasty: a two-year prospective randomized study on 100 patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of partial and full weightbearing after cementless total hip arthroplasty over a two year follow-up period. Fifty-nine women and 41 men (average age 61 years) received an uncemented Spotorno stem and were randomised into a full and a partial weightbearing group. No significant difference was found between the groups with regard to the Merle d' Aubigne hip score, VAS pain level, shaft migration or radiographic signs of bony ingrowth. All femoral components seemed radiologically well-fixed and showed bone ingrowth at 24 months. Provided that solid initial fixation is obtained full weightbearing immediately after cementless total hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-coated Spotorno-type femoral shaft component can be recommended.

[Partial weight-bearing in rehabilitation. Strategies for instruction and limitations]

Following trauma or surgery on the musculoskeletal system the primary aim is always as complete a restitution of mobility as possible. By mobilization with partial weight-bearing this is possible. The preferred way of teaching partial weight-bearing is the use of conventional bathroom scales. This method proves to be simple as well as time and cost-saving, but the transferability to the patient's daily life is questionable. Training and control of partial weight-bearing under dynamic conditions, such as normal walking, and walking up and down stairs seem to be very important. Different investigations have shown that the minority of subjects recruited could manage to maintain the given load of partial weight-bearing. Furthermore, the actual resulting moments within the joints, caused by muscles, fascia and tendons, are not considered in presets of partial weight-bearing, as only external forces (ground reaction forces) are measured. However, the problems in teaching partial weight-bearing have to be contrasted with the as yet unexplained issue of postoperative partial versus full weight-bearing.

Partial versus unrestricted weight bearing after an uncemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: recommendation of a concise rehabilitation protocol from a systematic review of the literature

The aim of this systematic review was to find evidence-based support in the literature to allow immediate unrestricted weight bearing after primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). Accelerated rehabilitation programs for THA are becoming increasingly popular to shorten hospital stay and to facilitate rapid restoration of function. The goals of these rehabilitation programs could be more easily achieved if immediate unrestricted weight bearing (UWB) could be allowed after a THA. So far, however, immediate weight bearing is frequently contraindicated in widely accepted protocols for uncemented THA due to fear for subsidence and absence of osseous integration of the femoral stem. Thus, frequently protected weight bearing and restricted activities are still advocated for at least 6 weeks after surgery. In addition, we analyzed the literature to come to a recommendation on gait pattern and walking aid. From a systematic search in several electronic databases 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were reviewed according to the Cochrane methodology. We found moderate to strong evidence that no adverse effects on subsidence and osseous integration of the femoral stem after uncemented THA occur after immediate UWB. Based on this literature review, we recommend early rehabilitation after uncemented THA with a reciprocally gait pattern using crutches, one cane for independency in ADL in case patients walk limp-free and walking without crutches as soon as possible. During the first weeks after surgery only stair climbing should be performed with protected weight bearing because of high torsion loads on the hip.

Progressive subsidence of a tapered, proximally coated femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to determine if subsidence of a tapered, proximally porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant with immediate postoperative weight-bearing differed between men and women. Modified Harris Hip Pain and Function Scores were collected preoperatively, and six weeks and one year postoperatively. Femoral subsidence was determined at six weeks and one year after surgery. Men demonstrated significantly increased Harris Hip Function Scores at six weeks, with slightly inferior Harris Hip Pain Scores at one year. Regardless of sex, subsidence was greater at one year than at six weeks; however, men subsided significantly more at one year than women (1.7 +/- 2.0 mm vs 1.0 +/- 1.4 mm, p = 0.03). While it appears that this stem provided excellent early fixation in women, it is unclear if the increased subsidence in men was more related to patient-related factors of age, weight and activity level or with specific implant characteristics.

The effect of early weight bearing on migration pattern of the uncemented CLS stem in total hip arthroplasty

Forty-two patients (younger than 65 years) with osteoarthritis were operated on with an uncemented CLS stem and randomized to early unrestricted weight bearing combined with intensive physiotherapy or to partial weight bearing combined with self-training. Radiostereometric analysis showed 1.2 (+0.11 to -6.76) mm subsidence of the stem at 24 months in both groups. There was no significant difference in the migration pattern between the unrestricted and partial weight bearing groups. Actual loading on the operated leg, measured with the F-scan system, did not influence the migration of the stem. There was a strong correlation between the average subsidence at 3 and 24 months (r = 0.96). Early full weight bearing and active rehabilitation can be used for the uncemented CLS stem without increased risk of early loosening.

Biomechanics of a new short-stemmed uncemented hip prosthesis: An in-vitro study in human bone

The migration pattern, cyclic motion, system stiffness and failure load of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis were compared to a clinically successful shaft prosthesis during the initial loading phase. The influence of implant-sizing on mechanical stability was also investigated for the new stem, in particular with relation to the bone quality. Prostheses were implanted in paired human femora and loaded cyclically up to 3515 cycles. Relative displacements between prosthesis and bone were measured using a 3D-camera and reflective marker system. Migration of the new stem was predominantly into varus and was higher than for the shaft prosthesis. The test set-up was proposed to simulate a worst-case loading scenario since muscle forces, which tend to reduce bone deformation, were not simulated. It could therefore be expected that clinical migration of the implants would be less pronounced than that observed in this study. Cyclic motion for the new stem was similar to that for the clinically successful shaft prosthesis, suggesting that bone ingrowth could be expected for the new stem. No significant difference in fracture load was observed between the implants. The system stiffness with the new stem was lower than for the shaft prosthesis, indicating more physiological load transfer. Smaller implant sizing with 'cancellous' fixation seems favourable, as it led to similar migration and smaller cyclic motion values than with 'cortical' fixation. A trend for higher cyclic motion and migration was observed in femora with poor bone quality. Hence, sufficiently good bone stock is necessary, when implanting the new short-stemmed prosthesis.